Monday, November 28, 2016

NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK: It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control


by Jim Fetzer

"It ain't what we don't know that hurts us; it's what we think we know that ain't so"--Will Rogers
Sandy Hook has become a celebrities' cause

The Sandy Hook experience has divided Americans, most of whom have been convinced by media coverage that it was a real event, where a young man massacred 20 children and six adults before killing himself.

Another substantial segment of the US population has taken a closer look at the evidence and drawn the conclusion it was a hoax, where no children really died: it was an elaborate psy-op to promote gun control.

Americans are hard pressed to sort these things out, because they are hit with a blizzard of reports that appear to confirm the official account, leaving them in the predicament of not being able to tell if it was real or fake.
It matters even more today because gun control has become one of the defining issues of politics in America, where leading Democrats (Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton) are using their authority as President (in the first instance) to issue Executive Orders constraining our 2nd Amendment rights and (in the second) threatening to impose liability laws upon their manufacturers for their use by those who buy them. Ben Carson, on the Republican side, has observed that Jews would have been better able to fend off The Third Reich had they not been disarmed; and Matt Drudge has challenged the President to demonstrate his sincerity by giving up his (heavily armed) Secret Service protection.
The appeals to Sandy Hook (shooting 20 children), the Charleston shooting (of nine blacks) and the  Oregon shooting (where college students were asked their religion and those responding "Christian" were shot in the head) have struck some observers as appearing to be calculated to instill fear into specific targeted subpopulations of the American community: parents, blacks and Christians, for example, where it's as though we were experiencing a series of psy-ops to convince the public that we ought to give up our guns. That troubles many, because disarming populations has all-too-often occurred to set the stage for tyranny in world history past. What if Sandy Hook was only an illusion?


Probabilities vs. Certainties



Knowledge of historical events (based upon documents and records, photos and videos and witness testimony, for example) can never be “definitive and certain”. You only know your own origin in life (where and when you were born and the parents who brought you into this world) on the basis of information that could have been faked. Even DNA comparisons can be invalid or mistaken on purpose or by accident. Your belief about today’s day/month/year is something else of which you have no direct and certain knowledge but rather have a host of sources of information, such as newspapers and television reports, which collectively confirm your belief but could be fabricated or faked, but which are almost always accurate and true.

The occurrence of an elaborate hoax intended to fool the people does not occur often, but there can be no doubt that it does sometimes occur. The Warren Report (1964), for example, provides an indictment of Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin of JFK, where the evidence for that conclusion was carefully selected and, in some cases, completely fabricated. The backyard photographs were faked, for example, and the home movies of the assassination were edited. That he had been captured in a famous photo taken during the shooting was suppressed. (Check out The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003) or many articles about JFK at jamesfetzer.blogspot.com for abundant proof, if you like.) These things can and sometimes do happen. And one of them happened here.
If you only read the government’s account, you might very well be convinced that JFK had been killed by Lee Oswald. And if you only paid attention to the mass media, you would probably believe that 20 children died at Sandy Hook. Once you acknowledge that some of the evidence has been fabricated or faked, however, the case begins to assume a completely different character. This does not mean we cannot know what happened in this instance, but it should not have been necessary to frame a guilty man.  New evidence or alternative hypotheses may thus require us to revised our position by rejecting hypotheses we previously accepted, accepting hypotheses we previously rejected and leaving others in suspense. We now know more about Sandy Hook.

Inference to the best explanation


The principle known as “inference to the best explanation”, has the potential to turn every American into a critical thinker  in comparing alternative hypotheses. In relation to Sandy Hook, there are two alternatives, which have consequences that would also be true (or probably true) if they were true and others that would be false (or probably false) if they were not (setting the alleged suicide by Adam Lanza to the side):
(h1) Sandy Hook was a real event, where 20 children and 6 adults were killed at a school;
(h2) Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax, where a drill was conducted and no children died.
But the key to understanding is making an appraisal of which of these hypotheses is better supported by the evidence. We can think of the evidence as effects of one or another hypothesis as their cause.  When one hypothesis makes the effects more probable than the other, it is more likely to be true and the alternative false. For the shooting to have been real, the school had to have been operational in 2012; yet we have indication after indication that it had been abandoned by 2008 (which you will discover in Chapters 2 and 3), including not only its deplorable physical condition (both inside and out), but also that it was not in compliance with both federal and state laws required in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act: 
Analogously, we know from past experience that the names, ages and sex of victims of crimes are almost invariably printed in newspaper accounts of crimes. In this case, however, the final reports coming from the Connecticut authorities did not include them. That is a very odd aspect of this event, but an attempt has been made to explain it away on the ground of preserving the privacy of the families of the victims. But if there were victims, their families already know they are dead. There is no evident benefit to the families, if it was real, but a major element of the cover up, if it was not. 
From the date of the event, we have a photograph taken from a CT State Police chopper at 9:15 AM/ET, which is 20 minutes before the first 911 call came in; there was no surge of EMTs into the building to rush those little bodies off to hospitals, where doctors could pronounce them dead or alive; virtually all of the emergency vehicles were kept at the Firehouse, which became the center of activity as opposed to the school; the parents were not even allowed to identify their children, which was done using photos. As a parent myself, I can emphasize that there is no way I could have been kept from viewing the body of a child of mine, where the conduct of the "parents" in this case is unlike that of any parents I have ever known, where these many oddities are confirmed by Chapter 5.
Other circumstantial anomalies 


If the school had been abandoned, then the shooting has to be an illusion, since there would have been no students present for Adam Lanza to shoot. And if that were the case, then we might not be surprised if any number of measures were taken at the time by authorities to suppress relevant information (and thereby making it unavailable) or by otherwise circumventing what would have been the ordinary and normal procedures of investigation and administration by local and state authorities. But the measures that were taken were rather extraordinary, including these examples:
* the Attorney General of Connecticut argued against releasing the 911 calls, where the court ruled against him;
* the Clerk of Newtown entered into secret negotiations with the state legislature to avoid issuing death certificates;
* a special panel of the state legislature recommended that any state employee who released information about Sandy Hook other than via Freedom of Information Act request be prosecuted as an E-felony with a five year sentence; and,
those who were hired to participate in the demolition of the school building were required to sign life-time gag orders that prohibit them from talking about what they saw or did not see during its destruction.
Each of these qualifies as a “fact” insofar as its truth can be confirmed by research you can conduct yourself. Admittedly, if all the information accessible via the internet about Sandy Hook were fabricated or faked, that would not be the case. But I know of no one who seriously contests any of these points.  So ask yourself, what is the probability that these five claims (if we also include the missing names, ages and sex from the final report) would be true if Sandy Hook had been a real event? And by comparison, what is the probability these five claims would be true if Sandy Hook had been a hoax? Which hypothesis is more likely to be true?

The Governor's Press Conference



The day of the shooting, Governor Dan Malloy and his Lt. Governor held a press conference, during which he observed that they had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen. That got me thinking about, “something like this”? What could that mean. There are only two alternatives: 


(a) that he had been told there would be a shooting in a school in his state, in which case he, as governor, should have warned school districts to be on high alert and make sure it did not happen, which he did not do; or, 

(b) that he had been told they would be taking an abandoned school and using it as a prop for a drill, which would be presented to the public as real to promote an aggressive gun-control agenda, which is the case here.

And when I looked into recent visits with the Governor to determine by whom he might have been "spoken to", I discovered that Attorney General Eric Holder had met with him on 27 November 2012 to discuss "Operation Longevity", a special interest of the Attorney General and the President of the United Staes for promoting gun control. Mark my words. The evidence presented here demonstrates that the school was closed by 2008; that there were no students to evacuate; that Adam Lanza appears to have been a work of fiction; and that the teachers, the parents, the Newtown School Board, the State Police, the Medical Examiner and the Governor--and by extension the Attorney General and the President--were all complicit in the deception


We have the FEMA manual 


Our collaborative research, you will find for yourself, is extensive, through and detailed--and leaves this matter resolved beyond any reasonable doubt. We have 50 photos that show the preparation of the Lanza home as a prop and another 50 documenting the refurbishing of the school as a stage (in Chapters 7 and 8). Doubt in this case would be reasonable were there a reasonable alternative explanation. But, as you are about to discover, there is none here.




And I am not just talking about the sign, "Everyone must check in", the Port-a-Potties, the boxes of bottled water and pizza cartons at the Firehouse, the name tags on lanyards and parents bringing their children to (what was supposed to be) a child shooting massacre! WE HAVE THE FEMA MANUAL. It stipulates that everyone must register and that refreshments and restrooms will be provided. Some participants did not realize that the official event was not until the 14th: We now know why some of the donation pages went up a day early and why Adam Lanza was recorded as having died on the 13th! Don't take my word for it, because you can read it for yourself. I included it here as Appendix A. 

The Requirement of Total Evidence

Indeed, scientific reasoning specifically and rational inquiries generally must satisfy the requirement of total evidence: in the search for truth, reasoning must be based upon all of the available relevant evidence, where evidence is relevant when its presence or absence (or truth or falsity) makes a difference to the outcome, typically on the basis of considerations of probability.  According to the official report on Sandy Hook by Danbury States Attorney Stephen Sedensky (to which we refer as "The Sedensky Report"), there were 489 children present that day. Minus 20 murdered, there ought to have been 469 to evacuate (as well as around 70 more teachers, administrators and staff). But we have no pictures of their evacuation. What we have instead this "iconic" photograph:


It has sometimes been said that "You can't prove a falsehood true!" But that assertion overlooks the role of false clams and fabricated evidence. We have here a photograph purporting to show a string of children being led away from the school to safety by a policewoman on the scene. This photo was published on the front page of virtually every newspaper in the world--and shown endless times on television. It was undoubtedly the single most important form of proof in convincing the public around the world that Sandy Hook was real. But there is a catch: the photograph was staged! And we know that not on the basis of the weaker evidence that there are too many leaves on the trees and no frost for this to be a 28 degree day in December but because Shannon Hicks took a second photograph!


Rearranging the kids to get a better shot  

It's bad enough that we have a series of parents looking on, some with their arms cross or their hands in their pockets--which is certainly not what we would expect in an emergency situation. It gets much worse when you realize that the police woman has stopped the children to rearrange them to get "a better shot"! Here's a comparison that shows what was going on and demonstrates--as conclusively as anyone could have the right to expect--that the first photograph was staged to create the false impression that there was an emergency and that these kids needed to be removed from a threat at the earliest possible opportunity--which would not leave time to stop and rearrange them as follows:



We not only know that Shannon Hicks was "in on the game" by taking these photos (as early as in October) in preparation for this elaborate charade but we also know that there was no evacuation. The claim is sometimes made that “You can’t prove a negative!” But that turns out to be false. When evidence that ought to be present if an hypothesis were true is not present, then the absence of evidence qualifies as evidence of absence. Suppose you were told there is an elephant in your living room. If you go there and find no indications of the presence of an elephant, you are completely justified in inferring that there is no elephant in your living room. 




If 469 kids should have been there, if the event was real, but they are not there, you are completely justified in inferring it was not real. An evacuation would have looked something like this, with strings of children led by other police officers or teachers performing their duty under stress. But we have DashCam footage at the locations in the parking lot where, according to official police records, the evacuation was taking place--and there is nothing there! Just as the absence of signs of the presence of an elephant in your living room is proof of the absence of an elephant, the absence of signs of the presence of children undergoing evacuation is proof that no evacuation was taking place. 

More parking lot anomalies--and a stunner!




Inspection of the vehicles in the parking lot in front of the school shows that they are parked in the wrong direction (which should have been nose-in), given the arrangement for driving into the lot. The image itself suggests of a group of drivers methodically filling up the lot with used or abandoned cars, driving straight into the designated parking places without regard for how they should have been arranged. Once again we ask, “What is the probability that the lot would be filled with cars parked in the wrong direction, if this had been a real event? What if this had been a drill?” Truly stunning, however, is the discovery of a series of photographs that display setting the stage early in the morning for the events that would transpire this day, including this one from Chapter 8:




Notice that the windows of Classroom 10 are not shot out and the flag is up. Wayne Carver can be seen behind the man in the blue evidence suit. This photograph is taken from one of the elevated cameras we have discovered that were mounted around the parking lot to record the drill. The mortuary tent is not there yet, which makes this early morning. Could we have more decisive proof? 

When an hypothesis has been confirmed by abundant evidence and no alternative explanation is reasonable, it has been established “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Hypothesis (h1), that Sandy Hook was real, has been falsified and (h2), that this was an elaborate hoax, has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.


Benefits to the Participants 


The benefits to those who participated in the Sandy Hook hoax have been substantial. The donation sites created by "families of the victims" have hauled in over $27,000,000 or in excess of $1,000,000 per family. Other substantial grants have been given to alleviate the pain and suffering of those who responded to the event. On Friday, 12 December 2014, for example, Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Representative Elizabeth Esty (CT-5) announced a $775,914 grant from the Department of Justice's Office for Victims of Crimes and their families, first responders and members of Newtown community in the wake of the shooting to "help fund continued mental health services and other support services", which sounds like a lot for participating in a charade.



Other pay-offs, bribes and hush-money--and under the circumstances, is there something more appropriate to call it?--are documented in Chapter 5. When debate was taking place over the choice between refurbishing the old school or constructing a new one, The Newtown Bee published about the presence of asbestos, lead and PCBs in the building, which had no doubt factored in the earlier decision to abandon the school in 2008. Newtown received $50,000,000 to build a brand new K-4 elementary school. I surveyed the cost of comparable cost for K-4 schools across the nation and discovered they average $7,000,000, which reflects the generous benefits that a community might accrue from cooperating covertly with the federal government in the pursuit of its political agenda.  


The Gun-Control Agenda 





We are told that fewer guns means less crime. But when you look into serious studies of crime rates in relation to gun laws, that is not what you discover. Appendix D, for example, "Comparing Murder and Homicide Rates before and after Gun Bans", suggests something closer to the opposite is the case; and Appendix E, "Comparing Death Rates from Mass Public Shootings in the US and Europe", demonstrates we are not the nation with the highest rates of mass public shootings, contrary to our president's claims. Barack
Obama himself praised the sweeping gun confiscation that took place in Australia in the late 1990s and said:

“Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown,” Obama said. “And Australia just said, well, that’s it, we’re not doing, we’re not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.” 
And while they haven’t seen a mass shooting since, local officials say that gun violence on the continent is much worse than it was before the tougher gun policies went into effect.
Meanwhile, the one thing that the President failed to recognize is that gun crime in the U.S. is on the decline. According to a PEW research study, gun crime is down 49% since 1993. Another study by the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that non-fatal gun crime is actually down 70% since the same time.  Even the President’s own study performed by the Center for Disease Control reached a similar conclusion: “Firearm-related death rates for youth ages 15 to 19 declined from 1994 to 2009,” the report states. “The number of public mass shootings of the type that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School accounted for a very small fraction of all firearm-related deaths.” What these studies show is there’s a clear agenda being carried out by the Mainstream Media to make it seem like mass shootings are the norm. As soon as a mass shooting happens, it reverberates through all the major news networks for weeks, much like an echo after the initial shot. Because of this, much of the nation seems to believe that gun violence, particularly school shootings, is on the rise even with evidence that points to the contrary
The reasons behind this aggressive behavior by the administration, even when gun violence has been falling in the United States, involves deep questions about the role of DHS in our society and why America has been devolving into a totalitarian state. I was born a year-and-a-day before Pearl Harbor, as my father used to put it; and I would never have imagined in my wildest dreams that the United States of American could descend into a bottomless pit of lies, deceit and deception. 


Faking a school shooting to instill fear into a population is an act of terrorism, where it has become clear that this instance was brought to us by officials at every level of the Connecticut government from the teachers and reporters to the State Police and the Newtown School board to the Governor and the Attorney General and the President himself. And this is the ugly legacy of Barack Hussein Obama.

NOTE: This is the republication of my blog for 24 October 2015 as we approach the fourth observance of an elaborate scam. The book was banned by amazon.com less than four months after having been placed on sale and having sold over 500 copies between 22 October and 19 November 2015. We now have a new publisher and the book can be obtained again at moonrockbooks.com in both black-and-white and color editions.

54 comments:

  1. Thanks for reposting this overview, Jim. It couldn't be coming at a better time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. An excellent analysis, MR. FETZER. Having been banned by Amazon myself, I've wanted to get a copy of your book ever since I first heard of its Amazon banning. It's been on my Amazon Wish List and ignored by friends for too long now; looks like I need to take this matter into my own hands.

    I had already come to the firm conclusion that Sandy HOAX was just that, well before your book was published. Nevertheless, I'm now going to purchase the book anyway, just because one can't have too much printed truth on their bookshelves.

    ~ D-FensDogG
    'Loyal American Underground'

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the excellent statement above by Jim, he mentions the comments of Connecticut Governor Malloy on that fateful day of the Sandy Hook Hoax December 14, 2012 that "we have been spoken to"... and even has a picture of him surrounded by Connecticut State Police as he made the statement which was broadcast basically world wide so far as I know. Yet, before the Sandy Hook investigator Wolfgang Halbig was forced to remove his website due to reported threats of violence to his person and family, he had a clip on the website with a colloquy between him and Governor Malloy regarding this statement made by the Governor where Governor Malloy directly denied to Wolfgang Halbig that he had made such a statement! In other words Mr. Halbig had caught the Governor in a direct lie which is again contradicted by the information above provided again by Professor Jim Fetzer and has been viewed many times world wide. This misconduct by a high official of Connecticut by one who recently even received a Kennedy award for courage, is disgraceful to put it mildly. All United States Citizens are expected to be truthful and honest in dealings with government officials at every level; can't we expect the same from government officials in reverse when they are speaking to us lowly citizens? Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
  4. The following statement was prepared of the order of weeks ago during the "Comey-Clinton" saga and may have been posted on Memory Hole which has also recently vanished similar to the vanishing of the website of Wolfgang Halbig www.sandyhookjustice.com.
    James Brien Comey, Jr. was born December 14, 1960 at Yonkers, New York but grew up in Allendale, New Jersey. His net worth is reportedly in excess of $11 million. He was appointed FBI Director Sept. 4, 2013 although approved by the Senate about 3 months earlier. He moved his family to Westport, Connecticut in 2010 into a wealthy neighborhood. Observe the interesting “coincidence” that he reached the exact age of 52, his birthday, on the same exact day the Sandy Hook Hoax was carried out in Newtown, Connecticut December 14, 2012! From the instant he took office of FBI Director, just over 8 months after the Sandy Hook Hoax, and even possibly earlier, he was privy to every sordid detail of this massive crime on America, from the planning stages to its execution to its continuing cover up by all relevant government agencies including but not limited to the FBI. Because of his position as head of the FBI, it is 100% certain he knows every sordid detail of this massive scam and crime and unconscionable hoax on every good American Citizen; yet he remains deafeningly silent about it all! He is covering up this massive crime on America just as only days ago he covered up crimes against America by another lying lawyer by the name of Hillary Clinton who graduated, as did her husband, from the cesspool Yale University Law School at New Haven Connecticut. Observe the common denominator in all these evil machinations against Americans the cesspool state of Connecticut or more aptly named Corrupticut. These facts are easily verified by anyone hence no references are provided. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ahh, very interesting background, MR. ABBE. I did not know that personal history about Comey. Thanks for posting that.

      Immediately after reading your latest comment, this thought burst into my mind:

      And is it merely coincidence that the Social Security number Barack Obama uses reportedly once belonged to a now long-dead man in Connecticut?

      There is no record of Obama ever having lived in Connecticut, and thus far I've found NO rational explanation for how he could have been assigned a SS# with a prefix number set reserved for residents of CT.

      How come Connecticut seems to show up so often around these criminals? Is there a deep "Connecticut Connection"?

      ~ D-FensDogG
      'Loyal American Underground'

      Delete
    2. I am aware of this but can't add any new information. A number of articles on this subject and the subject of Obama's birth certificate were published by Joseph Farah on his site World Net Daily. They also discussed some of the court challenges before and after Jan. 20. No court in the country would touch these challenges with a ten foot pole; they were either premature before this date or moot after it. All this involves the corrupt State of Hawaii also where many evil machinations have gone on to cover up all this. The problems arise because Obama has refused to reveal many details of his background. I recall having read a number of documents have also vanished from government archives similar to what happened with the investigation of Patton's death by Robert Wilcox. It is sickening that people would resort to stealing historical documents from government archives to protect some people from exposure. It was just reported on WND that Sheriff Joe is scheduled to have a news conference this week on their final conclusions on the birth certificate investigation but who knows what that will reveal. We really know very little of Obama's background while the birth certificate he presented is forged according to experts. Obviously he has plenty to hide. Secrecy is the enemy of the truth. Secrecy was also not addressed at all in the Constitution and our government obviously loves secrecy.

      Delete
    3. This blog is total bullshit!!! Talk to people who lost loved ones, not consiracy theorists. I know people who lost children, wives and friends. This hurts my soul and makes my head want to explode.

      Delete
  5. Jim, thanks again for the reminder. I feel that with Lance deHaven-Smith’s book “Conspiracy Theory in America” under my belt I can get a clear picture of elite level malevolence in all its naked inglory as displayed in the Sandy Hook high crime (as per ‘conspiracy theory’). The American people it seems to me facilitate these acts with their various compotes of Strauss and Popper. These type of American justifiable excesses will not stop unless Americans themselves change. Under Donald Trump they will – Jillary notwithstanding. It’s going to be hell for the average American Joe in the next 4/8 years.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's undeniable! Even to this day it's being used! The presidential debates it was used,maybe one of the reasons HRC couldn't be trusted? Lies! I've had threats by people,who obviously was paid to cover the truth. I also found out that almost every person in the town is debt free on their properties. The fact that the president constructed this,is treasonous! No wonder he signed executive orders to pull these stunts as preparing the USA against enemy attacks. Giving himself the power to test his crap on the citizens of his own country,says he's not for us! The latest EMP,space weather order is BS! He should quit using the people for his quest for NWO!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here is some good news this morning before Trump is even sworn in. Thank you Trump and Carrier. This is the sort of positive activity government officials should be engaged in rather than seeking to deceive good Americans out of their basic Constitutional rights all based on lies and fraud as the Sandy Hook Hoax did:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/30/carrier-says-it-has-deal-with-trump-to-keep-jobs-in-indiana.html
    Carrier says it has deal with Trump to keep jobs in Indiana
    “Air conditioning company Carrier said Tuesday that it had reached an agreement with President-elect Donald Trump that would keep 1,000 jobs in Indianapolis.

    Follow
    Carrier @Carrier
    We are pleased to have reached a deal with President-elect Trump & VP-elect Pence to keep close to 1,000 jobs in Indy. More details soon.”
    7:54 PM - 29 Nov 2016

    ReplyDelete
  8. Continued from above:
    . In addition to documentation of parts of this massive hoax on America by various courageous individuals, especially the magnificent efforts of Wolfgang Halbig, the free book “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook” by Professor James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., et al clearly demonstrates it for all to see. This book is the only book of about 20 on Amazon.Com to be banned by Jeff Bezos, an Electrical Engineer by training at Princeton University, from Amazon, while the other 19 or so which sustained the official lies, were kept available for sale to continue to fool a gullible and unwitting public. I think the Founders of this once great country would be crying today if they were here to observe this blasphemy on the country they produced over two centuries ago. Shame, shame, shame…. a thousand times on all those involved in this massive lie and scam on America. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://portal.ct.gov/Departments_and_Agencies/Office_of_the_Governor/Press_Room/Press_Releases/2016/05-2016/Gov__Malloy_Statement_on_Receiving_the_2016_John_F__Kennedy_Profile_in_Courage_Award/https://profileincourageaward.org/gov-dannel-malloy-2016/
      Quote from above link to John F. Kennedy profile in courage award site:
      “Connecticut Governor Daniel Malloy was named the 2016 recipient of the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award™ for courageously defending the U.S. resettlement of Syrian refugees amid security concerns following the November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris and personally welcoming a family of Syrian refugees to New Haven after they had been turned away by another state.
      The prestigious award for political courage will be presented by Jack Schlossberg, President Kennedy’s grandson, at a ceremony at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston on May 1, 2016.
      Daniel Malloy began his second term as governor of Connecticut in January of 2015. Later that fall, extremists carried out a series of coordinated, violent terrorist attacks in Paris, France. The attacks inflamed public fears of terrorism in the U.S. and sparked a wave of anti-refugee and anti-Muslim proposals by local, state and national politicians. More than half of the nation’s governors declared that in the current security climate, Syrian refugees would not be welcomed in their states. Continued:
      “As half of U.S. governors, leading presidential candidates and countless others across the country voice support for a ban on Syrian refugees from entering the United States, Governor Dannel Malloy took a stand against the hateful, xenophobic rhetoric,” said Schlossberg. “In doing so, he put principles above politics and upheld my grandfather’s vision of America that ‘has always served as a lantern in the dark for those who love freedom but are persecuted, in misery, or in need.’”
      Malloy could have chosen the politically expedient course and remained silent on the highly charged, controversial issue of refugee resettlement and national security. Instead, just three days after the Paris attacks and in a direct challenge to those calling for the U.S. to close the doors on Syrian refugees, Malloy announced that Connecticut would continue to accept refugees from Syria. Two days later, he personally welcomed a family of Syrian refugees to New Haven after the governor of Indiana turned them away.
      Malloy has remained unwavering in his commitment to those fleeing persecution in search of freedom, saying, “If refugees – many who are children fleeing a horrific, war-torn country – seek and are granted asylum after a rigorous security process, we should and will welcome them in Connecticut.””

      Delete
    2. This is the same governor who directly lied on camera to Wolfgang Halbig when asked if he said “He had been spoken to…” on national television Dec. 14, 2012 and who had spoken to him, all recorded on national television that day, he replied, “no he did not say that.” Has America now reached its lowest point of depravity? Wolfgang Halbig, who should have been given this award for courage, has now been forced to remove his website from anonymous threats to him and his family!! What would John F. Kennedy do today if he were alive to observe this massive unspeakable stroke of public relations hypocrisy in his good name by a bunch of shameful cowards? This is not to mention the massive gross obstruction by all the authorities in Connecticut from the Governor on down to simple release of public information regarding the events on December 14, 2012 the massive Sandy Hook Hoax perpetuated on an unwitting America.

      Delete
  9. http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/secret-service-officer-drops-bombshell-in-murdered-mom-case/?cat_orig=us Quote from the above article:
    “Muhammad Abdul Raheem, an officer in the Uniformed Division of the U.S. Secret Service for 11 years, decided to go public and reveal his identity because he felt the killing of Miriam Carey by federal officers on Oct. 3, 2013 was unjust.
    As an anonymous source, the Trenton, New Jersey, native previously told WND, in October:
    • “Everybody knew it was a cover-up.”
    • “Secret Service policy had been so obviously violated.”
    • “They all knew it was unlawful to pursue Carey because no felony had been committed.”
    • “Lying is so prevalent, they don’t even have to tell people to lie. People are so programmed, they don’t have to be told to lie. It’s done out of fear.”
    • Secret Service officers initially thought “someone was going to jail over it because it was such an obvious bad shooting.”
    For the record, Raheem now adds: “Whoever fired the rounds that took her life unjustly, they should be charged. The superiors who tried to cover it up, or were involved, them as well.””

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/secret-service-officer-drops-bombshell-in-murdered-mom-case/#cBMtc065YBdRRWQu.99
    The above case of the improper death of Miriam Carey on Oct. 3, 2013 is now confirmed by a member of the Secret Service with the guts to tell the truth to the public. WND has been following this case since her death that day.
    This is an example of what is needed in the Sandy Hook Hoax. We know likely hundreds or more people were involved in this massive hoax on all America which Jim as rightly called a terrorist act against all Americans by government. All of these aiders and abettors of this crime were on the public payroll in one way or another. So far none has come forward to admit these crimes. Please, just one of you, display the same guts as this courageous whistleblower in the Secret Service above and place your duty to your country above your selfish interest for a change, and speak up confirming the obvious hoax and fraud of this crime nearly four years ago December 14, 2012. If you do you will deserve the Medal of Freedom improperly awarded recently to a number of despicable undeserving Hollywood Perverts. Mr. Raheem above deserves one too. Perhaps the new President can be convinced to confer these awards to you. If two or three or more came forward that would be even better! And frankly all authors of the book “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook” should have also been given the Medal of Freedom too along with Wolfgang Halbig a very courageous citizen. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics Note: An earlier post revealing the many credentials of professor Henry C. Lee, Ph.D. a top forensic scientist and crime scene investigator noting his silence on the Sandy Hook Hoax has been evidently removed about 3 or 4 times.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Please consider adding functionality to your blog that would permit downloading of the entirety of an article in a form (like .pdf) that will capture the writing in a readable (possibly even attractive) way. This way all of us become "protectors of this knowledge" - as opposed to the prospect of its one day summarily disappearing from this site or (even more likely) becoming impossible to find using search. Please consider.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Might this explain the visceral reaction by the Democrats and establishment to Trump's taking office? He will most likely be briefed on many government secrets and may not agree to keep quiet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make a good point. The Sandy Hook Hoax was so blatant it is difficult to see them seeking to cover it up in government files. Jim has also written extensively on the Boston Bombing also where not only the event but the deaths and trial were totally corrupt. Even 9/11` could have some unpleasant disclosures in government files also. Trump would be too busy to worry about any of this now and he may never have time. The trouble is once people reach the top they tend to be protective of others in crime if you know what I mean.(circle the wagons) For example he appears to have backed off his original claims to prosecute Clinton. Expect more of this as we move forward if he is sworn in on Jan. 20.









      Delete
    2. I agree with Anonymous above --- I attended a trump rally just days before his election where he kept initiating the "lock her up!" chant to which the crowd thunderously accompanied him with with raised fists. A few short weeks later and Trump announced "the Clinton's are good people". We won't see any further (meaningful) investigations of Clinton or of 9-11 by Donald J. Trump.

      Now I can't wait to see his next moves four years down the road when he seeks reelection. I so wish I could say "fool us once..." but history proves once a fool always a fool.

      "It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country." Will Durant

      Delete
  12. Frankly our voting system in the U.S. is just as corrupt as the Sandy Hook Hoax and needs major surgery. Far beyond the problem of plurality rule having replaced majority rule in most elections from local to federal, where a majority of the registered voters rarely even show up at the polls, let alone decide anything, the more basic problem is that of voting by non citizens. The second problem is total lack of transparency in the election results so they can be checked and verified by any citizen or group, not just government bureaucrats. All elecronic voting must be abolished. We must return to verifiable paper ballots which would be recorded and made available to any citizen for verification later. Only four states require verification of citizenship at registration. Others use the "honor" system which is a total joke.
    With all the unverifiable uncertainties recounts are all meaningless at this point. In principle, what needs to be done, but won’t be, is to re- do the election with only paper ballots signed by the voter. But even before that were to take place, every registered voter in the country must be verified to be a legal U.S. Citizen which is a basic requirement to vote. Only four states require people to prove they are citizens at registration. Most others use the ‘honor’ system which is a joke. The Federal Government has refused to cooperate with States in this matter and refused to release a data base of legal citizens. Tests of the system have been made with a number of fraudulent voters sent to the Justice Department while Holder refused to act and charge them with fraud. Our country is corrupt at the highest levels. No one must be voting unless they are verified to be a legal U.S. Citizen period. Until that happens, and we return to only paper verifiable ballots, our elections are nothing but a corrupt meaningless sham. An excellent article on this very depressing subject is currently available on WND. Until our elections are conducted honestly, openly where any citizen or group can check the results, they are totally meaningless. Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
  13. Suppose we consider our country The United States of America as a 200+ year old patient on its death bed. What is the prognosis of the patient?
    1. Congress, Judicial Branch and Executive Branch all totally corrupted by lying lawyers and owned by a foreign country half way around the world. (You know which one, it can’t get along with neighbors.} All checks and balances between these branches of government have been obliterated.
    2. The voting and election system is totally corrupt at every level from lowest town to highest federal government. Minority rule runs the show with all abstentions flushed down the toilet. Secrecy prevents exposure of lying and cheating. People are permitted to lie about being U.S. Citizens with impunity and no verification by corrupt government all the way to the top at the Attorney General of the U.S.
    3. The war on cancer is a dismal failure having squandered upwards of $1 trillion while the cancer generals can’t even tell us what cancer is let alone how to cure it in the human body. About one person dies every minute either from cancer, treatment or both, usually treatment but falsely reported as from cancer. All approved cancer treatments are life threatening so when a cancer patient dies while under treatment they could have died either from cancer or treatment or both. The only way to prove the cause of death is from an autopsy by a top independent pathology laboratory but this is almost never done as a gift to the doctors and pharmaceutical companies profiting from this racket. This is the biggest medical racket of our time and the biggest medical failure of our time. The cancer generals are all guilty of scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity and should be sitting in a jail cell for life.
    4. The FDA, NIH, NCI, CDC are all totally corrupt and bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical companies.
    5. Our federal government lied about the events of 9/11/01 and used them as a ruse to fleece all Americans out of their Constitutional Rights when they passed the criminal and illegal so called “patriot act”, also improperly named and should have been named the tyranny act.
    6. The four star generals are total traitors and either stood down or were told to stand down and failed to defend the country on 9/11. All involved shold have been prosecuted for treason along with the other silent ones who refused to speak up about all this total corruption.
    7. Evidence shows the Sandy Hook Hoax was planned and executed by our government itself to fleece citizens out of their right to bear arms in the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution. Evidently Holder and Obama planned this at the highest level. Both should be jailed immediately.
    8. Government at every level routinely uses the crime of extortion against lowly citizens but prosecutes citizens who seek to use it against government.
    9. Government at every level routinely violates its own meaningless constitutions especially the meaningless “equal protection clauses” which are de facto nothing but nice sounding meaningless hot air.
    10. The Courts and Judicial System are totally corrupt at every level. None would touch the corrupt Obama Election Fraud with a ten foot pole and don’t expect anything from them this time around.
    Continued below:

    ReplyDelete
  14. Continued from above:
    One could write a long book on all this gross failure of the 200+ year old patient above. It is fully documented with numerous books and articles and hundreds of references to top authorities. For example, the book “IBM and the Corruption of Justice in America” by Earl Carey, 1992 lists no less than 42 federal judges by name and location who violated all the meaningless rules they took a meaningless oath to follow. Paul Revere should have shouted, “The lawyers are coming, the lawyers are coming.”
    There are many books on corruption in the war on cancer. Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. has published three seminal books “The Cancer Industry” with about 500 pages and 500 references.
    Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. has published many books and articles, one with 800 pages and 1200 references. America is running around the world fighting endless wars, killing or injuring millions of innocent peoples with impunity, destroying the earth itself and its atmosphere and water, while lying to its own population about its crimes against humanity. America is a disgraceful, dismal failure to put it mildly. It rightly deserves its impending death and demise.
    The terrifying situation in America today is aptly described by former U.S. Marine Ken O’Keefe in his video months ago from LAX.
    http://search.aol.com/aol/video?q=ken+o%27keefe+at+lax&s_it=video-ans&sfVid=true&videoId=4964FDA492F3BAFB183B4964FDA492F3BAFB183B&s_chn=prt_bon&v_t=comsearch-aolnewtab-t
    America is gone folks. It is only a matter of time now.
    Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics

    ReplyDelete
  15. I lived approximately two blocks away from Thurston High School when Kip Kinkel shot it up.
    I can guarantee you that no one died at Sandy Hook, no one shot up the school, nothing happened... except an elaborate play put on by the government for gun control.
    Quite possibly it may also have been a training exercise in case somebody shoots up a school. But one ambulance two blocks away? Children that show up and newsreels months afterwards that were supposedly killed? Parents that supposably have a child but there are no birth records of any such child? People that present themselves as married but are not? All of the alleged parents are actors or actresses? Supposed fathers that have to psych themselves up, giggle before they go on camera, go on camera with big fake alligator tears, and then as soon as the camera is off they're laughing again? No, nothing happened at Sandy Hook accept an elaborate play for Obama's false flags so that no one knew what else he was doing underhandedly at the time. Nothing but an excuse to push taking our Constitutional rights away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Im looking for hard evidence such as assessor records and real estate tax rolls in the names of the parents to prove residency

      Teachers from other schools who took in survivors ... bus drivers if the school was closed they don't have bus drivers

      Records of electricity use during the "closed" years

      Etc etc.

      Delete
    2. What have you found?

      Delete
  16. That the mainstream media account of the Sandy Hook "massacre" must be false is evident from the fact that the local newspaper, The Newtown Bee, published their first report on the massacre the day before it was reported by the MSM to have occurred. Here is the story, as cached by Bing.com on December 13th, the day before the alleged shooting. In it, Dawn Hochsprung, said to be the principal of Sandy Hook Elementary, describes events which, according to the MSM and White House account, did not occur until after she was killed. So not only was Dawn Hochsprung able to describe what would not happen until the following day, but she was able give an eye-witness account of what would not happen until after he own death, she being, according the the MSM, the first person at the school to be murdered).

    If Sandy Hook was a hoax, it provides Americans good reason to fight for their Second Amendment right to bear arms.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yeah, its all a conspiracy until you meet the parents of a child that was murdered that day and witness the hole in their lives. So irresponsible speculation such as this....Jim Fetzer should go to Hell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those "parents" had NO child of theirs killed. Please read this document.

      Delete
    2. What's irresponsible about such speculation, Tom?

      If you followed the story at the time, you would know that there were many aspects of what is supposed to have happened according to the mainstream media reports that appear inconsistent with evidence in the public domain. The Newtown Bee account of the interview with Dawn Hochsprung, for example, in which she "told The Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting," this despite the fact that Dawn Hochsprung was said to have been the first person killed, which raises the question of whether the interview took place at all.

      There's also the odd detail that the interview was published online the day before the alleged shooting took place (see my post above), as confirmed by the time stamp on the article as it appeared in the Bing.com cache. There is thus good reason to question the events as reported by the media.

      Unfortunately, your claim about meeting parents of a child that was murdered that day is supported by nothing that anyone engaged in this discussion can possible check for themselves. As a contribution to the debate, therefore, your comment is without weight.

      Naturally, if children died at Sandy Hook on December 14, 2012, there would be no one here who would not deeply sympathize with the parents. Equally, though, it must be obvious to all that it is the emotional response to the alleged Sandy Hook atrocity that would have been the objective of a fake shooting intended to strengthen the case for gun control.

      Delete
    3. This has always been a very curious line of allegation. I live about 10 miles from Sandy Hook. My wife is a prominent physician in our area and has patients who know people who lost children in this event. Her office manager has a son who was a teacher at this school (years earlier and transferred), lives there and knows parents of the children that died. He attended funerals.

      I cannot imagine these people have been hoaxed or are delusional or are part of some huge cover up for a false flag to promote gun control.


      While I do agree that there are many, many incidents of provoked or staged events to manipulate public opinion and sentiment, this one is very hard for me to process.

      The anomalies regarding many of the details are troubling but I have a very hard time believing that "no one died at Sandy Hook".

      Delete
    4. Then there is this. A climate of FEAR exists today in Newton. Everyone knows their phones are being bugged and people are DYING. Truth is an endangered species in Newtown. If you walk into Newtown as a stranger and ask a few questions you are immediately questioned as to your reasons for being there are.

      http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2014/11/an-eerie-visit-to-sandy-hook-newtown-ct.html

      Look at the strange actions of City Council. These people are clearly afraid. There is a powerful force working against the disclosure of any truth.

      Delete
    5. At least there are a couple of intelligent people here!

      Delete
  18. Thanks Jim

    You are playing an important part in the exposure of the sea of government LIES we are living in.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Why keep reposting your debunked article? That boy is very clearly not the same boy rearranged. .. of course, you use a blurry photo to keep your lie running.. but when you analyze a decent photo, Fetzer's ruse becomes clear. If you had evidence you wouldnt have to rely so much on photoshopping bs, hiding stuff from photos, and blurring photos. This is debunked tripe revisited... come on Jim.. admit you are wrong and quit lying about the rearranged child. You cannot show a single child rearranged. You just take a moment in time and lie your way through a narrative.

    ReplyDelete

  20. This has always been a very curious line of allegation. I live about 10 miles from Sandy Hook. My wife is a prominent physician in our area and has patients who know people who lost children in this event. Her office manager has a son who was a teacher at this school (years earlier and transferred), lives there and knows parents of the children that died. He attended funerals.

    I cannot imagine these people have been hoaxed or are delusional or are part of some huge cover up for a false flag to promote gun control.


    While I do agree that there are many, many incidents of provoked or staged events to manipulate public opinion and sentiment, this one is very hard for me to process.

    The anomalies regarding many of the details are troubling but I have a very hard time believing that "no one died at Sandy Hook".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's simply no better way of saying this, so...

      You're a liar.

      ~ D-FensDogG
      'Loyal American Underground'

      Delete
    2. OMG...okay....yep...you got it all figured out. So there you have it. The perfect response to a simple statement of facts as I know them. Nice marginalizing technique for something YOU don't want to believe. Thanks for the reply. And have a wonderful holiday.

      Delete
    3. The trouble with your statement, Anonymous, is that you provide no basis upon which anyone can assess its truth. You provide no identifying information about yourself, and you provide no reference to what information is publicly available to verify you statement. Thus, although you statement may be entirely truthful, it may also be complete rubbish. Since we cannot tell, why should we take it in the least bit seriously? Obviously, we cannot.

      Delete
    4. Thank you! I will indeed have a wonderful holiday.

      [If you had any flippin' idea HOW MANY TIMES we've all seen some "Anonymous" Internet shill tell us -- without providing one single shred of evidence -- that they know someone (or know someone who knows someone) who got killed at Sandy Hoax, you wouldn't have even bothered trying to run this sad, tired old, useless testimonial by us.

      Find a new method or quit your gig, because this tactic wasn't working THEN and it ain't gonna start working NOW, all these years later. Stop wasting your time and ours, Shill!]

      ~ D-FensDogG

      Delete
    5. Yes...there you have it...I lurk as an shill, posting to thousands of websites like this....and I will be tracking you too!! Yes!! So beware and really try to get some help with your psychosis. Or perhaps THAT works for you.....in your sad and useless life as someone who might not even imagine that someone is telling a truth from what they have experienced.

      Delete
    6. You forgot to mention the part about me living in my mom's basement and wearing a tinfoil hat.

      But, there, I covered it for ya. You're welcome, Mr. Shill.

      ~ D-FensDogG

      Delete
    7. So..yes...I chose NOT to reveal names of people I know and love...because they would be harassed by "truth seekers" like yourself....who would have questions about something very traumatic. To what end....so you could satisfy your morbid curiosity....and do what about this whole thing?? What would you DO?? REALLY??? So here's a little nugget but it will do nothing for someone like you...I live in Trumbull CT. Anyway, given the documented of false flag incidents, I have no trouble believing that the deep evil that perpetuates them exists....and there will be more....I SAID have have trouble with THIS ONE!!!! Do YOU know anyone with direct contact with victims?? What if they told you about something that doesn't square with your "ideas"? I will leave it at that.

      Delete
    8. I met parents.

      Delete
  21. So many things are sour about this! No deaths reported on that date in Newton! The big highway type sign saying "check in here" , plus all the bottled water stacked up for the actors. Sick,twisted gig!! Even Obummer himself using it as a ploy to take up gun control,why he initiated it in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  22. So what happened to the "dead" kids who were not killed?

    As an example please review these pictures.

    Here is six year old Ben Wheeler supposedly killed at Sandy Hook. (1)

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/parents-newtown-victim-new-baby-boy-article-1.2014698

    Now here ia a picture of six year old Ben and his older "brother" Nate who looks to me to be about 10 - 12. (2) Notice they had JUST moved into Newtown as had most of the "dead" kids. What are the odds on that?

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/parents-newtown-victim-new-baby-boy-article-1.2014698

    Now here is a picture of the Wheelers with a boy purportedly Nate. (3)

    https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=807&q=newtown+Conn+UN+sign&oq=newtown+Conn+UN+sign&gs_l=img.12...3572.19055.0.21888.20.12.0.8.8.0.358.1845.2j8j1j1.12.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..0.13.1843...0j0i30k1j0i24k1.F61JQOIEaDs#imgrc=THiUDIerMoZsWM%3A

    Now I ask you does this boy supposedly an OLDER version of the "Nate" we were shown in (2) look more like Ben (1) with a few years added or the "Nate" we were shown in (2)?

    To me the "Nate" in (3) appears YOUNGER than the "Nate" in (2) whoever it is also appears to me to be an older version of Ben than any of the "Nates"

    So this is how this deadly scam was constructed. The famous picture of the Desoto classroom was a photo shopped composite of individual child pictures that were taken in about the year 2009 NOT 2012

    Those children are probably alive and well but several years older than we would expect.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The names of the children have been released. 12 funerals were aired on TV. How do you explain that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Righttttttt, they can't they said the same about 911. Wait maybe wwII was a hoax to and Hitler wasn't real either right ?

      Delete
  24. this is so disturbing....i cant even begin to imagin someone thinking of such a horrific act of crime against children to use as a act to promote gun control...You would have to be a heartless cold blooded dement sick individual to even attemp to do such a thing..... and i believe its a pretty sad and sick of you or anyone to write or promote news that this was a hoax..... over & over..again for the parents and children that lost a child..a sister or brother or both,grandparents ,ect...to have to keep reliving this horrible tragic day because of these articles .. judgement day is near...... the day you have to go in front of god above and answer to him ....

    ReplyDelete
  25. Unknown,stay unknown! It's Obummer and his administration that cooked this up! The sick twisted senerio is a false flag, they will have to stand in front of the creator,and maybe you too? The school was closed,if was a small,greedy town,that profits from this false flag event,even to this day. http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2016/06/fake-funerals-and-false-flags/ Keep the falsehood going! You have to earn that evil money! There's no court that will go after gun manufacturers of a false flag event.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Sorry guys...my sister lives in new town...it was real...they know the kids who died...the town is still mourning and will for years to come...they demolished the school

    ReplyDelete
  27. They had to demolish the school,it wasn't fit for use. That's why it was closed way before the FEMA drill. And look at what they built! Must have been the best settlement the town acquired for their roles,along with other financial gain! Family shouldn't lie to each other.

    ReplyDelete
  28. To the nearest Manchurian candidate: would you kindly sneak into the oval office and kill the son of a bitch?!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Fool please, dame white folks wanna keep their guns. Please do and shoot each other while your at it :-/

    ReplyDelete