Wednesday, June 6, 2018



“Nobody Likes Tracy”

To review the background to the trial, check here for "Sandy Hook Update"

MHB Admin

What Might Have Coverage Looked Like?

A source close to MemoryHoleBlog has informed us they contacted Palm Beach Post courts reporter Jane Musgrave via telephone following the December 2017 trial of TracyvFAU wherein FAU Professor James Tracy sued his former employer for civil rights violations. This individual asked the reporter why the Post‘s coverage was so egregiously biased against Tracy and favorable toward FAU.
“Well, nobody likes [Tracy],” Musgrave replied. “He got what he deserved” because “kids died.”
When the party pressed Musgrave on why the newspaper’s coverage included so many glaring omissions of important evidence and testimony–content that would have put Tracy in a more positive light–the reporter responded, “We weren’t allowed to report that,” and that at the end of the day the Post would never publish anything supportive of the plaintiff.
This conversation confirms what the TracyvFAU plaintiff and his legal team observed as both the Post and South Florida Sun-Sentinel‘s sensational and flagrantly misleading coverage throughout the trial and even after the jury verdict was rendered.
The story titles alone suggest the Post‘s clear bias, with the Post referring to Tracy as the “Sandy Hook denier.” In one “opinion piece” the newspaper even solicits an embellished defamatory account of Tracy’s teaching style from one of its salaried employees.
-“FAU Professor James Tracy Claims School Fired Him for Sandy Hook Rants,” Palm Beach Post, November 30, 2017
-“Ex-FAU Prof on Trial Tries To Downplay Attack on Sandy Hook Parents,” Palm Beach Post, December 1, 2017
-“Christie: Tracy-vs-FAU More about Arrogance Than Free Speech, Insubordination,”, December 5, 2017
-“What It Was Like in the Class of FAU’s Conspiracy-Spinning Professor,” Palm Beach Post, December 8, 2017
-“Claims against FAU by Sandy Hook Denier Headed To Federal Jury Monday,” Palm Beach Post, December 8, 2017
After lengthy litigation and a trial where a federal judge repeatedly defended FAU and its administrators from the bench, the Post continued to ignore crucial testimony given by Tracy’s colleagues that demonstrated just how haphazardly the university’s provosts and deans applied the “Outside Employment/Activities Policy,” and how Tracy was virtually the only employee required to submit an “Outside Employment Form” for his protected speech on a personal blog.
One must keep in mind that FAU is among South Florida’s largest employers, with thousands of taxpayer dollars to spend on largely ineffective advertising  in both newspapers. As one Post staffer explained to journalist and private investigator Jose Lambiet in 2017,
“Business people in the community are no fools. They know advertising in the Post no longer gets results. The news content is so weak that nobody’s reading. It’s like to trying to sell shit.”
Both the Post and Sun-Sentinel are so desperate to please this large advertiser that they are willing to effectively skew their coverage of one of the most significant First Amendment trials in recent history to fit what they perceive to be their readers’ prejudices–in fact, misconceptions that these papers and national news media played a major role in creating via slipshod if not fraudulent coverage of the December 2012 Newtown shooting. In this vein Musgrave is forced to function as an anti-journalist–one who documents an event then proceeds to deliberately deceive her readership.
More recently, Musgrave reported on US District Judge Robin L. Rosenberg’s decision to revisit her misguided Halloween day summary judgement ruling and deny the plaintiff a new trial, pointing to the judge’s “stinging rebuke of Tracy’s claim that the jury got it wrong …
“The central premise in (Tracy’s) motion for new trial is that the jury’s verdict was against the great weight of the evidence,” Rosenberg wrote in a 31-page ruling. “This contention is without merit. Instead, the court concludes that the great weight of the evidence at trial was in favor of (FAU).”
Musgrave’s reportage, probably at her editor’s behest, repeatedly emphasizes Rosenberg’s  ruling to deny the plaintiff a new trial.
Further, it is obvious that Musgrave never read Tracy’s Motions (hereand here) since her slapdash piece attributes their authorship to Louis Leo IV, when in fact they were primarily authored and signed by co-counsel.

The Sun-Sentinel‘s brief story of Rosenberg’s ruling is (unsurprisingly) more reckless, as education reporter Marc Freeman fails to even mention the fact that the case is on its way to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
At the end of the day the eight-hundred pound gorilla in TracyvFAU must necessarily be overlooked by the Palm Beach Post, who ultimately answer to its owners-in-abesntia, the politically liberal Cox family. James Tracy stands accused of calling out Democratic President Barack Obama’s administration of staging a mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in order to institute more stringent gun control laws. In December 2015 Tracy was (falsely) accused of criminally harassing the ostensibly Jewish “Sandy Hook parents” while consorting with “holocaust deniers.” These inflammatory accusations ultimately led to his termination.
According to the Post itself, Judge Rosenberg’s ultra-wealthy “Palm Beach parents are both well-known Democratic donors.” Rosenberg was appointed to her federal judgeship by President Obama in 2014. Rosenberg’s spouse, former Palm Beach County state attorney Michael McAuliffe, is a career Democratic Party politician. It is no secret in South Florida that he has major congressional and quite possibly gubernatorial aspirations.
Such ambition requires maintaining the good graces of Democratic Party power brokers whose central political platform is celebrating Obama’s political “achievements” and stampeding the US public into enacting stricter gun control. If this isn’t enough McAuliffe’s law partner, Martin Reeder, is the Palm Beach Post‘s attorney. One can only ponder how thick the “firewall” is between the newspaper’s editorial room and the McAuliffe-Reeder firm.
Rosenberg is also a former board member of the radical Anti-Defamation League, the Zionist espionage and agit-prop organization that stands vehemently against extending free speech to all and believes that any Gentile who so much as sneezes the wrong way is “hateful” or “anti-semitic.” The ADL is typically so extreme that its mention often elicits embarrassed eye-rolls from many in the Jewish diaspora.
Despite these conflicts of interest Rosenberg apparently never considered recusing herself. She instead allowed the plaintiff to embark on a costly litigation process then slammed the door in his face with a comprehensive October 31, 2017 summary judgement order in favor of FAU. With the trial the court simply gave defendant FAU, with the assistance of its advertising clientele, full exoneration in the court of public opinion.
Imagine for a moment if Tracy was a progressive-left professor terminated from his tenured faculty position for blogging about “climate change,” the villainous President Trump, and the conspiracy theory that Trump allied with Russia to subvert the 2016 election process. One need only look at the many Facebook pages, Twitter accounts, and blogs of American academics that fit this very mold–some of whom work at Florida Atlantic and the state’s other publicly-funded universities. Imagine that the judge comes from a “well-known” Republican Party donor family and was appointed to the bench by Donald Trump.  Imagine the judge is married to a prominent Republican Party politician. Imagine the judge was Episcopalian and an active member of the National Rifle Association.
Then imagine just how different the Post‘s coverage of TracyvFAU would be?

Gunfacts: AR-15s: Mostly Harmless with regard to Homicides

The AR-15, allegedly the most popular consumer rifle in the United States, has become the poster child of the gun control industry.

But from a homicide statistics standpoint, they are mostly harmless.

Main Take-aways

  • AR-15s constitute maybe 4% of all American firearms.
  • AR-15s are used in 0.4% of firearm homicides, maximum.

Just How Many AR-15s Are We Talking About?

There is no doubt the AR-15 is a popular rifle. The firearm industry notes this. Users note this. Even the gun control industry notes this. Knowing how many are out there is crucial for understanding if they are a problem or not.

The AR-15 has been around since 1959, but the last eight years has seen a significant increase in its popularity.

And no wonder. The rifle is lightweight, meaning anyone can shoot it (YouTube has a bunch of videos of tiny young girls firing them). They don’t recoil much due to the mechanical design as well as the relatively anemic rounds they shoot. And, well, they are fun.

FULL DISCLOSURE: I have never owned, not do I want to own an AR-15. Just not my thing.

Given that AR-15s have been around for nearly 60 years, knowing just how many are in circulation requires guesswork. According to one compilation of manufacturer records 1 over five million have been made since the year 2000. The NRA once estimated 2 there were about 15 million in circulation as of the end of 2017. Triangulation we did from BATFE reporting 3 makes us believe that total is a reasonable one.

But what does 15 million AR-15s really mean? Based on estimates of the number of guns and various types of guns available, AR-15s are maybe:
  • 12% of all rifles
  • 4% of all guns (including handguns, shotguns, etc.)
From a pure market penetration standpoint, AR-15s are not that big of a deal. But when you look at AR-15s and murder …

AR-15s Used in Mass Public Shootings

… they become even less of a problem.

Let’s start with mass public shootings (MPSs) like the recent tragedy in Parkland, Florida. Because AR-15s were used in both the Sandy Hook and Parkland school shootings, they appear to have an outsized role in MPSs. But, the numbers betray this a bit.

AR-15s in Mass Public Shootings
AR-15s Involved 11%
AR-15s Minus Terrorist 9%
AR-15 and Other Guns 6%
Mother Jones database, normalized to FBI definition of MPS

Of the MPSs since 1982, at worst AR-15s were used in a mere 11% of those events. But one of those MPSs was a terrorist attack (San Bernardino), so the effective policy number is that 9% of MPSs involved AR-15s.

But even this is overstating the case. In most MPSs, the attacker carries in more than a few guns (and the enduring fact is, most MPSs are committed with handguns and shotguns). So, if we discount AR-15 involvement due to someone shooting up a room using his handguns, shotguns and AR-15, then the effective number of AR-15-specific MPSs drops to 6% of the total.
Mighty slim pickings for MPSs. But, the case against AR-15s  gets even weaker when one looks at all homicides, not just MPSs.

AR-15s Used in All Homicides

Common estimates for the number of guns in circulation 4 is between 270 million and 357 million. For our analysis we’ll use the high end because until the mid-1970s, nobody was really tracking this stuff. The stockpile of farm weapons, hunting rifles, war trophies, and so on is likely much larger than most prognosticators allow for.

Guns in Circulation 357,000,000
% Guns that are Rifles 125,565,332 5
AR-15s – % of Rifles 11.9%
AR-15s – % of all guns 4%

Combining this estimate with the percentage of new guns entering the national stockpile every year 6 we see that AR-15s make up at most 4% of all the guns in the United States. This number is way high given that the AR-15 was not introduced until 1959 and did not enjoy a massive market uptick until 2012–2017. But, we’ll stick with the very high 4% number as it makes the final figures that much more interesting (in other words, we are stacking the deck against the AR-15).

Rifles are not the homicide weapon of choice. Handguns are. Sixty-eight percent of firearm homicides are committed with handguns 7; and most of those are inner-city, gang related shootings. Rifles are used in 3% of homicides (soak that up for a moment – handguns 68%, all rifles 3%).

AR-15’s in Circulation 15,000,000
Homicides by Rifle 252 8
Homicides by AR-15s (max avg five years) 0.1
Rifles Used in Homicides 3%
AR-15s Used in Homicides (inferred) 0.4%

Since we can estimate what fraction of the number of rifles in circulation are AR-15s, we can then calculate how often they are used in homicides. All in all, AR-15s account for 0.4% of firearm homicides at worst.

NOTE: The FBI data used was from their most recently available dump, covering years 2012-2016. This, the number of rifle homicides includes the Sandy Hook Massacre where all the school victims were killed with an AR-15.


What Not to Worry About

It has been claimed that members of the gun control industry don’t care about facts, just imagery. Their fixation on AR-15s is a case in point. One type of firearm, which accounts for 0.4% of firearm homicides, is their poster child, their scary image for the nightly news. If they really wanted to ban something to make America safer, they should start with their own rhetoric.
  2. America’s rifle: Why so many people love the AR-15, NBC News
  3. Firearm Commerce in the United States, 2017
  4. There are now more guns than people in the United States, Washington Post, October 2015
  5. Inferred via BATFE commerce reports
  6. For this analysis we used the BATFE Firearms in Commerce report and averages the years between 1986 and 2015
  7. FBI Expanded Homicide Data Table 4, 2016
  8. FBI Uniform Crime Reporting

Jack Mullen: Hacked Minds Mobilized to Disarm America

The exact contrary of what is generally believed is often the truth.   - Jean de La Bruyere (1645-1696)

"If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it."  Edward Bernays - 'Propaganda

“Cultural Marxism, now called ‘Political Correctness’ is a loaded gun that one puts to their own head. The narrative illusion normalizes the abnormal and is an elitist weapon over minions for citizen vs. citizen policing for establishment control”. Information Warfare: The Meme is the Embryo of the Narrative - James Scott

    We are nearing the end of the American experience, as we know it now.

    Societal forces, including the insidious infiltrations of anti-civilization secret-societies such as the Freemasons, B'nai B'rith (also Freemasonry), the Knights Templar (Masons), Jesuits (related to Freemasonry), Rosicrucian (Masonic) and many others along with their multitudes of sub-orders, and the conditioning of the masses via propaganda and emotional hijacking of thought with subsequent insertion of viral and weaponized memes -have all nearly destroyed the pillars and foundation of American culture and civilization.

    The recent fake shootings at Sandy Hook, Parkland, Florida Night Club, Las Vegas and now Santa Fe are being used to generate armies of programmed civilization destroyers - people who's minds have been hacked and thoughts, like computer code, inserted.
“First and foremost, the most profound weapon a nation or special interest can possess is ‘control’ over information. This contributes to control over the narrative and the meme is the embryo of the narrative. Information warfare begins and ends with the meme.” (IBID)
    One such group is the subversive communist political front organization created by Zionist Billionaire Michael Bloomberg called, "EveryTown For Gun Safety." The title is a meme designed to deceive, conveying a sense of community approval bundled with the easy to understand and accept 'For Gun Safety', really who is not for gun safety?
    This group presents itself as being concerned with safe gun use, but actually works obsessively toward removal of rights of Americans to own a gun at all, and ultimately disarming all Americans through escalation of "gun removal" tactics placing all Americans in legal categories that are denied gun use. Note:  reasons for trying to disarm Americans can be seen in the results of disarmament in the Soviet Union before tens of millions were murdered by Communist (the flip side of Talmudic Political System Zionism) Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin or present day South Africans, who were disarmed after the communist African National Congress (ANC) took control of the South African Government and now face genocide.

    To facilitate this Zionist Organization's goals (call it 'EveryTown'), sub groups are organized using psychological operations tailored to the targeted minds. Tactics used to collect actors-members involve emotion and thought misdirection, the careful use of weaponized memes, targeting vulnerable and weak minds. One such group is  "Moms Demand Action," an organization funded by Bloomberg via "EveryTown." Note: Bloomberg alone has spent dozens of millions in the past decade to destabilize America and change the American form of government including taking down the Constitution. Spending which includes funding of political left candidates and more recently millions spent by on behalf of "EveryTown".

“In all, ‘Everytown’ spent $12.1 million on the 2014 election battles, including the Washington ballot initiative and legislative contests in states such as Colorado and Oregon, said spokeswoman Erika Soto Lamb. It's part of a $50 million election-year commitment Bloomberg made to gun-violence prevention. USA Today
    Working with vulnerable minds and highly advanced (cost, no object) weaponized mind propaganda which packages generalized deception; this organization animates foot soldiers that carry out the plans and operations of the primary subversive political group.
‘The mind is the new war space, and the meme is both a subliminal hand grenade and the new nuclear weapon. Psychographic targeting renders the expedience of parasitically embedding the meme within the vast labyrinth of ABSTRACT “Your ideas are bound to forces of which you have no control due to the fact that you’ve voluntarily submitted your freedom of thought to the perception steering censorship of dragnet surveillance capitalists.” “First and foremost, the most profound weapon a nation or special interest can possess is ‘control’ over information. This contributes to control over the narrative and the meme is the embryo of the narrative. Information warfare begins and ends with the meme.” ... 2 the mind.
Psychographic targeting is made easy via big data analytics, the treasure troves of readily available metadata curated by dragnet surveillance capitalists, and a legislative body that lacks the understanding of the dangers of its weaponization. Metadata layered with the weaponization of other digital vectors, such as search engine results, social media, banner placement, blogs, and bots infused with machine learning and artificial intelligence, can introduce, mutate, and expand memes and conversations out of thin air that can instantaneously become part of the mainstream narrative’ -Information Warfare - James Scott [Author Added Underline]
    The Video Below is powerful example of how carefully chosen, and lying, psychological operatives are employed to promote organizations like 'Mom's Demand Action' to weak and vulnerable minds; minds who have already been pre-softened by Trauma and Violence based theatre of the mind attacks which do not need real violence, only simulated real violence - in this video, it is the Fake School Shooting, staged at an already closed and abandoned school building in Newtown Connecticut (closed years earlier,) which provides the psychological opening through trauma; Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting.

    Because these vulnerable people are already predisposed to accept the words of perceived ‘authorities,’ without independent thought or research, they are already receptive to being potential carriers of the virulent and civilization destroying memes.

    Caution, the video below uses live-active memes to modify your thinking processes. Please view with critical thinking skills as a firewall to these dangerous memes.  
    The only work remaining for the "Moms Demand Action” Psychological Operation is to tap into already hacked consciousness (hooking the vulnerable false trauma-based violence ‘wound’ of a fake school shooting) and deliver the package of meme-laden, emotionally charged presentations. After which a certain percentage of the affected will drop what they are doing and download the package of memes and fall in line to begin the work they are being programmed to do.

    In this case, the hacked-mind-warriors have been programmed to be activists agitating legislators and government bodies to disarm Americans. These agitators will also dump (proselytizing) their implanted memes, much in the same way a virus will regenerate and shed itself after infecting a host, further infecting other minds.

    In the video, above, we are immediately brought back to the traumatizing memories of the Faked Sandy Hook school shooting when the narrator, Erica Lafferty, explains her mom was killed at Sandy Hook School. From there, the viewer is subjected to sappy sad music, crying people, and words like ‘slaughtered’ and ‘terrifying’ – these words useful for trauma based mind control programming. 

    This is a very dangerous use of occulted technology, which has been used repeatedly over centuries, but has been recently improved in the schools of modern psychological warfare for purposes of causing civilization change.
“The infowar and psyops game has been transformed & we are no longer dropping leaflets from helicopters over Vietnam saying ‘America Is Your Friend’. This is now a battle to defend the psychological core of the population in order to save this fledgling democracy.” Information Warfare - James Scott
    Because of the Internet and its ability to quickly reach millions of people, the dangers of sophisticated techniques of manipulation and mass mind control are more dangerous now than any other time in history.

    Large populations of Americans have been primed for use as meme-actors and meme-shedders.  With the mainstream media completely under control of the enemy of America, the media has been precisely tuned as a trusted client with unrestricted (no firewall,) access to the human central nervous system (processing unit,) the mind and brain.

    And, to make matters worse, Americans have been taught since birth to respect, trust and believe in 'authority,' and to forgo critical thinking skills when presented with information by 'trusted' 'authorities.'
‘We have voluntarily agreed to let an invisible government sift the data and high-spot the outstanding issues so that our field of choice shall be narrowed to practical proportions. From our leaders and the media they use to reach the public, we accept the evidence and the demarcation of issues bearing upon public questions; from some ethical teacher, be it a minister, a favorite essayist, or merely prevailing opinion, we accept a standardized code of social conduct to which we conform most of the time.’  Edward Bernays, 'Propaganda'
“Information Control By clever manipulation, people can be led to believe something that is not true when such information is carefully timed and presented by an accepted and respected authority. Information is processed by the brain in a very specific way. At the base of the brain, there is a "check valve" called the Reticular Activating System that screens information. What seems to happen is this: when new information is introduced, it is compared with previously acquired information and then catalogued. When the information is required, it is retrieved and brought into conscious awareness according to need. Now if there is no "file" for the piece of information, a file is begun and added to when related information is acquired. If you accept the information as true, it is catalogued that way. And if you reject the information as false, it is catalogued that way. 
However, if you don't know if the information is true or not, your trust in the source of information determines whether or not you accept it ,even if you are not sure or don't understand it. Secret knowledge is the basis of all power. Your source of information depends upon who you are and what position you hold in society. Your source of information determines the reliability of what you know. What you know and the reliability of what you know determines everything that happens to you. And information can be controlled. Words can inform or misinform. What people think can be controlled by controlling information.  Mind Control in the United States, Steven Jacobson. [Author Added Bold]
    This 'programming' has primed many Americans as candidates for greater roles in the continuing movements to change the American political system and to take down the present paradigm of civilization. These programmed individuals think according to the idea of hive-mind rather than individual evaluators of data and information, leaving the heavy lifting to others and selecting a group which best represents their feelings regarding the first impressions made about any issue or topic of importance.
‘Groupthink is a mode of thinking that people engage in when concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive in-group that it overrides realistic appraisals of alternative courses of action [10]. It is vital to maintaining an already collected and controlled population. If one has control over all forms of information, such as books media and the web, then a cohesive group consciousness is all that remains.’ (Information Warfare - James Scott)
    For these "Moms" the abundance of evidence, and proof “beyond reasonable doubt,” available to understand how and why the Sandy Hook School Shooting was FAKE, does not matter. Further it does not matter to these "Moms" the consequences for their children - if it turns out the school shooting was FAKE. 

    If these school shootings are FAKE (Sandy Hook and beyond) the implication is these "Moms" are being used as zombie-servants for an agenda that has no empathy and NO CONCERN for the damage it does by subjecting children and their parents to the trauma and mental abuse of a FAKED SCHOOL SHOOTING

    Further these "Moms," if they could think, would then realize this agenda is so evil it would be just a matter of simple induction to deduce they plan on hurting everyone after they have removed the tools of self defense from the people - leaving them DEFENSELESS against whatever may come. 

    For those who might want to join the other side, that is, those of us on the side of critical thinking and reasoning; those of us seeing reality, I offer these resources for learning about what really happened at Sandy Hook School.  From there take this information and educate others before it is way-too-late. 

    The book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, edited by Dr. James H. Fetzer with contributions from 13 contributors, including 6 (current or retired) Ph.D. professors, established through their research the school had been abandoned by 2008. The second edition is available here, Moon Rock Books. The first edition is available for free download here: Nobody Died at Sandy Hook

    As a video introduction and detailed discussion of the faked school shooting this video is among the best. 

    The primary issues facing Americans is the law of nature.  It is a universal axiom people are safer when they can defend themselves against any possible harm. You are safer if you have a tourniquet at home after a terrible cut, than you are waiting for ambulance to come and stop the bleeding.  It’s a law of nature that making third parties responsible for your safety and well-being will result in unacceptable outcomes. All people must take care of their own well-being before they can divide their time for the well-being of another.

    In the case of an emergency, there will always be a hierarchy of choices made before the next person can be served.  In the case of self-protection against violent attack, being able to defend yourself has the highest probability of survival.  Further, it can be shown (see my article There is No Such Thing as A Gun Free Zone) that people are overall safer in the presence of expanding populations of people who can take care of themselves.  

    The Gun Agenda today is not about safer gun use, but rather disarming Americans. Being disarmed forces people into a state of having the lowest probability of survival when facing violent attacks, and the least possible choices facing violent provocation or authoritarian demands.  When everyone is armed, a person or group or gang or even an army attempting violence against people has less probability of being successful - inversely proportion to the number people armed and nearby - simple logic. An armed society is a polite society and armed people are not easily susceptible to mass humiliation or extermination.

    Therefore, we have only ONE conclusion to draw regarding the motivations of those attempting to disarm Americans - It is not about making people safer - it’s about making violent aggressors safer.

    The time has come for those people who can think enough to understand this a war against Constitutional and European culture loving Americans and the enemy is winning. Winning, because there are so many subversive groups working simultaneously both externally and visible like "EveryTown" and anti-American organizations like SPLC, pretending to be protecting rights, while others are working internally, including the deeply imbedded secret societies with oaths of loyalties that require service to the agenda of the secret society above all loyalties and Nation States.

    It is no accident the disarm America agenda and the memes of their Zombie Army are focused on so-called Assault Rifles and in particular the AR-15.  This weapon, however, is involved in statistically insignificant cases of homicide by a firearm.  This should be telling - because the AR-15 is one of the best tools people could use to defend themselves against an organized violent attack (say from their government or hostile invading force.) 

    Keep this chart in mind:

    So, with just 15 million AR-15s, and 100 rounds of ammo per operator, American’s could resist an Army of millions of soldiers. If the controllers of the American people were planning to do harm to the citizens of United States, disarming the people would clearly be one of the first signs. 

    Be actually responsible: do something real for children - WAKE UP

    Related Video:

    To watch the video, click here
    Related Articles: