Wednesday, July 4, 2018

Robert David Steele: Memorandum for the President: 9/11, Domestic False Flag Operations and Your Legacy

Memorandum for the President: 9/11, Domestic False Flag Operations, and Your Legacy

Collective Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence, Ethics, Government, Peace Intelligence
9/11 — The Man Behind the Curtain?
4 July 2018
9/11, Domestic False Flag Operations, and Your Legacy
The public needs to understand the truth about 9/11 and all of the follow-on domestic false flag operations organized by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as part of the larger police state / anti-gun agenda. The National Rifle Association (NRA), one of your strongest allies from the early days of your campaign, should be fully engaged as you continue to defend the Second Amendment.
Talking Points for the Public
01 False flag attacks originated in maritime warfare, where both pirates and conventional naval ships would fly the flag of their enemy so as to get close enough for a surprise attack.  The USA has always excelled at wars based on lies (Spanish-American War, Mexican-American War) but actively embraced false flag operations when Ed Lansdale found how easy it was to fake guerrilla movements in order to elevate a CIA-controlled Army captain (Ramos) to the presidency. Since then false flag events have been a staple of CIA covert operations. I myself have managed a modest false flag operation for CIA.
02 9/11 was conceived by Israel, logistically-supported by Saudi Arabia, and both allowed to happen and made to happen under the direction of then Vice President Dick Cheney. Both the CIA under George Tenet and the FBI under Louis Freeh, Thomas Pickard, and Robert Mueller obstructed justice and conspired to shut down all early warnings such as ABLE DANGER, and then cover up the truth of 9/11.
03 Thirteen countries warned us months in advance of 9/11 – then Vice President Dick Cheney demanded they all keep their warnings secret, and months in advance of 9/11 scheduled a national counterterrorism exercise that would allow him to control the day. He moved the East Coast strip alert aircraft to Alaska, the FEMA command center was set up on the piers of NYC the night before, the evidence of how he contrived to execute 9/11 to justify foreign wars is voluminous, just hushed up.
04 In addition to its purpose in justifying a US invasion of Afghanistan to revive the drug crop and Iraq to control the oil fields, 9/11 was used to covertly liquidate $240 billion in gold assets that had been used to wage a Gold War against Russia from 1998-2000, under the day-to-day direction of Buzzy Krongard.
05 The first to question the official narrative were the Families of 9/11, some of whom had the integrity to refuse government “hush money.” Subsequently under the leadership of Richard Gage, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have completely demolished the false government narrative.
06 The false government narrative succeeded only because the mainstream media – including Fox News – was complicit in what has become the legal propagandization of the American public, and the success of what some call #GoogleGestapo at repressing Alternative Media views, especially conservative views.
07 Most if not all mass casualty events since 9/11, notably the Boston Bombing, Sandy Hook, Orlando, San Bernardino, and Las Vegas, have been false flag events.  Those that actually died were patsies. The fastest way to de-legitimize the anti-gun agenda is to disclose the truth to the public about these events.
08 There are many people who can answer any questions you have, extemporaneously: Richard Gage, Webster Tarpley, James Fetzer, and Christopher Bollyn come to mind. Your advisors will tell you they are liars. Not so. A wealth of detail is available online at 9/11 @ Phi Beta Iota.
09 If you demand the disclosure of the truth, and then create a Trump Truth channel able to engage 200 million US voters directly – a two-way channel – you will Make America Great Again.  The truth at any cost lowers all other costs. Throw in the Election Reform Act to give #WalkAway Democrats some options, and you win YUGE.

New York Times article attacking attorneys for Alex Jones in (absurd) Sandy Hook lawsuit


Alex Jones, target of malicious lawsuits by fake Sandy Hook parents

By Elizabeth Williamson

[Editor's note: This case has no descernible merit other than as an exercise in disinformation. The hoax was blown apart with the publication of NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), where 13 contributors (including 6 current or retired Ph.D. professors) proved that the school had been closed and there were no students there. See, for example, "Sandy Hook: How we Know the Lawsuits against Alex Jones are Malicious".]

Alex Jones, an online conspiracy theorist who claims the Sandy Hook massacre that killed 20 children and six adults was a hoax, has hired lawyers representing a founder of the neo-Nazi Daily Stormer website to defend him against defamation claims brought in Connecticut by families of seven Sandy Hook victims.
Since days after the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., Mr. Jones has spread bogus theories that the families were “crisis actors” in a government plot to confiscate Americans’ firearms. The families have endured online abuse, physical confrontations and death threats from Mr. Jones’s devotees.
Marc Randazza and Jay Wolman of the Las Vegas-based Randazza Legal Group are defending Mr. Jones in Connecticut. The lawyers also represent Andrew Anglin, the co-founder of the Daily Stormer, who is being sued for harassment by a Montana woman after Daily Stormer followers subjected her to a torrent of anti-Semitic slurs and threats. Mr. Anglin has cited Mr. Jones as an early influence.
Mr. Jones is also facing lawsuits filed in Texas by the families of two other Sandy Hook victims, but he has different lawyers there. Together, the lawsuits pose a significant legal threat to his InfoWars empire, First Amendment lawyers say.
Mr. Jones, who has been using his InfoWars radio show and YouTube channels to broadcast the false claim, is seeking to have all of the lawsuits dismissed.
Marc Randazza, one of the attorneys representing Alex Jones

Mr. Randazza has appeared on Mr. Jones’s radio show and in InfoWars videos. In a brief telephone interview, he acknowledged opinions by First Amendment lawyers not involved in the cases that the Sandy Hook families have a strong claim against Mr. Jones. “I think if you look at the allegations in the complaint, that’s an easy conclusion to make,” Mr. Randazza said. “But as these cases progress sometimes things turn in the other direction.”
“We are going to be mounting a strong First Amendment defense and look forward to this being resolved in a civil and collegial manner,” he said, asserting that Mr. Jones has “a great deal of compassion for these parents.”
On his website, Mr. Jones has suggested that the victims’ parents took part in an elaborate hoax, saying, “I’ve watched a lot of soap operas, and I’ve seen actors before.”
Since founding InfoWars in 1999, Mr. Jones has drawn a vast audience with bizarre theories, including that American terrorist attacks and mass shootings are “inside jobs,” and that the government lines juice boxes with hormones that make children gay.
“Alex Jones has built an opportunistic empire on the backs of families trying to pick up the pieces from shattering loss,” Joshua Koskoff, a partner at Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder of Bridgeport, Conn., the firm representing Sandy Hook families in the Connecticut lawsuits, said in a statement.
Mr. Jones did not respond to requests for comment.
Last week a District Court judge in Travis County, Tex., set Aug. 1 as a hearing date for the first of the Texas lawsuits. That one was filed in April by the parents of Noah Pozner, who was 6 when he was killed at Sandy Hook.

[Editor's note: But, as we have explained again and again, Noah Pozner cannot have been killed at Sandy Hook because "Noah Pozner" was a fiction made up out of photographs of Michael Vabner when he was a child, as Kelley Watt was the first to surmise. Consider:


The first obligation of the prosecution in this case, it would appear, is to prove that anyone died at Sandy Hook. We have a prima facie proof that the children were fabricated out of photos of older kids when they were younger, which means that Alex Jones was right to imply that Sandy Hook was "a hoax" and that the parents are themselves guilty of fraud.]
Mark Bankston of Farrar & Ball, the Houston-based firm representing the Sandy Hook parents in the Texas lawsuits, said in an email that the firm was eager to “finally hold Mr. Jones accountable for his malicious lies,” adding, “There are no more excuses for Mr. Jones to hide behind. Now he must answer to the law.”
 
[Editor's note: Absolutely, someone ought to answer to the law. The New York Times has been publishing nonsense about Sandy Hook since 15 December 2012, when it has to know better. The fake parents have split between $27-130,000,000 in donations from sympathetic but gullible Americans. That's more than $1,000,000 per family for faking the loss of a child. And they are perpetrating frauds upon the Court by pretending to be "Sandy Hook survivors".]

Memorandum for the President: Three Proofs we have Not been told the Truth about 9/11

Memorandum for the President: Three Proofs we have Not been told the Truth about 9/11

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth


The Impossible Entry
The footage of the South Tower hit exemplifies several anomalies, including a Boeing 767 flying at an impossible speed, an impossible entry into the building (in violation of Newton’s laws), and even passing through its own length into the building in the same number of frames it passes through its own length in air—which is impossible, unless this 500,000 ton, steel and concrete building posed no more resistance to its trajectory in flight than air.
Some have claimed that this was a “special plane” that could fly faster than a standard Boeing 767, but no real plane could violate Newton’s laws. The structure of the building, moreover, meant that it actually intersected with eight different floors. Each of those floors consisted of steel trusses connected at one end to the core columns and at the other to the steel support columns. Any real plane would have crumpled external to the building.

The Impossible Collapse

As Chuck Boldwyn has shown, the thickness of the steel varied from six inches thick in the subbasements to a quarter-inch thick at the top, which meant that the overwhelming mass of the steel was below the level at which “the plane” is alleged to have hit the North Tower. By his calculation, the fourteen floors above the “hit point” represented 1.4% of the mass of the steel, where it is preposterous to suppose that its collapse could have overcome the 98.6% of the mass of the steel below it. Indeed, as John Skilling observed, the towers were built with a safety factor of 20, which means that each floor could support 20 times its expected live load (dead load + furniture, facilities and human personnel).

The claim that the jet fuel from the plane strikes burned so intensely it caused the steel to weaken cannot withstand critical scrutiny. The steel used in the building was certified by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., to 2,000*F for three to four hours without suffering any adverse effects. NIST studied 236 samples of steel and found that 233 had not been exposed to temperatures above 500*F and the other three not above 1,200*F. Plus the fires in the South Tower lasted less than an hour, in the North less than an hour-and-a-half. The fires burned neither long enough nor hot enough to affect the steel. It was physically impossible for them to collapse.

A Controlled Demolition (WTC-7) vs. Demolitions Under Control (The Twin Towers)

As Jesse Ventura has observed, propane burns hotter than kerosene (the constituent of “jet fuel”), yet his camping stove, which is made of steel, does not melt when he uses it on a camping trip.  Far from collapsing, both buildings are being blown apart in every direction by enormous sources of energy, where they are being converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust and, when destruction is complete, there is no massive pile of debris in their footprint, which is a classic sign of a building’s collapse. Unlike WTC-7, the Twin Towers did not collapse, which means that the official account characterizing them as having “collapsed” is another blatant fabrication and deliberate deception.

Unlike the Twin Towers, WTC-7 came down in a classic “controlled demolition” at 5:20 PM that day, about seven hours after the destruction of WTC-1 and WTC-2, which I prefer to refer to as “demolitions under control”, since they were clearly not classic controlled demolitions. You can see the penthouse kink, where all the floors fall at the same time and, after about 6.5 seconds, there is a stack of debris (mostly floors) equal to about 12% of the height of the original. By contrast, the floors of the Twin Towers remain stationary, waiting their turn to be “blown to kingdom come” (in the memorable phrase of Morgan Reynolds).

For a comprehensive overview of the science and politics of 9/11, see "9/11: Who was responsible and why":