Sunday, August 21, 2016

Hillary Clinton’s teeth, tongue-hole & now-you-see-them-now-you-don’t wrinkles


By

There’s an episode of the old Star Trek TV series which reminds me of Hillary Clinton.
In “Mudd’s Women,” the Starship Enterprise intercepts a cargo spaceship and its occupants — a shady character named Harry Mudd and three women. Mudd would give these Venus pills to the women. When they ingest the pill, the women are instantly transformed into beautiful sirens; without the pills, they revert to their ugly old-hag selves.
Hillary morphs like one of Mudd’s women, looking old and wrinkled one day, then is suddenly transformed into smooth-skinned “Venus” Hillary.
Here she is, back stage with Barack Obama, on July 27, 2016, the third day of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Philadelphia, doing her typical open-mouthed laugh.
Hillary's hole, with Obama at DNC, July 27, 2016
It was this photo that alerted bloggers to the alarming hole in her tongue, suggestive of a recent biopsy for HPV tongue-cancer. Here are close-ups of the hole:
Hillary's tongue1When I wrote a post on her tongue-hole on July 30, 2016, observant reader Glenn47 noted that Hillary’s “teeth are in an unnatural shape.” Reader pumpkin responded that “Her teeth have been filed on the bottom.”
I remembered Glenn47’s observation when I recently, quite by accident, came across a picture of Hillary mere days before she had her teeth done. Take a look:
Hillary's teeth July 2016
Then there are her now-you-see-them-now-you-don’t wrinkles.
Here’s a photo of Hillary testifying at the Benghazi hearing on Capitol Hill on January 23, 2013, in which she made her infamous “What does it matter” outburst. See the fine lines above and the deep creases on the sides of her mouth?                                                                  
Hillary Benghazi testimony Jan 23, 2013
And here she is 3½ YEARS later, doing a bizarre brain-freeze “woo!” reaction to the cascading balloons at the DNC on July 28, 2016:
Hillary balloon brain-freeze DNC July 28, 2016
Here’s a side-by-side comparison of 2013 Benghazi Hillary vs. 2016 “porcelain doll” Hillary:
Hillary Clinton before & afterIt gives me the creeps just thinking of the torturous dental work, Botox and other cosmetic procedures that vain woman went through for her big moment accepting her Demonrat Party’s presidential nomination.
And to think she undertook all that torturous work while being so infirmed that she requires a cathetera defibrillator vestDiazepam injections, and help just walking up a few steps or standing up to deliver a short speech.
Hillary Clinton catheterHillary being helped up stairs 2016Hillary propped up by man in L.A., April 2016~Eowyn
Dr. Eowyn’s post first appeared at Fellowship of the Minds

7 comments:

  1. Pickes McFigglesworthAugust 22, 2016 at 5:09 PM

    Steve12, it is worse than that. Fetzer promotes disinfo either intentionally or unintenionally. His promotion of mini-nukes and holograms are the most obvious, but he might do less-than-obvious disinfo as well.

    Steven Jones has a paper on the mini-nuke theory if you are interested, and there are probably optical experts that can debunk the hologram theory easily. In fact, it may be so obviously flawed that they may not even try.

    What are you interested in knowing Steve? I know of some really good websites where people are honest and truthful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, he should list the politically significant events that are factually correct as told by mainstream historians and contemporaneous news media.

    I can vouch for a few events that were hoaxes/conspiracies:JFK, RFK, MLK, Moon Landing, and 9/11. There is overwhelming evidence that these events were substantially different than what is told by mainstream historians and MMM.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Erin McFlanagin (I <b>don't</b> have Freckles)August 23, 2016 at 3:26 PM

    He is living in a state of cognitive dissonance since he is compelling to defend things which are obviously untrue.


    I mean, Dr. Fetzer has to be aware that this kind of lack of transparency would never be tolerated in the scientific community


    True. That is why he booted from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. These people are scientists and could realize the egregious flaws in the mini-nuke theory. Jim Fetzer should have just said; "Well, that was a bad idea. I suppose you are right."

    But, no.

    Make me think that he was paid to create a rift in the 9/11 Truth Movement to obstruct justice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. PPthhh....💩

    ReplyDelete
  5. Iggie von Pigglesworth IIIAugust 23, 2016 at 10:05 PM

    PPhhth...💩

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Steve12. I see your ego is waiting for someone to acknowledge how smart (you think) you are so I will say it. Gee Steve12 you are really smart.

    I think applying some analysis to highly probable hoax events is a good use of Dr. Fetzers time. Conversely applying analysis to low probable hoax events is not a good use of time. Considering I have only seen him analyze 10-12 events over the last few years, as a reader I get a good return on investment of my time reading his reports,videos and blogs. If he analyzed every event the signal to noise ratio would weaken considerably and I suspect the impact would be lost. To me Dr. Fetzer has just honed his skill to only hunt where there is a high probability of catching his prey. Simple as that for me.

    PS BTW my troll spidey sense tingles when I read your posts.

    ReplyDelete