Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Doug Horne, "INSIDE THE ARRB" - Part I

Research on the authenticity of the Zapruder film has been proceeding at a rapid clip since the symposium on the film, which I organized and moderated at the Lancer Conference in 1996. It includes Noel Twyman, BLOODY TREASON (1998), ASSASSINATION SCIENCE (1998), MURDER IN DEALEY PLAZA (2000), and THE GREAT ZAPRUDER FILM HOAX (2003), all of which I edited. Since the film has been used as the backbone of the cover up from its inception--including the creation of the "blob" of brains bulging forward, the missing right-front cranial mass from the x-rays, the caption for frame 313 in LIFE magazine describing how the direction of the shot was determined by the study of the film, and Abraham Zapruder's appearance on television that evening, using his hand to show a blow-out to the right-front that did not occur--it is extremely fortunate that Doug Horne, INSIDE THE ARRB (2009)--in five volumes--did not follow the advice of some and suppress his research on the film. Indeed, one of the great virtues of Vol. IV is its exposure of film fakery.

ZAPRUDER FAKERY 1 - James Fetzer Part 1

Let me say that Doug Horne has been extremely generous in acknowledging the previous work by Jack White, David Mantik, David Healy, John Costella, and David Lifton, who are among those who have made the most important contributions to establishing that the Z-film has been recreated. After all, anyone who takes for granted that the film is authentic--as have generations of students of the crime in generations past--will be unable to reconstruct what actually happened in Dealey Plaza during the assassination, since some events--such as William Greer bringing the limousine to a halt to make certain JFK would be killed, Motorcycle Patrolman Chaney's motoring forward to advise Chief Curry that he had been shot, and Mary Moorman and Jean Hill's stepping into the street to take Mary's famous Polariod--have been removed, while other events--such as the bulging "blob", the blood spray, and the passengers being thrown forward WHILE THE LIMO WAS ACCELERATING AND THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN PULLED BACK--have been added in. Horne's studies reinforce these discoveries.

I especially like the manner in which Doug Horne encourages other students of JFK to abandon their long-held but provably-false belief in Zapruder film authenticity:

The biggest problem we face right now in the JFK research community are the legions of "old guard" researchers who refuse to face this fact [that the Z-film has been fabricated] and who stubbornly cling to some piece of "bedrock evidence", which in their mind will lead them out of the wilderness if only they study it long enough and can divine its true meaning. For Thompson, Wrone, Weisberg, Groden, and may others, the Zapruder film has been this piece of bedrock evidence for over four decades. I say to the old guard who have continued to insist that the Zapruder film is an authentic and unaltered film in spite of the mounting evidence of its alteration, "Come on over, and see the light." You will feel better for having done so--in fact, it will liberate you. Once you accept the fact that the Zapruder film is a clever (but imperfect) forgery, you are free suddenly to believe the Dealey Plaza car stop witnesses (which include several Dallas motorcycle policemen and Bill Newman); Marily Sitzman; the Kodak laboratory personnel (who all say the original film was slit the evening of the assassination); Marilyn Willis; Erwin Schwartz; Cartha DeLoach; Dan Rather; and the Parkland doctors and nurses. For if you believe the Zapruder film is authentic, you must, of necessity, believe that all of these people are either liars, or incompetent and unreliable witnesses.

Following the lead of Noel Twyman, BLOODY TREASON (1997), who consulted Roderick Ryan, an expert on special effects from the cinema capitol of the world, who told him that the "blob" and the blood spray had been painted in, Doug Horne consulted additional experts on special effects and reported that, "When the 6K scans of frames 313 through 323 were viewed, one after the other on two high resolution video screens in the editing bay, Ned Price (who just happens to also be the Head of Restoration at a major Hollywood film studio) said: "Oh, that's horrible, that's just terrible! That's such a bad fake." His colleague, Paul Rutan, opined: "We are not looking at opticals; we are looking at artwork." (By this, Rutan meant we were not looking at traveling mattes; we were looking at painted visual effects superimposed on top of the original film frames--by inference, he meant aerial imaging.) The film editor concurred with his two colleagues. To say that this was an electrifying moment would be a gross understatement.

The considered opinions of our two film restoration professionals, who together have spent over five decades restoring and working with films of the late 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s (when visual effects were done optically--not digitally), in that one moment superseded the statements of all those in the JFK research community who have insisted for two decades now that the Zapruder film could not have been altered, because the technology did not exist to do so. Our two restoration experts know special effects in modern motion picture films far better than Josiah Thompson, or David Wrone, or Gary Mack, or Robert Groden, or me, for that matter; and their subjective opinion [better: professional judgment] trumps Rollie Zavada's as well--a man who has absolutely no experience whatsoever in the post production of visual effects in motion picture films. And while Rollie Zavada, a lifetime Kodak employee receiving retirement pay from his former employer, would certain have an apparent conflict of interest in blowing the whistle on Zapruder film forgery if his former employer was involved in its alteration, our three Hollywood film professionals had no vested interest, one way or the other, in the outcome of their examination of the 6Kscans on August 25th of 2009.

Those who do not understand the evidence resist it, but if this had been the only contribution of Doug Horne's research toward a better understanding of the assassination of JFK and its cover up, it would have been worth the price of the volume by itself! I am completely and utterly in awe and admiration for his painstaking efforts and meticulous research on the most controversial aspects of the case, where I believe that it has become impossible to deny that the film is a fabrication and that the cover up cannot be understood--even remotely!--without rejecting the blindfold extended by Josiah Thompson, David Wrone, Gary Mack, Rollie Zavada and their chums and allies, who have held back major advances in assassination research on the basis of their misconceived objections to the alteration of the film. I therefore agree with Bill Kelly in his belief that "the corner has been turned" in relation to the question of Zapruder film alteration. Jack White, David Mantik, Noel Twyman, David Healy, John Costella, David Lifton and I have known it for some time, but there is no substitute for a presentation that anyone with the capacity for objectivity can comprehend! For that--and for his diligence, his dedication, his intelligence, his self-sacrifice, and his professionalism--I congratulate him!


Inside The ARRB - Douglas Horne interviewed by Jim Fetzer on "The American Awakening" (26 December 2009)


Inside The ARRB - Douglas Horne interviewed by Len Osanic on "Black Op Radio" (10 December 2009)

Part I

Part II

Jim Marrs & Douglas Horne interviewed by George Noory on "Coast to Coast A.M." (30 November 2009)


9 comments:

  1. This was a devilish plan: make a phony film to display false events and then people will always believe them (meanwhile they will take out the key events that really did happen, and then people will tend to ignore those key events).

    It doesn't take rocket science to figure out the mindset of Groden, etc., they spent their whole careers on a phony film and can't admit that now. I'm afraid they fell into the trap the devious conspirators set for people like them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Paul eventually receives a few calls from his kidnappers,demanding $5 million dollars from the embassy for his release. Later on,a series of bombing events make it more difficult for the hostage specialist to find him,and the movie concludes with a Drama Cool HD Video shocking finale.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This takes place at a subconscious level. So the lifelong casting call goes out looking for men to play that part again, and again. The plot is played out with new characters, or the Drama Cool New Video same old characters in new ways, with you in the starring role. All the while the 6-year-old girl in her tutu and ballet slippers sits in the director's chair.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The second day of the five-day festival is called Kali Chaudas or Narak Chaturdashi. Some Hindus refer to it as “Choti (small) Diwali” and use it as an excuse to start the celebrations early with feasts and fireworks. Others use the day to drive away demons or evil spirits from homes with traditional rituals. No matter the belief, the focus is mainly on the following day — Drama Cool Latest Video.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In respects to other TV series fans throughout the world, most Jdorama fans often fall victims to this bug due to the emotional attachment they have to the characters and the story. Especially if the actors or actresses are very charming. One example is Horikita Maki, she has a following in the millions all over the world due to sweet and adorable features it is easy to see why many fans can be attached to a particular series just for this reason. Usually these type of fans will watch every movie their favorite actors play a role in and some even end up watching a series even if they play a Drama Cool Tv Channel small part.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think Justin Timberlake did an awesome playing the Sean Parker role. Jesse Eisenberg really enveloped Mark Zuckerberg's mannerisms to a tee. I also liked the performance of the new Spider-Man 4 actor Andrew Garcia as character Eduardo. It was my first time seeing him on the Drama Cool New Vidoes. I gave the movie a perfect A grade.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Law and order. One of the longest drama series running, it’s first episode aired in the year 1990. By 2010 this show had been through 20 seasons. Definitively, the numbers talk good about it. In 1999 we saw “Law and Order: Special Victims Unit” which continues to air Drama Cool HD Video.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Colored bulbs and string lights can be used quite effectively when decorating a room for a party. You can use whatever color best suits your overall party theme. For example, a string of red lights wrapped around a small potted tree would add a festive look for a Watch Drama Cool Free online Day or Christmas party. Orange bulbs and strings of orange lights can add drama to your next Halloween party.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Online Casino Gambling Online Gambling Center

    รอยัล1688 Is a g club website Cambodia's leading online casino, a neighboring country in Thailand, is very popular today because of the Web Club. The casino has its origins in Poipet Casino, one of the leading casinos in Cambodia. For the origin of the casino games online through this point. It is a good starting point for risky and dizzy. Casinos are recognized and recognized worldwide.

    Nowadays, online casino games are becoming accepted and become known to people all over the world because online casino games in each form can be played according to the satisfaction of the players do not have to travel to Cambodia. It can be used to gamble online at home.

    The convenience of playing online casino games is popular throughout the world, especially gamblers in Thailand are very passionate and passionate about playing online gambling as well, so who loves to risk. Luckily, you only have one internet connection and one mobile phone. The gambler can play all the online gambling games that the player likes on the site. viva3388

    ReplyDelete