Friday, November 20, 2015

Debunking the Sandy Hook Debunkers: #5 bans NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK

by Jim Fetzer

My earliest warning had come from Preston James, Ph.D., among the most prolific and widely-read contributors to A social psychologist who is an expert on intel and covert ops, Preston had told me, "The book is too good. It has the potential to bring down the Obama administration. They are going to do everything that they can to suppress it--so don't be surprised when it happens!" The hammer fell on Thursday, when suppressed NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), where I cannot even order a copy for myself. Try to link to it and learn it's "not a functioning page on our site", as I explained was also true of Sandy Hook Elementary School in "Debunking the Sandy Hook Debunkers: #1 Was it an operating school?" We have now made the book available for free.

The notification of suppression

It would be too embarrassing to not have a cover story for taking it down, where Mike Palecek, the Series Editor, and I, the book's editor, received the following notification from createspace, which is the subsidiary of that published NOBODY DIED and where our earlier book, AND I SUPPOSE WE DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, EITHER? (2015) today remains available. The notification was intended to provide plausible deniability about an egregious act of censorship, where searching for parallels has brought to my mind the legal and other obstacles imposed to prevent the publication of THE PENTAGON PAPERS (1971), where they've enlisted to do their dirty work.

But this is clearly a subterfuge for the sake of plausible deniability for at least three reasons, which support the inference that its suppression is a political move because this book is simply "too good", "too hot" and "too threatening" to the Holder/Obama administration:
(1) Create Space and review every submission for its suitability for publication and conformity to their guidelines before they are accepted for publication. They accepted and published NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK on 22 October 2015, nearly a month ago. There is no good reason for this book to now be taken down for further review other than that it has become a sensation and has the potential to embarrass the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama, which appears to be the underlying problem.  
(2) Were there a bona fide reason for suppressing the book, would have to have made that determination in advance of taking it down. But as you can see from the notification I have received, no specific reason is given. That belies the claim that there is a legitimate problem with the book. I called Create Space immediately upon learning of its suppression and was told they would get back to me "within two working days" by email: the customer service rep with which I spoke could not tell me why it had been taken down. 
(3) By suggesting that I should review of the content guidelines for, a dozen in number (which are broad and varied in their character--including no pornography, no offensive material, no illegal items or stolen goods and such--I have no doubt that they are combing the book to put together a pseudo-justification for having suppressed it. In other words, they are looking for reasons to justify a predetermined conclusion, which is precisely what you would expect in a case like this. 
A book that addresses a politically-sensitive issue that has been central promoting the political agenda of the administration turns out to be too threatening and has to be suppressed on any ground the can contrive. What could be more telling than that they have taken the book down but cannot explain the reasons for suppressing it, which of course they had to have had in advance of taking it down. Just how dumb are we all supposed to be? After all, if we can figure out that Sandy Hook was a hoax, we can also figure out that's suppression of the book is a sham.

The INSIDE EDITION interview

Preston has also observed (in relation to "Debunking the Sandy Hook Debunkers: #4 INSIDE EDITION does a hit piece") that INSIDE EDITION was only serving as cover to set up an intel evaluation of my ability to defend the book from hostile criticism. He pointed out that the questions I was asked, such as, "Why are you attacking the families of children who died?", "Is that the best you can do?", and the like, were unresponsive to my replies and explanations. And I has struck me on reflection that there was no introduction of me or of the book, which precedes a bona fide interview. Additionally, the man who asking the questions left me several times to consult with someone else, who must have been the agent who was evaluating whether they had enough to smear me. But I was unflappable.

The large room in the background, moreover, did not resemble that of a real television studio, where I now believe that Preston was exactly right: they used INSIDE EDITION to arrange for me to be interrogated by an intelligence agent in Langley, where I was being grilled by an expert in psy ops in CIA Headquarters itself. My suspicion is that the proof that I adduced for this interview was powerful enough that, when they could not provoke me into some kind of angry response, they realized the book was too much of a problem for the Obama administration that it had to be suppressed. The timing of this interview and's removing the book from public access is otherwise an all-too-remarkable "coincidence". As FDR once observed, "In politics, nothing happens by 'coincidence'."

Dennis Cimino has told me that the interview showed them they had a big problem and believes that the instruction to take down the book came from the Department of Justice, if not the White House itself. And that makes a lot of sense, because the book was doing very well, it had been approved and there had been no problems up to this point in time. The connection between that interview and this action by leaves no doubt that the government has intervened. They have no choice but to do what they can by way of damage control, where the situation has been further complicated by Mike and my decision to release the book to the public for free, which is what we have done.

Now available for free

The book delegitimizes the government of the United States, in particular, the Obama administration, which cannot withstand the exposure of its techniques of disinformation. Confronted with this rude development, Mike and I decided to make the book available to the public for free. Notice that, by interrupting access to the book on, they have already accomplished the goal of discouraging others from buying it. We have sold around 500 copies in less than a month, which was a powerful indication that this book was almost certainly destined to become a "best seller". And in a true coincidence, I was featured on last night and made the book available during the interview.

Jeff Rense had asked me to arrange for Allan William Powell to join us, where Allan had come into possession of a vast repository of photographs. In Chapter 7, for example, we have 50 photographs of furnishing the Lanza home to serve as a prop; and in Chapter 8, we have another 50 photographs of refurbishing the school to serve as the stage. We have photos of the Nancy Lanza bedroom, for example, where Adam allegedly shot her; and there is some red stuff on the top, but it does not look like blood; and where, in their haste, they even left a blue moving pad beneath one of he legs of the bed, which is a sure indication that this was a phony arrangement and by itself proves this was a hoax:

Dennis believes that, after the "INSIDE EDITION" interview, someone at Langley called the White House directly to inform them of the threat that is posed by this book. While the horses are out of the barn and they can no longer control access to the book itself, Dennis (who has a background with intelligence work) does not rule out murdering some of us for having exposed them: that is not out of the question. I suggested that a lot of people would know if something were to happen to any of us, but he believes that they would do their best to keep it out of the media, where, given their success in keeping our discoveries out of the media up until now, he may have a point. Each of us should take nothing for granted.

The only available review has business arrangements with other book sellers who trade in both new and used books, where a few copies of NOBODY DIED are currently available at highly inflated prices. But that also allows for customer reviews to appear, where this one is now the only review of NOBODY DIED that appears on As I have previously explained, "Debunking the Sandy Hook Debunkers: #2 What's wrong with", the book had nearly 80 reviews and a flurry of comments on them, which is remarkable for a book that only appeared less than a month ago--on 22 October 2015! But today the only review that you can find is the following 5-STAR review:

Like the large number of other 5-STAR reviews that has now obliterated, this author had actually read the book. Indeed, it was striking that, of those who had submitted 1-STAR reviews--where there were virtually none in between--none of them (with perhaps one or two exceptions) provided any indication that they had even read the book, where many of them explicitly observed that they had not and were not going to bother to read it, which was indicative that a psy-op was taking place to drive down the average rating to make the book appear to be of middling interest to those who may casually search for good books they ought to read.

The irony of suppression

There is an irony to all of this, of course, because the most powerful proofs of the hoax are from the photographs, which we had to publish in black-and-white in the book lest it become prohibitively expensive. In the pdf, however, which we have made available, the color and precision of the proof we have adduced is simply beyond dispute. Take the astounding Exhibit 26 from Chapter 8, for example, where you can see the SWAT team is already present, the windows of Classroom 10 are undamaged, the flag is at full mast, crime scene tape is already up for a crime that has yet to be committed, and none other than Wayne Carver, M.E., stands leaning against a wall with his arms crossed awaiting the arrival of his portable mortuary tent, which is clear in the color version now available:

With the publication of the pdf, therefore, we have overcome one of the objections to our book that has been raised by our critics, as I observed in "Debuking the Sandy Hook Debunkers: #3 Deanna Spingola and C.W. Wade". If I am correct--that this may be the most important case of book suppression since THE PENTAGON PAPERS (1971)--does that make me and the other contributors targets for government assassins? Are they going to take out a dozen contributors, including six (current or former) college professors and a half-dozen other experts? Maybe they will take measures somewhat less drastic and try to halt the electronic download of this book. So do it now and share it as widely as you can. Our government stands exposes for committing acts of terrorism against the American people.