Monday, January 16, 2017

NUKING THE INAUGURATION (20 JANUARY 2017)


Jim Fetzer 

 MY NIGHTMARE NUCLEAR SCENARIO FOR 20 JANUARY 2017:
 













BARACK TO BE THE "DESIGNATED SURVIVOR". HE WON'T BE THERE.




​SHE WILL ATTEND AS THINKING THIS IS A "SPECIAL TREAT".

SHE WILL BE SACRIFICED FOR "THE GOOD OF THE CAUSE".

HILLARY HAS USED BODY DOUBLES BEFORE IN NEW YORK;


IF YOU THINK EYE/TEETH RATIOS CAN BE MANIPULATED,

THEN HOW ABOUT THE ENTIRE BODY MASS DIFFERENCE?



SOMEONE LOOKING LIKE HILLARY WILL BE THERE. BARACK

AND MICHELLE OBAMA, ALAS, WILL BE UNABLE TO ATTEND.


Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

15 comments:

  1. "Ten Aircraft Carriers Aligned in a Row" by

    Paul Craig Roberts who buys the copper/fiber swap cover story for this Staged Pearl Harbor #3 nuke false flag, to be blamed on Russia, or Iran, maybe NorKor. Even a small Nuke will turn these Nimitz nukes into floating Fukushima time Bombs, coating DC and New England for a century while tens of millions flee in chaos into potential blizzard conditions.

    Only massive forewarning to force deployment of these targets, before staged event, can stop this Demonic Warlord madness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jim- Maybe you could get James McCanney on your show to talk about this (found at his website):

    January 19, 2017 " Cyber Security - Part 2 - 11 Ways the Presidential 2016 Election Results Were Altered for a Hillary Clinton Win - False Hacking CIA Intel Claims That the Russians Somehow Affected the Election - Mathematical Analysis Using 3 Independent Methods That Hillary Clinton Could Not Have Gotten More Than 45 Million Votes - How The Rigged Election Was Not Enough For Her to Win"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jim: You are way off base here. If you thought this will happen, you would be leaving with loved ones to a remote, secluded area of Wisconsin. You're going to lose credibility here. Perhaps your goal is to tarnish the image of the independent media. I haven't known you to be the town crier but this takes the cake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing would gladen my heart more than to be off base here, but the CIA has been at war with Trump for some time and Trump, once in office, is going to be ruthless in decimating the agency for betraying him. The gloves are definitely off!

      Delete
    2. Jim: I agree a 'war' is brewing between Trump and the intelligence community. However, heuristically, if you think this is likely scenario, you would be out of dodge, so to speak. Your scenario is the decapitation of the U.S. Government. The theses put out by you and others is pure beta testing and the creation of algorithms to study public reaction and possible resistance to said scenarios.

      Delete
    3. David, I am doing my best to sort out what's going on. I am my own man. I work only for the truth. It astounds me that you would suggest someone who cares about his country would abandon it when the going gets tough. That is the conduct of a coward, not a champion of truth and justice. You are out of your mind.

      Delete
    4. Jim: You and I know your comment of my having an out of body experience is not an ethical response to my counter argument.

      Did you talk this way to your colleagues and students when you were a professor?

      Delete
  4. Jan. 20th is a gift to the Jihad as violence perpetrated by the Jihadis can be initially blamed on the Liberals and only later claimed by the Fundamentalist Muslims. Blowing up the Washington Monument for example or the Smithsonian could confer much fame on someone.

    ReplyDelete
  5. www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN5QXvj7uUA

    ReplyDelete
  6. Somehow I don't think this is a plausible event only for the sake Obozo will be there. He's their "golden child" and I doubt they would kill him off as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By my conjecture, Obama will be "unable to attend". If he and the real Hillary Clinton ARE THERE--not a body-double, but the real Hillary--those would be contra-indications and suggest that the inauguration will not be nuked, which, of course, I would welcome with profound relief.

      Delete
    2. There's only one problem with that scenario, Jim .. The outgoing POTUS is always present at the inauguration of the successor. It's what's known as transition. I doubt very much Obama won't be at the inauguration ceremony .. After all, George W. Bush was present at Obama's inauguration. It's a tradition.

      Delete
  7. Illegal drugs, gambling and prostitution are all going on outside of any regulation and control in America today and for many decades. This is why sexually transmitted diseases are at all time highs, people are using impure drugs, police departments are all corrupted and government loses billions of dollars in tax revenues. Why are not all members of Congress basically whores anyway selling themselves for a five letter obscene word MONEY? Trump could blow these issues wide open and grow the economy like no one ever has seen before by announcing in his acceptance speech he is immediately going to ask Congress to legalize all three of these "sins" which go on 24/7 anyway in America every day. American can have one giant orgy party while the U.S. Treasury pays off the debt in a year or less. It is all going on everywhere anyway so why not? There are no morals left in the country anyway are there? Everyone is watching porn or more. The Hollywood Perverts have won. We might as well share the profits with them. Read the op ed "Let Those Dopers Be" by Norm Stamper, former 34 year police officer ending as chief of Seattle Police Dept., Los Angeles Times about 2005. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
  8. This analysis has some potential flaws, such as potential distortion of images caused by different lenses, variability in image presentation and a seeming lack of a control image such as a known party photographed at the same time. Dr. Fetzer, can you comment?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Be advised and be aware.

    www.noahidenews.com

    ReplyDelete