Monday, August 8, 2016

America Nuked on 9/11: Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons in the DoD & the Mossad


America Nuked on 9/11 



Compliments of the CIA, the Neocons in the DoD & the Mossad

If you want to know the WHO, the HOW and the WHY of 9/11, this book provides the answers. In 28 extensive, thorough and detailed studies, 14 authors contribute their expertise on different aspects of 9/11 to resolve the issues decisively. 9/11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad in order to justify the transformation of U.S. foreign policy from one in which we never attacked any nation that had not attacked us first to one in which we became the greatest aggressor nation in the world, launching a series of invasions intended to take out seven governments over the next five years, as Wesley Clark, former Commanding General of NATO, has explained. It hasn’t played out that way, but not for lack of trying.
You will discover here that the most prominent 9/11 organization, A&E911, has been running a limited hangout focusing on the use of Nano-thermite, an incendiary, which has long since been demonstrated to be incapable of blowing the Twin Towers apart from the top down. While Richard Gage, Kevin Ryan and others acknowledge that other explosives may have been used, they refuse to explain what those could possibly be. Although their studies were based upon dust samples obtained from an apartment in the vicinity of Ground Zero, they deliberately ignore the far more extensive results of the U.S. Geological Survey’s dust studies, which reveal the presence of elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Moreover, the Journal for 9/11 Studies perpetuates the charade by publishing articles intended to perpetrate the false belief that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Because the Pentagon is our nation’s military command-and-control center, it was this event that justified declaring a “War on Terror”. But the proof that no plane hit the Pentagon is overwhelming and compelling. In fact, as surprising as it may seem, none of the official “9/11 aircraft” actually crashed on 9/11, as evidence from the “crash sites” and research by Pilots for 9/11 Truth has established. The public was conned by resorting to a series of sophisticated fabrications, reinforced by the major media. This book demonstrates we have lost our way and are now no better than a third world, banana republic.
The contributors include some of the best students and scholars of 9/11:
* Ed Ward, M.D. * Jeff Prager * Susan Lindauer * Preston James, 
Ph.D. * Dennis Cimino * Jack White * Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. * 
* Mike Palecek * T. Mark Hightower * Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. * Steve 
Fahrney * Aeronautical Engineer * Joshua Blakeney * Don Fox *
It has been edited by Jim Fetzer, former Marine Corps officer and Distinguished McKnight Professor Emeritus at UMD, and Mike Palecek, who has committed his life to the search for truth and justice.
Softcover, 458 pages, 338 photos, $20 from moonrockbooks.com


Contributors

An Aeronautical Engineer graduated from a major university with a Bachelor’s degree (with Honors) in Aeronautical Engineering with a major in aerodynamics. A qualified pilot and co-designer of two experimental aircraft, he has been engaged in aviation for over four decades. Many online debates about a “Boeing 757” at the Pentagon confuse the aerodynamic phenomenon known as Wake Turbulence (caused mainly by Induced Drag) with Ground Effect (caused as a reaction to downwash). Arguments that dispute the official account of a Boeing 757 approaching the Pentagon at 400 mph and taking out a series of lampposts are shown to be well-founded in their conclusion but in need to technical corrections to the explanations that have been advanced in their support, where a Boeing 757 at 400 mph could not have come closer than about 100 feet of the ground.
Joshua Blakeney, a journalist and writer based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, earned a BA (with distinction) in Sociology from Lethbridge. As a grad student, he received The Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship. His research on the Origins of the Global War on Terror became national news in Canada, when certain neoconservatives took issue with his chosen line of academic enquiry. He published Japan Bites Back: Documents Contextualizing Pearl Harbor (2015) based upon archival research he conducted at The National Diet Library in Tokyo, Japan. He has published in GlobalResearch.ca, The American Herald Tribune, Voltairenet.org, Coldtype.net, The Canadian Dimension, The Canadian Charger and The Information Clearing House. He recently started blogging about Japanese History.
Dennis Cimino, who has extensive engineering and support experience with military electronics, predominantly U.S. Navy Combat Systems, was the Navy’s top EMI troubleshooter before he went to work for Raytheon in the 1980s. He has collaborated with Jim Fetzer on many articles about “false flag” attacks, including (with regard to Sandy Hook), “The Nexus of Tyranny: The Strategy behind Tucson, Aurora and Sandy Hook” (30 January 2013), “Sent worldwide, Shannon Hicks’ ‘iconic’ photo was faked” (18 July 2014), and “Sandy Hook, Stephen Sedensky, William Shanley and the Elaborate Hoax” (28 July 2014). He has also published extensively on various aspects of 9/11. His articles on the Pentagon, for example, include “The ‘official account’ of the Pentagon is a fantasy” (2012), “9/11: A World Swirling in a Volcano of Lies” (14 February 2014) and “Reflections on the Pentagon: A Photographic Review” (16 August 2014), and “Limited Hangouts: Kevin Ryan, A&E911 and The Journal of 9/11 Studies” (with Jim Fetzer, 14 August 2014).
Jim Fetzer earned his Ph.D. in the history and the philosophy of science. A former U.S. Marine Corps officer, he has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality. McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11 and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone. The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Place of Probability in Science (with Ellery Eells, 2010), And I Suppose We Didn’t go to the Moon, either? (2015), Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (2015) and And Nobody Died in Boston, either (2016), which was his 32nd. He also hosts the two-hour video show, “The Real Deal”, on Media Broadcasting Center M/W/F from 8-10 PM/ET and “The Raw Deal” on renseradio.com T/Th from 8-9 PM/ET.
Don Fox has done extensive research on the role of mini-nukes by Dr. Ed Ward and on work by The Anonymous Physicist on the towers and has formulated an account of how it was done and why there is more to this story relative to very low-yield thermonuclear devices. His articles include “Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11” and “Mini Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle (with Clare Kuehn, Jeff Prager, Jim Viken, Dr. Ed Ward and Dennis Cimino). Don Fox has been among the most successful in conveying the results of this complex and technical research in a fashion that makes it easily accessible to a wide audience. See, for example, “2 + 2 = Israel Nuked the WTC on 9/11” and “Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes”. He maintains a blog at https://donaldfox.wordpress.com.
T. Mark Hightower earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Chemical Engineering from San Jose State University and over 30 years of engineering experience. He has worked in the chemical industry, the space program and the environmental field. He is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), and the American Water Works Association (AWWA). He became a “born again” conspiracy theorist in January 2004 after stumbling upon Peter Meyer’s Serendipity web site and learning that controlled demolition was a more likely explanation for the destruction of the Twin Towers than the official government story. He is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, a petition signer at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and a member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth. His 9/11 research is done as an exercise of his Constitutional rights as a private citizen, and in no way represents his employers or the professional societies in which he holds membership. He recently retired after 25 years with NASA.
Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D., has two history of science degrees, one from Cambridge 1968, plus a Ph.D. from London, 1995. An honorary member of staff of UCL for 11 years, he was in 1999 elected as a Member of the New York Academy of Sciences. A Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, he has several dozen articles on the history of astronomy in academic journals. His book, Terror on the Tube (3rd edition, 2011), establishes that the accused Islamic youth were innocent of the 2005 London bombings. Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality (2014), demonstrates that the official narrative of WWII cannot be sustained. He contributed four chapters to And I suppose we didn’t go to the moon, either? His latest book, The Life and Death of Paul McCartney 1942-66: A Very English Mystery (2015), has recently appeared.
Susan Lindauer covered Iraq and Libya at the United Nations, as a U.S. Intelligence Asset and back-door channel on anti-terrorism from 1993 to 2003. Most notoriously, in the summer of 2001, her team warned about a major terrorist attack involving airplane hijackings and a strike on the World Trade Center. Lindauer also campaigned heavily against the War in Iraq, and developed a comprehensive peace framework through her back-channel in the run up to War. Her book, Extreme Prejudice (2010), is the true story of what happened when she tried to disclose what she knew personally of Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence and the 9/11 warning to Congress and the American people. Her attempts to bring the truth to the public led to the nightmare of her arrest under the PATRIOT Act and her imprisonment without trial at the notorious prison inside Carswell AFB in Texas.
Mike Palecek lives in Saginaw, Minnesota, west of Duluth. A writer, he is a former federal prisoner for peace and the Iowa Democratic Party candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives, 5th District in the 2000 election, gaining 65,000 votes on an anti-war platform in a conservative district. A former award winning reporter, editor, publisher in Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota. The small newspaper that Mike & Ruth Palecek owned and operated in Byron, Minnesota, won the MNA Newspaper of the Year Award in 1993. He co-hosts “The New American Dream” radio show and has published over a dozen books that offer fictional but insightful studies of the American character and the plight in which we lend ourselves in the world today. Mike is the founder of Moon Rock Books and the co-editor of this volume.
Jeff Prager, founder of an award winning magazine for senior citizens, set out in 2002 to prove that 19 Muslims had hijacked four airplanes and attacked us. After extensive investigation by 2005, he realized that the official narrative of 9/11 was false, sold his business, left the United States and began to conduct 9/11 research full-time. What he found astonished even himself, because the evidence that the Twin Towers had been destroyed by a sophisticated arrangement of very small nuclear devices became simply overwhelming. He subsequently published an extensive and detailed report about this research in 9/11 AMERICA NUKED! (2012), which is a 500-page book available to the public for free, in Part 1 and Part 2.
Mike Sparks is a graduate of Liberty University with a B.S. degree in History/Education. His last assignment in the U.S. Army Reserves was as a MOS 11A5P Airborne-qualified Infantry officer with the rank of 1LT promotable. He leads Military Intelligence Group [00]7 (aka MI7) focusing on how Commander Ian Fleming, creator of the fictional super-spy James Bond (Agent 007), is actually warning us in code of real organized evil entities. He is the editor and co-author of several military reform books, including Air-Mech-Strike: Asymmetric Maneuver Warfare for the 21st Century (2002) andAirborne Warfare: New Edition (2015), plus several books on American Cultural Reform; Racket Theory: Why Humans Embrace Problems instead of Solving Them (2006), Hive Theory: Why Humans Stay in Destructive Rackets(2015) and in the military/spy arena with James Bond is REAL: The Untold Story of the Political & Military Threats Ian Fleming Warned Us About (2011). More recently, he has published The Point of Gravity (2012), Masquerade: Everything is NOT What it Appears (2013) and The Bell Tolls for Thee: The Poppy is Also a Flower (2014).
Ed Ward, M.D., among the leading experts on the use of nukes on 9/11, maintains an extensive archive about them and other forms of malfeasance by the U.S. at his “Weblog of Tyranny”, http://edwardmd.wordpress.com. He has been among the most brilliant and tenacious investigators of “false flag” attacks by the government and other entities, where his recent publications include “EgyptAir 804: Just another Government Mass Murder” and “Proven 9/11 Nukes = U.S. Government Involvement”, where he was among the first to appreciate that the official account of plane impact/jet-fuel fires/collapse was completely preposterous and scientifically indefensible. Ward has also appeared as a guest on “The Real Deal”, which you can hear at radiofetzer.blogspot.com.

68 comments:

  1. No doubt, nukes were among several forms of demolition involved in bringing both towers down at near free-fall acceleration. Although the evidence for nano-thermite is substantial it's contribution cannot explain the powerful explosive demolition charges that impaled huge steel beams into building across the street.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dr. Fetzer,

    Thanks for the mention and exposure of the facts.

    Ed Ward, MD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The nuclear-bomb theory is shit. If you cannot understand this, I will simplify. I have done the math and have come up with this equation:

      9/11 + ☢ = 5.8πŸ’©³

      As you can plainly see, the 9/11 nuke theory is equivalent to 5.8 piles of shit cubed.

      Delete
    2. Gutless PSYOPS crap vs Verified Fact. Proven WTC Micro Neutron Nukes https://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government-involvement/ Previous Related Articles http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm , http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

      Delete
  3. What our eyes and common sense tell us is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Saying that the buildings were brought down by a nuclear device is farther than I want to go. It seems like a mistake to say more than you need to say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another troll, huh? Notice how you did'nt write evidence just not where you wanted to go. Not scientific there, pal. Your heuristics are not germaine to the discussion. Ignoring evidence is not common sense.

      Delete
    2. Hey GodSend, I have a gift for you. UUhh....uhhh.......pphtt.πŸ’©...

      Delete
  4. Congratulations to you and all involved in your latest triumph!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jim: Seth Ross was a Wikileaks informant.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Excuse me, Jim, Seth Rich as the Wikileaks informant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Seth Rich was Wikileaks informant - which is considered Mossad operation since Assange allegedly reports to Mossad, why is Rich's killing considered Mossad hit?

      Delete
  7. Nothing better than pooping here:....ppptttthh..πŸ’©

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Equally substantive answer to my question re: what's not a hoax because Dr Fetzer et al. here have not had shot to say about it...

      Delete
    2. I think Dr. Fetzer might be a provacateur.

      You deserve better consideration. You have only asked a simple question.

      The truth fears no inquisition.

      Delete
    3. Anonymouse 🐁August 10, 2016 at 11:57 PM

      Hey Steve! You gotta check out this site:https://hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2014/11/26/james-fetzer-professional-conspiracy-theorist/

      Delete
    4. This is very strange, because I posted a lengthy and rather detailed response to this question by Steven12, in which I went through case after case and explained why "things did not add up" and further investigation was warranted.

      In the case of JFK, for example, the vehicles in the motorcade were in the wrong order, where his limo was out in front when it should have been in the middle. Two agents were left behind at Love Field and the motorcycle escort was cut down to four and ordered not to ride ahead of the rear wheels. It didn't add up.

      In the case of 9/11, there is no evidence of any plane having crashed in Shanksville nor at the Pentagon, where the debris only began showing up later and appears to have been dropped from a circling C-130. One piece of fuselage from a 757 was traced back to a crash in Cali, Columbia, in 1995. It didn't add up.

      In New York, the planes appeared to disappear their whole length into the North and South Towers with no collision effects, which is a physical impossibility. They should have crumpled against the buildings and most of their parts fallen to the ground, but that did not happen. It didn't add up.

      In the case of Sen. Paul Wellstone, the weather was fine, the plane was exception and he had two pilots when it only required one. The FBI was on the scene with preternatural speed and had to have departed from St. Paul at the same time as the Senator's plane. It didn't add up.

      In Sandy Hook, the school was in bad shape, loaded with asbestos and other bio-hazards and was not compliant with ADA requirements. There was no steam or heat rising from the building, no handicapped parking and cars in the middle rows were all parked facing the school. It didn't add up.

      In Boston, there were bodies on the ground with missing arms or legs, but no blood. The blood only showed up later, and it was Hollywood blood that came out of tubes. We even discovered they had used a smoke machine. It just didn't add up.

      As I explain in "Thinking about 'Conspiracy Theories: 9/11 and JFK", there are four stages of scientific inquiry, beginning with puzzlement when something does not fit with things you already know. Resolving that puzzlement leads to speculation about possible explanations and further research to sort them out.

      There is no unique answer to your question, because it is a function of one's knowledge, background and experience. Your presence here, however, does not fool anyone. You are obviously here to harass, not to learn. You don't add up.

      Delete
    5. There is no was that the planes should have crumpled and fell upon impact

      We can agree on many things, but that is certainly preposterous.

      There was enough space for the Aluminum to deform around the steel beams. This is a non-issue once you consider the kinetic energy and the heat, which would soften the aluminum.



      Delete
    6. Anonymous displays his ignorance about the structure of these buildings. Flight 175, for example, was intersecting with eight floors consisting of steel trusses filled with 4-8" of concrete, which, at 208' a side, represented an acre of concrete. Imagine the immense resistance posed by eight of those--where Flight 11 would have encountered seven.

      We know what happens when a commercial carrier encounters a small bird weighing a few ounces in flight. In fact, there were no collision effects from the encounter. It should have crumpled upon impact, but it didn't even slow down! This is such a stupid complaint that I find it difficult to take seriously anything coming from this source.

      Delete
    7. Where's the rolls royce engines, dunce? Office equipment found but no engines. You need better training, AP because this work doesn't appear to be a good fit for you.

      Delete
    8. By the way, Jim , the post at 8:37pm. was meant for the growing line of anonymous posters here.

      Delete
    9. Good point, David (although I believe they were Pratt and Whitney rather than Rolls Royce). We even have an antiquated engine at Church & Murray, where Jack White discovered FOX NEWS footage of a white van there where several men wearing FBI vests were unloading something heavy.

      It was stilling on an undamaged sidewalk under a steel scaffolding--and they even left the dolly behind! But something that massive hitting a concrete sidewalk would have damaged it tremendously. If the crash had been real, it would not have been necessary to plant an engine.

      I love how some of these phonies love to cite others! Anonymous cites a trash attack by a guy with whom I cross swords many times and who has nothing about me right--but he doesn't know and doesn't care about the difference between truth and falsity. Nothing new here.

      Delete
    10. Jim: The fact AP's come here to disrupt is a reflection you are on the the right track. You are threatening their control of the narrative.

      Delete
    11. Whatever.

      The hologram theory is impossible.
      Mini-nuke theory is impossible.

      James Fetzer succeeded in dividing the truth movement with bullshit.

      Most people realize this now.

      This is probably why this blog has only 3 commentators. Everyone else has better shit to read.

      He should have stuck to the truth.

      Delete
    12. David, I think you have it right. Anonymous does not offer arguments, only assertions, suggesting he doesn't know the difference. It is not I who has "divided the truth movement", but Steve Jones and Kevin Ryan (with their endless defense of nanothermite) and Judy Wood (with her endless claims about directed energy weapons).

      Ironically, these mini or micro nukes satisfy her definition of DEWs as devices that provide far more energy than conventional weapons and that can be directed, which is the case for those used on 9/11.

      Moreover--and this is especially telling--not only do both A&E911 and Judy Wood have half-baked explanations for HOW it was done but are unwilling to address the WHO and the WHY.

      Delete
    13. It's not fair to associate and devalue the Anonymous signature here simply because some juveniles whose brains have not yet attained mature evolution express opposition to Fetzer's and other contributors' superb concise argumentation. Fetzer's attack on those who present inadequate clarification of HOW but ignore WHO and WHY implies Fetzer does justice to Sheehan, who does address Who and Why, but as lawyer and historian does not deal adequately with the physics of HOW.

      Delete
    14. That vulgar poster belongs to a group on nuclear aspect of 9/11. He's known for his vulgarity elsewhere. He comes here because he's bored.

      Delete
  8. Issak Newton's GhostAugust 11, 2016 at 3:51 AM

    Jim Fetzer's theory of mini-nukes:

    9/11 + ☢ = 5.8��³

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is that supposed to constitution an argument? Have you studied the evidence, including the USGS dust samples? It cannot have been anything other than a nuclear event. But I am sure you simply don't care.

      Delete
    2. I saw the elevated tritium levels. Was the the EPA that made that test?

      I did see some USGS dust sample but they did not measure for radiation. I thought that the only proof was the tritiated water.

      Delete
    3. 9/11 + ☢ = 5.8πŸ’©³

      Delete
    4. Do you know how big a nuclear explosion has to be based on the critical mass of the isotope?

      I contend that any nuclear explosion would be visible on film for this reason, since the smallest nuclear explosion is really quite large.

      You cannot have a small nuclear explosion.

      Delete
    5. There's a lot out there about the use of nukes on 9/11. The USGS dust studies are important --as well as the unusual cancers incurred by firemen and other first responders. Very fine dust is a signature of their use. The proof of nukes is actually rather extensive.

      Some of these nukes have dilatable radi, say, of 100', which would create a diameter of 200' in buildings that were 208' on a side--and directed upward. Which means they qualify as "directed energy weapons" in the send of Judy Wood. Would it be a novel suggestion for you to take a look at the book and compose a review for amazon.com, for example?

      Delete
    6. I think only one nuke per building is possible. The smallest critical mass, with shielding, is a few kilos of Plutonium.

      There would be no way to hide more than one of these per building.

      This is a mini-nuke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiM-RzPHyGs

      This is the smallest nuke in the arsenal. It is not theoretically possible to have a much smaller nuclear explosion than this.

      Delete
    7. Since the Davy Crocketts were developed in the 1950s, you think there have been no developments over the past 65 years? The devices that were used on 9/11, however, appear to have been modifications of those.

      These mini or micro nukes have a dial-able radius that could be set for 100', giving it a 200' diameter, and directed upward. Then they were set off in a sequence intended to simulate that of a collapse.

      60-80 tons of steel simply disappeared in 9-11 seconds (9 for the South Tower, 11 for the North). Where did it go? And turning material into very fine dust is a signature of nukes. New York was covered with very fine dust.

      The US Geological Survey studied samples from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been present (in the quantities and correlations found) had this not been a nuclear event:

      Barium and Strontium, Thorium and Uranium, Lithium, Lanthanum, Yttrium, Chromium, Tritium. Plus there has been a stunning incident of deaths and maladies suffered by those first on the scene that are associated with exposure to ionizing radiation.

      This comes from an article in Veterans Today, which makes your mention of Davy Crocketts of special interest in this context:

      According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.

      Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)

      All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc. According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editor’s note: Document received and confirmed)

      Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop them in place. The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.

      Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72 hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editor’s note: Consistent with site data)

      Read more at http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/

      Delete
    8. Moreover, they cause intense heat. If there were sever radiations burns, these people would probably be the first to sue the government!

      http://www.aasc.ucla.edu/cab/imgContent/200706140002.jpg

      Any survivor with radiation burns?

      Delete
    9. Do you realize people were vaporized at Ground Zero?

      Delete
    10. There is no physical evidence for people being vaporized.

      The chemical evidence is lost in the atmosphere the moment it happens.

      Delete
    11. People were vaporized in Japan. Hello?

      Delete
    12. OMG.

      I am talking about New York.

      Nice diversion asshole.

      Delete
    13. Just admit you are wrong, move on and let the adults sort this out. Anyone named anonymous won't be taken seriously.

      Delete
    14. David Norton is wrong about anyone named anonymous won't be taken seriously, but right that this juvenile who uses the name Anonymous 11:13 demonstrates what Goethe said about invention without refinement or in other words imbalance of intellect and empathy. Disposition for sociopathy.

      Delete
    15. Isaak Newton's Ghost please take more drugs and enroll in an art school

      Delete
    16. I am wrong Dave Norton? How?

      The stupid Nuke theory is wrong.
      The stupid hologram theory is wrong.

      If you cannot see that, you are a tool.

      Delete
    17. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    18. Not grasping New York was nuked is pure denial. Take your juvenile actions and illogical assumptions someplace else.

      Delete
    19. OMG. I am juvenille?

      Where was the muchroom cloud and the blinding light; the searing heat?

      What about the EMP? Was there a power surge in adjacent buildings?

      Radiation poisoning is hard to miss. Your hair falls out.

      The burns are unmistakable.

      Delete
    20. Several types of rare cancers of first responders. Tritium levels 55 times background level even after all that water at ground zero. Tritium is a rare radioactive isotope.

      Delete
    21. The presence of other radioactive elements not known to be in towers. The presence of Zinc. I could go on and on. Snap! Wake up!

      Delete
    22. What radioactive elements were present? What is your source

      Delete
    23. This isn't a college class. Research on this topic is voluminous on the internet. Asking for souces is a common tactic of trolls and obstructionists.

      Delete
    24. I read the Tritium paper, but I have yet to see anything else. The USGS samples did not measure radiation.

      Is there is an over-abundance or fission products I would like to know.

      You don't have any compelling evidence do you?

      Didn't think so.

      Delete
    25. Asking for sources is completely legitimate.
      Mr Norton could advise the inquirer sources are available in Internet.

      Delete
    26. What I've read is available for others to read. Have fun researching. I started from scratch. Mr. Fetzer gave Mr. 'Out On The Limb' Anonymous a primer on what happened on 9/11l and he is still not convinced. Adding to this list

      Delete
    27. Is a waste of my time and asking for sources from that poster is troll behavior.

      Delete
    28. Mr. 'Out on the Limb' Anonymous, if you would pay attention and read, you would have noticed I stated there is voluminous information on the topic. What part of voluminous information on the internet don't you understand?

      Delete
    29. You are prevaricating.

      There is no evidence.

      Delete
    30. Jim gave you everything you need. Get lost troll!

      Delete
    31. For fission of uranium-235, the predominant radioactive fission products include isotopes of iodine, caesium, strontium, xenon and barium. The threat becomes smaller with the passage of time.

      So, are you saying that the Strontium and Cesium levels are indicative of nuclear fission?

      http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html

      Did anyone uses a Geiger Counter? Did anyone have a radioactive thyroid?

      Delete
    32. Has anyone replied to Steven Jones' paper?

      http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf

      He puts massive holes in the "Mini-Nuke Hypothesis" with his metaphorical cock. Absolutely buttrapes it!!!

      Delete
  9. Whatever happened to Chuck Bolwyn and Allan Powell who used to be on Fetzer's show all the time?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CHECK OUT 911SCHOLARS.NING.COM FOR MOST OF CHUCK BOLDWYN'S 911 RESEARCH, CALCULATIONS & CONCLUSIONS

      Delete
  10. Nukes do not pulverize material, as we saw with the WTC1 and WTC2. Nukes generate a lot of heat (several million degrees) and a lot of light. If nukes of any size (micro or mini) had been used to destroy WTC, then the towers would have been vaporized, i.e. turned into hot plasma, not into clouds of cold dust. Because we saw neither extreme heat nor blinding light, it is safe to say that nukes were not used to destroy WTC. Some kind of low-energy nuclear reaction maybe, but not nuclear bombs as we know them. We are talking about traces of radiation, not a Hiroshima-type event.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I second that!

      Now if only Jim can admit that he is wrong or has been lying all along.

      Delete
    2. 1. Has Jim ever admitted that he was wrong?
      2. Has Jim ever lied?

      Delete
  11. More and more coward trolls that don't have the cajones to use their real name. Pathetic!

    ReplyDelete
  12. When the Light is turned on, the Dark has no place to hide.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Just few weeks ago I saw a comment about Dr. Ekpen Temple, someone talking about how he has help him in his relationship break up, I also contacted him because i was facing the same problem in my relationship, today i can boldly recommend Dr. Ekpen Temple to someone who is also facing break up in his or her relationship to contact him for help today because he has help me restore my relationship back to normal, here is he contact details (ekpentemple@gmail.com) or whatsapp him on +2347050270218

    ReplyDelete