Friday, October 20, 2017

Fired by Jeff Rense for Disputing Las Vegas Fantasies


On "The Raw Deal" (19 October 2017), after I had featured an audio/video professional who had confirmed that the sound of gunshots in Las Vegas was prerecorded and played over the concert's PA system and a second guest who has found that various of the alleged "victims" died in different locations of different causes, some on different dates, I was fired by Jeff Rense.

These findings reinforce the medical evidence from experts, including a military surgeon and an American trauma surgeon, that the patients shown in multiple videos are actors with fake wounds. Which may explain why the Clark County Coroner's Office is on lock-down. They would have been besieged with requests for death certificates and autopsy reports when, under the circumstances, there aren't any.
Rense is promoting the completely absurd idea that this was an attack by ISIS in Las Vegas, where the shooting and injuries inflicted--including the dead and wounded--are real and that it was carried out by MUSLIMS! He had mocked my research during the third hour of his own show the night before (18 October 2017), where I confronted and dissected his indefensible claims during mine the following day. Apparently, he didn't like what I had to say.

Because the medical, audio and video evidence I presented--which builds on the medical evidence I previously published and discussed--blows his theory apart, I have embarrassed him. He already knew that Scott Bennett and I would be leaving for another network on 1 November--of which I had previously informed him (17 October 2017)--and (my best guess is) he needed a cover-story to explain our departure away (see http://www.freedomslips.com/hosts/baddeals.htm).


But how could anyone buy any variation on this having been a bona fide event? We know James Murren, the CEO of MGM/Mandalay Bay, sold 80% of his stock in advance--no doubt, to buy it back at a much reduced price and pocket the difference--and that George Soros had placed a $42 million short on the company, which, of course, made him a bundle when the stock fell following the shooting. The motives in this case extend to making billions by placing X-ray machines not only in resorts and casinos in Las Vegas but hospitals, schools and more across the USA.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8hz0Ltxh7s

Scott Bennett and I have presented an overview of the evidence using nearly 100 slides. There is no case for a single shooter, for ISIS involvement or of any role for Muslims! Egad! The FBI has wiped clean the cell phone and laptop pictures and videos of witnesses at the scene! How could anyone continue to take seriously the official narrative when the FBI ITSELF is engaging in the destruction of evidence and the obstruction of justice? That our own federal government is covering up what happened in Las Vegas demonstrates that the public is being misled.

The Jesus Campos Deception

Another is that the security guard, Jesus Compos, who has disappeared and whom the authorities claim they are unable to locate, turned up on The Ellen DeGeneres Show. He was waiting to do five interviews--including one with Sean Hannity on Fox--when he completely disappeared! No one seems to know his whereabouts, yet he turns up on TV, no less, with Ellen DeGeneres. Take a look and form your own impressions of the exchange between them:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7gj1FoRIfE

He seems a bit anxious and insecure, but that could be attributed to being on television. Less easy to overlook, it's not the same guy! Here are some images of the man on Ellen's show to show the difference. He must weigh 30-50 lbs more than the original "Campos" (left) and has a larger cranium and a much fatter face. The eyes and eyebrows are close but not the same and is missing moles on the lower-left of his chin. These are clearly not the same "Jesus":


Notice, too, that the original "Campos" wears glasses, but the "Campos" on Ellen does not. He was also giving a story line (about his confronting the shooter at the END of his spree), which has been officially changed to his encounter having occurred BEFORE he began. We never see the audience, either, which suggests that this was taped early on a stage with no audience present (sound track added). As though that were not sensational enough, the original "Campos" appears to be the husband of the allegedly married "terrorists" in the San Bernardino event:


Here's a video investigation I did, "The Real Deal: Staging Attacks from Sandy Hook to San Bernardino", with a highly qualified EMT, who explains, in detail, how none of the standard procedures (SOP) for medical emergencies were followed in Sandy Hook or in San Bernardino. We even have the Craig's List ad for extras in San Bernardino, with "good pay" and coverage for expenses, Call Date of 1 December 2015, going LIVE on 2 December 2015:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlytsY53BXA

Las Vegas, San Bernardino, Sandy Hook

The blatancy of these charades boggles the mind. The government of the United States has become complicit in the production of one staged event after another, which followed in the wake of the nullification of the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which precluded the use of the same techniques of disinformation and propaganda within the United State as were being used without. It was done by Barack Obama by signing the NDAA for 2013. This is his legacy.


Just as we have the Craigslist ad for extras in San Bernardino, we have the crowdsondeman.com ad for extras in Las Vegas 15 days before the event, which was just enough time to gather them together and explain their role as extras in a made-for-TV movie. By combining audio special effects with video special effects and having members of the crowd of 20,000--perhaps numbering a few hundred--it was possible to induce the spectators to stampede!

How would it be possible to have over 500 wounded by the impact of high velocity bullets and yet have the three hospitals in closest proximity to the crime have no admissions of gunshot victims! To which Jeff Rense replies, "Well, of course they are going to say that. They have been told to deny all inquiries about everything, of course they are going to say that, they are not going to release the names and give pictures of the wounds and wounded", which is frankly absurd.


As I explained during "The Power Hour" (18 October 2017), "It was a movie! It was a made-for-TV production with auditory and visual special effects", which had a producer and a director, even though at present we may not know their names. The abysmal state of the union manifests itself in the on-going determination of local, state and federal officials--including of the FBI--to mislead and deceive the public by staged events that are calculated to instill fear into the nation to promote a political agenda. They continue to perform acts of terrorism upon the American people.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota. The co-editor of moonrockbooks.com, he has a new radio show, "Bad Deals", on Revolution Radio, which will begin broadcasting on 2 November 2017. 



152 comments:

  1. I don't know whether anyone died or not. I just hope your new network does as good a job archiving shows as rense did!

    I did however want to call your attention to this article that claims the main to hospitals that took gunshot victims at night we're not any of the three that you called and asked

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/as-the-wounded-kept-coming-hospitals-dealt-with-injuries-rarely-seen-in-the-us/2017/10/03/06210b86-a883-11e7-b3aa-c0e2e1d41e38_story.html?utm_term=.8bb344c401eb

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course he didn't call EVERY hospital in the area. And he wants death certificates and autopsy reports on demand.

      Delete
    2. I called the three hospitals myself and confirmed what she had been told. One said "No comment", which I took to be a "No". The other two said they had admitted no gunshot victims. These were the three closest and would have been overwhelmed had this been real.

      Delete
    3. Did you call University Medical Center or St. Dominican Rose? A no comment doesn't mean No!!!

      Delete
    4. We called the three closest to the scene. I can see that you are eager to support the official account--as though there were one!--and do your best to undermine me. The evidence that it was a theatrical event is overwhelming. Believe what you want. One more shill--dime a dozen!

      Delete
    5. http://www.newsweek.com/las-vegas-shooting-more-victims-hospitals-682675, I myself called University Hospital and was told that the official numbers have already been given to the media, granted that does not mean no one was taken there. The hospital's Jim listed are three of the closest hospitals to the shooting, and gun shot victims were reported to have gone to those hospitals since they are part of the Valley and Dignity Health systems. University Hospital, however, would have been the main hospital since it had the highest trauma level in the area, that being said no proof directly that anyone was taken there except for news reports.

      Delete
    6. Valley is low trauma level (6 separate locations) and Dignity-St Rose (3 separate locations) is trauma level III.
      Sunrise is level II, and University has the highest standard for the most severely injured, level I.
      I ran down the stats of patients from news reports, to estimate how many gunshot wounds. posted in CSTT facebook.

      Delete
    7. It doesn't matter. Considering the numbers, every hospital would have been heavily obliged to receive patients.

      Delete
    8. Jim,
      If you are truly interested in meeting the victims and their families I will introduce you to them. My family was there. My niece just had her second surgery from a gun shot wound to her arm. Also, our family friend Jenny Parks was killed and 100% real (which would be pretty easy to confirm if you were interested in that). Replay to my email and I will introduce you to my niece and Jenny's family. Good luck!

      Delete
    9. Just heard from a very reliable source Fetzer is a very unreliable source . Damn I hate being had

      Delete
  2. Thank you for that article. It offers no real proof--just more fake news propaganda. These photos are so staged that I find them sickening.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your ouster from Rense was long overdue. Kudos to Jeff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When you can show I have something wrong, speak up. Remarks like this are displays of your ignorance. You would do yourself a favor by not speaking out when you have no idea what you are talking about.

      Delete
    2. Amen Jim. The shills must not be paid top wage because the quality of their argumentation is so poor these days.

      Delete
    3. Rude, unnecessary, unappreciated, UNHELPFUL comment. Apparently you have time to waste.

      Delete
    4. If fetzer was to leave rense nov 1 anyway, I can see this as a knee jerk reaction from rense. Just normal human reactions. Fetzer became the star at rense with the breaking story. A tough loss with him leaving.

      Delete
    5. Bill Rowett has 3 whole followers and an empty FB page https://www.facebook.com/bill.rowett.1

      Delete
  4. Rense has done a great job of providing numerous examples of why your inane theories on Vegas are bogus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, he has not. He cites second or third or fourth party reports. It is embarrassing that you would make such a claim when a blog here by Anastasia Smith reviewed 33 videos from the scene and found NONE OF THEM showed anyone hit by a bullet or actually wounded. Lots of SOUNDS OF BULLETS but no evidence of any real ones.

      Delete
    2. Sir, you are certifiable. Whether or not you believe Paddock acted alone, or was involved at all is one issue, but to claim people did not die based on the flimsy and incompetent evidence you've cited is RIDICULOUS.

      Delete
    3. PROVE IT by finding the dead people. Challenges without proof amount to nothing.

      Delete
    4. Hey genius, if the bodies of these victims were delivered to you, lunatics like you and Fetzer still wouldn't believe it. Steven Paddock may have indeed been patsy in this operation, but human lives were lost. Period. Death certificates and autopsy reports are NEVER available to the public. These are self fulfilling prophecies for people using it was a distraction in claiming no one died.

      Delete
    5. Well said, Bill. I haven't really followed Fetzer that closely the past couple years because it is all so predictable--always find the most outlandish of the theories of a particular event and run with it (as Jim Dieugenio pointed out in a long article on Fetzer awhile back).

      Delete
    6. Do you believe DiEugenio? I spent 7 hours going through his attack and refuted every claim of any significance: IT WAS ALL BULLSHIT" Here is the 5th our of the 7: You can believe any rubbish you want (and appear to be doing just that). But you are a fool to believe anything DiEugenio clams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw2SBjOvbrI

      Delete
    7. Anonymous and Rowett are intesting cases. One sign of a shill is that they make attacks with no evidence to support them. In the case of this guy DiEugenio, I even published a 7-hour rebuttal he neglects to cite, which demolishes the attacks he launched on me. Review them here, archived at http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/03/jfk-jim-fetzer-replies-to-jim.html Anyone who thinks he has a leg to stand on will be invited on my new show and we can debate the merits of his attack.

      Delete
    8. See if Eugenio will debate you, Jim. That would be interesting.

      Delete
    9. I will send him an invite. Not a chance. But I like the idea. I have already taken apart every attack he has thrown up against me. Why don't you write and tell him I have agreed and will he debate me.

      Delete
    10. Which one of Jim Fetzer's many conspiracy theories do you believe and why? Also, which one's don't you believe and why.

      http://americanloons.blogspot.com/2013/08/668-james-fetzer.html

      Delete
    11. Jim, if you're going to attack me for having "no evidence" I have yet to see anything legitimate and substantial from you proving the victims were fake. You mentioned last week on Scott Bennett's show that local funeral homes were delivering bodies to the scene to stage the wounded and dead. This is the pinnacle of insanity and paranoia. And this one just one of the many examples of why you are not to be taken seriously.

      Delete
    12. If anyone wants to meet real victims I can introduce you to them. These are people I’ve known for 20 years or more who don’t work for the government. No chance of crisis acting going on with these folks. But I’m sure you benefit from this type of disinfo and the corrupt factions of the government do too.

      Delete
    13. Fetzer profits off of many of his insane conspiracy theories, most of which I would guess he doesn't actually believe in. He's as legitimate as the fake crisis actors he claims exist in all of his fantasies. His cottage industry of over the top conspiracy theories has provided a nice retirement in his post university work.

      Delete
    14. Bill, did you see Fetzer's latest claim that they took bodies from funeral homes to place at the Vegas shooting scene? Of course, not a shred of evidence to back it up

      Delete
    15. @Charles, If you have any hard evidence, such as witnesses (including victims) or photos/video of gunshot wounds, just post it on youtube. It takes less than 10 minutes to record a video with a smartphone and post it. There are hundreds of people eager to examine this evidence and discuss it. So far the only credible witness testimony on youtube is of people who were told to shelter in place, and later told what allegedly happened, nobody except the authorities claim there was someone shooting from the 32nd floor, that his name was Paddock, that 60 were killed, 500 wounded, by gunshot wounds, by thousands of rounds. Not a single witness that passes the smell test , let alone hard evidence, has appeared to confirm these claims, the official story is based 100% on the credibility of the Vegas police. Given the prior hoaxes such as Sandy Hook, Orlando Pulse, the police doesn't have much credibility, and has done little to rebuild it.

      Delete
  5. Jeff Rense is not to be trusted as an infallible source of good information by any means. His harping on "Islamic terrorists" at every turn and his blanket condemnation of Muslims and Jews speaks for itself. While his site can be useful (for instance his posting of the pdf of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook), exercise caution when visiting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rense uses talented people to boost his advertising revenue by having interesting content, then dumps them when they show him up for being smarter than he is and also a lot more honest. Not surprising really is it. Rense.com is an entertainment site, not a reliable news site (for all the good Jeff does, point taken).

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would appear that Jeff Rense has shown himself to be aligned with the Council for National Policy and would get the same orders that Alex Jones does now as well. Interesting, how Rense formerly worked for GCN and Jones still does, I wonder if Rense still has contact with the Khashoggi family?

      Delete
    2. Just like ((tool)) Alex Jones who cries for Netanyahu the pig who attacked us on 911... Rense is also compromised ..he has had a lot of stupid guests on lately https://youtu.be/_mZdlOKdWdI take a listen to this fraud! And read the comments.
      Mr Fetzer has a good show with Scott Bennett and Donald Grahn..much better then disingenuous Rense and spit!

      Delete
    3. SHAME ON JEFF RENSE!

      Delete
  8. I knew that this parting of the ways between Dr. Fetzer and Jeff Rense would come soon.

    Almost, or maybe over, a year ago Rense started harping on the Muslims. There was a stark departure from his predominant mantra over the years as the Jews being his main target. Recently he only mentions the Jews in passing, almost as a second thought.

    Some one or some thing has purchased Jeff Rense. Many of us stopped going to his website, Rense.com, shortly after he made the sea change to the Muslims being the main culprit in everything.

    It is correct and of imperative importance to expose the works of the “Mossad, the Sayanim, the Zionists, the Israelis, the neoconservatives and “the Jews” in relation to the USA and in relation to historical and current world geopolitics, but it must be done in the right way. It must be done from a traditional historical Roman Catholic perspective for it to NOT be “racist” or based on biological determinism which is anti-Christ, anti-Christ's Church philosophy and is the usual charge waged against truth speaking Catholic commentators.
    (see for openers...
    ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=js-SaNEOXBg... Bishop Donald Sanborn sermon
    Christianity vs. Judaism)

    Just as the followers of the One Who is Truth will be persecuted in this world, so also will secular researchers who adhere to logical reasoning and factual data in evaluating all hypotheses regarding a given matter be ostracized and fired and spoken about untruthfully by those who do not care about any semblance of truth but only their image and income in this fallen world system.

    I hope that Dr. Fetzer will tell us soon where and when we can listen to his new show on the Internet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You need to expound on your comment that confronting the enemy comes from the traditional Catholic Church. Plus, the CC has been compromised, infiltrated and does not function as the universal Christian church it is supposed to. And, if one is not semetical, how can factual criticism of their behavior, policies, etc be antisemetic?

      Delete
    2. Beginning on 2 November, my new show, "Bad Deals", will be broadcast over Revolution Radio from 4-6 PM/ET (3-5 PM/CT; 1-3 PM/PT) on Schedule B. It's already up but begins in two weeks.

      Delete
    3. According to a recent book by Edward Hendrie, called 'Solving the Mystery of Babylon the Great', http://www.whale.to/c/SolvingMysteryofBabylontheGreatChaptersHDRHL.pdf
      the one-world religion, Mystery Babylon warned of in the bible, is both of Zionism and of Rome. 'The evidence', says Hendrie, leads to the inevitable conclusion 'that the Roman Catholic Church was established by crypto Jews as a false "Christian" front for a Judaic/Babylonian religion.' Moreover, 'that religion is the nucleus of a world conspiracy against man and God.'

      Philip Schaff (1819-1893) in his History of the Christian Church
      https://archive.org/details/historyofchristi07schauoft explains that from the beginning the Christian church was in a spiritual struggle against Judaism. Judaism could not win a head to head spiritual contest against Christianity. It was necessary, therefore, for the Jews to throw their efforts behind undermining the Christian church by injecting it with a Judaic contagion. Their long-term strategy was to change the Christian church from the inside out to align more closely with the Judaic/Babylonian theosophy. After the fall of Jerusalem, Cabalistic Jews migrated to Alexandria where they synthesized their Chaldean witchcraft with Neo-Platonic philosophy and cloaked that religion in Christian terminology. They then tried to introduce this new heathen Gnostic philosophy into the fledgling Christian Church. The attempt to penetrate the true spiritual church of Christ was futile. However, what this Judaizing strategy did accomplish was the creation of a new ersatz 'Christian' church, which grew into what we know today as the Roman Catholic Church.

      Since its foundation, the Catholic papacy has been zealous and often brutal in its endeavor to establish an empire of the Pope This determination was witnessed during the Inquisition where countless thousands died cruelly for resisting Rome. By the 1520s, Martin Luther's ideas crystallized opposition to the abuses and totalitarian control of the Church. This widespread theological revolt, called the Protestant Reformation, severely damaged the influence of the Catholic Church. In response, the Catholic Church founded the counter-reformation in order to destroy Protestantism.

      This Counter Reformation was largely headed by Ignatius Loyola, who founded the Jesuit Order in 1545 and launched an all-out attack against those who dared stand against the papacy and Rome. Loyola had been a member of a Secret Mystery Babylonian religious sect called Los Alumbrados. Loyola styled the Jesuits as a military order with the stated purpose of overthrowing the Protestant Reformation and bringing about a return to the Dark Ages by restoring the political and religious dominion of the Vatican over the world. Loyola's operative principle was that 'the end justifies the means'. Thus any means of restoring Vatican dominion was to be acceptable. Protestants and all other non-Catholics must be converted or eliminated. The saying among the Jesuits was that 'it is not a sin to kill a heretic'.

      What most do not know is that the Jesuit order is a Crypto-Jewish** order of priests. While it may have gentile priests as members, it was founded by Jews and today has close secret ties with other clandestine Jewish organizations. Benjamin Disraeli, a Jew and former Prime Minister of England, revealed that the first Jesuits were Jews. Ignatius Loyola’s secretary, Polanco, was of Jewish descent and was the only person present at Loyola’s deathbed. Loyola himself was a crypto-Jew as were many Alumbrados. A crypto-Jew is a Jew who converts to another religion to escape persecution and outwardly embraces the new religion, while secretly maintaining Jewish practices.

      **'The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFfbJt9wW-A

      Delete
    4. 'The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews' by Dr. Robert Aleksander Maryks, Boston College February 24, 2010. On the early Jewish Jesuits Ignatius of Loyola and his secretary Juan Alfonso de Polanco, who was also secretary to Loyola's successors Diego Lainez (another "converso") and Francis Borgia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFfbJt9wW-A

      Delete
    5. take a hike with that catholic bullshit.

      Delete
    6. I also noticed that Rense had started harping on muslims and was giving jews a break. In retrospect, that was very odd. The only logical conclusion you can make is that he either had a brain transplant, or he sold out.

      Delete
    7. Oh no. Here I go with another rant:
      Dachsie is no doubt sincere in what he says and in his trust of the Roman Catholic institution. Modern Catholics don't connect their church to the atrocities of the Inquisition just as they don't connect their local parish church to the pedophilia of Roman catholic priests in which the highest levels of the Roman hierarchy are involved. As shown in the movie 'Spotlight', the Roman Catholic institution is complicit by harboring, aiding, abetting and participating in this ongoing criminal activity. The local parishioners seem unconcerned about the implications of being a member of a criminal organization which stands in opposition to God, Jesus and the Bible. Somehow, even though they are members of a criminal organization they don't feel like they are criminal. It seems that the U.S. government is in agreement as they allow the Roman Church, a foreign sovereign entity, to continue to operate with impunity in this country.

      The influence of the Jews through the Jesuits in the Roman Catholic Church has been manifested from the beginning in Catholic doctrine. The Council of Trent was an attack on
      Christianity with anathema after anathema against Christian doctrine that was orchestrated by the
      Jesuits. The control of the Jews over the Vatican is so complete that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI), who is [was] the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued an official doctrine of Catholic faith that accepts the Jewish view that the messiah is yet to come. There is apparently much double talk in the document, as it accepts the Jewish view of a coming messiah [and therefore the implied rejection of the one who has already come] without overtly rejecting Jesus. The document is contained in a small book titled 'The Jewish People and the Holy Scriptures in the Christian Bible.' It is no surprise that this Jewish/Catholic doctrine was drafted by a Jesuit named Albert Vanhoye.

      According to the document:

      'It would be wrong to consider the prophecies of the Old Testament as some kind of photographic anticipations of future events. All the texts, including those which later were read as messianic prophecies, already had an immediate import and meaning for their contemporaries before attaining a fuller meaning for future hearers. The messiahship of Jesus has a meaning that is new and original.'

      But according to Jesus and his Jewish disciples:

      '..."These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled."' (Luk 24:44 ESV)

      'Philip found Nathanael and said to him, "We have found him of whom Moses in the Law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph."' (Joh 1:45 ESV)

      From the document:
      'Should not Christians henceforth read the Bible as Jews do, in order to show proper respect for its Jewish origins? [No]... For to read the Bible as Judaism does necessarily involves a...full acceptance of what Judaism is, in particular, the authority of its writings and rabbinic traditions, which exclude faith in Jesus as Messiah and Son of God.

      [however]... Christians can and ought to admit that the Jewish reading of the Bible [i.e. the messiah is yet to come]is a possible one, in continuity with the Jewish Sacred Scriptures from the Second Temple period, a reading analogous to the Christian reading which developed in parallel fashion. Both readings are bound up with the vision of their respective faiths, of which the readings are the result and expression.'


      Delete
    8. Jim is purportedly joining Revolution Radio at Freedomslips.com

      Delete
    9. Rense had his website for sale a couple of years ago...I wonder who bought it? Whoever did is radically anti Muslim and likely has something they are hanging over Rense as well. His entire mantra has changed in the past 2 years.

      Delete
  9. These people are clueless..why would one ask if you were referring to the "drill?" Let them sleep they can follow Rense into the ISIS rabbit hole ..they are not worth your time. Rense just like AJones have their orders for (((divide and conquer))) and blame the Muslims for everything..haven't these morons learned anything from 911? Obviously NOT. Maybe there is some truth that Vegas was done by ISIS if you realize ISIS was created by the CIA and Mossad ..then by ISIS they mean the USA and Israel.. that works.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have noticed James Corbett and Alex Jones are partial to a little Chinese bashing too.

      Delete
    2. Bashing the Chinese goes hand in the hand with the Council for National Policy narrative. It is why North Korea is next and Joel Skousen rants and raves about NK and China all the time. In addition, always remember what the CNP tells us. Russia is a major threat and communism is the only boogeyman.

      Delete
  10. Rense makes the list of CIA "fakes". Right up there with Alex Jewns. Keep up the good work James Fetzer.
    http://www.breakfornews.com/TheCIAInternetFakes.htm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought rense was not a fake till recent . When I go to the site today, it seems he sold out. Recent interviews with Paddock's school classmate seemed real phony. There really is a dirth of folks without things that make them look soldout. Quayle, Hodges are two who post stuff that makes them suspicious.

      Delete
  11. I agree with your analysis one hundred percent. This was the most blatant crisis act to date! Even the pictures alone on the "news" sites like CNN and the rest are so staged. In one picture the people were climbing over the fence supposedly in a panic but just over that fence were people sitting calmly at what appeared to be a bar and drinking and chatting with each other completely oblivious to what was happening just a few feet behind them. There were so many things wrong with this act from the beginning. I would suppose that now in America do not believe anything until it is proven to be real. prove it. I have a feeling that will be an impossible task.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...sitting calmly ..." I had not know that! - In (what I call) the "amateur EMT" video (abt 4min) there is - from auditory evidence - a fairly sizable crowd not too far distant whoopin and laughin and having a good old time throughout the entire video

      Delete
  12. I am really disappointed in this drscision from rense, although I don’t know behind the scenes activity and kind of surprised because I though freedom of speech was important for the country according to intro before each show

    ReplyDelete
  13. Not a real good idea to call hospitals. ( listening to the power hour ) A guy on youtube that did a lot of work on the Boston Bombing did that in Europe and they locked him up first in jail and then in a mental ward for evaluation. His youtube channel was Peekay.I think they finally shut him down but he was really good. And funny.It was the first time I saw the LAX dummy that they wheeled across mainstream media pretending that it was a human that had been shot and it was so obvious it was a dummy I had to laugh. Loved the article Jim and the Power Hour Interview.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not Europe, Australia. Legal trouble for his efforts subsequent to the Melbourne 2017 Jan 20 event. Youtube censored some of his channels, but see www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBqn4DL_nr0

      Delete
  14. Fetzer's articles and commentary on Las Vegas make perfect sense to me. If you bother to review the facts, common sense will tell you this event is fake. If this were a bona fide ISIS shooting, rather than destroying evidence, the government would make every bit of it available to the public.

    Rense must be either dimwitted or compromised.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Looks like the Las Vegas 'shooting' was being planned at least a year ago:

    The Las Vegas police officer knew he would 'die' soon.
    'A year ago, Hartfield created a computer file titled “Charleston Hartfield Memorial Service.'


    'Funeral today for Metro officer killed in Las Vegas shooting [no death certificate]*
    Charles “ChuckyHart” Hartfield, a Las Vegas police officer and 17-year veteran of the U.S. Army [and CIA operative?] in the 82nd Airborne Division and the Nevada National Guard, was laid to rest. A year ago, Hartfield created a computer file titled “Charleston Hartfield Memorial Service.” He addressed his wife: “Veronica, if you’re reading this, I’ve been called home,” Hartfield wrote. “Please do not allow anyone to wear black; black is totally depressing.” He got to the facts: Johnny Cash and Nina Simone should be played at the service. And everyone should remember him how he was. “I would like everyone to enjoy themselves. And remember me for who I was. The truth only. None of that stuff about how great I was. Only real stories.”'

    Pasted from
    https://www.reviewjournal.com/local/local-las-vegas/funeral-today-for-metro-officer-killed-in-las-vegas-shooting-video/

    *no death certificate

    https://www.archives.com/search/death?FirstName=Heather%20&LastName=Alvarado&DeathYear=2017&Country=United%20States&Region=Nevada&cert=False

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hang in there, Jim Fetzer. You're the best! I hope Ole Dammegard has you on his show soon. The two of you are investigators extraordinaire.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I NEVER trusted Jim Rense , and after this unjust treatment of Dr. Fetzer, IT only proves that Rense is a shill for the zionist pigs.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I NEVER trusted Jim Rense , and after this unjust treatment of Dr. Fetzer, IT only proves that Rense is a shill for the zionist pigs.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jim Fetzer, why did you originally decide to leave Rense? I looked up your new site, they make you pay to use the archives. You seem to be the most accurate of all the "truther" shows. You have it in for the Talmuds, your choice, but it makes it hard to share/link your work for others to read, who may be offended or even litigious or in Germany they put may you in jail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will find out more about their archives. I have heard there is a $5 fee to access them, but I do not know if that's for a month or a year. I will do what I can to make them available. This will be my eighth radio show. Rense is the only one who charged the hosts, when he should have been paying them! I am glad to be free and clear of him because he was becoming a propagandist for Israel by attacking Muslims with no proof. It was highly disconcerting.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    3. in the words of the infamous William J. Casey, "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    9. Jim Fetzer you seem to be the best on the "truther" type news. We should be able to have freedom of speech. To put people in jail for their views is giving up the freedoms we supposedly fought for. I agree with you that there people of Jewish and non-Jewish descent that have been a part of 911 etc. But on the thing about the Talmud, I looked up the Jewish defence of the contentious verses and it seems they can justify the Talmud verses if they are taken in context.

      Delete
  21. From Boston to most in Europe, the movie sets have been talked about by extensively by Ole Dammegard who used to work as a movie extra.

    He has given MANY examples of what to look for: from grip trucks, blocking off of areas being filmed by fire trucks, buses, semi trucks, etc. Peekay Truth from Australia had even done a trilogy movie of Boston where he literally nailed every single "victim", the directors, etc.

    Peekay had also been a movie extra and had gotten a few "on camera" shots in background scenes. If *anyone* had taken the time to see the ridiculous downtown Melbourne (where he lives) movie shots of the stunt driver doing donuts and the most VISIBLE directors giving hand signals to him (even the childish hands on steering wheel ...turn, turn movements) before he is directed where to go. Four cop cars were there and slowly took off behind him. Again, this is one where he supposedly "plowed through a busy crowd" WITH HIS BRAKES ON and even swerving to avoid hitting a crisis actor who had tripped in the way. Not to mention Melbourne at LUNCH time with few to little amount of people??

    Knowing a few movie positions (Foley artists = sound effects) is just one.

    If you contact these companies (and there are MANY) the crowd control pros are actually called "wranglers" and there should a certain ratio as not all on the scene are "in on it". This is to keep crowds from stampeding and someone actually getting hurt.

    www.crisis-solutions.com is a corporation that brags they can do FIVE of these simultaneously. In their Crisis Cloud they listed: 1.) NYC (done); 2.) Manchester (done) and the third was Edinburgh. Perhaps being outed by Ole stopped it; however, I suspect Ireland or N. Ireland may be hit soon as they have a very ACTIVE BDS population.

    Jim, I want to THANK YOU for having the courage to break this very complicated event down. I listened to you and Rense about this event and when he blurted out firmly about JUST THINK HOW MANY MUSLIMS WOULD BE WORKING THERE I did wonder what personality this chameleon was at the time.

    Since I was very ill and in hospital with sepsis at the time, I had to attempt to backtrack what the heck had happened and put the pieces together --- especially since Robin of HowISeeTheWorld has been knocked off YouTube as well as PK, etc.

    Besides, I'm not interested in his crazy guests about playing dialogue backwards, etc.
    Please advertise on FB where your new show can be found. I can assume Gary King but will wait for more information.

    ReplyDelete
  22. All I know is that I know someone with a much larger circle of acquaintances than I, who knows several people who have friends or relatives that were wounded. Not sure how to reconcile that as I too think these events are staged. They may have answered the ads of craigslist for all I know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that's like saying you have jewish friends.

      Delete
    2. Read the blogs about the military surgeon, the American trauma doctor, the FBI wiping the cell phones and laptops of the witnesses clean, and the review of 33 videos from the scene, which are linked in the blog above. Nobody died in Las Vegas. It was a made-for-TV production.

      Delete
    3. I have a friend that claims two of her friends died in the Las Vegas shooting. And, today as I was scrolling down the headline news on Rense, he had a posted video of an interview of a trauma team at a Las Vegas hospital. They claim they treated 216 shooting victims. It seems to me there is much confusion of the "facts". I would like to know what Dr. Fetzer's response is.

      Delete
  23. A genuine scientist does not allow himself to become so attached to any one hypothesis that he has to hide from new information. It is the truth that counts. But such admirable detachment is not so common. Just consider how attached even scientists are to the big bang or to the materialistic hypothesis that consciousness is manufactured by the brain.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I can't believe how much of a retard Rense is being about this.....This reminds me of the time Rense banished Henry Makow for reporting that izrahelli contractors confirmed working at Fukushima that day purposefully caused the meltdown there....

    ReplyDelete
  25. Surely whatever the event actually was there are persons who were harmed psychologically and perhaps physically by the stampede. They can and should bring a law suit against various parties involved including the LVNPD and the FBI; also MGM. Failure to do so will look suspect. What about the 58 funerals that should have by now taken place and been covered in the media? And without death certificates there can be no insurance payments. What a confused mess!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Rense is sort of a half step away from mainstream media. And he does publish articles from around the world with some value. Finally Islam is a problem.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I listened to that Rense segment and didn't hear them mention you once, Jim. I guess he mocked you without even mentioning you? Your paranoia is growing dangerously large.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean, "by name'? But everyone who has been following this case knew exactly who he was talking about. I am sorry, but you are displaying the level of superficiality that Jeff Resnse was displaying in his attack on me. By not mentioning my name, he makes his position more difficult to evaluate. You are speaking on Jeff's behalf, when there is nothing to be said in defense of his position.

      Delete
    2. Yes, Rense did not name Fetzer by name but he was attacking his narrative. I could sympathize with Rense more if he was being critical or put forth evidence to disprove Jim, but he did none of that, instead he insulted Jim's work and narrative with no merit.

      Delete
  28. THIS POST BY FETZER PROVES HIS POINTS, AS USUAL. FETZER AND RENSE 'HAVE BEEN SHILLING FOR ISRAEL BY SUPPORTING DONALD TRUMP.' FETZER HAS CALLED 'TRUMP THE ZIONIST JEW SHILL HE TRULY IS,FINALLY.' I HAVE POSTED MANY COMMENTS 'ADMONISHING FETZER' AND POINTING OUT 'HE WILL BE WRITING A BOOK ABOUT TRUMP AND HIS ALPHABET AGENCIES ATTACKING US, FOR ISRAEL.' FETZER SAYS 'HE'S WRITING A BOOK ABOUT THE LAS VEGAS ATTACK.' I'LL BE ONE OF THE FIRST TO PURCHASE IT. IT'S GOOD TO SEE 'FETZER TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT ZIONIST JEW PUPPET, MAFIA DON, TRUMP"!!!

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/with-us-president-in-his-corner-netanyahu-brings-new-swagger-to-his-un-address/?utm_source=The+Times+of+Israel+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=34425c1b0e-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_09_20&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_adb46cec92-34425c1b0e-55777825 ANALYSIS THIS TIME, HE DIDN'T SOUND LIKE AN EMBITTERED OUTSIDER With US president in his corner, Netanyahu brings new swagger to his UN address

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-first-us-establishes-permanent-military-base-in-israel/ 'IT'S NOTHING SHORT OF HISTORIC,' SAYS IAF GENERAL In first, US establishes permanent military base in Israel Head of IDF's Aerial Defense Command lauds new air defense facility as a symbolic and operational achievement

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThiTD3g55p8 Meet Trump's New Boss, Benjamin Netanyahu


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeAfJf4jzso&feature=em-uploademail US Opens 1st Military Base In Israel Ever!

    https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5015792,00.html Russia urges Syria not to respond to Israel's attack Ronen Bergman, Moscow|Published: 12.09.17 , 21:22

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/03/31/how-trump-became-the-russian-mafias-bitch/ How Trump became the Russian Mafia’s bitch (Updated) The story essentially starts in 1983 as mob boss and attorney Roy Cohn and his protege underboss Donnie ‘Kiddie Hands’ Trump were using mob money, mob concrete and mob labour to build a headquarters for the global criminal organisation Cohn has spent 20 years building.

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2017/07/30/trump-putin-russia-the-ties-that-bind-chabad-russian-mafia-and-semion-mogilevich/ TRUMP, PUTIN ,RUSSIA, THE TIES THAT BIND CHABAD ,RUSSIAN MAFIA AND SEMION MOGILEVICH

    https://journal-neo.org/2016/03/20/a-mafia-don-with-a-pompadour/ In the 1970’s when Trump was in his 20’s he hired Roy Cohn as his attorney and “fixer” as he took over his father’s New York real estate and construction business. Trump and Cohn were regular companions at Studio 54 where Cohn was the lawyer. Trump reportedly even kept a photo of Cohn in his office. In 1979, Cohn introduced Trump to a political dirty-tricks specialist named Roger Stone. Trump and Stone remain close to the present day. Stone, who has worked with Trump on campaigns since 1987, including the present Presidential bid, was charged and fined along with Trump for illegally breaking campaign rules as they fought the development of Indian casinos, competition for Trump’s Atlantic City casinos. Stone’s advice to Trump and other clients was, “Admit nothing, deny everything, launch counterattack….When somebody screws you, screw ‘em back—but a lot harder.” Trump learned Stone’s method well. In 2015 Trump again hired Stone for managing his GOP Presidential bid, but reportedly fired him in August, 2015 for taking too much credit for Trump’s growing success. The Don likes to take all credit. He is, after all, grandi

    ReplyDelete
  29. WOW! I have been reporting on the role of Israel in 9/11 and a host of other events, including (currently) the otherwise baffling collisions of US warships with lumbering cargo vessels off the coast of Japan; the hurricanes in Texas and Florida, where you can't get hurricane assistance in some cities unless you agree not to ban Israeli products; the sonic attack in Cuba and the fires in California. My take is that Bibi is VERY PISSED OFF that we did not deliver Syria on a platter. I originally believed Trump was an honest broker, but I now regard him as a shill for Israel. Check out my AMERICA NUKED ON 9/11: COMPLIMENTS OF ThE CIA, THE NEOCONS IN THE DOD AND THE MOSSAD (2017), which is available at moonrockbooks.com.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Wow, what the heck is wrong with Rense? Strangely, in addition, he put some MOSSAD mouthpiece on his YT channel and got pummeled by his subs.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Professor Dr. Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. is one of the top and most honest and ethical analysts of all these fake false flag terror events in the U.S. mostly by its own government to seek to fool its own citizens into a compliant country of sheep and cattle which will believe all their lies hook, line and sinker. "You are the easiest person to fool." Richard Feynman, Ph.D., Physics. But not Dr. Fetzer for long. You can even convince him to change his position on a subject but you had better have the evidence and facts to prove it. He also admits it if he made an error. Say a prayer of thanks for Dr. Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. outstanding scientist and top American from Pasadena, California. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I second! - but in this case not enough evidence to be confident that "nobody died" - Not impossible someone was running the fake theater stuff (at the concert) and doing actual wet work at the same time - seems as if it was a multi-venue event.

      Delete
    2. They appear to have brought bodies in to serve as "casualties". When medical experts conclude that the patients in hospitals are actors and their wounds are fake and 33 videos from the scene have sounds of shots but record no actual hits, we have enough to know it was fake through and through. We are only fine-tuning exactly how it was done.

      Delete
    3. For loadsa potential'casualties' search "silicone sex doll". Not cheap, but reusable and uncomplaining. If not already, it's only a matter of time.

      Delete
  32. Rense is not the brightest. I have always thought that he can't process all the info at a high level. Thanks for your work. It seems very thorough. It appears the right angle. The drills have got more sophisticated with after event crisis actors. Initially I thought no one died, it seemed like a crisis actor event, but witness' came out debunking this. Now it appears witness were crisis actors and a bigger drill going on, and the initial thought correct.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Jim, u probably was starting to surpass Jeff in listeners. If u went head to head u probably start pulling his audience. There is a void with AJ going turncoat.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Dr. Fetzer, I am following you on Freedomslips! I'm so thankful I found out, accidentally tonight, about this unfortunate happening FOR RENSE that only involves you! My Spirit NEVER received anything as "real" from this Las Vegas false flag, and true intellectuals like yourself offer concrete proof of the lies. Congratulations in moving to bigger and better! Blessings.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Jim- As always, excellent work on Las Vegas. Too bad about Rense, but I've never trusted him completely, and certainly never considered him an expert at figuring out these staged events. It took him a while to finally grasp that Sandy Hook was a hoax. And I've noticed that he's been going overboard on demonizing Muslims (by now, he should know that most of these supposed terror attacks blamed on islamic terror are done by the CIA, Mossad and other intelligence agencies) ever since he had that horrible car accident. I also think Rense has some serious ego issues and that once he invested himself in the narrative that this was a real event, he couldn't go in any other direction.

    Thanks for all of your hard work and your commitment to the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  36. This Campos character looks remarkably like another character,as well as the bloke in the San Bernardino incident, or caper. If it is the wayward "Russian".(actually Chechen) hacker that claimed to be able to hack and control "toys" (think drones) from remote distances, he might have been able to simultaneously manipulate the carrier object and "throw" sound from seemingly three directions and avoid sighting using bkackscreen techniques that have Proven effective against Chechen in the last eighteen months. If Vasily Inizinya and Jesus Campos are the same man,the possibility of Renses assertations being even slightly reasonable are Nil.
    Hopefully Rune Udal correctly evaluated the encrypted signal emitted from the hotel during the alleged window of time described as the assault time which ended within seconds of the police finally entering the shooters "nest,many bets could be off.I am still waiting for an acqaintence in Romania to confirm the incoming numerical codes for livestream video transmission to eastern European base channels during event time.Did the hotel room transmission go to more than one preferred destination as well as a cache site destination or just the opposite? Cyrillic letters are pretty uncommon in rollover combinations of predominantly numerical identifier combinations. That being said,those letters only appear once during the multiple isp rescrambles receiving the transmission. Proxies are the obvious given,of course,but hopefully Udal can utilize the cat servers he had linked by TransEuropa after the Hebdo circus.Those networks don't miss mmuch.trackdown may even be complete within days we are hoping.it will mean a total reset for the narrative.part if this may account for the three cchanges of timelines by the sheriff .it may not even be intentional.mandalay bay security may have accidently picked up this transmission, or parts of it,though it would have to be decoded.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Just saw the comment above from anon.

    Great to see you will be on http://www.freedomslips.com/schedule-b.htm
    Tues and Thurs 4-6 starting Nov 1

    These days I don't have much time to look into these staged events, but I know I can always count on you to get to the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Finding this video from Sane Progressive pretty convincing on the hoax claim:

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/XAlfWv5uoWmy/

    ReplyDelete
  39. Thank you Jim Fetzer for your tireless work on this (and of course other events as well). I suspected it was a false flag with fake victims when I watched the videos for myself. It's funny how we hear testimonies of people being shot left and right but yet in the videos you do not see that. Also why did some run and some linger? Also why did so many crouch and get down if the shooting was coming from way above their height? I think with this event the powers that be have done a better job infiltrating the conspiracy community with their version and stories supporting a version with real victims. And why can anyone (who is a complete stranger to me online) expect me to believe them when they say that they know of someone who was killed? Even Alex Jones seems to have been fooled or is purposely going along with this ISIS nonsense. But good that there are still some free voices out there.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I have known that Jeff Rense is an Establishment shill for years. Now the chickens come home to roost.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rense's website is a complete joke. Half the crap they post is disinformation and the information lacking citations.

      Delete
  41. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Just as with 9-11 and Sandy Hook and Boston, I see a progressive “improving” of the after-the-event disinformation and misinformation techniques.

    With Las Vegas, I think I see now for the first time that those “eyewitnesses” who are now coming forth and claiming multiple “shooters” are made up of not only those sincere people who really perceived being shot at from more than one angle and direction AS WELL AS crisis actors claiming multiple shooters.

    It used to be that we questioners of false events would think that someone who came forth and told their impression of multiple shooters was brave and worthy of listening to and giving them a way to tell their story on alternative media and even worthy of protecting them from the perpetrators who would want to silence them.

    Now it appears the Sunsteinian crafters of these false events are ramping up their muddying of the waters techniques by having crisis actors playing the role of courageous truth tellers.

    In like manner, over the last few years some reporters and “eyewitnesses” who are not on the side of fact and justice more and more mention Israel, Zionists and the Mossad to give themselves the appearance of truth tellers.

    Now it is more important than ever to search out the backgrounds of these people who give these after the event testimonies to try to determine if they are the real deal or are crisis actors, but we cannot do that because the algorithms for databases and search engines are noticeably and deliberately failing us in uncovering a person's history.

    These tricks have probably been employed for a very long time and I am just noticing them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you are going to make comments, in this instance about the role of the Catholic Church, you need to provide facts to back up your assertions. It helps the truth community and makes yourself stronger because your argumentation will be better.

      Delete
  43. Jim's presentation of the evidence with Scott Bennett as interviewed by Kerry Cassidy (link below) is the most accurate and comprehensive I've seen, and definitively demonstrates a criminal coverup with connection to the myriad false flag crimes of the staged event.

    Rense, VT, and others who "attack" while refusing reasonable discussion of the evidence are reacting with cognitive dissonance: an irrational display failing to meet any standards of basic integrity to take claimed data points one-by-one to consider any factual errors and/or need to include other missing data.

    Jim Fetzer is a true leader because he goes first with research, public presentation of available data, and analysis of what meaning he finds. The definition of "leadership" includes going first into difficult and dangerous territories. Jim's leadership should be soooo highly appreciated, and especially by people like Rense doing great work in other areas for Truth, and with full recognition that leadership will be supplemented as we learn more facts.

    Therefore, Rense should simply list any points of contention for public consideration, but can't/won't because such documentation would prove the limitations of his argument. Rene Descartes describes this condition:

    “But now, after having once and for all put to the test the judgments of men, I here again approach these same questions regarding God and the human mind, and at the same time treat the beginnings of the whole of first philosophy, but in such a way that I have no expectation of approval from the vulgar and no wide audience of readers. Rather, I am an author to none who read these things but those who seriously meditate with me, who have the ability and the desire to withdraw their mind from the senses and at the same time from all prejudices. Such people I know all too well to be few and far between. As to those who do not take care to comprehend the order and series of my reasons but eagerly dispute over single conclusions by themselves, as is the custom for many-those, I say, will derive little benefit from a reading of this treatise; and although perhaps they might find an occasion for quibbling in many spots, still it is not an easy matter for them to raise an objection that is either compelling or worthy of response.” – Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, 1641, “Preface to the Reader.” Descartes is considered the founder of modern philosophy, the founder of analytical geometry (which led to calculus), and a founder of the Scientific Revolution. Descartes was well-known in his age, but highly controversial. His work was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church in 1633, and his books put on the Index of Prohibited Books in 1663. The University of Utrecht condemned his work in 1643, where he had previously taught.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VT had an article in which they claimed Hillary doesn't have severe health problems and they even defended George Soro. It seems obvious VT is a psyop cess pool just like Rense.

      Delete
  44. Of course it's nonsense.

    Whenever these things occur in the future, there needs to be a more proactive approach to fighting it.

    My recommendation is to not make presentations about conspiracy, but rather keep quiet and take notes. Once it is a confirmed BS game, identify all participants from top to bottom level and then hunt and kill them.

    I wonder how it would effect their patterns of behavior and modus operandi.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Hey Jim, you could have also put the link to the video clip on the crisis actor Rocky Palmero http://edition.cnn.com/videos/us/2017/10/04/rocky-palermo-las-vegas-shooting-survivor-bts-ebof.cnn/video/playlists/victims-and-heroes-of-las-vegas-massacre/

    Seriously, how stupid is the typical American that watches this bullshit and believes it? Takes a high powered shot to the right side that should have killed him but this lucky bastard gets is up and about ready to get discharged the next day?

    Another element that needs to be brought up is the typical number of people who enter hospitals with gunshot wounds and succumb to those wounds is around 20 to 25%. That would mean another 100 deaths should have been reported by now. Where are they?

    I'd say wake up people but it's already too late. Your fates are sealed and most of you won't be around by this time next year.

    ReplyDelete
  46. It's Lunacy to consider this a "hybrid" event where some people were rumored to be shot but every victim on camera is a certified fake victim. No such thing as a hybrid FEMA drill.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Alex Jones just blurted out "many more dead people are being reported and this is being covered up."

    This would never be covered up because it plays right into the government's hand. This is ridiculous.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's full of it. His job working for Mossad and CIA (or whoever) is to lie, to deceive and manipulate the public, to mind other people's business.

      He's pure evil and needs to be shot in the head. ...the sooner the better.

      Delete
  48. A confessedly free speech platform, (as Rense Radio assures listeners it is before many if not all programs), should be more than capable of handling differences of opinion and interpretation.

    The only issues in contention are evidentiary. Examine and debate the evidence and the inferences that may legitimately be drawn. Emotional attachment to an interpretational narrative is facile, if it cannot stand up to rigorous interrogation of the underlying data.

    This Rense thing is a big disappointment. Jim Fetzer has always been an enhancement of the network and to lose his always thought provoking analysis is going to be a big hit to Rense's standing.

    Whether you always agree with Jim, or always disagree, there's absolutely one constant in the way an event is approached: data first. I've never seen the Professor shrink from an argument over the nature of evidence or its interpretation.

    If you don't agree, then argue your case: challenge the evidence; challenge the inferences; challenge the overarching reconstruction. Name calling and spite is for the playground.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree. Professor Jim deserves much credit for his courage and intellectual honesty. Thank you Sir.

      Delete
  49. It looks like Jeff is the only horse on his own network now. His guests leave a lot to be desired as of late. Maybe he needs to live life a bit and hang it up.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Extremely disappointed with Rense over this... I am reminded how he and his friend Jay Weidener pontificated about Sandy Hook in the exact same manner... shaming and insulting the disbelievers until one day I suppose the evidence became overwhelming and they changed their minds.

    Dismissing Jim Fetzer, instead of hearing him out, is an intolerable disgrace to the notion of truth-seeking. I don't think many are falling for it, nor the heap of so-called 'witnesses' and idiots that Jeff keeps parading on his show. Listening to these programs has become a real drag lately.

    Sorry Jeff... I've enjoyed your show on the basis of your objectivity as a host... Not because of your own opinions. You're a smart guy but I'm not interested in being told what I should think, ok? Do your job, man. Just do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I remember this too: " I am reminded how he and his friend Jay Weidener pontificated about Sandy Hook in the exact same manner... shaming and insulting the disbelievers until one day I suppose the evidence became overwhelming and they changed their minds."

      Delete
  51. awwww. poor fetzer. you and Rense have both been shilling for Trump and blaming the left, Clintons and "antifa" for over a year and now you are trying to pretend you have seen the light? Selling out couldn't mend the tear between you and rense? You shouldn't have sold out in the first place. Karma is a B****. Stop crying. You sold out and pushed the left/right paradigm crap for months and you want us to feel sorry for you? You didn't get tricked into supporting the israel shill Trump, you sold out. And now that same hand is burning you now. You could of been a legend. Shame in the final few years you have on earth, you permanently tarnished your career as a truth teller. Maybe Alex Jones has a spot for you at Infowars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think Fetzer deliberately misled us.

      Trump was the best of a bad lot, and I don't think Fetzer was ever "certain", he just gave Trump the benefit of the doubt.

      Delete
    2. The Corbett report said they are all crooks tricking us with the left/right paridy, but Corbett said once Larry Silverstein may have been a Patsy? And the says The Elders of Zion is made up and not real? So who do you trust? I like Fetzer the best? He has obviously stuffed up on Trump, either the man or the system got to the man and Fetzer was right.

      Delete
    3. Alex Jones was right about the USS Liberty. LBJ gave the orders to sink the USS liberty, it seems the Zionists were following his orders. It would have been different if JFK was in power, not LBJ, that is why they swapped LBJ for JFK, no refunds given.

      Delete
    4. Christopher, your comments come across as a mere cheap shot at Fetzer. Hindsight is 20/20.

      Candidate Trump presented himself a nationalist... which would have been a welcome change had it only been true. Prior to the election, we had no way to prove one way or another that he was (or wasn't) indeed what he presented himself to be.

      You Christopher, in your infinite and unparalleled wisdom might have felt strongly that we were being played by Candidate Trump, but you would not have been able to prove it with a logical and conclusive argument.

      Essentially, you were cynical and turned out to be correct, but could have just as easily turned out to be incorrect. Yet here you are, gloating over your own luck and trying to have us believe your cynicism should be credited as a form of brilliance or omniscience on your part.

      And before you start yammering about Trumps connections to the NYC moneylender circuit... let me suggest that these connections are not a form of conclusive proof or determination either way... that Trump would or would not make good on his platform... which was supposed to include restoring our industry, securing our borders, and for God's sake reigning in on the out-of-control military interventionism abroad.

      Besides that, your position suggests that Candidate Trump was intentionally deceiving us in order to get elected... Whereas many of us who have carefully weighed the evidence have arrived at a completely different conclusion... more along the lines that the Candidate Trump was in fact sincere in his original stated intentions, but once he became President has been blackmailed, threatened, or otherwise bought off.

      Consider also, that a vote for Trump was as much a vote against Hillary. And that being the case, perhaps we should console ourselves to have slowed things down a little.

      Either way, I suppose the resulting shame and disappointment that has become Donald Trump is just the same... Either way, I'll bet most of us can fully relate to your current cynicism and despair.

      But bashing Jim Fetzer with your "See... I told you so!" rhetoric is self-serving at best... I will give you the benefit of the doubt in that perhaps you haven't considered the arrogance and lack of intellectual footing for such a position.

      Not looking to pick a fight with you Christopher... Just telling it like I see it.

      Delete
    5. But, how could anyone informed NOT see through the comical figure of Donald Trump? You have to remember Fetzer also was a strong OBAMA supporter. He donated more than once to Obama's campaign in 2008. What does that say?

      Delete
    6. OK Anonymous, Sure Donald Trump is a character. Always has been. But when you 'saw through him,' what exactly did you see that would prove or disprove his intention to follow through with his pro-nationalist, populist platform? Please enlighten us.

      Delete
    7. Very easy. I JUST LISTENED TO HIS ACTUAL WORDS!!! HAHAHA. "Bomb the shit out of middle east" he said. Go watch his speech to AIPAC. Watch it. From beginning to end. Sounds very "Make Israel Great Again", not America. Look at Trumps connections. His decades of being a womanizing, racist slob. 911 truth-nope. Bilderberg-nope. Ending wars-absolutely not. Sean Hannity and the entire crew over at fox news loves him but used to make fetzer look like an idiot for talking about 9/11? Now Fetzer, Jones, Rense, and basically the entire "truth" movement, is basically fox news 2.0? But I know, I'm just a libtard rite? Lol. Go 2 sleep. Everything will be okay.

      Delete
  52. We shall know them by their actions... Alex Jones, now Jeff Rense... the true colors come out. Paid shills for the impossible narrative: An Islamic group creating an acronym that identifies them with a pagan Egyptian god - that alone shows the fantasy of "ISIS." And of course, we mostly know what those initials actually stand for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good points... totally agree regarding the absurdity of this 'group' known as ISIS. To promote their existence or purpose at face value is dishonest and disingenuous, ignoring the fact that "ISIS" is merely a front for deep-state US and Israeli intelligence ops.

      Jeff Rense knows this. He has openly stated these obvious facts on many occasions. But then at other times, he seamlessly incorporates the bogus ISIS narrative into various other stories that he promotes.

      Personally I suspect that Rense is not so much a paid shill as he is under some kind of threat... Lately he seems off-balance and afraid... certainly betraying his very own journalistic integrity and the principles that got him to the point where he is now.

      If indeed he has been threatened, then I also wonder if he is counting on us to see through the bullshit... that perhaps he has made himself to be intentionally absurd regarding Las Vegas. As kind of a 'signal.'

      Just a theory!

      Delete
    2. Well, everyone dismisses Alex Jones - I mean, they always did because he has a stupid face and a loud obnoxious manner of speaking. That said, he also, for many years, spoke truth. Then, approximately 2-3 years ago, started on the same path as you describe re: Rense - the whole narrative changed from "the false left/right paradigm" to his allowing this guy "Paul Joseph Stalin..." I mean "Watson" on his show to point up the travesties of "Islamic Terrorism" mingled with some excellent commentary on the ridiculous pop culture exhibitions these days. Very unnerving. It appears to me that Jones was either threatened, went nuts, or perhaps was never what he said he was. Who knows... ?

      Delete
  53. Buried down here at the bottom is a fact. Not one of these crowdsondemand types has ever come forward in any of your zany conspiracy theories. Boom! You are all dismissed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You obviously never had a clearance of any kind, but when one has a clearance, you must abide by stipulations that would put you in jail for many years, fine you hundreds of thousands of dollars, and potentially impose the death sentence. "Zany" - nice word, "Boom!"

      Delete
    2. Oh, and I have to correct another assertion you make. You begin your assault with a fallacy (or perhaps a phallus see?)... you say, "Buried down here at the bottom is a fact..." I must say, very dramatic, but in the end, what you cite as a fact is just your supposition, your two cents, your thought on the matter. I notice these days that this is a popular modality of argument among the idiotic - namely, lacking any scientific training that would have helped them separate "fact" from "inference" and "judgment" - they use their opinions and thoughts to signify "facts." That's not factual and that's not science. It might serve as a fallacious method of rhetoric that will work on people having no education, but not here.

      Delete
  54. It looks like Jeff is speaking revisionist history again, http://www.rense.com/general96/fetz.html. Jim has admitted that he was leaving Rense and did so in the above blog. Sad it seems like Jeff did not even read it to make such a false statement. Jeff has also disparaged other broadcasters and guests many times(Fatman for one, Henry Makow for another). Jim comes out of this looking like a million bucks and Jeff, well he takes another hit to what little credibility he has left. I cannot wait for Jeff to come on here anonymous and attack Jim and his fans, just like he is known to do. Jeff if you are reading this we know you have been controlled opposition for a while and many people rarely listened only for you, just for some of the guests you had on.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Dear James;

    I don't know if your are familiar with me or my work. It's not important. I used to be featured at both Rense and What-really-Happened. Rense did not inform me he was no longer linking my work. Finally some readers got in touch with me to say that I was no longer being updated or appearing on the site. I contacted Jeff and got no answer. I contacted his representative in England who handled my efforts on the site. Maybe because I was living in Europe at the time. He would not answer me. I got in touch with James Kirwan with whom I had been friendly for a few years and he would not answer me. Apparently Jeff told everyone that I might contact not to have any communication with me or they would suffer a similar fate. It was all beyond strange. There had been no episode, no falling out. I even thought Jeff and I were friends. On a number of occasions we shared lengthy emails of an intimate nature. I had defended both he and Mike Rivero at different times. On both occasions it cost me dearly but I was and am a loyal friend. Friendship to me is a very big deal.

    Shortly after Rense shut me out, Rivero did the same thing. He told me that it was because I had become subjective and too introspective. The thing is that Mike is a militant atheist and a spiritual life is the centerpiece of my existence. It is amusing in a way because his wife is a Christian and he often promotes her Christian music on his site (grin). Maybe there was no connection between the two but I got a very strong impression that they were told not to link to my work. I lost a lot of readers but so what? Most everyone who enjoys my work came around and still come around on their own.

    It is likely that Jeff is under some kind of pressure from certain directions. I am astounded that he bounced you for what I am given to believe are the reasons stated. Personally I don't know what the truth of the affair is BUT that he would give ISIS as the culprit caused me to break out into laughter. Someone has really gotten to him. He must cringe with shame and embarrassment over having to say these things. I know enough about what happened to KNOW that it is a government Deep State operation with Israel (as usual) involved at some level. I do not believe that everyone said to be injured or killed was a crisis actor. I do not doubt that crisis actors were employed there.

    I can see from some number of the respondents here that they are paid operatives. I recognize the syntax and delivery system. You have to expect that. I never argue with these people. It's pointless. I know what I know and I don't know what I don't know. I say my piece and people can take it or leave it.

    I am sure we have different takes on the events and circumstances of the time. For me we are in a great apocalypse and the ineffable is bringing it all about for the purpose of demonstration. I observe Mr. Apocalypse at work and I know that evil destroys itself and that all the sexual dysfunction and perversity, along with the communist driven Antifa thugs and so much that is present in the chaos of materialism is financed and orchestrated by George Soros and a sundry collection of Satanists and psychopathic international bankers and generally a cackling gaggle of the doomed. I see a bright promise on the horizon and have no fear of these miscreants whatsoever. Time will tell and we shall see. Don't worry about Jeff. He's made his arrangements, such as they are. I feel sorry for him. I genuinely liked and supported him when so many people advised me to steer clear. When I was no longer on those larger sites I never gave it a second thought, I just kept on doing what I do and trusting in the guidance of the invisible hierarchy. Be well James, you've done outstanding work and at great personal cost. The dogs bark but the caravan moves on. None of these paid footpads and catamites affect me one wit and they should not affect you. Let them wail on and gnaw their own feet off in the darkness.

    Regards,

    Les Visible

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have been a fan of some of your work for a long time, Les. You are on the list of people that Rense turned his back on for no good reason. It would appear that Jeff Rense took some more Council for National Policy bucks over his adamant of the Las Vegas shooting be 100% because of the Muslims, I wonder if he ever stopped taking them? I have no strong opinion yet on whether Las Vegas was utterly a staged event, that being said I am open to entertaining the idea and respect Jim's work as always. Remember when Jeff Rense used to have guests on to talk about the Jesuits, I do. Remember later, when Jeff used to have guests come on and talk about the Zionists, I do, also during the time no one ever talked about the Jesuits and if they did Jeff acted unconcerned. Now with Jeff, it is ISIS and the damn Muslims. It seems like Jeff has forgotten who pulls strings and sounds like Alex Jones does nowadays, I wonder if they are both taking talking points and money from the CNP. Are you there Joel Skousen? I am on to you, and I know your work.

      Delete
    2. Les: Sometimes less is more. Rivero is a gatekeeper with his ridiculous assertion of moon landings and a plane hit the Pentagon. He won't even debate Jim about either though this would be a great gift to the truth community.

      Delete
  56. Jim, If you think Rense is wrong, then does it not make sense to contact him directly and discuss the issue. Why do it in a way that will only create enmity and strife. Rense has published your emails to him stating that you and Bennet were leaving his network on November 1. This makes you look kind of foolish and petty. If you disagree with Jeff's take on what happened in Vegas, then just state that you disagree. No need to go for the jugular!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Good, now you are free to have a good look at Jim Stones Fukushima Sabotage report. Jeff has been allergic to it (he poo poo'd Stone the same as Duff poo pood you at one stage)..url: 82.221.1299.208
    Why has he got (correct me if I am wrong) a Cohen Jew turned Nazi turned Newage guru pedo convict on his show lately? Frank Joseph nee Frank Collin
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Collin

    More positively Les Visible is the 'real deal' like you too... and too shy and advertisementless to self promote.. here is his site.
    http://www.smoking-mirrors.com/
    (and surely no concidence as I was just listening to a search on the Pekay link in an above comment who's poster was Smokin Mirrors 7 (warning swearing)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBqn4DL_nr0

    as david duke says, no coincidences, just cohencedences
    "and nobody died at Las Vegas either, either" will probably come to pass, though be banned at Amazon.

    Rense - AJ for lazy intellectuals (like me).

    ReplyDelete
  58. anonymous 8:59 from me, Pierre...
    this think did not allow for edits or new comments before posting and verifying.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Notice how Fetzer doesn't respond to someone who will provide proof of friends who died.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Mr Fetzer is wrong about Jesus Compos. The pictures are of the same man at different weights.

    ReplyDelete
  61. I've interviewed J. Fetzer and would never have him on again.

    It is important to remember Fetzer is not a journalist, and his biased political leaves him unable to dialogue from point zero, and navigating from there.

    He merely picks are position based on bias, and finds any manner of means to defend that bias.

    This approach means ones ego has to be rock solid and made of iron, but oddly his ego is fragile and thus throws him violently into a dialogue to defend his emotions/ego.

    Too bad, only people that are basically gabby, get the most attention.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Do you need free Twitter Followers?
    Did you know that you can get them ON AUTOPILOT & ABSOLUTELY FREE by using Like 4 Like?

    ReplyDelete
  63. Quantum Binary Signals

    Get professional trading signals delivered to your mobile phone every day.

    Follow our trades NOW and make up to 270% daily.

    ReplyDelete
  64. If you need your ex-girlfriend or ex-boyfriend to come crawling back to you on their knees (no matter why you broke up) you got to watch this video
    right away...

    (VIDEO) Want your ex CRAWLING back to you...?

    ReplyDelete
  65. Does anyone know where the replays of Fetzer's new Revolution Radio shows are posted?

    ReplyDelete