Friday, October 2, 2015

Oregon Shooting: 13 Troubling Signs of Potentially Yet Another "False Flag"

by Bernie Suarez

When you practice something all the time you eventually get very good at it. The one thing many awakened and vigilant Americans have become good at over the past few years is sniffing out government false flags because they have so much practice at it. You may find that the events surrounding the recent Umpqua Community College shooting in southern Oregon may ring a few familiar false flag bells after you consider what the mainstream media is saying about the shooting. It is at least extremely reasonable to suspect that this is yet another gun control shooting false flag event since it has many of the characteristics of it.
Sounds crazy? Yes, it always does. False flags are supposed to divide people in addition to tricking them. But as I’ve said repeatedly in the past, when considering a suspected false flag event you have to start somewhere. Look for the beneficiaries of course and look for common patterns. I think many of us know the patterns by now and what to look for when suspecting a false flag shooting.
The college where the latest shooting took place is located six miles north of Roseburg, Oregon and was a very small town where you would expect everyone to be known to most people yet early on it appears this is not the case. Thirteen so far unknown people are said to be murdered and another 20 wounded.
So, should we believe that the Oregon shooting is legitimate with no government involvement? I would like to think so, but as always many things surrounding this latest shooting force us to consider if we’re dealing with yet another gun grab shooting designed to push anti-gun legislation. With the new world order’s Agenda 2030 pushed last week with help from the Pope, we know that Obama now has gun control as one of the remaining major items on the top of his list before he leaves office in 2016. Theadministration desperately needs this gun-control agenda to be pushed through and we’ve seen a laundry list of proven false flag shootings over the past several years.
Are you someone who wants to believe this is not so? Then deal with these 13 points which at the very least bring into question this latest shooting.

1 – Grandiose mainstream media headline demanding your attention to this story.

Without the same grandiose mainstream media headline, I myself would not have noticed this story online. Here we go again? This is now the latest 24/7 story that the mainstream media seems to want and need you to be fascinated by. This alone is a huge tell-tale sign no one should overlook.

2 – Immediate call for gun control in the story sub-headlines.

This latest Oregon school shooting comes with no holds barred. Even in the very headline there was a quick post announcing the need for gun control. Whenever you have gun control pushed on you before you can understand what just happened, that should be a red flag.

3 – Obama himself immediately calls for gun control seizing the moment Sandy Hook style.

Obama even admits his desperate gun control agenda is political
“This is something we should politicize,” he said, calling on Americans of all political stripes to hold their elected leaders accountable for acting on the issue.
It goes without saying that whenever Obama jumps into a topic you should run the other way and fast. Very few actions tell me this shooting has an agenda behind it more than seeing Obama immediately calling for gun control on cue. I’m thinking, doesn’t Obama have presidential work to do? Why is he so involved in specific stories that perfectly fit the new world order agenda? Are we to ignore this or consider this timing coincidental?

4 – Shooter is dead as usual.

We all know the script by now and once again and as usual the shooter does not live to tell the tale or defend his intent. That’s because dead men tell no tales. Consequently, the story as usual is left to the story tellers. And with the usual dead shooter there is much less need to worry about any account conflicts or future revelations of government involvement. Some things for everyone to consider are the following – Did the shooter try to lower his gun? What circumstances led to police actually killing the shooter? Are police reports available for us to see? Don’t police disable people any more?? Isn’t therepolicy for this? Did police follow correct procedure?

5 – Shooter identity completely unknown but repeated mention of “4 guns” very known.

How often does a shooting take place and no one knows who the shooter is (as of the time of this article)? Students didn’t recognize their own classmate? Or did the shooter decide to shoot a bunch of strangers in a school that he’s never attended? How is it that no one knows the shooter? This certainly was not the case in the Virginia Tech shooting of 2007 or Columbine shooting where everyone seem to know or recognize the shooter. Consider this carefully.

6 – “Conflicting reports” in the number of dead people. Identity entirely unknown as well.

Who are these dead people? What are their names? And why is there confusion as to how many people are dead at a small school? Is the body count that high? That difficult? You decide what this might mean given the context of all the facts coming out. It would certainly not be the first time we’ve heard conflicting stories and body counts.

7 – Oregon is recent state of political interest to Neocon former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

It’s not a far stretch to imagine that a good town for a false flag shooting would be one where trusted criminals have influence or are in power. Is it just me or has anyone else been wondering what the heck former Mayor Bloomberg was doing in Oregon? Is it a coincidence that former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been dumping a lot of money into pushing legislation in Oregon? In the past, others within alternative media have called for watchful eyes in Oregon given this connection. No big deal? You decide.

8 – Social media controversy already brewing.

Recall after the Sandy Hook shooting false flag we saw criminal Lt Paul Vance come on TV and call social media exposure of the Sandy Hook shooting “disinformation” and a “crime” to be “prosecuted.” Similarly, again we are seeing an early immediate attack and discrediting of social media in an attempt to control the information. Perhaps they are doing this knowing that soon more information will come out. Everyone should consider that this social media stunt may be purposely bogus to discredit social media. I suspect this may be what is happening. This is just another attempt by the controllers to condition people into thinking that the only reliable news comes from mainstream media sources.

9 – Initial images and videos show no ambulances, no blood or dead bodies.

If anyone has these images please provide them so we can see them but as of the time of this article this evidence was not available.
This reminds us of almost every shooting false flag where the mainstream media hides the images of the crime scene. Where are the images of the police yellow tape? The blood on the floor? The bodies? The ambulances and emergency vehicles?? By hiding all of these images all of the story and images is left to your imagination and this allows for maximum control of the information.

10 – Shooting has a divisive religious twist to it – opens door for blaming Islam, others later on.

Without any further explanation we’re told that the shooter demanded that his victims state what their religion was before shooting them. No one seems to offer what the intent of this was or what it means. Is this an attempt to leave the door open for a possible blaming of ISIS or some other extremist related patsy? Consider that the shooter up to now (the time of this article) can be anyone. Conveniently the controllers have held back the identity of the shooter.

11 – No clear cut witnesses actually saw the shooting.

Yes, believe it or not. After reading the story it appears there are only 3 witnesses accounted for. The closest thing to an eyewitness is Kortney Moore:
Kortney Moore, 18, told the local News Review newspaper that she was in her writing class in Snyder Hall when a gunshot came through the window and struck her teacher in the head.
The remaining 2 supposed witnesses only HEARD the gunfire according to reports.
Student Cassandra Welding told CNN that she heard 35 to 40 shots.
Student Brandy Winter, in a posting on Facebook, said she was in a classroom in Snyder Hall, next door to the room where the shooting began and ran, along with her classmates, when they heard the gunfire.
Winter also says that “from talking with a student in the classroom where it happen, almost every person in the room was shot by a man with four guns,” admitting she herself did not witness the shooting.
Anyone who knows about guns might find this statement a bit peculiar since you can only shoot someone with a gun one bullet at a time. You cannot fire 4 guns at once. Also, studies show that when someone is shot with a gun most of the time they will actually survive the shooting since the bullet must penetrate vital organs. Also people who are severely shot won’t die right away giving them time to potentially tackle the shooter. So it’s not easy to actually shoot and kill a room full of people with 4 guns. Also surely after the first few rounds everyone afraid for their lives would have run full speed out of the room.
So where are the people who actually saw the shooting with their own eyes? And, again, why did no one tackle the shooter as he switched guns given that most likely he could get off no more than 10 rounds at a time? I’m sure we’ll hear from the wounded victims much later on like the interview we saw with Greta Van Susteren and the Virginia Shooting survivor crisis actor.

12 – All students quickly treated as strip-searched suspects instead of victims.

Did the police not want the students to get a good view of the evidence and scene as they passed by? Was this part of the drill to condition students to give up their 4th amendment rights Boston bombing style under shooting conditions? And why were students joking?? Were these students not just exposed to a shocking bloody gruesome scene? I find this a little odd.
“They walked us straight through the crime scene with our hands up,” 18-year-old freshman Andi Dinnetz said. “It was more tense outside. In the classroom, everyone was trying to make jokes and keep it from being as serious as it was.”

13 – Social media manifesto-like messages once again posted to further substantiate shooter intent.

Mainstream media is posting a chain of messages posted by an anonymous character on the night before:
Don’t go to school tomorrow if you are in the northwest.
Once again, a would-be shooter in America whose shooting would quickly serve the gun control agenda just so happens to pre-post threats announcing or hinting at what he is going to do. This is another trademark of false flag shootings.


I want to believe this latest shooting is not a false flag. I have no other information except what mainstream media wants us to know. I (we) have an obligation to receive the information in the right context. And what context is that? That the globalists are desperate and they are running out of time to get more gun legislation in. The context that a month ago they suffered a horrific failure in Virginia when overwhelming evidence clearly shows the shooting was a false flag. Following this, the Virginia TV Reporter shooting disappeared completely from mainstream media news, and it disappeared for a reason. Surprisingly and ironically there was no mention of the late August Virginia TV Reporter shooting in this recent story which, by the way, mentions several of the other shootings from the past. Given that it only happened a month ago isn’t this a little odd?
Also consider this story in the context of the embarrassment that the U.S. is suffering with respect to ISIS being called out and bombed in Syria. The U.S. and the new world order is in the midst of a tumultuous period. They need a victory soon and just as everyone is looking at the ISIS/Syrian crisis failure here comes a new shooting to get your attention away from Syria.
Is this latest shooting a perfectly coincidental event for the globalisst or just another false flag shooting? You consider the evidence for yourself and decide. I’m sure new evidence will emerge. Whether that evidence debunks my suspicions or confirms it will remain to be seen.
Bernie is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.
Courtesy of Activist Post.


  1. Magnificent.
    Once again we have Dr. Fetzer to turn to when we are in the whirlwind of a potential false flag.
    There might really be dead people this time, who knows? But thank god there is someone with James Fetzer's intellect, instincts and intentions to give us some good points and solid links. I'm sure we will see the sleuths and real internet journalists pick this one apart as we go along.
    I mean it, I feel like I have a grown up to turn to, or a professor in a classroom when I have a tough question. It's a confusing world out there.
    Thank you Jim!


    1. Fetzer: Gross FAILURE For Induction, Philosophy; Gate-Keeper, Subversive

      Note Fetzer may serve certain purposes, but he has distinct problems and is blatant FAILURE for induction to the appropriate general theory, don't doubt.

      First among Fetzer's serious problems is don't forget, he's tried and true academic hack--a GATE-KEEPER, practicing "limited hangout," giving only SELECTED details, strategically leaving-out certain other essential details.

      Thus Fetzer goes over the details and items SEEMINGLY well enough, but a "philosopher" is supposed to do much more, esp. in way of induction (generalization) to the larger theory--where Fetzer fails miserably, even horrendously.

      For Fetzer is determined to defend, deflect fm, and make excuses for JEWS, pretending there are "good" Jews, the only "bad" Jews being "zionists." Fetzer grossly ignores satanic, anti-human Talmud, vital detail, which Talmud is fundamental essence of Judaism, Jews followers of Pharisees (who PROUDLY killed Christ), by definition.

      Thus u see, Fetzer is too well-trained as defender, excuse-maker for Jews, horrific gate-keeper, typical academic hack.

      Further, observe the HORRIFIC prejudice Fetzer, pretended "philosopher," has for that basic Western philosophy within Christian literature and allegory which Fetzer, consummate, Jew-serving academic hack, writes-off as mere "religion," as if religion is other than reason and rationality, not worthy of attn. or comment.

      Thus Fetzer FAILS to induct to the overall satanic conspiracy, satanism founded upon extreme subjectivism, subjectivists holding "reality" is mere issuance of one's mentality/consciousness. So u see, "satanism" is actually quite-well scientifically founded and observable, as noted by MANY other observers, in "hip-hop" music and other entertainment, but also and evermore for the selective administration of justice and legal treatment.

      Hitlery Clinton thus, for just one example, is immune fm the nat. security laws which ruined career of Gen. Petraeus, not to mention many "whistle-blowers."

      Thus Fetzer not only FAILS so miserably for the necessary induction which he's supposed to know something about as so-called "philosopher," but this gross FAILURE actually serves AGENDA of the palpable, discernible, verifiable cultural satanism, Fetzer actually rather endorsing at least an aspect of this satanism, as in form of moralism/Pharisaism, Fetzer the consummate academic hack pretending to the subjectivist pretext (Kant and Bentham) in way of non-existent "good-evil."

      So don't be dazzled by Fetzer's mere recitation of numerous, various details--don't forget the large INDUCTION and overall picture is what's necessary in way of understanding CAUSATION--which Fetzer discourages and deflects fm in all his insidious moralism, pretending there are "good" Jews, like there are "good" psychopaths, "good" satanists, and "good" Christ-killers.

    2. I forgot to give ref. for satanic Talmud--see,, and

  2. Of course I meant Dr. Fetzer bringing us Bernie's article.
    On to James Tracey!

    1. Tracey: Another Incompetent Hack, Subversive, Gate-Keeper

      Tracey is just ANOTHER incompetent, subversive academic hack and gate-keeper, as I describe Fetzer, above--they FAIL miserably for the INDUCTION to larger picture, deliberately ignoring details about Talmud and Christian allegory, always on corrupt pretext of Pharisaism/moralism.

  3. Many warning flags revealed about this event. For a deeper "take", read what Michael Hoffman has observed:

    We live in the Twilight Zone, aka the END TIMES!

    1. When THEY come for your guns, just let THEM have the bullets! THEY LIVE - but THEY DIE, too!

    2. Jim Stone, as usual, sniffed out Roseburg before anyone could say "hachoo"!

    3. Here's the (double) "take" on this at the Conspiracy Cafe:

  4. Everyone should keep these points in mind: Both the Boston Bombing and Sandy Hook were totally fraudulent staged events as professor Fetzer and others have shown. Government was involved at the highest levels, possibly even the CIA in the planning. FBI was certainly involved in the deception and lying. Therefore, any events after these two must be assumed to be false flags unless the physical and forensic evidence and actual crime scene evidence show otherwise. Remember this: When government is involved in the lying and cheating, anything goes. They can and possibly do pay someone to "die" or get "killed". They could pay them off and let them begin a "new" life as these agencies do every day. They can easily dupe all the others at the school as they likely did by treating them like criminals. There are no true eye witnesses. No timely crime scene photographs showing gun fights or bullet holes in walls or blood or the dead shooter at the crime scene, nothing as usual and you can be sure there won't be anything either. Remember every thing was destroyed at Sandy Hook. Even the wrecking crew was sworn to secrecy with criminal penalties if they violated the promise. The stakes are high here. Government has pulled out all the stops. They are all pathological liars. They have unlimited money to carry out their evil agenda. Again, assume every subsequent event after Sandy Hook and Boston Bombing is a false flag unless proved otherwise with real physical proof, not hot air. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    1. Right! - and the question is: WHY do these ALIEN idiots keep doing the same thing (staging shooting hoaxes with crisis actors) over and over again and expecting different results? (Einstein's definition of INSANITY). Or is it extreme chutzpah?!


    2. Simple Satanist Theme Lost In Gross FAILURE Of Fetzer For Philosophy, Induction, Analysis

      Anon, at 4:15 pm, above, Winfield, is absolutely right-on, and those are just SOME of the details providing basis for necessary INDUCTION for which induction Fetzer and other gate-keeping incompetents have FAILED so miserably and horrendously, as I've noted.

      For observe the great SATANISTIC culture of corruption, dominated by central-banking (just literally legalized COUNTERFEITING, truly un-limited supply of currency--see and for expo on US Federal Reserve Bank).

      And note satanism is precisely defined and discerned: EXTREME SUBJECTIVISM--and who are the leading, consummate subjectivists?--JEWS, and only Jews; see and for Talmudic expo.

      Observe also, Chris Bollyn ( identifies Jews ("zionists") at every strategic pt. in great 9/11 conspiracy, for another example. Late Mike Collins Piper ("Final Judgment") also detailed place of Jews in the epochal JFK assassination.

      Unfortunately, subversives and gate-keepers, exactly like academic hacks like Fetzer and James Tracey, continue to subvert and gate-keep the truth discovery process by "good Jew, bad Jew" game, pretending there are "good Jews" as if there are "good" psychopaths, good satanists, and good Christ-killers.

      Thus within the evermore corrupt, hubristic, SUBJECTIVISTIC culture/society, Jews naturally rule and dominate as they're COLLECTIVISTIC, hence most united, organized, "connected" subjectivists--all-out SATANISTS, controlling, influencing, and manipulating the stupid, clueless, confused, "individualist" gentile morons, even though gentiles are more numerous.

      Thus gentiles must embrace Christian TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) against Jew lies (JOHN 8:44) founded necessarily upon OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality, including then 10th amendment and emphasis upon state and local government. There are no "good" Jews--GET RID OF THEM ALL, along w. their sympathizers and defenders among gentiles--anti-Christ enemies, TRAITORS and heretics.

    3. Oh my goodness, Aspertame, why are you here?
      You spend amazing amounts of energy and sheer nonsense filling Dr. Fetzer's comment section with your gobbledygook.
      You must be a plant from someone like Bob Foote, or seriously have no where else to go?
      Seriously, why are you here? Could you answer me that?
      I know that Jim has "taken you on" in the past, and I hope he is done, so let me take a stab.
      Do you have, in the end, any decency? Why do you continue to pollute this man's comment section?
      Notice that unlike your master, Bob Foote, James Fetzer does not "moderate" away your piles of steaming propaganda, and allows it to sit there and rot on its own. Like it should.
      Again, if you are not a troll/shill/Bob Foote plant, then answer the question...
      Why the hell do you give a shit what James Fetzer puts in his blog? The internet is a big place. You would be much happier with some other nut job zealot, Jonas Alexis comes to mind.

    4. Here here.
      This "shooting" is perfectly timed to take the news away from Putin's check move on the Syria situation. I wish it were a checkmate, but we have to see. The warmongers are really scrambling to demonize his joining the "fight against ISIS" and not doing a good job. They need this new distraction.

    5. A "troll" is just someone, seemingly un-reasonable, that someone doesn't like, but I present a clear, substantial case/argument, and my entries speak for themselves, regardless ur brainless, moronic lies.

      "Decency," u ask?--I doubt strumpet like u understands meaning of the word, ho ho ho.

      Real question is, what's an empty-headed zero like u doing here? Ho ho ho ho

    6. No, you ARE a troll. Same stupid message over and over. Dr. Fetzer DOES blame Jews and quite often. It is not necessary to blame Jews and Satanism every time as it unnecessarily 1) drives away beginners in the truth movement who are not yet capable of considering such information and 2) draws out OTHER trolls screaming "anti-semite."

      Watch the Real Deal sometimes and you will see Dr. Fetzer doesn't hesitate to point the finger at jews for culpability even when his guests shy away from the subject.

      Also, Dr. Fetzer DIDN'T EVEN WRITE the above article. Your tedious, redundant rants are mis-directed. Perhaps you should start your own blog since others aren't meeting your expectations.

    7. This guy is likely a government schill. According to Cynthia McKinney, schill direct subjects off topic. Also, Masonic Luciferians embrace anti-semetic speech to condemn it to further their agenda. This overpaid stooge wants to give people the impression truthers are haters.

    8. "Off topic"?--only question then is what's "topic," which the liar doesn't say. And truthers should hate lies and liars, which liars are Jews, by definition, proven by their actual acts throughout history. And I give all necessary references.

    9. Ho ho ho--get a load of above, fm 6:01 am, " unnecessarily 1) drives away beginners in the truth movement who are not yet capable of considering such information." So (a) why wouldn't anyone be able to so consider?--the patronizing fool doesn't say. And (b) why should everyone else be required to defer to such "beginners"? Ho ho ho ho ho. And "drawing out trolls"?--gee whiz but all blogging would have to end, in that case, eh? Ho ho ho ho ho. Fetzer has the most brilliant fans, we see. Ho ho ho hooo

    10. And indeed the Dept, of Homeland Security (Insecurity} has been infiltrated by the Jewish State of Israel, with all our intelligence, both civilian military, and all our resources, under its command, to be used to set up its goal of global domination of Earth. Check out the article posted by Vatic, "Mossad's One Million Helpers World-Wide".

  5. Jim: Dialogue is too important to let this uncivil-minded cretin ruin your blog. I would like to suggest some standards of decency this guy needs to adhere to and if he can't, ban him. Enough is enough.

    1. "Cretin"--ho ho ho--look who's talking, ho ho ho. Go ahead and ban me, scum--I've made my arguments, which are quite clear--banning would only confirm the thesis, ho ho ho ho.

    2. You're a poor representative of Christ and other truths. Don't go away mad, just go away.

    3. Right punk moron: all u need is leg to stand-on, right?

    4. There ya go. Calling people punk and moron and saying "ho ho ho" gives you plenty of credibility to back up your stance. Attaboy!

    5. Ho ho ho--all the "cred" I need, anyway, moron, ho ho ho

  6. The WORST massacre of a family was that of Cassidy Stay - RIGHT?? So, you would expect a damn anniversary news story by at least ONE media agency ... just go look. ZERO, ZIP, NADA. Poof!

  7. Thank you for this introduction to Bernie Suarez and the website he created. And to think that this weekend, our United States of Israel had the nerve to bomb a hospital in Afghanistan and to issue statements implying that Doctors Without Borders is a terrorist organization. No wonder Kurt Vonnegut entitled his biographical book, the last one he published, A MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY, a great read.