Monday, August 1, 2016

An Olympic Sized Scam: The Munich Shooting

Scott L. Alexander

Once again the world has been shocked by another senseless killing of innocent people by a gun-wielding maniac. However, as the events unfolded we once again begin to see and hear various incongruous aspects that reveal yet another contrived and staged event. I often read comments to articles such as this one by readers who show their frustration by asking such questions as, “So, do you think that every mass shooting or killing a false flag?” Many readers accuse myself and others of being “conspiracy theorists”, or even “disinformation agents”. To a certain extent I can understand their frustration. After all, our governments are suppose to help keep us safe and news media organizations are suppose to exist to give us honest and unbiased information. Unfortunately, we live in a world where our governments lie and deceive us, and the mainstream media is their agent in this deception with one prevarication after another. Of course not every event that entails mass casualties is a false flag or staged event, but sadly, most are.

An Observation

Before I offer my thoughts on the latest shooting event in Munich, Germany that took place on Friday July 22, 2016, I would like to offer an interesting observation I have been witnessing of late. I will then tie these observations into what we witnessed in Munich and other recent events.

Over the past few years I have noticed a trend in major motions pictures put out by the various Hollywood studios. It used to be that whenever there was a movie scene in which a television news reporter was covering a particular incident that news entity was always fictitious. For example, if Godzilla was terrorizing Tokyo or New York City the news crew covering the event would have a name like GGN or World News Bulletin. In other words, they were not real news organizations.

In addition, the reporters for these fictitious news organizations were always nothing more than actors hired to play a convincing role in the film. Lately, however, that has changed. We are now beginning to see real news organizations, such as CNN and Fox News being used in these movies. Also, instead of actors we see actual media personalities such as Anderson Cooper, Wolf Blitzer and Larry King in addition to others.

Why is this being done? Is it to enhance a sense of realism in order to draw in the audience? I believe that is only one aspect. The familiar face and voice of a real-life journalist does make for a more realistic scene. Hollywood executives are fully aware that their audiences will find a certain comfort in seeing a familiar face. But the motion picture industry consists of more than just actors, directors, producers and special effects artists. Hollywood also employs focus groups, PR firms and even psychologists and sociologists. Most of us do not stop and consider these aspects because, quite understandably, we just want to be entertained.

The USG in Hollywood

The United States Government, along with the various intelligent agencies, are also represented in Hollywood and have been used for decades. Even the various branches of the military are represented and are even used as a kind of subtle and subliminal recruiting tool. Stop and consider movies such as Independence Day, Transformers, The Avengers, Battle Los Angeles, etc. What do these movies have in common? They all have US military involvement. Whenever we see aircraft carriers, F-16’s, Apache helicopters, tanks and the like who is operating this equipment? Hollywood actors and stuntmen are not operating these pieces of hardware. They are using actual fighter pilots and other military personnel. The Military Industrial Complex knows full well that they can expect to gain new recruits by showing the patriotic exploits of our nation’s military in Hollywood films.

All of these tactics are well planned and thought out forms of psychological imprinting. What’s more, the United States, more often than not, is portrayed as the “good guy” in these motion pictures thus instilling a sense of American patriotic pride with enthusiastic shouts of, “USA! USA!” What could be more wholesome than extorting the virtues of truth, justice and the American way? However, the reality is quite another story.

A few days ago I watched the recently released Batman vs. Superman movie. This film contains eight real-life media personalities who reported from Batman’s Gotham City and Superman’s Metropolis, including, Anderson Cooper, Nancy Grace, Charlie Rose, Soledad O’Brien, Dana Bash, retired blogger Andrew Sullivan, Vikram Gandhi and TV host Neil deGrasse.

I expect this trend to continue as other blockbuster films continue to be released. This is not only being done to enhance a sense of realism into a particular scene or movie. This is a deliberate and well-planned psychological effect in order to shape and mold our way of thinking and looking at tragic and/or sensational events. Whether it’s Gotham City, Orlando, Florida or Nice, France and Metropolis, the lines are being blurred. Subliminally we are being conditioned to believe that whatever the mainstream media presents to us, whether true or fabricated, should always be believed. At the same time we are being desensitized to violence and gore. Whether it’s on the silver scene or on our eleven o’clock news, the constant bombardment of these shocking images of death and mayhem are done in order to further instill a normalcy bias. It’s time we begin to use our own critical thinking skills and break away from those that are trying to control what we think and believe.

Turning to Munich

Several excellent articles and videos covering the recent shooting in Munich, Germany have been written by observant members of the alternative/independent media. Each author has his/her own take on what transpired as well as to how and why it might have taken place. Some of the more fascinating aspects being pointed out is the relation to numbers and dates and how they coincide with this event. Many believe that numerology and various occult aspects play a major role in these events and are not coincidental. Some refer to what they call the “powers that be”, the “Illuminati” or the “Globalists” as staging these events. While I do not discount these observations, I am not an expert in the occult, numerology or gematria and will leave that type of analysis to those better versed than I.

My background and expertise is that of a veteran police officer and former detective. I first look at these events as a law enforcement professional. What are police agencies and first responder personnel doing and how are they acting? I next look at the crime scene(s) to get an idea of what has transpired and what clues I can find in order to further my investigation. The one thing I do not do is jump to conclusions and place blinders in front of me. Every crime is different and no two are exactly alike. The worst thing we can do is to assume that every shooting, assault or murder is the same. That being said, at the same time there are aspects of certain crimes that contain consistent themes such as victim and supect behaviors, crime scene processing, etc. With this in mind, here are some of my observations.

Too Many Law Enforcement Personnel

When this incident first began to unfold I was fortunate to have caught the beginning live footage as it was being broadcast on Sky News. The first thing I noticed was that police were literally coming out of the woodwork. A very short time had transpired since the initial report had come in, yet you had dozens of police officers in full combat gear already on scene.

While police practices do differ somewhat in European countries compared to the United States there are tactics used that are universal. I seriously doubt that German police officers can get into their uniforms and positions any faster than American officers. While the majority of agencies in heavily populated cities do have SWAT and/or counter-terrorist officers prepared for deployment it takes time to coordinate and assemble. Fully armed tactical officers don’t just sit around all day in armored personnel carriers waiting to spring into action.

Take a look at the officer below. Look at all of the equipment needed for an operation such as this. While Europe is known to have heavily-armed officers in their major cities most are not this heavily equipped. Assembling this much gear takes time. Yet, we see dozens of similarly dressed officers.

Additionally, prior to being deployed in a tense and fluid situation such as this, where innocent human life is at risk, you must have coordination among the various officers. Certain teams of officers are assigned specific tasks. One group might be securing one scene while another group is securing another. In other words, everyone has an assignment to execute. However, what we saw in Munich were officers running around seemingly not really knowing what their job is. For instance, take a look at the following photographs.

The live news coverage kept showing the above officers. They seemingly had no destination or sense of urgency. It was though their commander simply instructed them to just keep running around the block until told otherwise. These are tactical/SWAT officers. They don’t just run around. They normally get to their posts and get down to business.

Another point to assess here is that in the beginning of the live broadcast we were advised that there were at least three shooters. Then we were told that this was the work of one single “lone gunman”. Where have we heard this before? If we accept the lone gunman scenario then we have to ask this: Why have they locked down an entire city and deployed this much manpower in search of a single, teenage shooter? This reminds us of the Boston Marathon where martial law was essentially employed and the residents of Boston were told to “shelter-in-place” while a massive manhunt ensued to find a single teenager who was hiding in a boat! Imagine if the city of Chicago went into lock down every Friday and Saturday night while the police searched for a single shooter. It’s simply absurd.

Make no mistake. All of these police officers were used by the media for dramatic effect. As usual you have officers randomly pointing their firearms at a threat that could not possible exist. Here are some examples. I would not be surprised if some of these officers were simply hired as actors.

Seriously. What is this female officer (below) pointing at? It must not be too concerning because no one else seems to be aware of a threat.

SWAT Team or GQ Fashion Shoot?

These officers look more like a Chippendale’s dance team! I don’t think it takes this much fire power to secure a Game Stop! If this were a real event this many officers would not likely be standing huddled together for fear of being shot by cross-fire from their fellow officers.

The McDonald’s Crime Scene

We were told that victims were shot and killed by the alleged shooter inside and outside of this McDonald’s. What we should see here is police tape to block public access to the crime scene. Also, the gunman fired several rounds of ammunition from his semi-automatic handgun, but we see no evidence markers showing investigators the location of spent shell casings and other pieces of evidence. Lastly, although we were told that victims were shot at this location, we see no evidence of blood on the pavement, no damage to the building or immediate area, no broken windows, etc. Again, if multiple victims were shot there would have been blood at the scene.

Matching Shooters?

These appear to be two separate individuals even though we were told there was only one shooter. The suspect firing outside the McDonald’s location appears to be older and more stocky than the individual who was firing from the rooftop. With that said, the photos are of a poor quality, so I might be inclined to change my analysis of this should higher resolution photos become available. The grainy photos and video have become typical for these types of events. Almost any cell phone today takes fairly high quality photographs and video, yet we always seems to be shown 1963 Zapruder-like footage of the actual suspect and shooting while all other photos are highly pixelated and crystal clear.

Witnesses, Survivors and Family Members

Within the law enforcement community investigators use a concept known as “The Victim Profile”. This can give investigators valuable insight into the state of mind and believability of people who have been, or have claimed to have been involved in a traumatic event. Most people who have been shot, shot at and/or been in the immediate vicinity of a shooting are most likely to exhibit certain behaviors consistent with a traumatic event where they were in fear of their lives. For example, a person is likely to be confused, frantic, shaking, crying, etc. They may even exhibit symptoms of shock and/or disbelief. However, they would not, for example, appear calm. While there are exceptions to every case we usually call those types of people sociopaths!

The Rooftop Argument

We are told that the man shown above had an argument and verbal exchange with the shooter. He lives in an apartment above the parking garage where the suspect was firing rounds. Among the many other ridiculous and unbelievable statements this man stated that he wanted to kill the suspect, so he threw an empty beer bottle at him. Miraculously there just so happens to be a video of his conversation with the suspect. Here is the transcript of their conversation. (Also, notice there is a full-sized professional video camera on the table directly behind him. Where did that come from? I would be interested in knowing more about this man’s background.)

Ask yourself if any of this is remotely believable. No one talks like this.

Balcony man: “You fucking assehole you...”Gunman: “Because of you I was bullied for 7 years...” 
Balcony man: ‘You wanker you. you’re a wanker’Gunman: “...and now I have to buy a gun to shoot you” 
Balcony man: “A gun! Fuck off! Your head should be cut off you asshole”
The gunman and balcony man begin shouting at each other.  
Balcony man (apparently to people filming:) “He’s got a gun here the guy has one” 
Unseen voice: “Fucking Turks!” 
Balcony man: “Fucking foreigner!" 
Balcony man to someone else: “Ey! He’s got a gun! He has loaded his gun. Get the cops here. He’s walking around here the wanker” 
Gunman: “I am German” 
Balcony man: “You’re a wanker is what you are” 
Gunman: “Stop filming” 
Balcony man: “A wanker is what you are. What the fuck are you doing?” 
Shooter: “Yeah what, I was born here” 
Balcony man: “Yeah and what the fuck you think you’re doing?” 
Gunman: “I grew up here in the Hartz 4 (unemployment benefits in Germany) area.” Balcony man and Shooter talk at same time.  
Balcony man: “Yeah treatment is something for you” 
Gunman: “I haven’t done anything here for (unintelligible) ... ‘Please shut your mouth” 
Balcony man: “You cunt you” 
Balcony man to people nearby: “Hey, he’s on the upper floor here”The cameraman goes into cover as the gunman starts firing.  
Balcony man calls him a cunt again. 
Balcony man: “They must have been shitting into your head” 
Gunman: “They have not. They have not, that’s the thing. They have not”
Again, no one talks like this. However, if you look closer and play particular attention to the phrases that were used you begin to see a pattern. Therefore, I believe that certain aspects of this conversation were scripted intentionally. For instance, when the Gunman states, “Because of you I was bullied for seven years” that helps to reinforce the part of the media’s narrative that told us the suspect was indeed said to have been bullied while in school. Likewise, when Balcony Man shouts, “Yeah, treatment is something for you” that reinforces the media having told us that the suspect had a history of mental illness and had been receiving therapy from mental health professionals.

Shooting Victim’s Father

There are several stages in the grieving process grief, commonly known as shock, denial, anger and acceptance. This man’s twenty-one year old son has just been murdered. How does he express his grief? He walks through the streets of Munich carrying a bouquet of flowers and his son’s photograph. He then goes up to random people, shows them the photo and says, “This was my son.” Again, this is not believable. He shows no signs of distress or loss and he sheds no tears. The media is using this as photo-op in an attempt to play on our emotions hoping that we will be sympathetic.

Another Loner With a Manifesto

The day following the shooting we were told that the suspect had been identified as an eighteen year old German-Iranian man by the name of Ali David Sonboly. He was described as a friendless loner who had been bullied in school. He was obsessed with school mass shootings, which police said was likely one of the motives for his actions. In addition, we were told that he spent the majority of his time playing violent video games. Most unbelievable too was that Sonboly was said to have hacked a young girl’s Facebook account where he then posted a message to lure people to the McDonald’s by offering to pay for their food. Seriously? Ask yourself if that sounds logical.

Sonboly lived with his parents and siblings. During a search of the suspect’s room police found a manifesto (there’s always a manifesto) as well as computer evidence which the authorities stated showed that the shooter had obtained his firearm and ammunition via the internet’s “Dark Web”.

During media coverage a reporter stated that he had spoken to several occupants of the apartment complex, but that no one remembered seeing or knowing Sonboly. It was though he did not really exist. This is very reminiscent of Adam Lanza – the shooter who was identified as having shot and killed children at Sandy Hook Elementary.

This is suppose to be a friend of David Ali Sonboly’s younger brother. Every time he was asked a question about the shooter he would glance over to his right as if being coached by someone off camera as to what to say.

Victims Left in the Street

Once again see victims who have been left in the street with people standing around unconcerned. Had this been an actual shooting these people would have been immediately stabilize at the scene and quickly rushed to the hospital. Even if they were deceased first responders would not have just left them lying on the pavement.

This victim was reported to have died on scene after having been shot four times in the back. The man in the white tee shirt told reporters that he tried to stop the bleeding and was talking to the victim in an attempt to keep him calm. If he was shot four times then the area and the man in the white tee shirt should have been covered in blood. However, what we see looks to be nothing more than some red food coloring.

Staged Memorials

In almost every instance following a false flag, staged or contrived event you will always find mourners who have brought flowers, candles, teddy bears, etc. In addition, you also have all the hugging and crying with no one actually shedding a tear. It’s fake! An interesting example in Munich is that at every memorial I came across I found the exact same kind of flowers and the same candles inside bright red containers. This leads me to wonder if there is a False Flag Specialty Store where citizens can purchase their flowers and candles so that every memorial is uniform in its design and aesthetically pleasing.

Three’s a Crowd

Finally, as I mentioned earlier in this article, during the original live broadcast media was reporting that authorities were looking for at least three individuals believed to be involved in the shooting. There were even eye-witness reports from people who told reporters that they observed three men firing weapons. Then, as is typical in these types of mass shootings, the narrative is suddenly changed to the theme of the lone gunman.

Even though we have photos of the three suspected shooters we were later told that these men were briefly detained and released once police found that they were not connected to the shooting. Why does this always happen? Sandy Hook, San Bernardino, Orlando, Dallas and Baton Rouge were all reported originally to have more than one shooting suspect before the narrative changed.


I believe these types of staged events will only increase in number and frequency. In the time I have spent writing this article there have been two more attacks in Germany. A man was reported to have used a machete to murder a pregnant woman near Stuttgart. A few hours later reports came in from Ansbach that a suicide bomber, who is also reported to be a Syrian refugee, had detonated an explosive inside a wine bar. It seemingly does not end. There will be more. All we can do is seek out the truth and utilize our critical thinking skills and independent thought. We can no longer rely on our government or the mainstream media. We must first trust ourselves and find like-minded individuals. The media are playing on our emotions in an attempt to distract us from looking at the facts. Another way they are doing this is by inserting popular media figures into our favorite motion pictures as I mentioned at the start of this article. Don't be taken in by it. The summer is only half over...and it’s only going to get hotter.

Scott Alexander has been a police officer for the past twenty-four years. Fifteen of those were spent as a general detective. For those that may be unfamiliar, a general detective is a police officer who investigates a wide variety of crimes without specializing in one particular field. They are (what you might refer to as) the “jack of all trades” in the detective world. Aside from homicides, sex crimes and undercover drug operations, Scott has investigated just about every other type of crime – from petty theft to harassment and stalking to fraud and forgery. 


  1. OK, so Munich shooting was a hoax.

    Can Dr. Fetzer, Mr. Alxander or others tell me which events they've analyzed with their investigative techniques that turned out NOT to be hoaxes?

  2. Well, hundreds of thousands of events take place every day and the overwhelming majority of them are authentic, not faked. But experience after 9/11 has shown that it is easier to use actors and a script than to actually murder people, whose relatives and friends might get pissed off and do everything they can to expose what happened.

    1. Steve is co-intel or mentally unable to see your points no matter how clear and persuasive. Move on to the next.

    2. He didn't answer my question - what "point" is there to see? The answer to my question would be in the form of events - e.g., Columbine was investigated and found not to be a hoax.

      Why is that an unfair question, or evidence of being "mentally unable" to see someone's point?

      Why is this question so hard for everyone?

    3. I'm sure that Dr. Fetzer will answer my Q when he gets a chance - it's a very simple Q and every one of the events he or his fellow researchers have investigated can't be a hoax, so I'm sure a list will follow at some point. I'm also sure he's quite busy, so I understand that he has not had a chance to answer yet.

    4. And Steve has no problem with no bodies, no blood, no gun casings, idiotic witnesses, family members not crying, etc.

      Oh, and the Mossad agent who just happened to be filming at both the Nice hoax and this hoax.

      Steve, are you retarded, stupid, ignorant, or a paid shill? Or all of the above?

      I know the answer. Shill.

    5. Do you hvae reading comprehension issues?

      I'm not debating that this or any other particular event is not a hoax.

      I simply would like to know what has been found to NOT be a hoax using these methods. Very fair Q.

      Why are you all making something so simple into something so difficult.

    6. Jim: This Steve 12 is AP. He was on Breitbart attempting to bait people to make aggressive comments against the US government. You have to give him the boot. He's the log jam in genuine discussions like this one and others.

  3. "Well, hundreds of thousands of events take place every day and the overwhelming majority of them are authentic, not faked."

    Thank you for replying.

    1. I'm not talking about every day events.

    2. My question gives specific criteria:

    I'm asking what events that you have actually used your investigative techniques to analyze have been judged NOT to be hoaxes. So events that you turned the techniques on, but you deemed not to be hoaxes.

    If you know of other researchers who have investigated events and also came to the conclusion that the event was not a hoax that would also be helpful.



    1. Well, Victor Thorne was found dead and some think it was a suspicious death, but from my sources who knew him up close and personal, it was a suicide.

      Sandy Hook should be a good test case for you, since there are mountains of claims that it was a real event rather than a FEMA drill. You may want to examine that one in detail as a nice test case., for example, had 20 books on Sandy Hook but banned exactly one, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), which was the only one to disagree with the official account.

  4. I skimmed the article, but saw no reference to Richard Gutjahr. It seems that he was the photographers in Nice that caught the truck and either he or his daughter was the photographer that got the video in Munich.
    Now that is some lucky photographing.

    1. Good point. He seems to be filming these events all over the world: in Nice, in Munich and elsewhere, no doubt. He certainly has a finger on terrorist attacks!

    2. You should really give that Steve guy a straightforward and honest answer.

    3. As straightforward and honest as your moniker. Anonymous is so specific.

    4. Anonymous is my first name. Do I need to fax you my birth certificate?

      My mom was anonymous, so the doctor just put "anonymous" on my birth certificate. It has been this way for 32 years.

  5. Thank you Mr Alexander. You are an exemplary servant of the reading public. I wish I could award you a high Public Service Medal.

  6. Maybe you're traveling Dr. Fetzer? I'm sure you realize that this is a very common sense thing to ask for.

    Any investigator of any phenomena should easily be able to report which situations are 'phenomena present' vs. 'phenomena absent', so I know my answer will be coming shortly



    1. The events that are interesting are those that are both complex and controversial, especially ones of political importance. JFK, MLK, Bobby, 9/11, Sen. Paul Wellstone, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing and (now) Orlando and Dallas are those that have drawn the most attention. Egad! There are a staggering number of shootings and other events that do not appear deserving of scrutiny. So I am at a bit of a loss about your inquiry.

    2. False flag events tend to happen in well organized "democracies" like the USA, UK, France, Germany where they can provide some value to the gov. It would be pointless to stage one in Baghdad or Damascus where genuine ones go on all the time. Usually they are accompanied by calls for gun control. Calling for gun control in Afghanistan or Libya would be ridiculous. Would it surprise you to learn that apart from false flags there have not been any news worthy shootings for a long time, that they are rare events, and that at most shootings of the real kind might be family affairs where a father kills wife and children and self but is a nobody and therefor only attracts local media for a couple of days? Given the size of the USA, drugs, alcohol, and the availability of guns really very few shootings occur--but this is not the image of America desired by the Ruling Class who really dislike an armed citizenry! This should answer your question Steve12; it also suggests a project for you,viz. to begin searching the records for un-news worthy shooting involving three or more persons during the last ten years. Good luck.

  7. "There are a staggering number of shootings and other events that do not appear deserving of scrutiny. "

    Right. But have you ever looked at an event, started investigating, and found that it "checked out"?

    And if so, what events were those?

    1. "But have you ever looked at an event"--a good place to look now would be Chicago with all the gang killings. They get mentioned now and then and it is obvious that these were gang killings. No mystery. On the other hand when a Michael Hastings is killed and the police immediately claim it was suicide? (after all he was driving 80mph?) then you are justified in being skeptical. And these do seem to happen frequently. A UN guy going to testify about Hilary suddenly dies due to a gym accident? raises the eyebrows. But when someone drives into a ravine who has been drinking heavily . . . But Steven12 this a good project for you as I mentioned. You do the research and report back your findngs.

    2. He won't. He's AP. He's just here to obtruct with minutia. He will only report back to his supervisor at Langley, the SLPC or Tel Aviv.

    3. " good place to look now would be Chicago with all the gang killings. "

      I guess you don't know what an event is:

      And I asked what events Dr Fetzer had STARTED investigating but found was not a hoax. This is an easily understood question with which many are having comprehension issues.

  8. "He's just here to obtruct with minutia. "

    An overarching question such as the one that I'm asking is the opposite of minutia:

    1. Hey, LITTLE STEVIE 6-GRADE, isn't Summer Vacation over yet? Aren't you supposed to be back in your 6th grade class "SHEARING STUPIDITY" and SEDUCING SHEEP?

      Dude, you're never gonna graduate to the 7th grade if you don't stop screwing around (with sheep) and do some serious research.

      "Fat, drunk, and stupid" and working for UNCLE SCAM "is no way to go through life, son."

      ~ D-FensDogG
      'Loyal American Underground'

    2. Do you know what events have been analyzed by Dr Fetzer, Mr. Alexander, Dr. Eowyn, etc. and turned out NOT to be hoaxes Stephen?

      Very weird to see so many people run so hard from such an easy and fair Q

      I'm earnestly trying to figure out why you're all so scared of this Q that you refuse to answer. Maybe one of you will fill me in.

    3. for the last time, SFB-Steve12, Fetzer has a crystal ball which INFALLIBLY tells him which events are HOAXES and merit his investigations! He doesn't and has never waste/d his valuable time by investigating events which are not HOAXES!

    4. Your simple disappearance from this Blog, SFB-Steve12, will be fine!

    5. But how does he know which are hoaxes and which are not until he starts investigating? You're not making any sense.

      I just want to know which events he investigated and decided were not hoaxes.

      Very fair Q.

    6. The CRYSTAL BALL tells Fetzer which events to investigate, SFB-Steve12!

    7. LITTLE STEVIE6-GRADE, did you know that you are Uncle Sam's HARDEST WORKING yet MOST OVERPAID shill? (Are you even smart enough to understand what I just implied there with that question?)

      >>... I'm earnestly trying to figure out why you're all so scared of this Q that you refuse to answer.

      Yours is a 12-IQ question which, not surprisingly, matches the IQ you boast about in your pseudonym (Steve12).

      I have not "refused" to answer ANY question. And as stupid as you are, with that 12-IQ of yours, I suspect you're still smart enough to know by now that nuttin' 'bout YOU "scares" me in the least.

      You keep repeating this moronic question as if you think you've really come up with a "Gotcha!" gimmick. Well, it's the furthest thing from a "Gotcha!", and it's so damned retarded that most commenters have simply (and justifiably) ignored your silly ass.

      I'll be pleased as Spiked Punch to answer your 6th grade, 12-IQ question. But only under one condition:

      If I answer your question, do you give your word here, in writing, that afterwards you will SHUT THE FUCK UP(!!!) and never post that dumb-assed question again? Do you? YES or NO? (Not that I would really trust and take the word of a paid Uncle Scam shill like you but... do you promise, LITTLE STEVIE6-GRADE?)

      If you will drop this question forever and find a new line of bullshit to pursue after I answer the question, then I will answer it.

      Do we have a deal, Shill?

      ~ D-FensDogG
      'Loyal American Underground'

  9. A simple list will be fine.

    E.g.: Photos from event X, Y, & Z were analyzed and found to not be concealing a hoax. How hard is that?

    I mean, it can't be that EVERY event that ends up being analyzed ends up being a hoax, obviously. That would be discrediting of the analysis methods to say the least.

    So please tell me what the events "checked out".

    1. I got an answer for you Steve. Wait....uhhhh...uuuhhhhhh...ppth..💩

    2. I take it you didn't like the deal I offered you, eh? Well, I tried. You can't say I didn't try.

      ~ D-FensDogG

    3. PPppt..💩

    4. Dude, you're regressing!
      Now it's "Little Stevie 5th-Grade"!!

      ~ D-FensDogG

    5. pt..💩

      Sorry Stephen. It was the Chinese Buffet.

      You deserve a straightforward answer. I think that Columbine was not staged, but I have not looked into it.

      The fact is, that most shootings on the news do seem to be staged. People are not as violent as you would expect from watching the news.

      People kill people, but it is rare that people kill multiple strangers. There are usually people so despised, that they take homicidal preference to strangers.

      Think about your life. Is there anyone you wish dead more than a group of random strangers?

      But I agree. These False Flag Theories would seem more believable if there was a corresponding amount of shootings that were exonerated as legitimate by said theorists. I cannot really explain it any better than that. Legitimate shootings get much less fanfare, since the staged ones are staged with sensationalistic intent.

      I have not researched any shooting directly, so I cannot directly answer your question.

    6. You come on here wanting people to accept your scientific credentials and then you use the word believe. Case closed. I am shutting the door on you. Watch your hands.

  10. WHY has the Moderator not BANNED SFB-Steve12 from this Blog for repeatedly, ad infinitum, asking the same stupid question which has already been answered? WHY is Fetzer even bothering to reply to this SFB IDIOT?

    1. Banned for asking a simple Q? Are you guys really so thin-skinned that you want people banned for questioning something? And so simple a question!

      I thought questioning accounts of events was your guys' forte?

      I guess only if you ask certain questions. Others are not allowed? They're certainly not answered!

      How richly ironic...

    2. BANNING is the only solution to permanently get rid of SFB IDIOTS like you, SFB-Steve12!

    3. You're like a pesky fly, SFB-Steve12. You deserve to be SWATTED (BANNED)!

    4. 卐 Dont be a forum NAZI 卐

  11. I have specifically not moderated off Steve 12 because Jim responded. His/her moderated tone and seemingly innocuous question has not fooled me or any of the smart people on this blog who remember him. Now he and "godsend" have started another of those stupid feud hijacks.
    Speaking of those smart people, can any of you tell me how I go about "banning" or blocking a specific commenter in Blogspot? I can not figure it out and am tiring of going through each individual comment, especially when they seem to have nothing productive to do with their time besides be parasites who fill this blog with nonsense, vitriol and obvious evil shillery.
    Thanks for the advice, good people. You know who you are.

  12. I agree that Steve12 is some kind of op. We investigate cases that don't add up, especially when they have great political significance. The vast majority of events that transpire do not qualify for further investigation.

    Most deaths of Presidents of the US, for example, have appeared to be straightforward and not candidates for further exploration. The death of JFK, by contract, reeked of conspiracy and cover-up.

    Most legislation passed by Congress has more than perfunctory interest, but some, such as the PATRIOT ACT, NAFTA and the proposed TPP, have enormous political ramifications and deserve further investigation.

    It's when things don't add up that they draw attention by those of us who are attempting to expose deceit and deception by the government. Check out "Thinking about 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK", for more discussion.

    1. Hi Jim. I was wondering why some people at Truth and Shadows seem to think that you are a gatekeeper? I am not JAQing¹ off, I am just really curious. I like your JFK articles and they are really helping to elucidate the what transpired that day.

      ¹JOQ is an acronym for Just Asking Questions. This is a disingenuous technique that couches criticism as naiveté.

  13. Steve makes a good point about possible confirmation bias. Perhaps Columbine is an example of a legitimate shooting.

    From the article: "This leads me to wonder if there is a False Flag Specialty Store..."

    I found this hilarious.

  14. very nice blog,,,,

    PPC Training - Sit hub is experienced PPC Training course institute in uttam nagar, Delhi. We are proven to be the best training hub in uttam nagar, najafgarh, janakpuri, vikaspuri, nawada, Delhi, India

  15. This post is likeable, and your blog is very interesting, congratulations.
    us mail address

  16. Hello, I'm here to introduce someone to you all, his name is Dr.Ekpen Temple a spell caster that help me restored my broken relationship, I saw an article on the Internet someone talking about him how he help her in her relationship, today I'm a beneficial of that article, so that is why I'm also talking about how he has helped me so that someone out there that is facing the same challenge can also contact him for help. Here is DR EKPEN TEMPLE contact info: or on Whatsapp number +2347050270218.

  17. Get your personal numerologic report.
    Start the most interesting journey of your life and learn your true life purpose.

  18. If you need your ex-girlfriend or ex-boyfriend to come crawling back to you on their knees (no matter why you broke up) you have to watch this video
    right away...

    (VIDEO) Win your ex back with TEXT messages?

  19. Kv Green Homes PVT.LTD Company in Delhi Buy property in India- Buy Sale all types of Property in Uttam Nagar at best real estate company

  20. Gain instant access to 16,000 woodworking plans.

    Teds Woodworking has more than 16,000 woodworking plans with STEP BY STEP instructions, sketches and diagrams to make every project smooth and easy...