Saturday, April 21, 2018

Is Alex Jones About to Betray his Followers and the Conspiracy Research Community?

Jim Fetzer

Instead of attacking the Sandy Hook parents who are bringing a lawsuit against him for defamation--because he has (from time to time) asserted that Sandy Hook was fake and that no children died (which implies that they are BIG TIME liars and frauds)--he has wimped out by making an appeal to pity, which is the elementary fallacy of using the unfortunate consequences of something being true as though it were proof that it's actually false! He's not going to get away with it--but why even try?

Sensing weakness--since truth is an absolute defense against defamation, but Alex is not arguing that his observations about Sandy Hook fakery are true--Lenny Pozner and Neil Heslin are not going to back down, even though they are (in the process) opening themselves up to discovery, which would provide an opportunity to establish the fact of Sandy Hook as an elaborate charade in a court of law. Neil Heslin, for example, longs for "a  knock-down, drag out fight", which Alex ought to give him:

As it happens, I have been sending contacts, including Jerry Corsi, samples of proof that it was a staged event--a two-day FEMA exercise, with a rehearsal on the 13th, going LIVE on the14th--but received a cordial dismissal from Corsi and passive reception from others there--which is rather astonishing, since we have proven that the school was closed by 2008 and there were no students there. I recently made a summary overview of the history of research on Sandy Hook:

The building was non-compliant with state and federal laws implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which I verified at the time with Connecticut and Federal laws, which require that every access and entrance point be wheel-chair accessible. Obviously, as this photo proves, that was not the case, where no wheelchair could navigate this wooden stairway. And we have mountains of proof that the school was in dilapidated condition, which by itself establishes that this was a fraud.

The reason for closing the school, construction of which was completed in 1956, appears to have been that it was loaded with asbestos and other bio-hazards, where it was also damaged by hurricanes and a major flood in the area in 2007. The Newtown Bee (2 December 2013) ran a story about this as though that were new information and to cover for the $50,000,000 grant the District received for a new K-4 school, which average $7,000,000 across the nation, where the Bee, too, was deeply involved.

And the Crime Scene Van was on the scene before the crime had been committed, which appears as an Exhibit in Ch. 8 of the book, which anyone can download for free as a pdf. We know it was before the shooting, since you can see the string of four windows in Classroom 10 just above the roof of the van, where they are undamaged. After the event, they would be shot out--especially the second from the left--which means that the Connecticut State Police were involved and were even running the show.

Confirmation has come from many sources since banned NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015) because it blew the case out of the water and exposed it as an elaborate fraud. One of those has been the report of Richard Plante on one of my blogs, where he reported his experiences in traveling to the school with a friend to pick up some student desks on the cheap. Even more stunning, however, has been the discovery of how they faked the kids using photos of older kids when younger, where Wolfgang Halbit has even produced photos of the Sandy Hook kids grown up, alive and well:

Review the video and you will see extensive and compelling proof that Sandy Hook was a hoax--a drill where no students died, which was done to promote gun control, as members of the Obama Department of Education explained to Paul Preston, when he reached out to his contacts there--as the book itself lays out in spades. Under these circumstances, when Alex Jones is perfectly positioned to blow the case apart (with a little help from his friends), let him not falter and betray his fans and the research community lest he gain a prominent and permanent standing in the Internet Hall of Infamy.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota and co-editor of

Government Accidentally Releases Documents on "Psycho-Electric" Weapons

They were mistakenly sent to a journalist.

By David Grossman

[Editor's note: This looks authentic to me but also out-dated.]


The government has all kinds of secrets, but only a true conspiracy theorist might suspect that "psycho-electric weapons" are one of them. So it's odd that MuckRock, a news organization that specializes in filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with state and federal government bodies, received mysterious documents about mind control, seemingly by accident.

Journalist Curtis Waltman was writing to the Washington State Fusion Center (WSFC), a joint operation between Washington State law enforcement and the federal government to request information about Antifa and white supremacist groups. He got responses to the questions he asked, but also a file titled “EM effects on human” Inside, where documents like this:

Documents held by the Washington State Fusion Center.

And these:

Remote mind control AND remote brain mapping.

Human brain waves as described in documents held by the government for some reason.

At least some of the images appear to be part of an article in Nexus magazine describing a 1992 lawsuit brought by one John St. Clair Akewi against the NSA. Akewi claimed that the NSA had the "ability to assassinate US citizens covertly or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be diagnosed with ill mental health" and was documenting their alleged methods.

Nexus was, and still is, an Australian magazine focused on the unexplained, conspiracy theories, alternative medicine and the like. It covered Akewi's case in 1996 but was unable to get Akewi to discuss it further: "I tried ringing Mr Akwei to find out what was the out-come, if any, of his court case. He firmly but kindly told me that he could not speak about anything to do with the case over the phone and hung up," reads an editor's note at the end of the article.

The federal government has absolutely experimented with mind control in a variety of methods, but the documents here do not appear to be official.

Waltman had no idea why these documents were included in his request and isn't sure why the government is holding them. The WSFC did not respond to requests for more information.

Source: MuckRock

David Grossman writes for He's previously written for The Verge, Rolling Stone, The New Republic and several other publications. He's based out of Brooklyn.