Thursday, November 10, 2016

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: THE ART OF THE DEAL

By Vivian Lee

I don’t do it for the money. I’ve got enough, much more than I’ll ever need. I do it to do it. Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That’s how I get my kicks.                                -Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
The stunning win by Donald J. Trump in the November 8th U.S. presidential election took many by surprise, since Hillary Clinton was the chosen candidate. Everyone seemed to think that Clinton would win – either legitimately or in a rigged election. News coverage favored Clinton by a wide margin, and the only major network to give Trump a break was Fox News.[1] Most polls predicted that Clinton would win the presidency, with her odds of winning put as high as 85% and Trump’s as low as 35%.[2] The pundits are now asking how they all got it wrong.[3]
trump-art-of-the-deal
Donald Trump with his book, The Art of the Deal. Image: The Guardian.
Blame is being placed on “the e-mail scandal,” with James Comey’s letter of October 28 to the U.S. Congress refocusing attention on Clinton’s private e-mails just 11 days before the election.[4] FBI Director Comey reopened the investigation after another 650,000 e-mails were found, this time on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The laptop was confiscated by the New York Police Department (NYPD) and turned over to the FBI. On November 6, Comey caved to pressure, announcing that no charges were warranted, but some said the damage had been done.[5]
Election night was a long, drawn-out affair, with final results not in until 2:40 am on Wednesday. The television networks “called” the electoral vote in the states, a notoriously undemocratic way of deciding U.S. elections before all the votes have actually been counted. Fox News ran consistently high vote counts for Trump, as opposed to the lower numbers predicted at CNN. Dramatic coverage continued into the wee hours, with a number of states said to be “too close to call” – including Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona, all of which eventually went to Trump, who won by a landslide.[6]
megyn-kelly-screenshot-11-8-16Megyn Kelly going to find out why Fox can’t call any more states for Trump. Image Fox News.
Although many states were “called” earlier in the evening based on partial results and exit polls, the last few states were agonized over by the networks, with Fox anchor Megyn Kelly walking back to the desk of experts twice to ask them why they could not call these key states – and when they might be able to do so. According to Kelly, she thought Fox would be able to call the election around 11 pm. She said she expected Clinton to win, until there was an abrupt shift, when “the real vote” started to come in. She ascribed the dramatic turnaround to
“a hidden Trump vote…It was a resounding victory. I have never seen anything like this. You will never have a result this shocking where people got it shockingly this wrong.”[7]
A return to Anthony Weiner’s laptop may provide an explanation.
weiner-washington-times
Anthony Weiner. Image Washington Times.
Unnamed but highly-placed sources, including NYPD detectives and prosecutors, revealed that the laptop contained “enough evidence to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life.” Also reportedly involved were Huma Abedin, Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein – convicted pedophile, as well as members of the U.S. Congress, the Saudis, and other interests in the Middle East. Epstein and his “Lolita Express” have been associated with numerous well-known people, such as Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton.[8] The NYPD reportedly said that if the FBI and Department of Justice did not issue indictments against “Clinton and co-conspirators,” they would go public with the e-mails. According to an NYPD chief:
What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach…There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to WikiLeaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that…People are going to prison.[9]
This being the case, what better way to stanch the blood than to give Trump the presidency?
Although Comey let Clinton off the hook, it seems clear that forces within the government had decided she was a liability. Should she be elected, the emails would come out, and she would be indicted along with many others. And Trump had vowed to investigate “crooked Hillary” with chants from supporters to “lock her up.”[10] Inconveniently, as it now turned out, the election had been fixed in favor of Clinton.[11] Clearly it was time to make a deal with Trump.
trump-1985-la-times
Donald Trump in 1985, shortly before the publication of The Art of the Deal. Image Los Angeles Times.
The best thing you can do is deal from strength, and leverage is the biggest strength you can have. Leverage is having something the other guy wants. Or better yet, needs. Or best of all, simply can’t do without. -Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Let’s say that Trump was approached by government insiders and told he could be president – if he agreed to certain terms. Let’s say that the deal was this: Trump gets a win on November 8th and becomes the nation’s 45th president; he lets all allegations against Clinton and her foundation drop; he respects Obama’s “legacy”; and he agrees to partner with Israel.[12] This deal was struck after Comey’s letter of October 28. Clinton was given notice as Election Day approached (although she may have held out hope that she could win). And the news teams were informed during the course of the election.
When the counter-fix went live, the networks experienced the turnaround – the “hidden Trump vote” referred to by Megyn Kelly. Around 10 or 11 pm, the anchors began to refer to Trump as the winner, frequently correcting themselves or qualifying their statements: “I mean, IF he wins,” or “that is, presuming he is elected.” This included Anderson Cooper and his cronies at CNN, who suddenly turned conciliatory toward Trump after months of abuse and slander. The consolation prize went to Clinton: winning the popular vote. Even this was predicted by the networks, with no surprise or consternation.
It’s strange how things can turn around. -Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Was this the deal of a lifetime? Or did Trump really win the election?
Vivian Lee is the nom de plume of a tenured professor at an east coast university.

Notes:

[1] “Open Season on Donald Trump: Corporate Press Propaganda at Behest of Clinton Campaign.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/10/29/open-season-on-donald-trump-corporate-press-propaganda-at-behest-of-clinton-campaign/
[2] “Why Did Many Polls Seem To Miss a Trump Victory?” CBS News, 11/9/16. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-did-many-polls-seem-to-miss-a-trump-victory/.
[3] “News Outlets Wonder Where the Predictions Went Wrong.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/business/media/news-outlets-wonder-where-the-predictions-went-wrong.html
[4] “FBI Investigating New Emails for Classified Information.” New York Times, 10/28/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/10/28/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-clinton-email.html. “Oct. 28 FBI Letter to Congressional Leaders on Clinton Email Investigation.” Washington Post, 10/28/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/oct-28-fbi-letter-to-congressional-leaders-on-clinton-email-investigation/2113/
[5] “FBI Chief: No Charges for Clinton after New Emails Reviewed.” New York Times, 11/6/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/11/06/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-clinton-emails.html. “Read the Full Text of James Comey’s Letter on the New Clinton Emails.” USA Today, 11/6/16. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/06/read-full-text-comeys-letter-new-clinton-emails/93398304/
[6] “Donald Trump Wins the Presidency in Stunning Upset over Clinton.” Washington Post, 11/9/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/election-day-an-acrimonious-race-reaches-its-end-point/2016/11/08/32b96c72-a557-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html. “Presidential Election Results: Donald J. Trump Wins.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president. “Key President Election Results by State.” http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
[7] “Megyn Kelly Admits She Was Expecting Different Election Result.” Western Journalism, 11/9/16. http://www.westernjournalism.com/megyn-kelly-admits-she-was-expecting-different-election-result/
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein. “Alan Dershowitz on the Defense (His Own).” New York Times, 12/12/15. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/business/alan-dershowitz-on-the-defense-his-own.html. “Prince Andrew Faces Court Appearance in ‘Sex Slave’ Case against Jeffrey Epstein.” Mirror, 9/22/15. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-faces-court-appearance-6495024. “Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender’s Jet Much More than Previously Known.” Foxnews.com, 5/13/16. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html
[9] “Breaking Bombshell: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury.” Infowars, 11/3/16. http://www.infowars.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
[10] “At Florida Rally, Trump Resumes Attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton.’” Washington Post, 9/27/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/27/at-florida-rally-trump-resumes-attacking-crooked-hillary-clinton/
[11] “Predetermined Vote Counts Show Nov. 8 Presidential Election Is Rigged in Favor of Hillary Clinton.” https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/11/03/predetermined-vote-counts-show-nov-8-presidential-election-is-rigged-in-favor-of-hillary-clinton/ “Trump’s Victory Should Not Obfuscate Election Fraud.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/09/trumps-victory-should-not-obfuscate-election-fraud/
[12] “Biden: Trump Administration Will Stand with Israel.” cnn.com, 11-9-16. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump-israel/index.html

34 comments:

  1. An impossible scenario. It would have needed to know Jim Stone was acting as a disinfo agent. He, Jim, lost track of the election for three hours when he went shopping - I think it was shopping. So even he was not signalling his intentions at that time.

    I doubt whether Jim could be co-opted. He has risked his life many times in the service of the good guys. Alex Jones got and released Jim's full report. Some guy got through to Zero Hedge with a 200,000 hits strategy and Tyler released the full JS report like Alex.

    None of this means a deal - Hillary won the popular vote and nearly the Electoral College. This was close. The rigging only ceased as I said to my wife at the time because they couldn't get a replacement team of top-level hackers/riggers in quickly enough to replace the guys exhausted by JS.

    Sorry don't buy it, Prof.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The article author offers no proof that the mysterious omnipotent riggers made a deal with Trump. Irony is Trump's assertion the election is rigged. Also assertions NYPD will bring Clintons to court make one tired. If Trump really wants to re-investigate 9/11, won't he be killed by the perps who presumably are identical with the riggers?

      Delete
    2. Get Your Trump Shirt NOW!

      Being Nice Is For Cowards And Democrats…Trump Summed It Up Perfectly…

      Will You Throw Away Your Political Correctness Crutch And Show You Are Ready To MAKE America Great Again? Get Your Trump Shirt NOW!

      Free + Shipping & Handling

      Find out here: Get Your Trump Shirt NOW!

      Best rgs

      Delete
  2. When things seem too good to be true...Maybe Trump has done a deal...I dont know. I sincerely hope he is who he says he is...but if he is...then I fear for him.... "They" will pull him into line...or remove him. A battle has been won...The war rages on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Rice*A*Romney....that must have Zombie Treat"....

    A satire at FauxScienceSlayer on a century of POTUS puppet shows. Two flawed, polarizing candidates stage mock campaigns, but one displays super human endurance, other is exposed as hard core, satanist criminal. Ruling Demonic Warlords got painted into a corner, rigged their way out by softening the Reptillary defeat ratio. Trump is being fitted with puppet strings, if he resists, there's the JFK exit plan.

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/30/conservative-scold-ken-starr-got-a-billionaire-pedophile-off.html

    PHARISEE
    “Conservative Scold Ken Starr Got a Billionaire Pedophile Off”
    “Many believe Jeffrey Epstein could have been jailed for life for violating scores of underage girls, but Ken Starr and the rest of his legal team got him a deal.”
    I think the above article is also relevant to all this speculation. Almost everyone knows who Ken Starr was or is today. Today he was recently fired or “reassigned” as president of Baylor University in Texas for refusing to take action against members of the football team who reportedly raped many co eds.
    Obviously Ken Starr has had a change of heart since the days of the Clinton scandal in the White House.
    This article illustrates how secrecy and money can change things. And this is likely what is behind the recent strange machinations by the Sandy Hook Birthday Boy James Comey who was born December 14, 1960 and today lives in Corrupticut. Since becoming the FBI director he also likely knows all the sordid details of Sandy Hook too.
    Ken Starr and James Comey are both lawyers. Lawyers love secrecy and promote and defend it in all of their communications with clients so they can say one thing to them in secret but promote something quite different in public for public consumption. Lawyers have bad reputations going back centuries in history. The mythical society of Utopia even banned lawyers because they “disguised” matters. Also Hillary and Slick are also lawyers trained to lie and cheat in secret at Yale University, New Haven Connecticut. Everyone should observe, however that Donald J. Trump, whatever he is or may be, hidden from the public, so far as we know he is not a trained lawyer. “I think we may class the lawyer in the natural history of monsters” John Keats. Reference: “IBM and the Corruption of Justice in America” by Earl Carey, Bismarck House, St. Louis, 1992. This remarkable book, published about 8 years before the internet came online, lists no less than 42 federal judges, all trained lawyers, by name and location, from Anchorage to Phoenix, from Pasadena to St. Paul, who patently violated their oaths and law with impunity all done in secret. All these machinations taken together support the suspicious possibility of the article, but likely the truth is much much worse and involves much larger sums of money. As the late Howard Zinn, Ph.D., former professor of History at Boston University observed, “The Jails are full of petty thieves but the grand thieves are running the country”. And he might have added, “….and all done in secret provided and protected by the full military armed force of government which we lowly citizens provide to them via our hard earned forced taxation.” Secrecy is the enemy of the truth. Until secrecy is eliminated in government, we lowly citizens will never know the truth about anything.
    Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So how can secrecy be eliminated in government, or are you unable to provide solutions because physics only taught you to recognize problems?

      Delete
  5. http://nypost.com/2016/11/09/the-one-scenario-that-could-still-get-hillary-into-the-white-house/
    The above article in the NY Post tonight illustrates the dichotomy between the meaning of an abstention at the voting booth and an abstention by an elector of the Electoral College.
    The data we use are for illustrative purposes only and not represented as precise. If we add up the current published data for the popular votes for president from Fox News, we get an approximate total for all four candidates of about 125 M where M means million. Again we are using round numbers for illustrative purposes only. This is the number of adult voters who are presumably legally registered to vote. It does not count children or non registered voters.
    From Wikipedia, if you add up adult women and men listed for 2014 you get about 245 M. This would include registered and non registered voters and others who may be disqualified from voting for crimes for example. Let us ignore these details. The 125 million who voted for either of the four candidates are the only ones counted in the total. Any others who went to the polls or voted by absentee ballot could have abstained from voting for any of the candidates for president while voting for other candidates or issues on the ballot. All these abstentions were flushed down the toilet in the count for president. Moreover since the difference between 245 M and 125M is 120M, this means about 120 M citizens abstained from voting for president and had their votes all flushed down the toilet. We can’t conclude what the number of registered voters are from the above data. Suppose we assume half of the 120M who abstained were registered voters. Then we would have 185 M registered voters total. A simple majority of this would be one half plus one or about 93 M . None of the candidates on the ballot even came close to this, the closest was Hillary with a little over 60 M. Therefore this illustrates what I have posted elsewhere that we have minority rule. No candidate received even a simple majority of the registered voters on these assumptions.
    Now consider what happens in the Electoral College. Theoretically an Elector of the Electoral College is not bound to vote the party line of the election results. It does not happen often but it can happen. If enough of them refused to vote for Trump this could theoretically deny him the nomination. However when Congress went to confirm the results they would likely ignore this should it happen and push him over the top anyway. But who knows? Congress can be very unpredictable too. An abstention by a lowly voter at the ballot box is rendered worthless, while an abstention by an Elector at the Electoral College could deny a candidate the whole election! This illustrates why it is fundamentally wrong to flush all abstentions down the toilet under any circumstances.
    Winfield J. Abbe Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wouldn't it be fundamentally right to propose concrete changes?

      Delete
    2. I have made recommendations in other posts. Basically the election law should read:
      "No one is elected or no ballot issue, like a tax increase passed, unless and until a majority of the registered voters say so period." This would still not include the opinions of the non registered voters either. Even with this system there could be many voters in the non majority group who would be unhappy with the outcome but at least this would be "simple majority rule" and not the tyranny of the minority now in place solely for the convenience of running government and at least under this proposal incumbent unopposed judges would not be "automatically" reelected. How would you like it if one person could show up at your state legislature and double your taxes? Well that is basically how our local sham elections work. In the previous post Captain Greene should be corrected to Commander Greene. By the way, after the above saga at the Navy School in Athens, Captain Ruff was abruptly fired by the Admiral in charge in Florida. Of course all the details and reasons for this unusual action were also a carefully guarded secret too, with the full military armed force of the government.
      Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

      Delete
  6. Jim: This article is bs and this community can do better than this patchwork article. I will debate this professor any place, any time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wrote to Vivian when she sent it that I thought he had simply overwhelmed their ability to rig the election. Because I post something I regard as valuable and important does not mean I therefore agree with it. You have displayed a profound desire to attack me for reasons I do not profess to understand. Your comment here is just plain stupid.

      Delete
    2. I sure hope you are not writing to me because I have displayed a profound desire to keep things civil and have supported your blog despite severe attacks upon my character. I sure hope you engaged in mistaken identity because you are way off base to the degree you should apologize for insulting me.

      Delete
    3. And another thing Mr. Fetzer, nothing I write on your blog is 'stupid.' I write measured, researched and intellectually based comments often extemporaneously.

      Delete
    4. What is "stupid" is asserting without argument that this article "is a lie", which would mean that it's author published it knowing it is wrong with the intent to deceive its readers. That is dumb.

      As many other comments suggest, what she has outlined here is a very plausible possibility, one in which I do not personally believe but one which I regard as well-reasoned and which could be true. You suffer from a lack of imagination and thought.

      Delete
    5. I did not assert it was a lie. Tripe? Yes. Her article is both ethically and logically flawed because she takes his comments in a general context and applies them to a specific situation to make her argument that his winning is not legitimate.

      Now on the this phantom criticism of you at every turn makes me wonder if you're not having a 'senior moment.' Your comment is baseless and bizarre. You should be thanking me and people like me who are pillars of truth telling. Of course, everyone is entitled to a bad moment or two.

      Delete
    6. By the way, Mr. Fetzer, propaganda can be plausible. That's why it works. It can be 95 percent accurate and five percent nonsense. People like us have to weed out the non-sense.

      Delete
  7. I think this is extremely plausible. The vitriol is not well explained. Noticeably, WikiLeaks was NOT mentioned in any MSM as having much to do with the Trump "win".
    Bev Harris' explanation of the failed rig (or counter-rig) may well fit with this information, but I think that is still a bit unclear since I thought fractional voting would have (sorry) "trumped" turnout. I understand the distribution of the vote, rural Trump vs urban Clinton may have played a role, but I again assumed fraction magic would have taken care of it.
    Third point is that it seemed when Dr. Drew mentioned Hillary's being prescribed 1950s era meds for her condition, someone had already had the fix in for her. So health was another factor in the globalists (Zionists) dropping her. Being a woman certainly did not help, it is also fair to say.

    The bitter fruit is that Bernie would have beaten Trump in both Michigan and Ohio, at least. The sweet fruit is that we may yet avoid serious confrontation with Russia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not just Wikileaks, but many other things were ignored when "explaining" the outcome. - Now the same European newspapers who daily published propaganda for Hillary and against Trump in most insulting manner for Americans are presenting Trump in friendly manner. That's the European shepherds and their sheep

      Delete
  8. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20161112_Did_Jersey_photographer_s_video_of_Clinton_stumble_change_course_of_history_.html
    Did Jersey photographer's video of Clinton stumble change course of history?
    Updated: NOVEMBER 11, 2016 — 12:04 PM EST
    QUOTE FROM ABOVE ARTICLE:
    “In the days after Donald Trump's stunning presidential win over Hillary Clinton, Zdenek Gazda has been bombarded by phone calls and texts, telling him he changed the election.
    He doesn't disagree with them.
    Gazda is a freelance photographer from New Jersey who filmed the video of Clinton after she became ill and stumbled at a campaign event two months ago.
    "People say to me that it showed she's not strong," Gazda said on Friday. "If I wasn't there, nobody would have known what happened....People need to know the truth."
    Some believe the video raised questions about whether Clinton was healthy enough to serve in the White House.
    Gazda, 50, said he has taken thousands of photos and videos in his career, but the feedback from his encounter with Clinton still stuns him.
    "Nothing close to it," he said.
    A version of his video has been viewed more than two million times on YouTube.
    Gazda used some old-school journalism instincts and was the only person near Clinton when she wobbled and appeared to collapse Sept. 11 after visiting a 9/11 memorial ceremony in New York City….”
    “Gazda, who had made more than $100,000 for his famous 20-second clip, said after he turned off his video, said he saw Clinton shaking inside the van.
    He admitted he wasn't sure what his video had captured until he looked at it. "I was shocked at what I saw," Gazda said. “
    "A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS." Click on the link to the article above and watch this stunning video. I think this makes more sense than the complicated conspiracy theories floating around. In physics usually the simplest explanations, consistent with experiments and facts are the correct ones. Complicated explanations are usually wrong and unintelligible as well. An example of this is the speculated genetic theory of cancer which is not only incomprehensible but has dismally failed for nearly 50 years but the "experts" do not want to let go because government continues to waste public money funding research grants in this field. The genius level biochemist Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. in Germany (1883-1970) has been quoted that they sought to make experiments as simple as possible. "With complicated experiments we have never learned anything new." or words to that effect. Warburg is regarded as the greatest biochemist of the twentieth century but the cancer generals have criminally disregarded his seminal discoveries on cancer because they hated his guts for remaining in Germany his entire life.
    Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have no doubt in my mind that Trump won the election because of the devastation and kick back of the common man. And for those reading entrails and tea leaves in these early days of the transition... I wouldn't recommend jumping to conclusions about the true motives of the Von Trump Family Don with regard to transition teams and early appointments. Don't forget, he was able to get the NY mob, unions, bureaucracy, banks, and neighborhood organizations to work together to accomplish what no one else could: build civilization. As a true impresario, a maestro, he must write the score, assign roles, direct the choreography, and conduct an orchestra filled with serpents, vermin, scum, and creators to manifest an unprecendented symphony that the masses will both applaud and receive value from in this theme park called America!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Common person, you sexist cocktard.

      Delete
    2. Women freaking exist and work, more than men, you know. You turd.

      Delete
    3. An interesting AND poetic comment? Thank you William.
      And thank the moderator for cleaning the filth from here so folks like William and Dr. Abbe have space to share their thoughts. Good community.

      Delete
  10. From Golddiggers 1933, "The Forgotten Man":
    https://youtu.be/CzMy7-7WV44

    ReplyDelete
  11. Podestas linked to Madeleine McCann adbuction?
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/14/british-detectives-efits-madeleine-mccann-suspect
    http://abcnews.go.com/International/maddy-mccann-cops-release-sketches-kidnap-suspects/story?id=20563026
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sketches-show-suspect-in-madeleine-mccann-disappearance/

    Those sketches by Scotland Yard are the freaking Podestas!!
    Un-fuckingbelievable.

    Check out also a site called pedocrats.com with a compendium on Podesta Pizzas, Laura Silsby, Epstein and more form the Wiki emails.

    This is why we got Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. Thanks for the reminder that there are children to be saved from monsters. We must not lose sight of the fact that this ancient coven of vampires and rapists is finally seeing some exposure. We can not let up now.
      https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/

      Delete
    2. God Bless you! What a great site.
      Pedocrats.com
      I've been on this for years and this guy has used his self described autism to put it all together.
      Thank you
      AA

      Delete
  12. Bev Harris (blackboxvoting.com) explained what happened on Alex Jones. The Hillary riggers waited in big cities, astride the computers, to see how much they had to bump the numbers to put her over the top. But the landslide was too big. Check out this map (scroll down for counties) and see that in everywhere but where they had their operatives waiting Trump was winning by at least 70, sometimes 80%!
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/2016-election-results/us-presidential-race/
    They would have had to "bump" the numbers in the cities they had blackmailed their way in to over 100%! They still used them liberally in California to give her the "popular vote" BS meme. The founding fathers knew that big cities might stuff ballot boxes (rig machines) so they created the electoral college.
    Add that to the fact that the NYPD had made too many copies of the material in Weiner's "life insurance" file for the satanists to find or kill them all, and their butt boy Comey was forced to say something by NYPD and what few honest FBI agents there might be. One officer did lose his life, and looks like another went down since. Then the negotiating began. The landslide made it so that they couldn't rig it easily, and the deal was she go away quietly.
    Add that to the fact that such an obvious steal would have had the real 70% Trump supporters screaming for paper ballots. That would finish off hundreds of the corporate butt boys that have been kept in power by them (Walker, McCain, Graham, Rubio). Then add to the mix that they work overtime to keep in power the people that they can bribe and blackmail, and you realize why there are so many pedophile satanists infesting the hierarchy, out of proportion to their numbers in real life.
    We must be vigilant and press while we are on offense. Children are being raped and murdered, after their blood is transfused to ancient hags. Whatever power is in calling on Jesus Christ, Angels, God, whatever, I call upon that power now. Save our beautiful children from these demons lord.
    AA

    ReplyDelete
  13. This article at Memory Hole is great if this subject interests folks. Then the comments below are even better. Smart people follow Dr. Tracy and Dr. Fetzer.
    https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/09/trumps-victory-should-not-obfuscate-election-fraud/#comment-119592

    ReplyDelete
  14. http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/11/12/michael-moore-shows-trump-tower-demands-meeting-president-elect/
    Video of Michael Moore on Facebook Live in New York.
    www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority%20rule
    1.
    2.
    “Full Definition of majority rule. : a political principle providing that a majority usually constituted by fifty percent plus one of an organized group will have the power to make decisions binding upon the whole.”
    Plurality | Definition of Plurality by Merriam-Webster
    www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plurality
    1.
    2.
    “Simple Definition of plurality. : a usually large number of things. : a number of votes that is more than the number of votes for any other candidate or party but that is not more than half of the total number of votes.”
    The Founders of this once great country went to great lengths to balance different interests and prevent any one interest from dominating presidential elections. Of course the country was totally different then. But the efforts of the Founders were intended to prevent powerful interests like the media today from brainwashing the public with lies as they do. This is exactly why we have the Electoral College which is difficult to influence as its groups meet independently in every state and are therefore difficult for prejudiced parties to influence. Michael Moore does not like this now because his left wing agenda is losing. His claims that they are the majority are also false. As usual this election was based on minority rule because most people abstained and all abstentions are flushed down the toilet as in all of our corrupt plurality elections. Moore needs to return to high school civics class. Also, who knows anything about these protesters; they are likely paid shills making an easy $500 per day in NY. Most of them likely never voted in their life.


    ReplyDelete
  15. If you're seeking out Muscle XTX the exceptional present for your children, one that they will not grow out of and they also can preserve to experience for years, ensure to test out professional.For more ==== >>>>>> http://purenitrateadvice.com/muscle-xtx/

    ReplyDelete
  16. This election campaign should be viewed as a contest between two groups on the top. A genuine contest, not just one for the show.

    Contemporary observer, Senator Ladd, noticed that the agitation and debate in the years leading up to the Federal Reserve Act was a contest between two banking groups:

    "I do not know that the throwing over of George Harvey, with sympathies for the house of Morgan, and the taking on the ship of Paul M. Warburg, of the house of Kuhn, Loeb &. Co., by the Wilson forces had anything to do with the capture of both parties, but I have long had my suspicions that it did have a great deal to do with it. It has long been rumored that there are two groups of the big international bankers who are continually battling silently against each other for financial domination, and there are many indications that such is true. However, that does not mean to say that they are at variance as to the system to be used, or that there is difference of opinion when it comes to the necessary legislation for their operations. In these matters they usually present a solid front, save where it obviously would be prudent to adopt a different method of procedure. Obtaining authorization for their system through legislative channels is entirely different from a fight between themselves for control of the system. All of this talk about who is the author of our present financial system is principally chatter. Some day I may deem it advisable to say something to this body about Mr. McAdoo and his connections with Kuhn, Loeb & Co."

    In the 1832 election campaign the House of Rothschild and the Rothschild-friendly State banks supported Andrew Jackson and the anti-Bank of U.S. Democratic party; Whigs and Anti-Masons voted for (paid) friends of the Bank of the United States (in which Baring brothers and Stephen Girard were shareholders)

    Unmitigated audacity, lying, viciousness, hard-cider were the order of the day in 1832, 1836, 1840.

    ReplyDelete