Thursday, April 8, 2010

aka "Curtis": Were Tesla-style Weapons Used on the Twin Towers?

A guest who has now appeared on "The Real Deal" thrice to discuss Nikola Tesla and some of his remarkable inventions and uses the name "Curtis" has sketched how he believes the Twin Towers may have been taken out. His suggestion is that a Tesla-style vibrating device may have been used to bring about the demolecularization of the concrete and the steel. We are talking about very high frequencies of vibration, which were discussed on the program on Monday, 8 February 2010, Friday, 19 March 2010, and then again on Friday 26 March 2010. This possibility, I believe, has to be taken seriously, since there is no reasonable prospect, in my mind, that any combination of conventional explosives--with or without thermite in one of its various guises--could have brought about the complete and total transformation of two 500,000-ton buildings into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust. To see what has to be explained, turn to my earlier blog, "New 9/11 Photos Released", and you will begin to appreciate the dimensions of the problem.

Nikola Tesla and 9/11 - aka Curtis interviewed on "The Real Deal" with Jim Fetzer (8 February 2010)


9/11 and Tesla - aka Curtis interviewed on "The Real Deal" with Jim Fetzer (19 March 2010)


Tesla, Nazis, Bushes - aka Curtis interviewed on "The Real Deal" with Jim Fetzer (26 March 2010)


The pdf version can be found here.









5 comments:

  1. Not to be a downer, but Jim also interviewed Chuck Boldwyn, a physicist, also on real deal, and I find Chuck's hypothesis about the mini nukes even more likely than Tesla.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There have recently been several science-fiction devices proposed for the demolition of the three skyscrapers on 9/11.

    The nano-thermite found already explains the demolition; thermite is ALREADY normally used in demolition.

    It appears the neocons behind the demolitions are getting worried that their highly improbably cover story (jet fuel) is unraveling, and they're trying to discredit the 9/11 truth movement by associating it with science fiction.

    Tesla devices, nukes, and time travel have recently appeared in articles attempting to "explain" 9/11.

    Besides, everyone knows the Vulcan Science Directorate has determined that time travel is impossible.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alan8 does not seem to appreciate that there is no good reason to think that these 500,000-ton buildings could have been converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust by thermite! Thermite is an incendiary that can cut through steel, typically at an angle, where gravity does the rest. A demolition like that would have left an enormous stack of "pancakes" equal to about 12% of the original height of the structures, which, at 110 stores, should have been around 11 + 2.2 = 13.2 stories. But they were actually destroyed below ground level!

    No doubt, Alan8 will respond by appealing to "super-thermite", but, not to put too fine a point on it, no one seems to know whether or not it even exists, much less what would have been the effects if it had been used on the Twin Towers. My guess is that, at the very least, it would have created a huge cloud of dense, black smoke. But no such stack of black smoke is visible. (See for example, "New 9/11 Photos Released" on this very blog and take a good look at the disintegration of the remnant of the core columns of the North Tower.

    In addition, It would be a good idea for Alan8 to check out the studies of Steve Jones' work under "The Science of 9/11" on the Scholars' web site at 911scholars.org, including the critique by Stephen Phillips, Ph.D., another physicist, which can now be found at this location, http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/PhillipsCritique/physicist_critiques_jones.html In my opinion, the claims for thermite/thermate/... are vastly overblown and are probably incapable of scientific justification.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Plus, Alan8, think of the practical realities of thermate versus say mini nukes. How in the name of pete could they possibly get enough thermate, a chemical incendiary, into the towers to do that much destruction plus all the weird effects like cancers. Mini nukes, on other hand, you wouldn't need that many of them, and that would make their planting of them practical , and it explains all the weird effects. They just ignited the nukes from the top down , that way it just turns them into dust fountains and the material would never fall. qed to me anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As for mini nukes... compared to a full size nuclear bomb could be like mini donuts compared to a full size donut. Now a full size nuclear bomb creates a mushroom cloud miles high in the sky. And every time mini nukes are mentioned they always refer to several mini nukes... like several mini donuts. Where's the smoke and where's the heat? Concrete does not turn to a very fine dust when an explosive is next to it. And steel does not disappear with explosives whether they are big bombs or mini nuclear explosives. Look very close at the base of the WTC tower... what you see is only what remains. Explosives break things up they don't make things disappear such as a 500,000 ton tower in 10 seconds. Do mini nukes form mini nuclear clouds? ~ I made that chart as a puzzle with only four puzzle parts... Airplane, fires, explosives and Tesla's Teleforce. If the puzzle part doesn't fit perfectly into those WTC events... then it doesn't fit at all. There was no HUGE explosion from a mini nuclear device... no mini mushroom clouds. When the towers came down they came down in a ROAR of dust with no smoke.

    ReplyDelete