by Scott Bennett with Jim FetzerIn this advisory about the appropriate response to JADE HELM, Scott Bennett, a former counter-terrorism expert who has blown the whistle on CIA funding for ISIS, which, as I have previously reported, is a creation of the DIA ("ISIS and other absurdities 'Made in the USA'"), explains what we as American citizens can do to bring JADE HELM to a halt through the Constitutional legal process. Among his most important points are the following:
(1) Since the power of law is what is being used to justify the operation, the power of law and the counterattack of citing Constitutional violations is the best, and probably only real power, which can be used to defeat it;
(2) The power of citing the law will influence the mind and behavior (PSYOP) of the invading forces (aka, the uniform wearer), and their political allies; and demoralize them from engaging in any abusive activity against civilians;
(3) This is "an invading force", since the operation involves federal—not National Guard—military forces entering different states and running “command and control and counterterrorism operations”, and should be so regarded;
(4) Acting with legal righteousness (that is, acting with the assumption of the “law on our side”), communicates to both the military invaders and the fellow civilians in each state, a strong sense of confidence and integrity in civilian primacy;
(5) Filing legal actions in Federal and State Court to halt JADE HELM, which will eventually be decided in the favor of the civilian plaintiff and result in punishment of the invaders, signals that they are already, potentially, in violation of the Constitution and laws of America;
(6) Legal proceedings erupting out of grievances or injuries which citizens suffer at the hands of their government employees who act outside their authority or take liberties that courts will reinterpret as criminal is among the highest forms of patriotism of which citizens are capable.
JADE HELM: What can be done to stop it?
Since the power of law is what is being used to justify the operation, the power of law and the counterattack of citing Constitutional violations is the best, and probably only real power, which can be used to defeat it. Why?
THE POWER OF SUGGESTION, THE FEAR OF LAW:
Subconsciously speaking, the power of citing law will influence the mind and behavior (PSYOP) of the invading forces (aka, the uniform wearer), and their political allies; and demoralize them from engaging in any abusive activity against civilians. All Americans—civilian, military, and government personnel—fear most of all losing their family and reputation (their good name) and material goods; and the law is the universal license for taking these valuable things away from a person.
Therefore a person’s natural fear of the law being used as the license or justification to do this, is the same fear we must define and manipulate in order to impregnate the minds of the “invading forces and their conspirators” with the offspring of peace, security, and constitutionally mandated tranquility.
(Note: I say “Invading Forces” [aka, uniform wearers] since the operation involves federal—not National Guard—military forces entering different states and running “command and control and counterterrorism operations”. )
When we, the civilians, are being observed or watched or interogated by the government “uniform wearers”, how we present ourselves determines if we “live or die” basically. To believe otherwise is to be blind or ignorant about the recent police shootings in various places.
THE NATURE OF CONFIDENCE YIELDS THE AROMA OF SAFETY FROM THE FRUIT OF PEACE:
The posture and attitude of acting with legal righteousness (aka, acting with the assumption of the “law on our side”), communicates to both the military invaders and the fellow civilians in each state, a strong sense of confidence and integrity in the civilian—which automatically dispels any military-police suspicion of rogue criminal or anarchist motives in the civilian population.
It is important to communicate this political righteousness and legal harmony, in order to “cool tempers” and neutralize any hostile actions--or reactions--before they can occur. Shootings by police against civilians result from hot heads and foolish mistakes—usually triggered by the civilians’ pride or arrogance.
In fact, it is essential to constantly infuse the mental and emotional posture of “acting in harmony with law” into every communication (email, blog, letter, statement/speech) in order to germinate a larger “strategic” communication plan that influences the various target audiences; and subtley permeate this strategic communication (which may be defined as carefully chosen, image impregnating, metaphorical and poetic language balanced with a clear, almost sterile simplicity) into every hour of every day, in order to maximize control of every inch of territory that the “invaders” explore and test, and which the indigenous civilians already occupy and desire to defend.
OFFENSIVE AND DEFENSIVE MINDSETS:
An attitude of “having the law on our side”, is not defensive, it is offensive and follows the war strategy put forth by the ancient Chinese military tactician Sun-Tzu. It obviously harmonizes with Sun-Tzu by “winning the battle before it is ever fought”, through convincing the military invader that the law (which humans instinctively and subconsciously define as “God’s will”) is on the side of the civilian people, not the government power. Therefore the military invader sees himself as automatically being in the wrong, and instinctively assumes he must be defensive and vigilant and attentive against committing any further illegal acts, if he is to keep his job, his reputation, his wife and children, etc.
THE LAW OF FEAR:
Fear of law, and specifically the fear of being labeled “out of order” or “acting beyond your authority” is the “static accumulated electric shock” waiting to be touched, which every military, police and government bureaucrat will instantly retreat from. Consequently, fear is the weapon of choice when targeting the minds of government-military-police personnel. Why? Because FEAR is the most powerful motivator of human action.
APPLICATION TO JADE HELM:
Since fear is the key, demonstrating to the invader that they are already, potentially, in violation of the Constitution and laws of America, and that legal actions have already been filed in Federal and State Court, which will eventually be decided in the favor of the civilian plaintiff, and result in the punishment of the military invader and his joint-conspirators who planned and engaged in activities in violation of citizens “Civil Rights” (especially, our 4th Amendment rights: The right to be free from government and military interference, and to be secure in our person and papers, and not subjected to any “managing” or “reporting” or “interrogations” or other invasive activities).
After all, these were the original acts of violence which triggered the War of Independence from the British King’s abuse (and taxation) of the American colony citizens.
In closing, the purpose of this “strategic communication” in reaction to the JADE HELM operation is to preserve private Constitutional rights, and national government integrity, because without government integrity, the citizen has no personal integrity—despite any prideful, autonomous self delusions sto the contrary.
This is the nature of legal proceedings which erupt out of grievances or injuries which citizens suffer at the hands of their government employees who act outside their authority or take liberties which courts will reinterpret as criminal.
The truth is this: a person who respects himself, respects the other human beings wearing police, military, and emergency services uniforms—because we have given them those uniforms as an expression of our legal will. The purpose of this legal will was simply so that we personally wouldn’t have to ACT or perform the duty, of the uniform.
Note: the uniform was designed by the citizen based on thousands of years of social service needs and historical foundations, and the duties of the uniform essentially obeys the ongoing language of these social service needs people have. Also the enlightened citizen communicates this respect to those who wear the uniform by speaking in forms—and appearing as symbols--of calm, gentle, legal firmness.
These acts by the enlightened citizen subconsciously communicates to “those wearing the uniform” that the enlightened citizen—not the rabble, the rebel, the anarchist, the troublemaker, the criminal, the vicious, or the perverse--are on the side of the uniform wearer, because the uniform wearer is the symbol of “law and order”.
The enlightened citizen communicates to the uniform wearer that they are on the same side, and the citizen has the power of “watching out for the uniform wearer’s best interest” (which gives him authority and moral purity), which he expresses by, once again, drawing the uniform wearer’s attention to the very real danger of commiting constitutional violations if they engage in certain activities.