Saturday, October 24, 2015

Prologue: Sandy Hook: Was it reality or an illusion?

NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control (2015)

by Jim Fetzer

"It ain't what we don't know that hurts us; it's what we think we know that ain't so"--Will Rogers
Sandy Hool has become a celebrities cause

The Sandy Hook experience has divided Americans, most of whom have been convinced by media coverage that it was a real event, where a young man massacred 20 children and six adults before killing himself.

Another substantial segment of the US population has taken a closer look at the evidence and drawn the conclusion it was a hoax, where no children really died: it was an elaborate psy-op to promote gun control.

Americans are hard pressed to sort these things out, because they are hit with a blizzard of reports that appear to confirm the official account, leaving them in the predicament of not being able to tell if it was real or fake.

It matters even more today because gun control has become one of the defining issues of politics in America, where leading Democrats (Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton) are using their authority as President (in the first instance) to issue Executive Orders constraining our 2nd Amendment rights and (in the second) threatening to impose liability laws upon their manufacturers for their use by those who buy them. Ben Carson, on the Republican side, has observed that Jews would have been better able to fend off The Third Reich had they not been disarmed; and Matt Drudge has challenged the President to demonstrate his sincerity by giving up his (heavily armed) Secret Service protection.

The appeals to Sandy Hook (shooting 20 children), the Charleston shooting (of nine blacks) and the  Oregon shooting (where college students were asked their religion and those responding "Christian" were shot in the head) have struck some observers as appearing to be calculated to instill fear into specific targeted subpopulations of the American community: parents, blacks and Christians, for example, where it's as though we were experiencing a series of psy-ops to convince the public that we ought to give up our guns. That troubles many, because disarming populations has all-too-often occurred to set the stage for tyranny in world history past. What if Sandy Hook was only an illusion?

Probabilities vs. Certainties

Knowledge of historical events (based upon documents and records, photos and videos and witness testimony, for example) can never be “definitive and certain”. You only know your own origin in life (where and when you were born and the parents who brought you into this world) on the basis of information that could have been faked. Even DNA comparisons can be invalid or mistaken on purpose or by accident. Your belief about today’s day/month/year is something else of which you have no direct and certain knowledge but rather have a host of sources of information, such as newspapers and television reports, which collectively confirm your belief but could be fabricated or faked, but which are almost always accurate and true.

The occurrence of an elaborate hoax intended to fool the people does not occur often, but there can be no doubt that it does sometimes occur. The Warren Report (1964), for example, provides an indictment of Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin of JFK, where the evidence for that conclusion was carefully selected and, in some cases, completely fabricated. The backyard photographs were faked, for example, and the home movies of the assassination were edited. That he had been captured in a famous photo taken during the shooting was suppressed. (Check out The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003) or many articles about JFK at for abundant proof, if you like.) These things can and sometimes do happen. And one of them happened here.

If you only read the government’s account, you might very well be convinced that JFK had been killed by Lee Oswald. And if you only paid attention to the mass media, you would probably believe that 20 children died at Sandy Hook. Once you acknowledge that some of the evidence has been fabricated or faked, however, the case begins to assume a completely different character. This does not mean we cannot know what happened in this instance, but it should not have been necessary to frame a guilty man.  New evidence or alternative hypotheses may thus require us to revised our position by rejecting hypotheses we previously accepted, accepting hypotheses we previously rejected and leaving others in suspense. We now know more about Sandy Hook.

Inference to the best explanation

The principle known as “inference to the best explanation”, has the potential to turn every American into a critical thinker  in comparing alternative hypotheses. In relation to Sandy Hook, there are two alternatives, which have consequences that would also be true (or probably true) if they were true and others that would be false (or probably false) if they were not (setting the alleged suicide by Adam Lanza to the side):
(h1) Sandy Hook was a real event, where 20 children and 6 adults were killed at a school;
(h2) Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax, where a drill was conducted and no children died.
But the key to understanding is making an appraisal of which of these hypotheses is better supported by the evidence. We can think of the evidence as effects of one or another hypothesis as their cause.  When one hypothesis makes the effects more probable than the other, it is more likely to be true and the alternative false. For the shooting to have been real, the school had to have been operational in 2012; yet we have indication after indication that it had been abandoned by 2008 (which you will discover in Chapters 2 and 3), including not only its deplorable physical condition (both inside and out), but also that it was not in compliance with both federal and state laws required in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act: 
Analogously, we know from past experience that the names, ages and sex of victims of crimes are almost invariably printed in newspaper accounts of crimes. In this case, however, the final reports coming from the Connecticut authorities did not include them. That is a very odd aspect of this event, but an attempt has been made to explain it away on the ground of preserving the privacy of the families of the victims. But if there were victims, their families already know they are dead. There is no evident benefit to the families, if it was real, but a major element of the cover up, if it was not. 

From the date of the event, we have a photograph taken from a CT State Police chopper at 9:15 AM/ET, which is 20 minutes before the first 911 call came in; there was no surge of EMTs into the building to rush those little bodies off to hospitals, where doctors could pronounce them dead or alive; virtually all of the emergency vehicles were kept at the Firehouse, which became the center of activity as opposed to the school; the parents were not even allowed to identify their children, which was done using photos. As a parent myself, I can emphasize that there is no way I could have been kept from viewing the body of a child of mine, where the conduct of the "parents" in this case is unlike that of any parents I have ever known, where these many oddities are confirmed by Chapter 5.

Other circumstantial anomalies 

If the school had been abandoned, then the shooting has to be an illusion, since there would have been no students present for Adam Lanza to shoot. And if that were the case, then we might not be surprised if any number of measures were taken at the time by authorities to suppress relevant information (and thereby making it unavailable) or by otherwise circumventing what would have been the ordinary and normal procedures of investigation and administration by local and state authorities. But the measures that were taken were rather extraordinary, including these examples:
* the Attorney General of Connecticut argued against releasing the 911 calls, where the court ruled against him;
* the Clerk of Newtown entered into secret negotiations with the state legislature to avoid issuing death certificates;
* a special panel of the state legislature recommended that any state employee who released information about Sandy Hook other than via Freedom of Information Act request be prosecuted as an E-felony with a five year sentence; and,
those who were hired to participate in the demolition of the school building were required to sign life-time gag orders that prohibit them from talking about what they saw or did not see during its destruction.

Each of these qualifies as a “fact” insofar as its truth can be confirmed by research you can conduct yourself. Admittedly, if all the information accessible via the internet about Sandy Hook were fabricated or faked, that would not be the case. But I know of no one who seriously contests any of these points.  So ask yourself, what is the probability that these five claims (if we also include the missing names, ages and sex from the final report) would be true if Sandy Hook had been a real event? And by comparison, what is the probability these five claims would be true if Sandy Hook had been a hoax? Which hypothesis is more likely to be true?

The Governor's Press Conference

The day of the shooting, Governor Dan Malloy and his Lt. Governor held a press conference, during which he observed that they had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen. That got me thinking about, “something like this”? What could that mean. There are only two alternatives: 

(a) that he had been told there would be a shooting in a school in his state, in which case he, as governor, should have warned school districts to be on high alert and make sure it did not happen, which he did not do; or, 

(b) that he had been told they would be taking an abandoned school and using it as a prop for a drill, which would be presented to the public as real to promote an aggressive gun-control agenda, which is the case here.

And when I looked into recent visits with the Governor to determine by whom he might have been "spoken to", I discovered that Attorney General Eric Holder had met with him on 27 November 2012 to discuss "Operation Longevity", a special interest of the Attorney General and the President of the United Staes for promoting gun control. Mark my words. The evidence presented here demonstrates that the school was closed by 2008; that there were no students to evacuate; that Adam Lanza appears to have been a work of fiction; and that the teachers, the parents, the Newtown School Board, the State Police, the Medical Examiner and the Governor--and by extension the Attorney General and the President--were all complicit in the deception

We have the FEMA manual 

Our collaborative research, you will find for yourself, is extensive, through and detailed--and leaves this matter resolved beyond any reasonable doubt. We have 50 photos that show the preparation of the Lanza home as a prop and another 50 documenting the refurbishing of the school as a stage (in Chapters 7 and 8). Doubt in this case would be reasonable were there a reasonable alternative explanation. But, as you are about to discover, there is none here.

And I am not just talking about the sign, "Everyone must check in", the Port-a-Potties, the boxes of bottled water and pizza cartons at the Firehouse, the name tags on lanyards and parents bringing their children to (what was supposed to be) a child shooting massacre! WE HAVE THE FEMA MANUAL. It stipulates that everyone must register and that refreshments and restrooms will be provided. Some participants did not realize that the official event was not until the 14th: We now know why some of the donation pages went up a day early and why Adam Lanza was recorded as having died on the 13th! Don't take my word for it, because you can read it for yourself. I included it here as Appendix A. 

The Requirement of Total Evidence
Indeed, scientific reasoning specifically and rational inquiries generally must satisfy the requirement of total evidence: in the search for truth, reasoning must be based upon all of the available relevant evidence, where evidence is relevant when its presence or absence (or truth or falsity) makes a difference to the outcome, typically on the basis of considerations of probability.  According to the official report on Sandy Hook by Danbury States Attorney Stephen Sedensky (to which we refer as "The Sedensky Report"), there were 489 children present that day. Minus 20 murdered, there ought to have been 469 to evacuate (as well as around 70 more teachers, administrators and staff). But we have no pictures of their evacuation. What we have instead this "iconic" photograph:

It has sometimes been said that "You can't prove a falsehood true!" But that assertion overlooks the role of false clams and fabricated evidence. We have here a photograph purporting to show a string of children being led away from the school to safety by a policewoman on the scene. This photo was published on the front page of virtually every newspaper in the world--and shown endless times on television. It was undoubtedly the single most important form of proof in convincing the public around the world that Sandy Hook was real. But there is a catch: the photograph was staged! And we know that not on the basis of the weaker evidence that there are too many leaves on the trees and no frost for this to be a 28 degree day in December but because Shannon Hicks took a second photograph!

Rearranging the kids to get a better shot  

It's bad enough that we have a series of parents looking on, some with their arms cross or their hands in their pockets--which is certainly not what we would expect in an emergency situation. It gets much worse when you realize that the police woman has stopped the children to rearrange them to get "a better shot"! Here's a comparison that shows what was going on and demonstrates--as conclusively as anyone could have the right to expect--that the first photograph was staged to create the false impression that there was an emergency and that these kids needed to be removed from a threat at the earliest possible opportunity--which would not leave time to stop and rearrange them as follows:

We not only know that Shannon Hicks was "in on the game" by taking these photos (as early as in October) in preparation for this elaborate charade but we also know that there was no evacuation. The claim is sometimes made that “You can’t prove a negative!” But that turns out to be false. When evidence that ought to be present if an hypothesis were true is not present, then the absence of evidence qualifies as evidence of absence. Suppose you were told there is an elephant in your living room. If you go there and find no indications of the presence of an elephant, you are completely justified in inferring that there is no elephant in your living room. 

If 469 kids should have been there, if the event was real, but they are not there, you are completely justified in inferring it was not real. An evacuation would have looked something like this, with strings of children led by other police officers or teachers performing their duty under stress. But we have DashCam footage at the locations in the parking lot where, according to official police records, the evacuation was taking place--and there is nothing there! Just as the absence of signs of the presence of an elephant in your living room is proof of the absence of an elephant, the absence of signs of the presence of children undergoing evacuation is proof that no evacuation was taking place. 

More parking lot anomalies--and a stunner!

Inspection of the vehicles in the parking lot in front of the school shows that they are parked in the wrong direction (which should have been nose-in), given the arrangement for driving into the lot. The image itself suggests of a group of drivers methodically filling up the lot with used or abandoned cars, driving straight into the designated parking places without regard for how they should have been arranged. Once again we ask, “What is the probability that the lot would be filled with cars parked in the wrong direction, if this had been a real event? What if this had been a drill?” Truly stunning, however, is the discovery of a series of photographs that display setting the stage early in the morning for the events that would transpire this day, including this one from Chapter 8:

Notice that the windows of Classroom 10 are not shot out and the flag is up. Wayne Carver can be seen behind the man in the blue evidence suit. This photograph is taken from one of the elevated cameras we have discovered that were mounted around the parking lot to record the drill. The mortuary tent is not there yet, which makes this early morning. Could we have more decisive proof? 

When an hypothesis has been confirmed by abundant evidence and no alternative explanation is reasonable, it has been established “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Hypothesis (h1), that Sandy Hook was real, has been falsified and (h2), that this was an elaborate hoax, has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

Benefits to the Participants 

The benefits to those who participated in the Sandy Hook hoax have been substantial. The donation sites created by "families of the victims" have hauled in over $27,000,000 or in excess of $1,000,000 per family. Other substantial grants have been given to alleviate the pain and suffering of those who responded to the event. On Friday, 12 December 2014, for example, Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Representative Elizabeth Esty (CT-5) announced a $775,914 grant from the Department of Justice's Office for Victims of Crimes and their families, first responders and members of Newtown community in the wake of the shooting to "help fund continued mental health services and other support services", which sounds like a lot for participating in a charade.

Other pay-offs, bribes and hush-money--and under the circumstances, is there something more appropriate to call it?--are documented in Chapter 5. When debate was taking place over the choice between refurbishing the old school or constructing a new one, The Newtown Bee published about the presence of asbestos, lead and PCBs in the building, which had no doubt factored in the earlier decision to abandon the school in 2008. Newtown received $50,000,000 to build a brand new K-4 elementary school. I surveyed the cost of comparable cost for K-4 schools across the nation and discovered they average $7,000,000, which reflects the generous benefits that a community might accrue from cooperating covertly with the federal government in the pursuit of its political agenda.  

The gun control agenda

We are told that fewer guns means less crime. But when you look into serious studies of crime rates in relation to gun laws, that is not what you discover. Appendix D, for example, "Comparing Murder and Homicide Rates before and after Gun Bans", suggests something closer to the opposite is the case; and Appendix E, "Comparing Death Rates from Mass Public Shootings in the US and Europe",
demonstrates we are not the nation with the highest rates of mass public shootings, contrary to our president's claims. Barack Obama himself praised the sweeping gun confiscation that took place in Australia in the late 1990s and said:

“Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown,” Obama said. “And Australia just said, well, that’s it, we’re not doing, we’re not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.” 

And while they haven’t seen a mass shooting since, local officials say that gun violence on the continent is much worse than it was before the tougher gun policies went into effect.
Meanwhile, the one thing that the President failed to recognize is that gun crime in the U.S. is on the decline. 
According to a PEW research study, gun crime is down 49% since 1993. 
Another study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that non-fatal gun crime is actually down 70% since the same time. 
Even the President’s own study performed by the Center for Disease Control reached a similar conclusion: “Firearm-related death rates for youth ages 15 to 19 declined from 1994 to 2009,” the report states. “The number of public mass shootings of the type that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School accounted for a very small fraction of all firearm-related deaths.” 
What these studies show is there’s a clear agenda being carried out by the Mainstream Media to make it seem like mass shootings are the norm. 
As soon as a mass shooting happens, it reverberates through all the major news networks for weeks, much like an echo after the initial shot.
Because of this, much of the nation seems to believe that gun violence, particularly school shootings, is on the rise even with evidence that points to the contrary.
The reasons behind this aggressive behavior by the administration, even when gun violence has been falling in the United States, involves deep questions about the role of DHS in our society and why America has been devolving into a totalitarian state. I was born a year-and-a-day before Pearl Harbor, as my father used to put it; and I would never have imagined in my wildest dreams that the United States of American could descent into a bottomless pit of lies, deceit and deception. 

Faking a school shooting to instill fear into a population is an act of terrorism, where it has become clear that this instance was brought to us by officials at every level of the Connecticut government from the teachers and reporters to the State Police and the Newtown School board to the Governor and the Attorney General and the President himself. And this is the ugly legacy of Barack Hussein Obama. 


  1. Sandy Hoax Placed In Satanic, Criminal Perspective, Fullest CONTEXT For Culture, Society

    Thus Sandy hoax is examined in regard to various circumstances and details attached and included therewith, the inductive logic leading to conclusion of hoax, deliberate deception and fraud, and thus CONSPIRACY is fully grasped and justified.

    "[W]hen you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." -Sherlock Holmes (A.C. Doyle)

    Further, note the element of financing for the Sandy hoax is truly prodigious, no expense was or even now, as the hoax continues, is spared.

    To give yet further CONTEXT to Sandy hoax are the other fake shootings that have taken place and exposed, including the Charleston, SC supposed shooting of 9 church-goers, the infamous "Eliot Roger" shooting, among the many other frauds and media put-ons (a).

    (b) These deliberate hoaxes and frauds then can additionally be grouped with yet other conspiracies, much more deadly, including 9/11, JFK, RFK, MLK assassinations, among others too.

    (c) Further still, one must observe the largest context socially and culturally, and consider that criminal enterprise known as CENTRAL-BANKING, specifically then, the US Federal Reserve Bank, which is simply legalized COUNTERFEITING, which actually rules and controls the entire nation and culture, the US gov. completely under its control. See and for expo on US Fed and central banking.

    Thus we find the continuing staging of these frauds and minor conspiracies all happening within a large context of fraud and criminal conspiracy, that of central banking, and we see the SIMILARITY of our present situation w. that of the original American founders, described in Jefferson's Dec. of Independence, when Jefferson described the King of G. Britain conspired w. the British Parliament against the colonies and citizens.

    Striking differences btwn the two eras, of Jefferson's and our own, now, is (1) present establishment and corp. mass-media is fully-owned by the criminal powers and is being used against the people, UNLIKE in Jefferson's era.

    (2) The religious practice of the people, Christianity, was much more effective HELP and AID to the people of Jefferson's time than establishment religion of present is for the benefit of people today.

    (3) For today, there's distinct satanic element and EXTREME HUBRIS which didn't exist in Jefferson's day, satanism defined as extreme subjectivism whence one makes oneself God, the subject being creator of his/her own reality. And this satanism is something that is widely observed by numerous people for legal and political application and also in the entertainment field.

    Hence the elaborate conspiracy of Sandy hoax is far more understandable in large CONTEXT of the heavily satanistic and criminal-dominated culture of the present day. Given the circumstances, Sandy hoax elaboration and production is quite understandable; MOTIVE and OPPORTUNITY are un-questionably present and demonstrable for such criminal hoax and fraud. Sandy hoax is something the top criminal masterminds WOULD seek to perpetrate--and it would be done in the way it was and is still being pushed.

    Thus Sandy hoax and conspiracy is best understood IN CONTEXT, and it's a very daunting context--that of rampant satanism, the culture and nation literally in THRALL of criminals, that large criminal conspiracy being one of sublimity which is why/how it continues to succeed fueled by the typical hubris/madness which always goes along. Many people then can't be saved, or cured, or "enlightened," but some surely can, and these are ones, especially the youth, who must be addressed.

  2. And I would add that Obama's crimes and hoaxes could not be accomplished with out eager help from the corporate media, Anderson Cooper commits treason 12 times before breakfast every morning, and CNN, ABC, FOX, NBC are part of criminal conspiracies. It appears that Amy Goodman's role in promoting every staged even is to protect the Democratic Party. It will be a good thing when Establishment media loses all credibility. Hats off to Jim Fetzer, a lion in investigative research and publishing.


    1. Fetzer Continues To FAIL: Sandy Hoax Must Be Seen In Fullest Context, Not Mere Isolated Instance

      See above note by apsterian: the mass-corp. media are WHOLLY-OWNED by the topmost criminals and "banker" COUNTERFEITERS, their purpose being constant, continued, never-ending psy-ops, confusion, distraction, and diversion of the people--just like, and no diff. fm public edjumacation branch, of which Fetzer is consummate product, tried and true.

      Observe Fetzer also provides cover for topmost satanists, Jews, refusing to examine Talmud (see, selling-out the people's Christianity, denigrating it as mere "religion" w. no serious, genuine philosophic content or meaning.

      So Fetzer is himself an enabler of the satanic powers, playing GATE-KEEPER for truther opposition to satanists, FAILING to demonstrate best, fullest, and proper scientific method, keeping the rationalist and ethical pursuits muddled and confused--as u urself demonstrate w. ur half-baked "gee-whiz" -like "discovery" about the mass-media, as if they're not wholly-owned units fm very beginning, mere parts to the criminal whole and larger context.

      Thus Fetzer, supposed philosophical, fails the people for fullest cultural and social CONTEXT, which large perspective is his very purpose as philosophic, this aside fm the broad economic purpose and meaning of MONEY, by which top banking criminals continue to defraud, confuse, and divert the people.

      For now the next step for criminal powers, fully in control of things political and judicial, is to get the country and people involved in horrendous war which serves to muddy the proverbial "waters" even further, the poor victimized people evermore utterly destroyed.

    2. "It will be a good thing when Establishment media loses all credibility."

      Based on recent comments made by my formerly media-trusting conservative octagenarian parents, I'd say it already has.

  3. VIDEO analysis of bogus "Adam Lanza" ID Photo:

  4. Sandy Hook "parents" are professional ACTORS playing roles. Nobody died at Newtown CT.

    Newtown GOALS were banning AR-15 rifles; restricting Home Schooling; new Mind Control Laws.

    Newtown = TREASON

  5. Yet more absolutely insane malarkey from a professional disinformation specialist,Fetzer.

    1. Fetzer Has Problems, But Actual Facts, Details Of Sandy Hoax Are Quite Accurate

      Fetzer is indubitably a hack, limited-hangout, controlled opposition, gate-keeper, as I describe and explain, above, but the info and details documented in this particular blog are all true, and there are all necessary ref.s given for those details. So u, anon, at 6:56pm are simply lying, typical Jew-spew.

      Fetzer's real failure is (a) he doesn't give ALL THE DETAILS which are pertinent, esp. regarding proper CONTEXT, including central-banking which accounts then for the financing, including control of all the factors, mass-media, politicians, and law-enforcement which must be involved for such a thorough-going criminal fraud/hoax as Sandy hoax.

      (b) Fetzer fails for proper philosophy and CONTEXT, including not only Sandy hoax, but all the other, similar psy-ops and fake "shootings," and additionally, other specific conspiracies, like JFK, RFK assassinations, 9/11, etc.

      (c) Fetzer fails then for INDUCTION to the proper large theory, including not only Sandy hoax, but to the ABSOLUTE criminal hegemony and control over our culture given by means of (d) central-banking, which also Fetzer overlooks, neglects, and ignores. For example, what is MONEY?

      (e) Thus Fetzer fails to induct to the overall, satanic/hubristic nature of the degenerate culture in general, the Spenglerian "Decline of the West" in (extreme) subjectivism, thus satanism, Fetzer overlooking the place of Jews (subjectivists by religion) and the nature of their satanic Talmud (see, including then the assistance given satanic master-minds by Judeo-Christian (JC--see and hereticalists and half-baked fools calling themselves "Christian," etc.

      (f) And of course, Fetzer, smug and typically hubristic, fails to grasp the genuine philosophic value, purpose, and significance of Christianity, Fetzer the academic hack, incompetently and too quickly writing-off such Christian philosophy as mere "religion."

      So Fetzer, the academic hack, surely has lots of problems, draw-backs, and short-comings, but actual facts and details specific to Sandy hoax aren't among them. Fetzer merely keeps the proper focus of attn. out of proper context and far too limited--against proper philosophy and science.

    2. s a former Marine Corps officer who has spent the last 25 years exposing government complicity in JFK, 9/11, Wellstone, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing and more, this kind of rubbish just won't wash. See my three books on JFK, my book on 9/11 and my book on Wellstone, for openers.

      I have chaired or co-chair 5 national conferences on JFK (Minneapolis 1999; Dallas 2000; Dallas 2001; Duluth 2003; Santa Barbara 2013) and done a thousand radio and TV interviews on JFK, none of this makes any sense. It is simply irrational and contrary to the evidence.

      I founded Scholar for 9/11 Truth December 2005, was the keynote speaker at The American Scholars Conference in LA 2006; was flown to Athens to appear on a 3.5 hour television show about 9/11, which was broadcast to the world via satellite. I organized the Madison Conference in 2007; the London conference in 2010; and the Vancouver Hearings in 2012.

      I have probably done more to expose government complicity across the board than anyone else on the face of this earth. If you have other candidates in mind, let me know and we can compare what they have accomplished and what I have done. And I am not finished yet.

      Indeed, my most recent book prior to this, AND I SUPPOSE WE DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, EITHER? (2015), exposes the moon landing hoax, the death and replacement of Paul McCartney, the first death of Saddam Hussein, the second death of Osama bin Laden and the Holocaust.

      Another absurdity implicit in some comments here is that, unless you expose corruption of every kind at every level, you cannot have made a serious contribution, which is obviously absurd. Anyone who offers such insinuations has to have their own agenda, which is other than exposing the truth about JFK, 9/11, Wellstone and more. Spare me.

      I welcome criticism, but it has to be serious. If you think I have something wrong, then identify what I say and why I say it, then explain what I have wrong and how you know. That form of criticism I can respect, but gratuitous smears based upon massive ignorance of the Obama administrations obsession with gun control, for example, doesn't cut it--for me or any other serious scholar.

    3. Fetzer's General FAILURE(S) Of Science, Observation, Induction

      Prof.: We've noted ur serious and significant short-comings over and over--so let's go over them once again.

      1. Regarding the specific conspiracies, JFK, 9/11, Sandy hoax, u often provide exhaustive, even tedious listings of details, BUT u don't cover that particular detail which over-looks and -shadows the others, which is CENTRAL-BANKING, as we've noted for u, giving ref.s, too, and saying how and why.

      For how is it the mass corp. Jews-media so consistently and overwhelmingly pushes ZOG's agenda?--they're OWNED--by who?--the powers associated w. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilaterals, and Bilderbergers--HOW?--by means of the legalized COUNTERFEITING, the top criminal enterprise which literally owns and controls our culture, not only the ENTIRE mass corp. Jews-media, but public edjumacation too, of which u're unfortunate product, the blind leading the blinded people.

      For just consider, just for Sandy hoax alone, the massive, incredible, and prodigious spending and financing which went into it all, planning for yrs, bringing the people and families into the local area, making all the pay-offs, buying all the houses, bribing all the officials, bureaucrats, politicians, and judges.

      2. Thus u FAIL to grasp the nature and implications of the large culture in Spenglerian "Decline of the West," in its horrific HUBRIS and satanism, satanism entailing extreme subjectivism, the large culture and society now LITERALLY captured and held hostage by these criminal COUNTERFEITERS calling themselves "bankers"--a captivity in effect for over a hundred yrs now fm the infamous Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (see and for expo).

      3. Thus u're guilty of FAILURE of science and logic in way of (a) noting ALL the facts and details, and then (b) INDUCTION to proper conclusion.

      4. Another gross FAILURE is ur (typical) refusal to consider Judaic Talmud which explicitly teaches this satanism, (extreme) subjectivism, and literal criminality, war against humanity (gentiles).

      5. U FAIL to observe the gross satanism (extreme subjectivism) of the general culture in way of mass popular entertainment and also for politics and legal developments--this when there are many, many others (as on u-tube) who easily make these simple observations which u would only need to cite.

      6. U FAIL to appreciate and grasp the genuine and substantial PHILOSOPHIC value of the people's traditional Christianity, writing it off, ignoring, and patronizing it as mere "religion."

      So u see how u so egregiously FAIL, esp. for ur pretense to philosophy, one who properly grasps perspective and CONTEXT for all the pertinent details. There are other problems too, for example, ur muddled grasp of ethics and basic metaphysics, but I just emphasize the main and immediate problems, failure of proper induction, failure to grasp the culture-wide satanism/subjectivism/hubris, and that egregious specific failure regarding central-banking.

    4. If this were recast by suggesting that there is always more corruption to expose, including that of the KCS (Khazarian Crime Syndicate)--about which my friend and colleague, Preston James, publishes so much--then by all means, let me join in recommending his work. Here is a nice sample: "The hidden history of the incredibly evil Khazarian Mafia"

      I can certainly endorse the idea that Preston has been covering the issues that seem to matter the most to apsterian. I therefore recommend that he read Preston's work and comment on it and be the first to recommend it TO GET THE COMPLETE PICTURE. I agree with almost everything that he (Preston) writes. But his interests and mine are not the same. They are complementary, I would say, and to that extent, I recommend his work, too. But it is a bit of stretch to fault Jim Fetzer for not being Preston James, just as it would be absurd to fault Preston for not doing the kind of research that I do, which my history has exemplified.


    5. Fetzer, PREDICATABLY, Diverts From Pertinent Issues

      It has NOTHING, first of all, to doing w. "Khazarians"; it has first of all to do w. the horrific criminal enterprise of legalized COUNTERFEITING, known as central-banking which Fetzer TOTALLY overlooks in considering all the details fm which then to INDUCT to proper general theory.

      "Khazarians" come into it all secondarily, esp. as they're such consummate criminals, so integrally organized, w. sublime philosophy and justification for their criminal, satanic, and murderous activities--the Talmud--see and for best expo.

      The other items to be observed along w. the Sandy hoax details would include the other fake "shootings" and incidents like at Boston marathon, Charleston, SC, the "Eliot Roger" incident, etc., all in conjunction w. this strategic and essential financial instrument which is NECESSARILY at the bottom of it all, the various psy-ops incidents within the larger, overall psy-ops treatment.

      So we see Fetzer is simply out-of-his-element for proper scientific/philosophic grasp in general for overall command and observation of all the pertinent details upon which then one INDUCTS for proper general theory.

    6. I like your outlook, apsterian, but on Jim here I disagree. There were some things about the physics of 911 with which I felt Jim was wrong on, but I don't think he is a gatekeeper or a disinfo artist.

      The "higherups" in the globalist crime structure are ever more visible and identifiable than the lowly crisis actors are. We already know who they are, and so do you.

      On top of that, no one knows everything and thus it is incumbent upon each individual to be their own expert and sort the information out no matter where it comes from. Don't expect Jim to have all of the knowledge and wisdom of God.

    7. Fetzer sure enlightened me! ( Thanks Fetzer. ) And it got me to your post Apsterian. Great points about A L L that money and the FED etc. A house divided cannot stand is how I look at Fetzer. In my humble opinion you both have done humanity a great service, enlightening us working poor sheeple.

    8. Unfortunatley Fukushima makes it all mute...

  6. Don't drink the ashkeNAZI Khazar koolaid------or should I say any of it because its all koolaid.

    Beware of the Alien Nation- Scorpions
    EL-ohim---"Behold the man has become as one of "us" to know what is good and evil. Unfortunately not even they (the counterfeit) know what good and evil is.
    Thank God EPOCH 6 is nearing the end.

  7. Don't drink the ashkeNAZI Khazar koolaid------or should I say any of it because its all koolaid.

    Beware of the Alien Nation- Scorpions
    EL-ohim---"Behold the man has become as one of "us" to know what is good and evil. Unfortunately not even they (the counterfeit) know what good and evil is.
    Thank God EPOCH 6 is nearing the end.

  8. Mr. Fetzer: Not to speak for Apsterian but I think in condensed version, we must do more than strike at the branches, we have to get at the root of it all. The entire criminal and immoral conspiracy.

    I think he thinks you should be as candid as Brother Nathanael. Let it all hang out.

    1. David, Fair enough! But how am I go get a handle on a series of assertions for which he offers no arguments? Let me illustrate with two of his complaints as follow:

      3. Thus u're guilty of FAILURE of science and logic in way of (a) noting ALL the facts and details, and then (b) INDUCTION to proper conclusion.

      As a philosopher of science and professor of logic, I have published and taught extensively on deductive and inductive reasoning, especially what is known as
      "inference to the best explanation", which I discuss in the Prologue. What am I supposed to have wrong?

      I would be surprised if apterian could even define the properties that distinguish inductive from deductive reasoning. Certainly, although he has asserted this AGAIN AND AGAIN, I have seen nothing to give the least indication he knows what he is talking about. I am therefore at a loss as to how to respond.

      4. Another gross FAILURE is ur (typical) refusal to consider Judaic Talmud which explicitly teaches this satanism, (extreme) subjectivism, and literal criminality, war against humanity (gentiles).

      On the contrary, I have addressed the (important) distinction between Talmidic Judaism and Torah Judaism, where everything I have learned about the former causes me grave concerns about anyone who would embrace its doctrines. But that cannot be said about the latter, where apsterian, so far as I can see, draws no distinctions between them: they are all JEWS and therefore despicable!

      How am I to countenance such extreme anti-Semitism? I am critical of the policies and actions of the government of Israel across a wide range of issues, which I frequently address on "False Flag Weekly News", which is presented every Thursday from 11-Noon/ET (10-11 AM/CT).

      So what am I missing? I seem to recall apsterian has commented on my interview with David Duke, "IQ, Race and Politics" on The Real Deal, where the Talmudic/Torah distinction is addressed. But I am not an anti-Semite and cannot embrace his world view. I have no idea what more you would have me do. Brother Nathanael does his thing; I do mine.

    2. David, your comment has led me to appreciate that apsterian is concerned about the broader historical and cultural context within which events like Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing take place. I agree that there is more to be said, where I am doing my best to clarify exactly what happened and did not happen as a necessary precondition to assigning responsibility and blame.

      I can carry this only so far with regard to Sandy Hook (the teachers, School Board, CT State Police, Governor, US Attorney General and the President of the US), 9/11 (Bush, Cheney, the Neo-Cons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad) and so forth.

      The kinds of issues that remain concern the role of those players within a broader context of political and financial interests, the forces behind the scene who are pulling the strings and such. I am doing what I can to carry these issues as far as I can, where I appreciate what others (such as Preston James and Peter Dale Scott) are doing with those larger concerns. So I get it and agree that their work is of enormous importance, too.

    3. Mr. Fetzer: I don't think anti-semitism actually exist as the Jews are not a race but a tribe tied to a religion. I would even gather Duke would state no difference between Talmudic and Torah Jews as to be able to move to Israel, one has to be a Jew. Israel checks and traces DNA. Further, perhaps Duke has spoke of Elaine Kagan, appointed to the USSC only because she is a Jew as a undistinguished jurist. Jews over-represent their kind in career choices by 2500 percent! There is no anti-semitism.

      As far Apsterian, I think he wordsmiths as some of his meme is hard to follow. However, his global view of what is going on today is pretty accurate. For example, in your educated opinion, what is the ultimate goal of promoting gun grabbing legislation?

      Thanks for your kind replies.


    4. Fetzer: EXPOSED As Pompous, Senile, Ignorant Old Fool, Nothing More

      Well, this dialectic shows us some interesting things regarding Fetzer and his understanding of the Jew and satanist captivity of what's left of gentile, Christian, and Western culture, degenerated so horribly now into such gross hubris in "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.

      And Jews are race indubitably if they steadily mate w. one another over numerous generations, which is what's happened. "Anti-semitism" ought to be understood the way Jews construe it--ANTI-JEW--works for me.

      But surely most of all we're confronted w. the amazing, abysmal, sheer ignorance of Fetzer regarding Jews and Judaism, Fetzer making a non-existent and absolutely moronic "distinction" btwn Tamudic Judaism and Torah Judaism, ho ho ho ho. For Judaism = Talmudism (= subjectivism and satanism), by definition.

      It's true there's slight problem of equivocation for meaning of word, "Jew," as some of the original (Roman) writers tended to call all the denizens of Judea, "Jews"--when "Jews" (esp. nowadays) are properly understood as followers of Pharisees and Talmud, distinct fm Judeans, "Jews" the followers of Pharisees who were only about 5% or so (the middle-class) of people of Judea, Judeans, at time of Christ.

      There are no "Torah Jews," though there are a few supposed descendents of Judeans who reject the Talmud, who call themselves "Karaites," but these Karaites so few now as to be utterly insignificant. See also Gosp. MATT, ch. 15, where Christ identifies and distinguishes Pharisees for their heresies.

      Otherwise, Fetzer just lies when he says he can't figure-out what's meant regarding his failure to considering all the evidence and info regarding basic facts of Sandy hoax, including (a) the element of CENTRAL-BANKING, as I plainly described, (b) as well as the other items regarding the other, similar, fraudulent psy-ops, including Boston bombing, Charleston, SC, "shootings," "Eliot Roger shootings," etc.

      The senile old fool (Fetzer) then says he'd be surprised if anyone undertood the diff. btwn induction and deduction.

      So we see Fetzer is so idiotically pompous--and surely quite SENILE, truth be told--it's pretty useless talking to someone like him, ho ho ho. But at least we get the truth out, regarding Fetzer's miserably flawed analysis, and the joke is on those poor people who depend on such as Fetzer who imagine he's only one who knows anything about science or logic or reasoning, etc.

    5. A few dozen arrests and prosecutions of key individuals would take care of nearly all of it. For example, just six arrests and successful prosecutions in the MSM area would wipe that wing of the KM out entirely.

    6. apsterian, you went to far here and lost your high ground with all of the name calling.

    7. Ap - thin-skinned? You were doin' alright then ya' lost it and me.

  9. Professor James Fetzer: When posters above are permitted to post under fictitious or fake or phony or assumed names or aliases, like apsterian or Anonymous or “sumerian god king”, who could all even be the same person posting for all one knows, they are posting in the same vein as the powers which use secrecy, imposed at the point of a gun, to prevent truthful facts about Sandy Hook from being provided to you and others to make intelligent and truthful decisions and conclusions. The mentality is exactly that of a common street criminal robbing a store in the darkness of night with a mask on in order to hide his or her identity so they can’t be brought to justice for their crimes. Posting anonymously brings no, zero risk, to the poster, while allowing them to use endless ad hominem attacks or meaningless attacks and discussion to divert attention from the basic issues of the proof and arguments you make. It is nothing but one sided propaganda garbage. I urge you to stop indulging them and require that all posters must fully identify themselves with true name, address and telephone number before they are provided your permission to participate in your blog at your expense, not theirs. To do otherwise, as you have done is like allowing a criminal with a mask on to enter your own home. You would not do that. Why do it here? Continued below.
    Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

  10. Continued from above:
    We know from basic psychology of people that when one is not identified, they can and do all sorts of unconscionable acts because they lose and risk nothing by not being identified. This is “crowd” behavior masked by a crowd. In fact, is not this the very essence of the concept of a “false flag” in the first instance, where, for example, the old pirate ships would put up the flag of another on the mast with the intentions of fooling others about who was doing the looting and cheating and stealing and crimes, etc.? All those who are not fully identified by true name, address and telephone number, must be banned and prevented from posting garbage just as you would prevent such thugs from entering your own home. All this is exactly the same insidious mentality as government itself, like the CIA or State Department or Pentagon or president, etc., using secrecy, imposed at the point of a gun, or the officials in Connecticut using secrecy, imposed at the point of a gun, where the full military force and power of government is being used against you or any other citizen seeking the truth about taxpayer funded, also at the point of a gun, activities conducted in secret, behind closed doors to prevent truthful facts and information from seeing the light of truth and the light of day. In fact, if secrecy had not been government imposed at the point of a gun, all your efforts at writing this book and the many accompanying articles would likely have been rendered unnecessary and moot. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    1. Forget The WHO; Rather, Think About The WHAT, Moron

      Winfield never has been very bright, and I continue to be amazed he possesses a Ph.d in ANYTHING, ho ho ho.

      But Winfield, just think about this, old chap: it doesn't matter WHO says what, or what are the credentials or other circumstances, etc.--IT ONLY COUNTS WHAT IS SAID, fool--that's what u need to think about, u idiot.

    2. apsterian, I have been very patient with you. When you attack and belittle me, that is one thing; but to attack and belittle others posting here is another. I am telling you to cease and desist that practice. If you can't find a way to make points without these nasty remarks, take them elsewhere.

    3. What?--"nasty remarks"?--what's so "nasty" about them?--aren't they ABSOLUTELY TRUE?--is that what's soooooo "nasty" about them? Why shouldn't dear little Winfield take his "elsewhere"?

    4. I don't do social media in general and only grudgingly have a Disqus account, so I had to post as an anonymous here. As a result, no one can tell which posts are mine. I generally post by my real name and much prefer it that way.

      But the advantage of anonymous posting for a site like this is that it allows unbridled opinion making, unbridled idea presentation, and unbridled evidentiary introduction, all without fear of retribution.

      With benefits and drawbacks either way, all told I am neutral on the matter.

    5. Jim, do you think you could block this pratt apsterian. I think you've been more than generous to him and I think most might agree that he's primarily there to disrupt, probably a DHS disrupter. As a friend can I ask you block him? Cheers Allan Powell

    6. Another Jewwy, Jewwified, Jew-friendly, piece-of-shit troll here, folks--they're LEGION, and will be till the fiat-money system finally collapses--the way these things go.

  11. Dr. Fetzer,

    Got a new false flag for you: the Sandy Hook of storms, Patricia.

    A CAT 5 storm that does very little damage? No deaths? This was hyped as the storm of all storms by the National Hurricane Center backing it up with satellite imagery from NASA, NOAA, and National Weather Service.

    Well, the imagery LOOKED like CAT 5, but the results certainly didn't. Do a Google image search on past CAT 4 & CAT 5 storms, then do one on Patricia. The images are nowhere in the same league. The absence of roof damage is like the absence of helicopters and rushing EMTs at Sandy Hook. It's BOGUS.

    Then there's the very curious GAG ORDERS issued by the good old USG forbidding anyone from the NWS, NOAA, etc. for speaking against the company line.

    a good breakdown from Jim Stone:

    "Final answer at the end of the day: There WAS NO HURRICANE. This was a lie from start to finish. It made landfall nowhere. It dissipated into a tropical depression 100 miles out at sea after barely becoming a tropical storm. This fake cane was just a load of bunk to support the climate scam. Only a little rain in Guadalajara, only a little rain in Guanajuato, only rain even in Puerto Vallarta, which the eye passed over. Many witnesses are wondering WTF happened to this storm, which never existed. It is OFF THE TV. It is NOT ON DRUDGE, and out of the news TOTALLY. It is not even in news flashes.

    OFFICIAL TALLY: Zero deaths, zero property damage. The entire coast is populated from start to finish. There is no way for any real hurricane to have a tally of ZERO.

    Even if, as the prevailing damage control lie goes: "the hurricane was extremely compact and had only category 1 winds 15 miles away from the eye wall," we have the leading edge, at 30 miles wide, full cat 5, and the sides for another 30, for a cat 5 to category 1 total distance 60 miles. WHERE IS THE DEVASTATION? There is not one downed house, not one washed out road, not one flipped over car when cars should have been missiles and the ENTIRE coast is populated. Who is pushing this crap about a record hurricane? ANSWER:

    Climate scammers who want a "world record hurricane" on the books for the climate change/carbon tax agenda, that is who.... This hoax hurricane arrived two days after the U.S. federal government threatened all people at NOAA and other weather agencies that if they went against the "official word" they would be jailed for breaking a gag order."

  12. Freudian slip:

    “Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown,” Obama said. “And Australia just said, well, that’s it, WE'RE NOT DOING, we’re not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.”


    "And Australia just said.."
    "And (the country's officials) just said..."

    "We're not doing - (that again)!"
    "We're not doing - (a mass shooting again)!"
    "(We're not staging a fake shooting again)!"

    "And the country's officials just said...We're not staging a fake shooting again!"

    Oh, the tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive.

  13. Fullest Theory, Explanation Of Sandy Hoax Requires All Pertinent Details

    So, to sum-up for Fetzer's work here on Sandy hoax, we observe the limited, local details given by Fetzer are all fairly, quite true, far as they go--which isn't too far, truth be told. For the details are too limited.

    And at least one extremely pertinent detail is missing, that being the CENTRAL-BANKING element, but which crucially accounts for the TREMENDOUS expenditures involved for financing this gross travesty of conspiracy and fraud by all the players, local and Federal.

    Another crucial detail is that Sandy hoax is one of a number of other extremely similar such frauds and psy-ops--like Boston marathon bombing, Charleston, SC "shootings," "Eliot Roger" "shootings," and many others too.

    For these details, above-noted, are necessary to answer question regarding the amazing ENORMITY of the Sandy hoax event, involving the collusion and co-operation of all the players involved, local police, state troopers, Feds, school officials, bureaucrats, politicians, and judges, and including the corp. entities and media who get so much funding fm gov. sources, etc.

    For necessary INDUCTION then is the absolutely satanic nature of the conspiracy of Sandy hoax, and including also the larger conspiracy which Sandy hoax was integral part, this for overthrow of US Constitution and state and national sovereignty of USA under one-world gov. run by afore-mentioned financial criminals at the top of things.

    And this larger, satanic conspiracy then has to do more specifically w. the internal motive, leadership, and basic energy of the satanists led by foremost satanists, the Jews, followers of the Talmud, satanism being essentially extreme subjectivism.

    Such then are the FULL details of Sandy hoax which must be considered for most accurate and informative THEORY, rationale, and explanation of things. Sandy hoax is truly integral event and particular piece of larger, more general "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.

    1. Yeah, no shit, Sherlock The satanic cabal did it for money. Great deductive reasoning. Go find an editor because you read like an ass.

    2. stupid puke, issue is what constitutes "satanic cabal," dumbass, and why/how. U don't like how it "reads"?--then don't read, stupid scum. U're the ass, moron.

    3. apsterian, you seem to think you are the king of how to get something across to the people so why don't you show us by starting your own website or blog. after a period of time you can come back and tell us how you did but you know what? most of us here will care less then than we do now. go find somewhere else to spread the bullshit that dribbles from your mouth. asswipe

  14. Fetzer Needs To Interview Hoffman

    This is serious suggestion: Fetzer ought to have Michael A. Hoffman II on his show for extensive int-view on subject of Jews and their filthy, satanic Talmud. Hoffman would undoubtedly consent to come-on and be int-viewed, and Fetzer would even find Hoffman himself is a "revisionist" on subject of holohoax, Hoffman himself having written a good deal on it.

    Fetzer can ck-out Hoffman for credentials, etc., on Hoffman's blogs at and, also,

    Fetzer will learn there are no non-Talmudic Jews w. questionable exception of "Reform" Jews who claim not to follow Talmud, but who do follow their own midrash (interpretation of Torah in accord w. "Oral law Tradition," repudiated by Christ). And of course, all Jews of race support and defend Talmudic Jews--otherwise they wouldn't call themselves "Jews."

    1. OK. I have visited his web site and he looks like an interesting guest to feature. So I have invited him to come on the show and suggested two dates in early November to discuss Judaism, distinctions between Talmudic and Torah Jews and other issues related to our exchange here.

    2. It's good to see that rather than chase open anti- semitic bigots from your blog, you openly engage with then and are responsive to their needs.

      Then again, you are a holocasut denier, so what was I to expect! You might only be a small cog in the larger machine, Fetzer, but you should be proud to do your part in keeping the "Final Solution" alive! Congrats.

    3. I don't get it. Exposing lies, deceit and deception in the process of getting history right IS BAD and the preservation of false historical narratives IS GOOD? I am sorry, but your sense of values and mine are at opposite ends. You can believe what you want, but some of us care about the truth and are will to apply our background and abilities to ferreting it out, even when it involves some of the most sacred beliefs of our time. If the Holocaust was real, then research will support it; and if it was not, then the world deserves to know.

    4. It would be a good thing if that's what you were doing, obviously. Instead you're just lying and entertaining bigotry.

      Maybe you in fact do believe your own BS and anomaly hunting "reasoning"? But even if you do, entertaining anti-semites (and worse ones who write "ho ho ho" after every fucking word they type) is inexcusable. I'm sure your Jewish students felt they could get a fair shake from you, right! Disgusting.

      I really hope the low-standard postmodern academic philosophy movement is wholly over as it produced too many "academics" like yourself who've not only failed to add anything to civilization, but have markedly detracted from it by positing that truth is unknowable so "anything goes".

      You will not be missed.

    5. steve12, there is not a single constructive thing that you have added to this discussion. Not one, and yoiu are indeed the bigot here, not Fetzer.

  15. Just goes to show how uselss 90% of academic philosophy is these days. Dennett himself has written more rigorous and interesting thoughts in one book than this clown and almost every one of his ilk combined have in their entire career. Money that could be better spent on science faculty that actually, ya know, do something.

    1. Conventional academicians like Daniel Dennett don't get into the trenches to sort out the controversial and complex issues of our time, which include JFK, 9/11, Wellstone, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing. So what's the point of citing him here?

      As a participant in a recent conference, "Academic Freedom: Are there limits to inquiry?", where JFK, 9/11 and the Holocaust were used as illustrations, I began to study the official narrative and the results astonished me: there are 236 references to 6,000,000 Jews in serious plights or fear of loss of their lives in the international press prior to The Nuremberg Tribunals beginning as early as 1890!

      And a distinguished historian of science in the UK, Nicholas Kollerstrom, has published BREAKING THE SPELL about the records of the International Committee of the Red Cross, which were updated in 1993, and document 297,081 deaths from all causes combined in all the camps. That has caused me to look closer.

      It also turns out that scientific research based upon the laws of biochemistry and of materials science support the inference that, had Zyklon B been used to gas large numbers of inmates, their bodies would have turned pink and the wall of the chambers where it happened turned blue. But we have no reports of pink bodies; and the only chambers that turned blue were those used for delousing, which was being done to kill body lice and prevent the spread of typhus--that is, to maintain health and hygiene in the camps--which were actually labor camps and not centers for extermination. You can't get any work out of a corpse.

      For those who want to learn more, I have published four chapters by experts on the Holocausts in my most recent book before this, AND I SUPPOSE WE DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, EITHER? (2015). The public deserves to know the truth about their own and world history--which they are only going to learn from unconventional scholars who are willing to take on real issues to expose unpleasant truths and the lies, deceit and deception by our own government.

    2. I've read some of this. If you can stomach the Gish Gallop and follow a few of the evidence threads, they evaporate. The evidence is always shit or anomaly based. Type-Os, unexplained notes, what "should have" happened (w/o an experiment to show it), eyewitness accounts, etc.

      There are so many "anomalies" in these things that you can nary cover them all. The tell tale that they're BS is the more or less equal weighting. In science, all evidence is not equal. In conspiracy culture (there is no science here), it's one "unexplained" thing after the other, but no smoking guns. . That's usually an indicator that it's bullshit. This give the appearance of convergence, but each piece is equally weak.

      So, I go after the bigger picture. When the ledger doesn't add up at the end, it doesn't matter how many calculations seemed right - something is off. There's no BS vortex to get pulled into with, no 750 books to read (which is an obfuscation tactic, of course).

    3. "Conventional academicians like Daniel Dennett don't get into the trenches to sort out the controversial and complex issues of our time"

      How the brain works is so unimportant. One cool thing tough: it actually exists. So there's that

    4. Yikes! Not only are you ignorant about the facts of Sandy Hook and that conventional academicians will not touch JFK, 9/11, Sandy Hook and other complex and controversial issues of our time, but you have no knowledge of my history as an author and scholar.

      I have over two-dozen books on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science and evolution and mentality. My curriculum vitae is easily accessible at

      Try AI: ITS SCOPE AND LIMITS (1990), PHILOSOPHY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE (2nd edition, 1996), or COMPUTERS AND COGNITION (2001). And check out THE EVOLUTION OF INTELLIGENCE (2005), where I explain the emergence of human mind from animal mind within the framework of the concept of minds as sign-using (or "semiotic") systems.

      Why someone like Steve12 wants to publish public posts about matters about which he is completely ignorant is beyond me, but I am discovering there is a lot of that going around these days--and he is not the exception but closer to the rule.

    5. "rigorous and interesting thoughts"

      If you are bored, then leave. If you want rigor, I suggest you go read a basic math textbook.

      I am going to go ahead and call you a useless idiot along with steve12 (that is his IQ).

  16. So no one could answer my question in the last thread:

    Why would a cabal in possession of so much power (inlcluding weather control and alien weaponry) that they have control over almost all human affairs be afraid of changing gun laws?

    It's a very fair, reasonable, and pedestrian question. No one could answer. OK.

    I'll move on to another.

    What mass shooting was NOT a fake? What mass shooting actually checks out? Just a nut goes and shoots a place up. Any? Aame for natural disaster NOT caused by HAARP, assassinations, etc.

    I want know: what events are just life - just shit happens?

    1. I think you need to get the facts straight before you indulge in speculation. Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill to promote gun control. Look at the blizzard of anti-gun orders Obama has signed since. As I explain above, he signed 23 EXECUTIVE ORDERS already on 16 January 2013!

      He and Holder have been obsessed with gun control for a very long time. We have Holder on video at a Democratic Women's Convention in Washington, D.C., in 1995 talking about the necessity to "brainwash" the public to change its attitudes about guns. That was his word, not mine: BRAINWASH--in 1995!

      And they seem to have done a pretty good job with you, because you appear to be incapable of accepting evidence even when it is abundant, detailed and compelling. Perhaps you should go to the Capitol and sit down with Obama and explain to him why he should not be so preoccupied with guns?

      You exemplify the coulda/woulda/shoulda response of many who can't deal with the truth. The fact is that Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill to promote gun control. WE EVEN HAVE THE MANUAL. So you might want to give this matter just a little more thought, because you don't seem to have a clue.

    2. As someone mentioned to you already, this power is based on consent. The scam is based on a thin veneer. When the power elite decide they no longer want or need the people's consent, barriers will have to removed to further their agenda. I could play your immature game of why we have elections with dumb and dumber and nothing of positive substance changes. Why hold elections then?

    3. OK David. Two questions.
      1.Do you buy into the more "out there" stuff about the gov't having weather control and alien technology?

      2. Do you believe in a secret cabal or group that appoints leaders for us and fixes the political system?

    4. Let me ask you a question before I answer yours. Do you think the elite's power is based primarily on consent now?

    5. No. Now please answer mine

    6. Warren Christopher thought weather wars were happening. What do consider alien technology?

      I don't operate on beliefs but stated or known facts. However, if anyone follows along, it is rather evident the power elite pick the candidates. Haven't you heard the richest 140 families fund both parties. Ever heard of the Citizens United ruling?

    7. Other defining characteristic of the conspiracy theorist: cannot answer a simple...fucking... question. Everything is some postmodern Socratic breakdown.

      I believe we are essentially an oligarchy due to moneyed interests, and I can show specifically how financial / politics shenanigans are being perpetrated as evidence for that position. I know all about income inequality, the SCOTUS CU ruling, etc. Sounds like we may even agree on much of it.

      You, however, cannot even answer the simple fucking questions of whether the gov't or some secret cabal (1) can control the weather and (2) has alien technology.

      What do I consider alien technology?????? WHAT???? Technology from alien beings!!!!

      I mean, what is that? Why can't you people ever answer a fucking Q?

    8. I guess that's the thing: if you never give a definitive answer, you're never staked to anything, and you can never be shown as wrong. All kidding aside about you being unwilling to answer Qs, it is probably THE foundational problem of conspiracy theorists for a scientist: lack of falsification.

      That said, it is annoying when someone makes their argument unassailable by having no assertions!

    9. So says the poster by the name Anonymous. The irony is rather thick. I am one of the few on this site with a real name posting. And your hostility doesnt move other than turn the ignore button unless you knock it off and start acting like a rational person.

    10. Again, can't answer a fucking question.

      "Do you think someone is controlling the weather"?

      Wait - let me ask you a question first!
      What do you mean aliens?
      You're anonymous!
      You're hostile!

      Un-fucking-believeable, you people are.

      I answered you're fucking questions but you refuse to answer mine. That's sort of hostile if you ask me!

    11. I am replying to the do things just happen or are they orchestrated? I live in Australia. I know the effect taking our guns away has had. If Americans want the kind of stress levels we now endure go ahead and control guns. You have been warned.

    12. It appears that chemtrails and weather modification are causally connected, that the chemtrails are being used to deposit particles of aluminum, barium and strontium in the atmosphere, where the aluminum can be heated by sources like HAARP to create high-pressure zones that can be used to manage the location of low-pressure zones that would bring rain water to specific regions. But it is a bit complicated and I am not surprised most of the public hasn't a clue.

    13. My bad - I did not see this. Can you send some links? Do you know some events where this has been used as a weapon?

    14. My bad - I did not see this. Can you send some links? Do you know some events where this has been used as a weapon?

    15. "Why would a cabal in possession of so much power (inlcluding weather control and alien weaponry) that they have control over almost all human affairs be afraid of changing gun laws?"

      I will answer your question right here:

      Because as of now they would be taken out and shot, and they don't want that to happen.

      Doh ... (drool-splut) <= that's you, dude. d:-p

      Jim Fetzer has done a very good job here. If you don't like what he has written, then you are either one of the criminals, an overly suspicious truther like apsterian, or a sleeping sheeple. Nobel Prize winner, you ain't.

  17. Obama and Holder? Aren't they figureheads of the cabal?

    Jim - do you not believe your own bullshit or what's the story here?

    1. You're a troll. You will argue whatever is answered. Shut up and go away.

    2. I'm a troll for asking him if he believes someone is controlling the weather? You don't know what a troll is

    3. I'm a troll when I say that you guys have probably never kissed a girl. That's fair

  18. And can anyone answer a goddman direct, simple question here? You'll prattle on for an hour on a shadow or some detail that you don't really understand, but you can't answer "What event it not a conspiracy?"

  19. I answered your question to question two rather clearly and if you don't like my answer to question one, tough tomatoes.

  20. "Warren Christopher thought weather wars were happening" is not an answer to the question "do you believe someone's controlling the weather"

    Do you really need to be told this?

    When you ask me a question, at least I have the courage to answer....

    1. Whoa, you answered with the word "no." What conviction! I think when someone like Christopher acknowledged in the 1990's there are weather wars going on then it is quite plausible that weather modification programs exist.

    2. I said more than that, but whatever...

      And the alien technology? Like pulling teeth. Do you know what you think?

      While I'm at it - does a cabal control all the world's gov'ts?

      This all goes toward your claims about rule by consent

  21. Let's open this up. This is fascinating.

    Jim: do you think that someone is controlling the weather?

  22. Jennifer Anniston? Really? Does anybody have any
    interest in what that feeble-brained moron thinks?

    She has been artificially supported longer than Disco.

    Or, even Julia Roberts: another sell-out Clown with
    no discernible talent.

    1. She was one of 15 or more who participated in the ad. When I discovered it on "Occupy Democrats", I put up links to my "The Real Deal must see Sandy Hook update", "The Real Deal must see Boston bombing update" and a couple of articles and, to my astonishment, within 24 hours, it had been taken down.

    2. Huh! Well what do you know? Gone in 24 hrs. you say? Huh! I wonder why? It must of been a pretty expensive ad. Huh. Right after your links were attached telling, "the real deal." Huh, that's weird. I wonder why they would just pull it like that? "Mother should I trust the government?" - Pink Floyd

  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

  24. This comment has been removed by the author.

  25. What do you have to do to get a comment removed at this blog?

  26. Keep eff bombing and your general hostile presentation style and you'll be find out soon enough.

    1. And as an aside - the F word is to communicate my extreme annoyance with your lack of transparency and communicativness on a DISCUSSION blog. You come here to DISCUSS, then refuse to.

      In my world, that's an Fbomb-worthy offense. But I'll clean up my language with you since you don't possess a sufficiently hardy constitution to handle

    2. Golly gee, but everyone is so thrilled to be asked stupid kike questions by stupid kike. Stupid kike can't figure-out why anyone isn't thrilled by the kike, ho ho ho ho

  27. You can find the time to type this but you can't answer simple questions? Does the F-word hurt you feelings? Grow up and have an adult conversation.

    I can't imagine having a world view that I am terrified to discuss w/ others who do not agree. What else explains your (et al.) reason for dodging every...single...question

    1. Stupid Jew filth scum--that's what u are, get it?

  28. Try again...

    So anyone want to tell me what events out there are NOT a conspiracy? This is one way to test the anomaly hunting method that you guys use to analyze details. What event has been analyzed and stands up as being what it appears to be - a shooting, a weather event, a plane crash, etc.

    If every single event is a conspiracy, then the method can't be valid - that's my assumption here.

    So let me hear it. What's NOT a conspiracy?

    1. Kike: don't u have Palestinians to mass-murder?

    2. I mean, after all, kike: there are humans who go about their business, and there are u kike scum criminals who are criminals by ur religion (Talmud), and so there's war of humanity against u jew filth, right?--dincha' know that, kike?

    3. What happened to "ho ho ho" Mel Gibson? It was corny and stupid, but it was.... so "you" - ya know?

      Maybe you're trying to take some feedback from someone with a life in some hope that you'll get laid? No dice kid - chicks don't dig reclusive Unibomber-like obsessives like you. Save up some $$$ and get a prostitute. It'll relax you a little so you can thin about something other than Jews for 10 minutes.

  29. I got the unibomber description right, didn't I? The obsessive nature? It's not just the Jews, is it Apsterian? No - you have some issues with obsessions, don't you? And that has had some costs in your personal life, especially where "the ladies" are concerned, ha? It can be a little lonely - I get it.

    1. What's this, kike?--u're ASKING me, a mere gentile? Ho ho ho ho ho--now u see why we laugh so much, eh? Ho ho ho o ho ho ho. "Issues w. obsessions"?--if u say so, kike, ho ho ho ho

    2. What are you, Santa Claus? *yawn*

  30. You were eff bombing prior to my unfortunate choice to engage with you. Also, it is more than apparent you lack the character to avoid not using improper communication skills.

    1. What do u expect fm Jews?--do u doubt these are CRIMINALS (a) and psychopaths (b), this by nature of their religion? Thus EVERYTHING about the culture dominated by these kikes is "conspiratorial," by definition. And so naturally, kike strategy is to make us gentiles think we're deluded to think kikes are criminal monsters, murderers, and psychopaths. We gentiles are only wrong for tolerating Jew filth in first place--against our ancestors' advice.

  31. This article,

    Saturday, October 24, 2015
    Prologue: Sandy Hook: Was it reality or an illusion?
    NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control (2015)
    by Jim Fetzer

    Is the best, most complete, most factual article on Sandy Hook to date.

    It is a shame that the comments area seems to be contaminated by those who do not want to discuss this article but rather continue their infestation here and most other recent articles on this blog.

  32. The evidence given to paint Sandy Hook as a hoax is pretty convincing. I was pro-gun even before reading this, and I still oppose gun control now. Even if there was a Sandy Hook, there had to have been a left-wing conspiracy behind it just to publicize it as "proof" that guns would need to be regulated. If security guards were armed, that would have stopped the murderer. Obviously this is shady business, and there must have been some sort of set up.

  33. It's not just for gun control. These criminal hoaxers have extorted tens of millions of dollars from governments via legal settlements and have defrauded the public of millions more via solicitation of donations. Criminal point man for this fraud is Bob Vance. I vote he gets waterboarded first.

  34. James, I wouldn't worry about Apsterian. Just a jealous racist troll-boy with delusions of grandeur. As soon as "his" exhaustively-documented books - which completely cover everything he conjectures about - are published, then we'll finally have the whole truth! (Waiting... waiting... waiting...) Ahem, well, until then, your books are incredibly awesome...

    1. Righto, stupid kike troll puke, ho ho ho--way to suck-up. And "racism" is virtue of LOYALTY, moron--ck any dictionary, scum--the 5th of original Ten Commandments, "honor thy parentage (race)."

  35. Thanks for the post. The guns are supposed to be the means of safety and safeguard and not the means of killing others. People who are really concerned about the safety may simply join the Firearms safety training classes and get the license to carry that firearm to safeguard everyone.

  36. Dear Prof. Fetzer,
    There is something you need to be AWARE of. You may have heard about some of the die-offs occuring in our oceans, but most have no understanding of how catastrophic the actual reality is. Go to: '' and look at this mans staggering contribution in revealing the truth of Fukushima RADIATION on the west coast, which has killed most life in the North Pacific in just 4.5 yrs. Fukushima is pouring radiation into the sea NON-STOP 24/7 365. We are facing an extinction level event. There is a timeline: 1 - 5 yrs. =Animals and plants start to feel the effect. 5 - 10 yrs. = Humans begin to feel the effect. ( GET SICK AND DIE ) 10 - 20 yrs. = MASS EXTINCTION of all life in the north. 20 - 100 yrs. = The soutern hemisphere starts to see the effect. GET down south or suffer. 3 active meltouts/melt throughs with no remediation. Billions and billions of lethal doses are out in the water and air and more are added EVERY hour. Why do we just sit here in an active fallout zone? People are next. And the only thing you can do is move SOUTH. ( Please take me! ) You can give you and your family more time [ to live ] if you go down there. This is SCIENCE not fear-mongering. Prof. Fetzer, it's hard to describe how alarming it is. No live whale births in 4 yrs. Only 77 Orcas left, in the southern pod. The whales are not singing any more. They hardly ever talk at all anymore. Like somethings wrong with the enviornment.The many, many washed up whales are underwheight, malnutrition. They are starving. There is no more food in the pacific ( krill, etc. ) As they die on shore they try and suck the rocks of any nutrients... Unpresedented weather changes... affecting million yr old patterns of samon. Grizzlys living off apples, berries -no samon. Hungry. Attacking humans. It's starting...

  37. So... I don't get it really...Jim Fetzer, who, it seems to me, is one of the nicest, most honest, decent and factual investigators around, who hold scores of degrees and honors in academia, wastes his time on a blog where supposedly grown men call each other names? I don't get it...

  38. Thanks for the post people who are really concerned about their safety and the safety of their loved ones may take help from the firearms safety training so as to get proper training how to handle any firearm in case of any emergency.
    MA Gun License

  39. Thank u so much for having such a nice and entertaing stuff for us. I really enjoy your blog and the way you have describe your content.I also have some amazing and wonderful stuff and i wana to share it with you.
    World Records List