Wednesday, June 1, 2016

9/11: The Who, the How and the Why


by Jim Fetzer


"(All) the wise people in the world who are experts on American policy and who analyze the images and the videos [of 9/11] agree unanimously that what happened in the [Twin] Towers was a purely American action, planned and carried out within the U.S"--Saudi Arabian Press

Saudi Arabia has blown the whistle on the US over 9/11
It was only a matter of time. Once the infamous 28 suppressed pages of The 9/11 Commission Report (2004), which report on Saudi Arabian funding for several of the 19 alleged 9/11 hijackers--15 of whom were from Saudi Arabia, none of which were from Iraq--became the focus of public attention in the mass media and a bill had been introduced to allow US citizens to sue Saudi Arabia for its complicity in the atrocities of 9/11, it was only a matter of time before Saudi Arabia struck back by revealing that, on 9/11, the US had attacked the US in order to provide the pretext for perpetual war in the Middle East.

The plan for 9/11 appears to have originated in the fertile imagination of Benjamin Netanyahu, who was seeking a means for manipulating the United States into attacking the modern Arab states that served as a counter-balance to Israel's domination of the Middle East, which would pave the way for its eventual expansion to become "the Greater Israel" of historic Zionist aspirations that would extend from the Tigris-Euphrates to the Nile. He had already organized a conference held in Jerusalem on which Terrorism: How the West can Win (1987), long before the concept of terrorism had begun to exert its influence up the American mind.  Netanyahu has displayed political genius in bending America to do the dirty work for Israel.

Bibi at the top of his game
9/11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the Neocons in the Department of Defense (most of whom had come from the Project for a New American Century and were dual US-Israeli citizens) and the Mossad, with funding, it turns out, from Saudi Arabia. It should have struck a nerve in the US when a half-dozen or more of the alleged "hijackers" turned up alive and well the following day, making contact with the media in the UK, which David Ray Griffin, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2011), makes the first point in his classic demonstration of the deceit and deception of the 9/11 Commission by suppressing and misrepresenting key aspects of the atrocities of that day.

What this means is that the WHO and the WHY are easier to establish than the HOW, where the HOW becomes enormously important as proof about the WHO and the WHY. There are three major 9/11 research groups active today, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which has long championed the use of nanothemite in the destruction of the Twin Towers) and the Judy Wood DEW group (which focuses on the use of directed energy weapons as the means that was deployed to attack the World Trade Center). Remarkably, neither A&E911 nor the DEW group has been willing to address the WHO and the WHY--where even their explanations of the HOW appear to suffer from serious inadequacies. Only those associated with Scholars for 9/11 Truth--and, in the past, with veteranstoday.com--have addressed all three with success.

The importance of "the HOW"

The question of HOW it was done has to be the foundation for any serious investigation of the WHO and the WHY for the obvious reason: If the WTC was attacked by 19 Islamic terrorists who hijacked four commercial carriers and brought about the atrocities of 9/11 under the control of a guy in a cave in Afghanistan, as we have been told, then the case is closed! It is because the "official narrative" of 9/11 cannot be sustained that serious students have been driven to search for more adequate accounts of 9/11, which are consistent with the available relevant evidence and do not violate laws of physics, of engineering and of aerodynamics. Indeed, these violations are among the most blatant refutations of The 9/11 Commission Report (2004), because they prove that it cannot possibly be true.

The 47 massive core columns vs the external support columns
The Twin Towers incorporated an innovative "tube within a tube" design, with 47 massive core columns at the center, which were connected to the external steel support columns by steel trusses, which were filled with 4-8" of concrete (where the variance reflects that the trusses had v-shaped groves that were 4" deep, so in some places, the concrete was 4" thick but in others 8" instead. The buildings were among the most robust in the history of architecture, exceeded perhaps only by WTC-7, the infamous "Building 7", which would undergo a bona fide collapse at 5:20 PM/ET, 7 hours after the Twin Towers were demolished, even though it was hit by no plane and endured no jet fuel fires.

In "20 Reasons the 'Official Account' of 9/11 is Wrong" (veteranstoday.com, 10 September 2000), I explained some of the most basic reasons we know that what we have been told is not only false but provably false and, in crucial respects, not even scientifically possible. The impact of the planes, for example, cannot have caused enough damage to bring the buildings down, since the buildings were designed to withstand even multiple impacts by aircraft (as Frank DeMartini, the project manager, has observed), the planes alleged to have hit were similar to those they were designed to withstand, and the buildings continued to stand after those impacts with negligible effects.

Most of the jet fuel, principally kerosene, burned up in those fireballs in the first fifteen seconds or so. Below the 96th floor in the North Tower and the 80th in the South, those buildings were stone cold steel (unaffected by any fires at all other than some very modest office fires that burned around 500 degrees F), which functioned as massive heat sinks dissipating the heat from building up at specific locations of the steel. The melting point of steel at 2,800 degrees F, moreover, is about 1,000 degrees higher than the maximum burning temperature of jet-fuel-based fires, which do not exceed 1,800 degrees F under optimal conditions; but the NIST examined 236 samples of steel and found that 233 had not been exposed to temperatures above 500 degrees F and the others not above 1200.

Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., had certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000 degrees F for three or four hours without any significant effects, where these fires burned neither long enough or hot enough at an average temperature of about 500 degrees for about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in the North Tower to weaken, much less melt, any steel. And if the steel had melted or weakened, then the affected floors would have displayed completely different behavior, with some degree of asymmetrical sagging and tilting, which would have been gradual and slow, not the complete, abrupt and total demolition that was observed. Which means the NIST cannot even explain the initiation of any ”collapse” sequence. And their collapse was not even physically possible.

The Destruction of the Twin Towers

The thickness of the steel from subbasements to top floors 
The top 30 floors of the South Tower pivoted and fell to the side, turning to dust before it reached the horizontal. So it did not even exist to exert any downward pressure on the lower 80 floors. A retired high-school physics, chemistry and math teacher, Charles Boldwyn, has calculated that, if you take the top 14 floors of the North Tower as one unit of downward force, there were 199 units of upward force to counteract it. Moreover, the relative thickness of the steel used in the core columns diminishes from 6" thick in the subbasements to 1/4" inch at the top, where the top 14 floors of the North Tower, for example, represented only 1.4% of the mass of the steel, where it is absurd to suppose that 1.4% of the mass of the steel could have caused the collapse of the lower 98.6%. 

William Rodriguez, who was the senior custodian in the North Tower and the last man to leave the building, has reported massive explosions in the subbasements that effected extensive destruction, including the demolition of an hydraulic press and the ripping of the skin off a fellow worker, where they filled with water that drained the sprinkler system. Rodriguez has observed that the North Tower explosion occurred prior to reverberations from upper floors, a claim that has now been substantiated in a research by Craig Furlong and Gordon Ross, ”Seismic Proof: 9/11 Was an Inside Job”, in which they demonstrate that those explosions--both in the North Tower and also in the South--took place as much as 14 and 17 seconds before the presumptive airplane impacts, a point to which I shall return.

Heavy-steel-construction buildings, such as the Twin Towers, are not generally capable of “pancake collapse,” which normally occurs only with concrete structures of “lift slab” construction and could not occur in redundant welded-steel buildings, such as the towers, unless every supporting column had been simultaneously removed, floor by floor, as Charles N. Pegelow, who is a structural engineer, has observed. The demolition of the two towers in about 10 seconds apiece is very close to the speed of free fall with only air resistance, which Judy Wood, Ph.D., formerly a professor of mechanical engineering, has observed is an astounding result that would be impossible with extremely powerful sources of energy. If they were collapsing, they would have had to fall through their points of greatest resistance.

Indeed, the towers are exploding from the top, not collapsing to the ground, where their floors do not move, a phenomenon Wood has likened to two gigantic trees turning to sawdust from the top down, which, like the pulverization of the buildings--their conversion into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust--the government’s account cannot explain. There were no “pancakes”. WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM/ET after Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing to do might be to “pull it”, displaying all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions: a complete, abrupt and total collapse into its own footprint, where the floors are all falling at the same time, yielding a stack of pancakes about 5 floors high.

How it was done

WTC-7 debris (upper left) vs. WTC-1 (mid-right)
Had the Twin Towers collapsed like WTC-7, there would have been two stacks of “pancakes” equal to about 12% the height of the buildings or around 15 floors high. But they were actually reduced to below ground level. Since there were no “pancakes”, there cannot have been any “pancake collapse” of either building, where the buildings were destroyed by different modes of demolition. As Fr. Frank Morales of St. Mark's Episcopal Church located near "Ground Zero" and a first responder, explained to me during two interviews on "The Real Deal", both buildings were actually destroyed to or even below ground level, as the photographic evidence confirms. Notice here, for example, that, to the left you can see the 5.5 stories of debris from WTC-7, but in the immediate foreground where WTC-1 had stood, there is nothing comparable--because these buildings did not collapse! 

But if the buildings did not collapse but were converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust in about 10 seconds apiece (officially, 11 seconds for the North Tower; 9 for the South), how was it done? Judy Wood's comparison to two enormous trees turning to sawdust from the top down gives us some clues. Blowing them apart from the top down required some form of energy that delivered far more than conventional and that could be directed, where the apparent cause was a very sophisticated arrangement of micro and mini nukes, directed upward, and initiated in a sequence that was intended to simulate the collapse of buildings by another means, one model for which would be to take them out one cube of 10-floors at a time, which, in the case of the North Tower, would have required 11 seconds and, in the case of the South, 9, which corresponds with NIST's own temporal estimates.

Anyone who studies the destruction pattern of the North Tower has to be struck by the complete and total demolition taking place, which proceeded in stages that correspond closely to the model. Here, for example, is a time sequence of the destruction of the North Tower as it took place on 9/11:

The North Tower being blown apart from the top down and converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust 
While the photographic recored proves that the Twin Towers did not collapse, it does not explain HOW it was done, which has been established on the basis of other evidence, including especially the United States Geological Survey (USGS) studies of dust samples taken from 35 locations in lower Manhattan, which record the presence of an array of elements that would only been present in the quantities and correlations found had this been a nuclear event. Consider the following findings:

Elements found in USGS 9/11 dust studies
Indeed, the USGS data has been confirmed by the variety of incapacities incurred by the first responders and others in the vicinity of Ground Zero, which including multiple myeloma at the rate of 18 per 100,000 vs. 3-9 per 100,000 in the general population; non-Hodgkins lymphoma, leukemia, thyroid, pancreatic, brain, prostate, esophageal and blood and plasma cancers, which are highly associated with exposure to ironizing radiation. As of March 2011 no less than 1,003 first responders died from various cancers; more recent estimates put the number close to 70,000. 

What about the planes?

Since a half-dozen or more of the alleged hijackers turned up alive and well the following day, it ought to have crossed the mind of Americans that they cannot have died on 9/11 by causing four commercial carriers--two 767s in New York and two 575s in Shanksville and at the Pentagon--to have crashed in suicide missions. in The Pentagon’s own videotapes do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O’Reilly admitted when one was shown on ”The O’Reilly Factor”; at 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is high and should have been present and easily visible; it was not, which means that the video evidence also contradicts the official account.

The clear, green, unblemished Pentagon lawn
The aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory “flying at high speed barely above ground level” physically impossible, because a Boeing 757 flying over 400 mph could not have come closer than about 60 or even feet of the ground, which means that the official account is not even aerodynamically possible, an aeronautical engineer, explains here. Since the laws of aerodynamics, no less than the laws of physics and of engineering, cannot be violated and cannot be changed, we should have known from the beginning that something was drastically wrong with the official story of 9/11. But, as CIT (Citizens Investigative Team) has emphasized, we have multiple reports of a plane approaching the Pentagon on a different trajectory only to swerve over it with no impact.

Flight 93, which is alleged to have crashed in Shanksville, left no obvious aircraft debris. As both the reporters first on the scene reported, the eerie aspect of the crash site is that there was no sign that any plane had crashed there. To cope with the obvious, one variation has it that the plane disappeared into an abandoned mine shaft, which is absurd on its face. But then they should have brought out the heavy equipment and the bright lights and dug and dug, 24/7, in the hope that, by some miracle, someone might possibly have survived. But nothing like that was done. Even the singed trees and shrubs were trimmed, apparently to make it impossible to subject them to chemical analysis, which would have revealed that they had not been singed by any jet-fuel based fires.

The fascinating cases, therefore, are not the 757s in Shanksville or at the Pentagon, where the proof no planes crashed is simply overwhelming, but in New York, where we seem to have videos showing Flight 11 hitting the North Tower and Flight 175 hitting the South. Because we have so much more data related to Flight 175, let's take a closer look at what happened there, which appears to be a classic instance of the propter hoc fallacy,  which maintains that, because one event happened before another, we are entitled to infer that the second happened because of the first. As in the case of typical Hollywood special effects (such as Superman in flight or Spiderman spinning webs), things are not always as they appear to be. This may be the most stunning case in history.

Flight 175 and the South Tower

Flight 175 simply disappears into the Sosut Tower
There are some 52 videos of one or another portion of the trajectory of Flight 175 approaching the South Tower, which were broadcast again and again on 9/11 to create the virtually indelible visual impression of the plane hitting the building. It actually requires considerable concentration to see that the plane disappears effortlessly into the building with no collision effects!  So we are witnessing an impossible scenario in violation of the laws of physics and of engineering. The impact between a 120-ton aluminum aircraft and a massive 500,000-ton steel and concrete building should have caused the plane to crumple against the building, with wings and tail, bodies, seats and luggage falling to the ground. The engines might have entered, but most of it not. Yet none of that appears to have happened.  It simply disappears into the building.

We have done frame-by-frame analysis of the two most important videos, the Michale Hezerkhani (taken from the side) and the Evan Fairbanks (taking looking up the side of the South Tower). In both cases, the plane disappears its whole length into the building in the same number of frames it passes its whole length through air. (Try it yourself, if you have any doubt! Do frame-by-frame advance and verify what I am reporting here.) Unless the resistance posed by a massive, 500,000-ton steel and concrete building to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight poses no more resistant than air, we cannot be viewing a real event. We know the formula, d = r x t, where d is the length of the plane and t is the time taken, which yields the rate of travel. They are the same. There is no diminution in velocity.

As if that were not sufficient proof, we know the structure of the facades of the Twin Towers, where Flight 11 was intersecting with seven floors consisting of steel trusses connected at one end to the core columns and at the other to the external steel support columns, filled with 4-8" of concrete. At 208' on a side, that means each floor represented an acre of concrete. The horizontal resistance posed would have been simply enormous. We also have photos of the streets beneath those facades, which are bereft of any aircraft debris. You could have reclined in a lounge chair sipping Mai Tais and been perfectly safe at the times these events took place. 

These were not real collisions with real airplanes, where debates have raged over whether it was done with CGI (computer-generated images), VC (video compositing) or using sophisticated holograms. As if more proof were required, Jack White, legendary photo/film analyst with whom I collaborated in research on JFK, discovered video footage of a white van at the intersection of Church & Murray, where an antiquated engine from a Boeing 767 was found. Several agents wearing FBI vests are in the process of unloading something heavy, but they didn't know enough to get it right. It was under a steel scaffolding and resting on the sidewalk. Had anything so massive hit the sidewalk at high speed, it would have done tremendous damage. But there it sits. Incredibly, they even left a dolly behind!

Why did they have to fake it?

It sounds incredible until you put the pieces together to figure out why they had to fake it. The plan was to have these planes completely enter the buildings before they exploded to create the impression that the Twin Towers had collapsed because of the jet-fuel based fires. We already know that that was simply impossible, but the perps were counting on the media to endlessly repeat the video footage in the expectation that public would believe what it was seeing with its own eyes. The original plan had been to use drones under remote control, until they discovered that the intricate lattice structure of the steel and concrete buildings made that physically impossible. They had to fall back on "Plan B" by faking the images of the planes and using prepositioned explosives to simulate those explosions.

Explosions drained the water from the sprinkler systems.
An intense fire in the North Tower in 1975 had tested Underwriters Laboratories certification, burning at an estimated 2000 degrees F for four hours without causing the steel to weaken, much less melt. At that time the decision was made to install sprinkler systems in both of the towers, which would have extinguished the very modest fires that remained after the prepositioned jet fuel or napalm had been consumed in those spectacular fireballs. In order to nullify their effect and preserve the illusion that the buildings had collapsed because of the fires--where no steel structure high-rise has even collapsed from fire before or after 9/11, much less on 9/11 itself--they had to neutralize the sprinklers. Massive explosions were set off in the subbasements of both buildings in order to drain them of water. 

The problem was to "explain away" those explosions, which were timed to coincide with the apparent impact of the planes with the buildings, where they would be attributed to jet fuel falling through the elevator shafts. That was implausible, since the buildings had staggered elevators that ran for 30 floors, where you had to exit and take the next for another 30 to reach the ground. There were only a few maintenance elevators that went from the subbasements to the top. But who would even notice? It required precise timing, however, which made it all the more imperative that the planes should appear to impact with the buildings at just the right time to be responsible for the explosions in the subbasements. It did not work out as planned.

14 seconds too early at the North Tower; 17 at the South.
As Gordon Ross and Craig Furlong, "Seismic Proof: 9/11 was an 'Inside Job'", have shown, there were hand/eye coordination discrepancies of 14 and 17 seconds in the detonation of the explosions in the subbasements and the apparent impacts of the planes--where the explosions occurred before the plane impacts! They have reviewed the data repeatedly, but have been unable to eliminate the time differential, which makes their research one more decisive proof that 9/11 was indeed "an inside job"--where this one does not depend upon any violations of the laws of physics, of engineering or of aerodynamics, which are, if anything, even more conclusive. They simply screwed up the timing, which, all by itself, proves that 9/11 was, indeed, "an inside job".

Where do things stand with 9/11?

There is more, especially about the alleged Islamic hijackers, including that they were not competent to fly these planes and that their names are not on any original, authenticated passenger manifest. But it's hard to defeat the fact that several of them turned up alive and well the following day, which ought to have raised suspicions in the minds of Americans that, if the hijackers did not die, then the planes cannot have crashed; and if the planes did not crash, then the passengers aboard them did not die because they had been hijacked and forced to crash by the 19 Islamic fundamentalists--which means that the entire "War on Terror" was based upon a lie by the American government to the American people.  The American government has not even produced their tickets as evidence that they were even aboard the aircraft that they are alleged to have hijacked, which would have been easier to create than faking all four of the alleged aircraft crash sites. (For more of the evidence that supports this conclusion, see "The Real Deal Ep #100 The 9/11 Crash Sites" with Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine (USA, ret.), who was formerly in charge of all US military signals and photographic intelligence, who not only agrees but offers some additional substantiation.)

As Wesley Clark informed us during his speech to The Commonwealth Club in San Francisco in 2007, when he returned to the Pentagon from serving as Supreme Commander, Allied Forces Europe (the Commanding General of NATO), he learned of a plan to take out the governments of seven countries in the next five years, beginning with Iraq and Libya and ending with Syrian and Iran. The Russians have put an end to that by intervening at the request of the Syrian government, but it has not been for lack of trying. What most Americans do not appreciate to this day is that the plan Gen. Clark was outlining was not a response to 9/11 but the motivation for 9/11 by annihilating each of the nations that posed the least threat to Israel and its future aspirations.

When the 28 pages of The 9/11 Commission Report (2004) that have been suppressed became the inspiration for Congress to pass a bill that would allow American citizens to sue the Saudi Arabian government for its complicity in 9/11, the families and survivors of the victims of 9/11 were livid that the President of the United States would side with Saudi Arabia and lobby for its defeat. But Barack Obama is simply carrying out the policies and positions that he inherited from the previous administration of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, who directed the CIA, the Neocons in the Department of Defense (most of whom had come from the Project for a New American Century and were joint US-Israeli citizens) and Mossad to conduct the operation to transform US foreign policy from one in which we, at least officially, never attacked any other nation that had not attacked us first to one in which we, to benefit our "ally" in the Middle East, have now become the greatest aggressor nation that the world has ever known.

The truth would have emerged by now but for the influence of 9/11 organizations that are functioning as gatekeepers by offering limited hangouts in lieu of the truth, the whole truth and nothing but about 9/11. A&E911, for example, continues to focus on nanothermite, even though it cannot possibly have been responsible for blowing the Twin Towers apart from the top down. They claim they know that other explosives may have been involved, but refuse to identify what they could possibly be. And, like Judy Wood and DEWs, they refuse to discuss WHO was responsible and WHY. Unfortunately, they do not even do an adequate job of explaining HOW it was done, where the nanothermite theory was inspired by the study of dust samples from an apartment near Ground Zero, which has now been superseded by the far more extensive research of the USGS. What lives by the dust, dies by the dust. You are not going to like what you read here, but it is your duty as an American citizen to absorb it.

This is the Prologue to America was Nuked on 9/11: Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons in the DoD and the Mossad (moonrockbooks.com, 2016 forthcoming)


73 comments:

  1. even the greater Israeli thesis is weak. Israel and Saudi Arabia have long been allies. the jews clearly wanted to demolish iran, Iraq, and Syria, but the rest of the middle east was already under jewish control.

    so there must be other motives behind 9/11 than Israel's imperial aggression. the patriot act was one motive as it was part of the nwo conquest of the world.

    the towers contained great wealth of gold, diamonds, and ust bonds, the latter of which needed destruction.

    the main point is that jewish aggression was only a part of the motive to 9/11.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone knows this garbage and nothing will be done about it, so BLOW ME!!

      Delete
    2. What an obvious troll! Almost nobody knows about the 14 and 17 second mistake. Almost nobody knows that the Twin Towers were nuked. Almost nobody knows that the planes in New York were faked. I have encountered a lot of phonies and frauds in my day, but this guy--Robert Kimble--takes the cake! What a shill.

      Delete
    3. Well, that does not sound quite right to me. Money is an inadequate explanation for 9/11. Taking out WTC-7 included the destruction of S&E records for the prosecution of major Wall Street firms. There are additional reasons for 9/11, where mine are not meant to be exhaustive.

      Delete
    4. Robert is related to Dr med Richard Kimble, falsely accused of killing his wife and on the run. Robert sniffs glue.

      Delete
    5. I agree that the 14 and 17 second errors were new information and worth the price of admission so to speak.

      regarding motives they were varied and complex. as with each accomplice in jfk, each perpetrator of 9/11 had parochial motives which bound them together in the big event. there were plenty of subplots.

      Delete
    6. He's trolling for a blow job too

      Delete
    7. While the exact number of seconds is new to me I did know almost from the beginning that there was a time gap proving that there were explosives going off in the basements and subbasements. The janitor made that clear in one of his early interviews. Strangely in the first few days everything came out almost which made the official investigation completely unbelievable. The most remarkable was the plane disappearing in a tunnel leaving nothing behind. Walt Disney.

      Delete
    8. Fascism came to Amerika long ago, by 1981 if not earlier. Whether death is induced by nukes or directed energy makes no difference to me - my personal impression of Fetzer's study and what has been presented on VT is to show that Pentagon insiders with access to advanced weapons "did it", and unfortunately those PNAC insiders were very disproportionately Jewish. I won't suggest that anti-Semitism could ever be eliminated in a nation with such a tiny minority of Jews, but it would sure be *greatly* reduced if that tiny minority weren't so disproportionately represented in the government et al.

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    10. Yes, but the inconvenient fact you left out is that Joooos created PNAC, they occupied a disproportionate representation in the Pentagon, and in effect used the U.S. military to cover their behinds in effecting 9/11. So Joooos did it, top to bottom. Yes indeed.

      Delete
    11. The Brits are a real wildcard, just like the Israelis (no comment offered as to what's the difference). The royalty is extremely wealthy and fits right into the classic Rothschild/central bank milieu, and given that Bush/Schwartzkof et al were willing to accept knighthoods from the Queen, it's clear to anyone who isn't blind that they and their sponsors intend to protect their assets at all costs. But, imminent threats aside, the Western culture is undergoing rapid change, and as long as Her Majesty and Our Majesties are able to protect their assets, I'm sure they'll accept any and all cultural changes that they can tolerate. Jews are an elite society, which might escape people who haven't lived and worked in their circles, but societies tend to dominate where they can, and it makes the non-elite very nervous. For my money, no sub-culture representing a tiny minority in the population should be allowed to dominate institutions of government and the military. It's a bad trend. It doesn't matter who the soldiers are - it matters who the deciders are. PNAC and those a-holes like Wolfowitz, Perl, Feith, Kristol, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush et al - they're pure evil and need to be identified and removed from all positions in government.

      Delete
    12. It's who we are, or who we've become. Dumb and dumber USA, courtesy of the leadership provided by Bush Junior and others. How do we get out of this? Shaking off a dictator is easy compared to shaking off a culture. Hitler, a dictator, tried to radically change a culture, and some observers here feel that Trump represents a new desperate attempt to do something similar. So who knows where we're going?

      Delete
    13. You don't overlook WHY except in regard the motives or reasons of those like Judy Wood you say don't ask.

      Delete
  2. Outstanding documentation, Jim; thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Hey Carl - If you ever feel like revisiting and facing up for the first time to the documentation I brought to you here 5ya, (as 'fellist'),

      http://radiofetzer.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/car-hermann.html

      then feel free!

      ***

      Jews killed MLK, not Whites - just like Jews did 9/11, not Muslims.

      Delete
  3. Excellently written because the explanation is clear and plain.
    It would seem that the attacks were also motivated by the aim to kill certain persons?
    However two questions:
    1. Where are the four passenger airplanes and persons aboard?
    2. Would it not be possible to present as footnote the names of the persons who hold both U.S. and Israeli citizenship ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. A very good discussion of PNAC and its members can be found at https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/project-for-the-new-american-century-pnac/

    Two of the planes were not even in the air and the other two did not crash. See "The Real Deal Ep #100 The 9/11 Crash Sites" for detailed discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If the government's explanation for the events of 9/11 is correct we would be seeing a massive R & D effort to develop kerosene bombs that have the ability to mimic nuclear explosions. I do not see any recent PhDs in kerosene technology so I suspect that this is not happening.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fetzer, what about the debris field in Pa?
    With the evidence of the jet liner being blow out of the sky by a us fighter jet?
    Seems this is the one that was destined to take out Bld. 7
    4-buildings * 4-jet aircraft makes sense but for murphys law...Hahahahaha!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John, That's fraudulent. As I have explained in detail in "The Real Deal Ep #100 The 9/11 Crash Sties", Pilots for 9/11 Truth determined--based upon air-ground communications--that Flight 93 was still in the air and over Champaign-Urbana, IL, after it had allegedly crashed in Shanksville. And Flight 175 was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, PA, long after it had officially hit the South Tower. Both were in service until they were deregistered on 28 September 2005. Check it out.

      Delete
    2. John, That's fraudulent. As I have explained in detail in "The Real Deal Ep #100 The 9/11 Crash Sties", Pilots for 9/11 Truth determined--based upon air-ground communications--that Flight 93 was still in the air and over Champaign-Urbana, IL, after it had allegedly crashed in Shanksville. And Flight 175 was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, PA, long after it had officially hit the South Tower. Both were in service until they were deregistered on 28 September 2005. Check it out.

      Delete
  7. In the book "The Curve of Binding Energy" (originally 1973,1974; new release this year), Theodore "Ted" Taylor mentions five times how a nuke could take down the World Trade Center buildings. Uncommon prescience, or someone in the know regarding future events? The book also mentions how a properly shaped nuclear charge could burn away a shaft of destruction (specifically for mining efforts). Interesting how the cores of WTC 1 & 2 appear to disappear leading to their collapse. Nothing to see here folks, move it along...

    ReplyDelete
  8. When you think about it, 9/11 was an all-or-nothing deal; i.e., the perpetrators have risked it all.
    But to be "successful", they had to know in advance that there would be no meaningful investigation. Thus it's clear that they already had complete control of the "U.S. government" before the attack.
    In light of this, I suggest that the primary goal of the 9/11 false-flag attack was to overthrow the rule of law and consolidate power in the executive branch. In other words, they wanted to create an unaccountable, unprecedentedly powerful seat of political power.
    Now having created this seat of power, in order to take full advantage of it, they needed to install into it the most evil person - the most evil political puppet - that they could find.
    (You cannot run the world from a "constitutional republic", thus we no longer have one).
    I believe we are watching the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. The first beast of Rev 13, has prepared a seat of unprecedented political power and has installed into it the second beast of Rev 13, the so-called "anti-Christ" or "Son of Perdition". And I note that these two entities seem to be the same two entities described in Daniel 7 as the "fourth beast" and the "little horn", respectively.
    Daniel 7:8 describes a vision where the "little horn" uproots three existing horns, and I believe this is describing the post 9/11 consolidation of power in the U.S. government. This corresponds to John's second beast (Rev 13), because this beast has two horns, representing the legislative and judicial powers which have been ceded to the "president" who now wields power he was never intended to have.
    The beast intends to use its puppet ruler to forcibly impose its Satanic "New World Order" on the whole planet, in pursuit of Satan's kingdom on earth (as per Isaiah 14:12-14).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Revelations states it simply: "neither buy nor sell" (i.e. make a living or buy food) unless you have the Mark. But we are very nearly there. With cash nearly gone for most people, debit cards will be the only money. And those cards (and the people who hold them) can be turned "off" at the press of a button. Think about it. We are very close.

      Delete
    2. Hence the new "chip" cards banks are replacing existing cards with. Makes perfect sense Dale.

      Delete
    3. Underscoring the issue, yes!

      Delete
  9. My compliments Prof Fetzer. This is the clearest explanation I have come across in 15 years of following the 911 mass murder by treasonous insiders.

    I read 'Veterans Today's' essays on the use of mini-nukes as a 'shape charge' under WTC 1 and WTC2. It seems they were placed these under the 22,000 Gallon tanks containing liquid Freon gas
    for the Air conditioning systems and by doing so it turns a mini Nuke into a small Hydrogen bomb which, it was claimed, explains the pulverization of the buildings, not to mention the over 1,000 Cars and vehicles strangely bursting into flame, in spite of some being parked hundreds of yards away.

    If there's a person in America who knew from day one this was a scam, it would be the GOP presidential Nominee Mr Donald Trump. He is on record as saying, 'you'll find out who did 911 after I take office'.

    Trump also knows America can never, be Great again' until this monstrous stain on her escutcheon is addressed.

    We may yet see the perps in prison attire! Someone has to do it and while at it take on the Media who are just as guilty as the swine who rigged the buildings with explosives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bah! Also Mrs. Clinton has promised to uncover the truth behind UFOs if she's elected. They're marketing strategies targeted for conspiracy-theories likers.

      Delete
    2. UFOs are "Unidentified Flying Objects", and are a great concern for any nation's military, regardless of any posturing by politicians.

      Delete
    3. I don't understand why Floda believes Trump knows the truth about 9/11 when the truther community itself is divided and if he would know or even open a new investigation, do it or be able to do it?
      I'm really sorry to say this, but I fear Floda will be disappointed by Trump.

      Delete
    4. The real "truther community" is not divided in any important sense. It accuses the president, certain cabinet members, neocons, and certain Israelis of blowing up the WTC to advance a New Pearl Harbor. As a so-called truther, I remain focused on that. What they used to blow them up is a topic of research which *may* lead to new discoveries, but is not essential in convicting the perpetrators. Lack of the murder weapon puts a greater burden on the prosecution, but is not absolutely essential for conviction.

      Delete
  10. In a holocaust revisionist trial in Germany at one point the judge announced: 'Truth is no defense in this case'. This and much else is New World Order Justice. If THEY succeed we will be lucky to have privileges.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't believe Wm St George presents the context of the statement made (in German) by the German judge correctly.

      Delete
  11. "Blow me" is such a good and classy way to debunk facts is it now. The miraculous paper passports that survived was the icing on the cake for me.

    Thanks for a great piece. Hope justice will be done.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dear James Fetzer,

    I love your research on Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon Bombing and I own your book about Moon landings, Holocaust, and McCartney, which I enjoyed greatly.

    For this reason, I wish offer some criticism regarding micronukes and Mossad because this kind of book IMO will be a departure from the evidence-based rigorous research that you have conducted up to this point.

    1) Nukes cannot be "directed upward"; they blow in all directions, spherically. Mini or micronukes, if they could destroy WTC, must have created a crater below WTC because debris would have been blown into the ground just as it was blown sideways and upward. Yet, the basement of both buildings was mostly intact and the WTC "sink" was not damaged either.

    2) Like thermite, which burns extremely brightly, nukes would have resulted in a blinding flash of light, which we did not see.

    3) Nukes produce an electromagnetic pulse disabling most types of electronics. For this reason, setting off several nukes in a timed sequence would be a problem because the first ones would prevent the others from exploding.

    4) The levels of radiation after a known type of a nuclear explosion would have been thousands of times higher than what was detected by USGS. I agree that destruction of WTC was some kind of a nuclear event, but these were not *nuclear bombs.* With known nuclear bombs, the incidence of cancer would be tens and hundreds of times higher among first responders, not twofold higher. The radioactive fallout would have been detected across the globe, just like after Chernobyl. Yet there were no reports of a radioactive fallout, even by countries that are traditionally hostile to the US government.

    5) The buildings were turned into fine powder, but nukes do not pulverize things, they burn, melt, and blow up stuff. We would see big chunks of buildings flying in all directions, including downward, not fine powder.

    Problems with Mossad:
    All evidence is circumstantial, there are no documents. Many pieces of evidence make no sense and appear to be staged or planted, like the "dancing Israelis" or the Israeli van (loaded with explosives) with the 9/11 event painted on its side. Rational people do not behave in such a blatantly self-incriminating way, especially intelligence officers.

    The claims of dual citizenship are not proven either (photos of passports anyone?). It is entirely possible that some PNAC architects are dual citizens but proof is lacking. I agree that Israel benefited from 9/11 and a number of people with ties to Israel participated in this false flag, but the claim that 9/11 was brought to us by Mossad seems to be an exaggeration. Especially because you base this claim on supposed provision of mininukes by Israel. Rebekka Roth is pushing the Mossad angle very hard and her motives are known to be less than noble.

    Mossad's participation in 9/11 is possible but unnecessary. On the other hand, involvement of American intelligence and military agencies is inevitable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Conventional nukes yes, but advanced nukes are capable of much better tuning. Dual citizenship is a given - nothing controversial there - the motives are transparent, and the overwhelming control by neocons indisputable.

      Delete
    2. Material was turned to dust at the ionic and molecular bond level. Nuclear and thermonuclear explosions do not create such fields affecting material bonds at nearly the level of the quantum electromagnetic exchange forces. The nuclear hypotheses are wrong. But such devices were invented four decades ago.

      Delete
    3. The poster Anonymous who admires the blogger's research but expresses objections to certain attempted hypotheses to 911 is wrong in two respects about Mossad:
      1. The "dancing Israelis" were apprehended in NJ and their behavior to police is on protocoll. To believe their dancing is "unprofessional" does not suffice to disqualify their employment.
      2. Nobody asserted Mossad acted alone. That's another very stupid and silly misattribution. Mossad got the nukes with USAF treason.

      Delete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. In the (genuine) scientific sphere, attributing real physical events to other-dimensional entities is seen as disinformation - a distraction. I do believe in the spirit world, but as most religious people do, I believe the perpetrators must be held accountable in a human court. As to the thousands covering it up, there are only a handful directing the orchestra, and the rest are just the singers. It is not a secret, and the important point is to raise awareness among the public (extremely difficult).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the scientific sphere attributing real physical events to other dimensional entities is not, as dalethorn incorrectly asserts, judged "disinformation" and "distraction". In science the problem is not attribution, but proof and method of verification. Since such supersensible entities are not perceptible by physical organs of perception, the methodical approach is complicated.

      Delete
    2. "Scientific Proof", in the context of conspiracies by officials who have power to hide and destroy evidence, is itself a disinformation tactic. "Prove it" they say, with one hand behind their backs. To that I reply "Give the benefit of the doubt to individual persons, but never, ever to the office and their deeds."

      Delete
  15. This article is a fine example of why I am Jim's biggest fan. So few people can do his kind of research, retain his volume of information and compile and present it with such a fine hand. Bravo Jim.
    I do, as you know my friend, have to agree with most of Anonymous above. Mini nukes do not account for the cars that were melted except for the tires and any paper inside, or many of the other anomalies that Judy Wood points out. I know you and she are not compatible, but to skip some of the strange things (cars flipped over and on top of others for instance, and the dustification) because they do not fit in to a model is not consistent with your general level of thorough analysis.
    Respectfully,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Finding out what flipped the cars or caused certain dustifications would add to the academic knowledge on 9/11, but the collapse of the skyscrapers is what led to the war and the Patriot Act, and so my money is on bringing the perpetrators of those collapses to justice, regardless of all the other stuff. I'm staying focused, with an open mind, but not a distracted mind.

      Delete
  16. Professor Fetzer, I look forward to reading your new work "America was nuked on 911".I would have to believe you are aware of former Soviet Officer Dimitri Khalezov's 911thology which as far as I know was the first whistleblower to tell the world of the "Built In" nuclear demolition scheme.How much if any of your research for your new work may have been determined from Khalezov testimonial? I know he has been mention at VT Today but Mr Duff seemed to dismiss him to easily.Any thoughts on this ....anyone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Khalezov implies several parties,but foremost calls out freemasonry and high ranking Mossad General Mike Harari

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. As a courtesy for new readers here, who aren't aware that "godsend" is a clown who posts here to disrupt Professor Fetzer's site, I make these notes.

      For people who aren't aware of Fetzer's public reputation (i.e. Wiki and others have him as a "Loon"), you might not know why clowns, trolls, and other pests would post nonsense on this blog. They do so to discourage you from reading here.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. Dalethorn,
      Thank you for joining us. I am sorry you spent so much of your valuable time responding to "Goldstein" or "Godsend."
      They have both lost the privilege of my reading their comments before deleting them.
      I'm not going to go thru yours to see which ones were troll food, so forgive them standing out on their own. Welcome.

      Delete
    8. Thank you. I am OK with genuine opposition and controversy, but when a gatekeeper is disrupting as part of a strategy to keep people away, I like to point that out.

      Delete
  18. Fred Arcuri: The U.S. was founded by Freemasons, whose enlightened views were responsible for individual freedom and liberty, as opposed to the authority of kings. The enlightenment, as I've been told by some freemasons, comes from the light-bearer, i.e. Lucifer. Now if the founding fathers had said that real authority comes only from God (via the Bible for instance) instead of kings, and skipped the "enlightenment" influences, we at least potentially could have had a government of moral imperative, but sadly we have only the gift of Masonic tradition.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If none of the planes crashed please can you explain what happened to a friend of mine who was on the plane hijacked out of Boston.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those that were have disappeared, one way or the other. When you're dealing with a government who has pointed 50 thousand thermonuclear bombs at the heads of everyone on Earth in a threat to exterminate them, sacrificing a few thousand people is just a breakfast warm-up. And that extermination threat is backed up by thousands of trained military personnel, who will fire off the doomsday machine when ordered. Few people today have the perspective to understand how the government could do a 9/11, because they've so long accepted total extermination, and they don't realize how that has changed the government.

      Delete
    2. There's an episode of Star Trek, "A taste of Armageddon", that explains much about the proxy war, like the War on Terror. And in spite of much disinformation about how Star Trek was so liberal, our "gunboat diplomacy" went into effect when the engineer (currently in charge of the Enterprise) told the high council of the planet they were visiting "All installations on Aminiar 7 have been located and fed into our fire control system. In 45 minutes the entire inhabited surface of your planet will be destroyed, unless you surrender your hostages."

      Now that was a liberal TV show. Just imagine the real thing, with 50 thousand ancient thermonuclear bombs and god-know-what kind of death machines have been developed since.

      Delete
    3. Fascinating comments, Dalethorn. Thank you. Anyone who recognizes the lessons and philosophy of Star Trek is high up in my book.
      Chance George and I were just on Jim's show, the Real Deal. It meant a lot to Chance and I. Your input would be appreciated if you are so inclined.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBCkinDmWDE&feature=youtu.be

      Delete
    4. Beekeepers, could you tell us your friend's name, for research purposes? I am sure you are not one of them, but many trolls go to comment sections and say things like, "my friend's son died at Sandy Hook" and things like that as part of their paid strategy. If we could find out more about your friend, it could help us sort out what did happen to him or her.
      Thanks, and welcome! Hope you keep learning about the truth.

      Delete
    5. I watched the video - a lot of familiar things there, which connect very well to my years at MUFON. Although I haven't done any on-the-ground investigation of UFOs and ETs, I have some impressions - call them working hypotheses rather than strong opinions: 1) I think there is very good evidence of aliens visiting in spacecraft, EBE the short-term survivor being an example. 2) Some stories of recovered craft are well documented. 3) Lazar's early reports of element 114 and antimatter combustion that got control of the atom's Strong Force, to warp gravity and space as a quick way to jump to the stars - it's even more believable today. 4) Jose Perez deCuellar witnessing an abduction - very interesting. 5) Some of the crop circles are way beyond hoaxers in the technology required to make them. 6) Underground bases containing humans, raised separately from society through all of their existence, make up a veritable army of disposable agents who can hush up any number of witnesses, in most cases anyway. Media disinformation fills in the rest. 6) I think that Alternative 3, in one form or another, accounts for many of the missing $trillions.

      Delete
    6. Thanks Dalethorn! Years at MUFON huh? Got any friends with reliable plans for a magnetic motor? You know the suppression technique is to flood the web with fake plans and phony devices to discredit it and make money at the same time.

      Delete
    7. Umm, yes ... he was told to leave it alone and didn't, and oddly enough Fanny Mae somehow sold his property deed to a third party who foreclosed due to a weird technicality. He went to county court, then ended up in federal court where they shut him down. And it gets stranger ... he demanded to know who the "real owner" of the deed is, given that he thought it was Fanny Mae, and the papers that the loan 'servicer' brought to court had the names redacted. So I told him "I've seen this before, so get out now while you can" etc. etc. So anyway, I guess there's enough money at stake that it's easier than most people expect to shut off any low-cost energy competition.

      Delete
    8. That's an excellent idea - the poster who wants to know what happened to his friend who was airplane passenger should let us know his name.

      Delete
  20. Your work is totally enthusiastic and informative.
    clear water concepts

    ReplyDelete
  21. It's been weeks that I've been in contact with this spell caster. He was recommended to me by Sharon Moore. Dr Abalaka help me out with my finances and also a favor spell. His Email Address is dr.abalaka@outlook.com. We've been very good friend and he rendered so many services like Love Spells, Luck, Money Spells, Health, WellBeing, Protection, Healing, Curses, Hex, Breakups,NEW! Combo Spells, Authentic Voodoo Spell, Business spells, Health/Healing spells,Curse removal, Job spells, Healing from all kind of diseases, Love binding, Barrenness(need a child), Need love, Lotto spell,Promotions spells Success spell, Money rituals, winning court case, Divorce spells, Low sperm count, Infertility in women, Breast enlargement/reduction,Penis enlargement/reduction and so many others. Wish you all the best

    ReplyDelete
  22. ;ATTENTION YOU ALL: I am agent Michael the Illuminati official agent,i am from united kingdom and I join Illuminati in UK ,i have been give the alternative to expose Illuminati to the universe that Illuminati is real when you met the rightful agent like me Michael ,i have been an agent to this brotherhood more than eight year now and I am still a member and agent,don't be afraid to contact us if you are willing to join this fraternity, this fraternity welcome anybody in this world wide ,this comment is been post by head office,the last comment that was past by the head office in USA was been using by fraudsters and the comment has been stopped by the Lord and from now upward (30 August 2017) we the Illuminati have stop using it because a lot of scammed are now creating a fake USA number,that is why will have come with new identity number to locate the rightful agent by calling the head office in USA not in US anymore,ignore +44 has head office from today 30 August 2017 and start calling +44 has head office number for conform,be ware that no need for calling UK number has Illuminati head office,is now located in UK ,for confirmation call +448726142373 To join call Michael at +2349032318560 or In-box us on E-mail: worldilluminati201@gmail.com.. that will the Illuminati is now working on a new program to limited fraudsters and scammer that always use our comment to aim and achieve,please don't call US number has head office has confirmation,it has be bandy by us the Illuminati now at 30 august 2017 call +448726142373 as confirmation number,no need of contacting us mobile chat as face-book,imo,E skimo,you are ask to whatsapp an E-mail us,for joining,don't face-book any agent,it is not our access to join on face-book chat,the only alternative to join is to E-mail/whatsapp Michael at +2348162084839 The rightful identity of us the Illuminati: HEAD OFFICE: +448726142373 WHATSAPP: +2348162084839 CALL: +2349032318560 E-MAIL: worldilluminati201@gmail.com Be Were of scammer and contact us the real Illuminati,reach us through Michael from now, Fake identity of us Illuminati this list below: Head office is not located in US anymore, don't add anybody with US number and don't E-mail any email that is not i Worldilluminati201@gmail.com Please don't lead yourself to fraudsters all the name of Illuminati,the complain of I have been scam is more than what will can complicated with!save your self by contacting us through this comment of us the Illuminati head office,......
    NOTE...IF YOU ARE NOT READY TO JOIN DO NOT CONTACT US

    ReplyDelete
  23. I want to thank Dr.Agbazara for his job in my family, this is man who left me and the kids for another woman without any good reasons, i was pain and confuse,till one day when i was browsing through the internet with my computer then i saw Dr.Agbazara contact, then i contaced him and he help me cast a reunion spell, since I then the situation has changed, everything is moving well, my husband who left me is now back to his family. reach DR.AGBAZARA TEMPLE via email if you have any relationship problem at:

    ( agbazara@gmail.com )
    OR whatsapp or call him on +2348104102662

    ReplyDelete