Thursday, August 31, 2017

John Kass: The Democratic silence on antifa is dangerous

There is a disturbing silence from leaders of the Democratic Party over those gangs of black-masked leftist thugs shutting down free speech and beating people to the ground with clubs.
We’ve seen such leftist violence before, and we saw it again just the other day at a protest in Berkeley, when the city police backed off and the thugs who call themselves antifa swarmed peaceful protesters of the right.
It’s all over the internet, young men of the hard left in black masks, black gloves, armed with clubs, hunting down prey who dare speak their minds.
What’s striking about all this is the silence.
There has been no concerted media effort to pressure Democratic politicians to denounce Democratic muscle. So Democratic politicians have been relatively silent, as have many of their loyal pundits. A few pundits of the left have even compared the thugs with American soldiers hitting Omaha beach, a ridiculous attempt to legitimize the violence.
This is all corrosive and dangerous. And in a loud political year, the silence of Democratic politicians explains so very much.
Because silence is consent.
And in this silence you may hear something terrifying: the rule of law breaking down.
When politicians aren’t pressured to declare themselves, they don’t. Most Republican and Democratic pols are transactional personalities who hate taking a stand until after consensus is formed. They’d rather wave a moist finger in the air to see which way the wind blows.
This business of political muscle and politicians can be found in the history of Chicago politics too. Any alderman would condemn violent street crime to get journalists off their back. But if you asked them to condemn specific street gangs or Outfit crews by name, asked them to call out thugs who provide them political leverage in the precincts, they’d look at you as if you’d sprouted six heads.
Now, it’s not just a Chicago thing. Political street violence is a national thing. The thugs of the left have shut down free speech at college campuses, at political protests — and they do so at will. Cops in Democratic-run towns now either stand down or step back. And the hunting begins.
Conservatives see the danger to the republic, but so do a few liberals who have been bold enough to warn against the hard, violent left. Alan Dershowitz, the former Harvard Law School professor, is one.
“Do not let the hard left, the radicals, represent the Democratic Party,” Dershowitz warned recently.
“There is an alt-left and we cannot deny it. The alt-left are radical people who want to deny us free speech, who want to close the campus to conversation, who want to stop people from having dialogue, who want to use violence ...
“Antifa is not our friend. They will not help us win elections. ... I do not want to give a pass to the hard radical left, which is destroying America, destroying American universities, destroying the Democratic Party,” Dershowitz said.The easy parallel to antifa and Berkeley is the properly horrified reaction of most decent Americans to the white supremacists and Nazis rallying recently in Charlottesville. The rally was ostensibly about protecting Confederate history, but in effect, with Nazis and the Klan there, it became the theater of white tribalism.

It resulted in the death of a counter protester, Heather Heyer, struck by a car driven in rage by a mad and angry thug of the right.
And President Donald Trump’s ridiculous equivocation after Charlottesville — chastising extremists but also saying that among them were some “fine people” — cost him dearly. He was loudly condemned by many, including me.
But at least at Charlottesville and after there was a common understanding, among most journalistic elites, among political elites of both parties, that Nazis and white supremacists would be loudly condemned.
Not so with antifa at Berkeley. Leftist thugs seem to be a protected class, as far as Democrat bosses and much of the Washington media are concerned. Until quite recently, antifa was described not by name, but merely by the neutral term “counter protesters.”
Counter protesters?
Such weakness and partisan favoritism breeds cynicism, and the rule of law breaks down.

Berkeley happened just as the deadly hurricane hit Texas, and just as Trump pardoned his ally Joe Arpaio, the notorious former sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona.
Arpaio had been convicted of a misdemeanor for violating a court order seeking to stop his office from discriminating against Latinos in a war against illegal immigration that has overwhelmed Arizona. He’s become something of a hero to the right, even though he was a lawman openly defying a judge.
There is an easy argument that Arpaio represents the weakening of the rule of law. He was a sworn lawman yet brazenly ignored the courts. But that’s a political slogan. Slogans are too easy. And they don’t get to the thing itself.
Because long before Arpaio was sheriff, the borders with Mexico had been corrupted. Republican big business wanted cheap and compliant Mexican agricultural labor. Democrats wanted a new dependent class of compliant constituents.
Federal immigration laws were already a joke. And when the rule of law is mocked by the political elites, it breaks down. History tells us that men like Arpaio enter the breach.
So ask yourselves: With leftist antifa thugs becoming increasingly violent, and mealy-mouthed Democratic politicians hesitant to denounce potentially useful political muscle, who steps into the breach?
I hope it worries you a bit. It worries me, too.
Kass writes for The Chicago Tribune.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

The Lies of 9/11 “Miracle Workers”. BUSH AND CHENEY: How They Ruined America and the World

Edward Curtin

“America’s fate was sealed when the public and the anti-war movement bought the government’s 9/11 conspiracy theory.  The government’s account of 9/11 is contradicted by much evidence.  Nevertheless, this defining event of our time, which has launched the US on interminable wars of aggression and a domestic police state, is a taboo subject for investigation in the media.  It is pointless to complain of war and a police state when one accepts the premise upon which they are based.” – Paul Craig Roberts, How America Was Lost
David Ray Griffin is an international treasure and truth teller, who, while being ignored by the mainstream corporate media (MSM) for his extraordinary series of books exposing the false flag attacks of September 11, 2001, will someday be lauded as a modern prophet. To those who know and have studied his work, he is an inspiration for his persistent insistence in a dozen books since 2004 that the truth about the US treachery of that infamous day is essential for understanding the violence, planned by neo-conservatives and embraced by neo-liberals, that the United States has subsequently inflicted on the world.He has consistently argued that to believe in the government’s explanation for 9/11, one has to reject logic, scholarship, and the basic laws of modern science.
Bush And Cheney: How They Ruined America And The World is Griffin’s latest, and probably last, effort to reach those people who, out of fear, ignorance, or laziness, have walled themselves into a cyclopean labyrinth of denial about the defining event of our time.  Without the clarifying truth about the attacks of September 11, 2001, there will be no exit from the continuing nightmare the world is experiencing.
If you are reading this review, you are probably not one of those people Griffin is trying to reach. Ay, there’s the rub!  As the title of his book suggests, he is using reversed logic to try and reach those who have accepted the official fiction that is The 9/11 Commission Report (No doubt without having read it. Outside of serious researchers, I have never met a person who has, except for some of my students) and all the antecedent and subsequent government and MSM propaganda.
To this end, the first three-quarters of the book is devoted to the “destructive transformations of America and the world as a whole” that were initiated and justified by 9/11, many of which have been accepted by innumerable people as being based on government lies, most notably the war against Iraq.  Griffin’s hope is that if he can convince skeptical readers that the government would lie about Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, etc., resulting in the deaths and maiming of millions of innocent people and the destruction of their countries, it would also lie about the attacks of September 11 that “legitimized” such carnageand the ongoing shredding of the US Constitution.
The Will to Examine Miracles?
It’s an ingenuous and compelling method, culminating with his concluding section on “15 major miracles” of 9/11, by which he means “violations of the laws of nature” in the strictest scientific sense.  Astutely logical, deeply sourced, and scientifically compelling, the book’s conclusion can only be rejected by one adamantly closed to accepting the ugly truth about the US government and its media accomplices.
But getting skeptical people to read the book is the trick.  I think that is very hard but much easier than to get the MSM to do so and give it a fair shake.  People have friends whom they trust, and sometimes friends can convince friends to at least take a look. Speaking of the MSM, Griffin puts it thus:
However, while granting that the Bush-Cheney administration told big and disastrous lies, which led to millions of deaths, most mainstream commentators have considered the idea that this administration engineered the 9/11 attack to be so absurd that they can render judgment without checking the evidence.
“Judging without checking the evidence” is the job of the MSM, who are stenographers for the government, but regular people might be persuaded to check the evidence before reaching a conclusion, if they can be led to that assessment one logical step after another. One can even hope that left-wing alternative media critics of the government, many of whom avoid this issue like the plague, might find the courage to reassess their anti-scientific denials in light of Griffin’s work. After all, “the laws of physics don’t lie,” and logical reasoning has generally been a strength of many dissenters, especially those well-skilled in the art of disputation.
The Birth of the Tangled Web
Griffin is a master logician, so he begins with the obvious fact that the Bush-Cheney administration failed to prevent 9/11 and therefore failed to keep America safe that day, as Donald Trump said in a 2016 election debate, for which he was castigated by his opponents and the media.  But he was right; it is a fact, whatever Bush-Cheney’s deceptive excuses. As a result of those attacks, the US attacked Afghanistan, claiming that was because Osama bin Laden orchestrated the attacks from that country. No evidence of bin Laden’s guilt was ever presented, though Colin Powell initially said it would be shortly forthcoming (he quickly reneged on the promise). The invasion of Afghanistan, planned well in advance of 9/11, was the start of the war on terror that’s been going on for 16 years with no end in sight. A 16-year-old war based on no evidence, just lies. Griffin shows how the alleged “evidence” that was eventually produced – the bin Laden videos – were fraudulent; that they were indeed “produced,” and not by bin Laden; they were “bogus” according to Professor Bruce Lawrence of Duke University, the leading academic expert on bin Laden. And the FBI reported that it had “no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” But the administration and the media sang of bin Laden’s guilt in unison. The public, beaten down in fear and trembling, accepted the claim as a fact, as they were further traumatized by additional lies about the anthrax attacks that are a key component of the entire propaganda campaign of fear and intimidation that resulted in The Patriot Act.  (Graeme MacQueen’s masterful analysis, The 2001 Anthrax Deception, should be required reading; for he shows how the often forgotten anthrax attacks are intimately linked to those of September 11 and when studied closely, prove that 9/11 was an inside job.)
So Griffin begins with the lie about bin Laden that led to the lie about Afghanistan that led to the illegal and immoral and ongoing war against Afghanistan and all the millions of deaths and destruction that have ensued.
So knowing how lie leads on to lie, let us count some of the lies that followed.  Griffin documents these in deeply sourced details, but I will list them concisely:
US Government Lies Subsequent to the 9/11 Attacks:
  • That the 9/11 attacks were surprises, a “New Pearl Harbor.”
  • That there was solid evidence for bin Laden’s guilt.
  • That the invasion of Afghanistan (and Pakistan) was therefore justified.
  • That the “war on terror” and therefore The Patriot Act were necessary.
  • That Saddam Hussein was connected to 9/11, was developing nuclear weapons, and had weapons of mass destruction
  • That the attacks on Muslim countries were not based on Islamophobia
  • That the chaos and destruction unleashed throughout the Middle East were not pre-planned and intentional.
  • That the Obama administration’s attack on Libya was a humanitarian response to the “madman” Gaddafi, who adopted a rape policy fueled by Viagra drugged troops ready to unleash a blood bath.
  • That the war against Syria was not a CIA-instigated plan to overthrow Assad under the guise of “liberating” the Syrian people.
  • That the jihadists in Syria, including ISIS, were not armed and supported by the US, with many of those arms being shipped out of Benghazi, Libya, under the direction of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, General David Petraeus, and Chris Stevens, the US ambassador to Libya.
  • That the Syrian “White Helmets” are independent volunteer do-gooders, not a propaganda outfit funded by the US and UK governments.
  • That the wars against Muslim countries throughout the Greater Middle East are not connected to the Israeli occupation of Palestine and serve as American support for Israel’s agenda in the region.
  • That drone killings are legal and morally justified.
  • That the US Constitution has not been shredded.
  • That the coup d’état in Ukraine was not a US operation as part of a continuing US aggression toward Russia and a growing threat of a nuclear annihilation.
  • That the US buildup of military forces along Russia’s western borders and the massive transfer of US Naval forces to China’s east are not US acts of aggression making nuclear war more likely, but are acts of self-defense.
  • That the threat of ecological holocaust is not connected to a 770 billion dollar “defense” budget, a trillion dollar nuclear weapons modernization program, and US wars against countries containing vast amounts of fossil fuels and rare minerals.
That is only a sample of the lies that Griffin uses to lead the reader back to 9/11, the alleged reason for the death and destruction justified by such lies.  If the US government would lie in all these ways, he is saying, why would they not have lied with the Big Lie that started this string of destructive deceptions.
September 11, 2001
Thus the last section of the book (a little more than 25%) is devoted to “9/11: A Miraculous Day.” Herein he explains why George W. Bush and Dick Cheney should not be trusted on 9/11. They did not want an investigation into the September 11 attacks; wanted the public to just trust them. They were eventually forced into an investigation by public pressure; originally named Henry Kissinger to head it (don’t laugh – ha! ha!); rigged its makeup and had Philip Zelikow, arch neo-con and Bush insider, appointed its Executive Director. In short, they did everything possible to prevent an honest investigation. And we know that the result was The 9/11 Commission Report that is a piece of legerdemain on a par with The Warren Commission Report. In other words, a cover-up.
Griffin shows that “Bush and Cheney lied about their activities on 9/11” and that their relationship to the subsequent anthrax attacks, a key motivator for The Patriot Act and “the war on terror,” suggest that their administration was the source of those attacks and therefore the 9/11 attacks. (see Graeme MacQueen’s The 2001 Anthrax Deception). Griffin further notes how declassified official accounts refute “central features of the Bush-Cheney account of 9/11.”
And then – the coup de grace – he shows how the official account of 9/11 depends on “miracle stories.” Yet, “a look at the evidence shows that many people who accept science on tobacco, evolution, and global warming, accept miracles, implicitly, on the subject of 9/11, especially in relationship to the World Trade Center (WTC).” Herein lies the great stumbling block to convincing people of the truth of 9/11. Science, logic, careful reasoning, evidence, documentation, what you can observe with your own eyes, etc. – none of this matters when you are intent on being deceived (or pretending to be) because of the implications of examining the evidence and reaching conclusions that are deeply disturbing to your world view, ideology, or sense of self.  To admit that you have believed a pack of lies for years is very difficult to accept.  But regular people of good will can do so.  These are the people Griffin is trying to reach.  To convince those who have for years publicly and professionally dismissed those who have questioned the official version of 9/11 as conspiracy nuts is probably an impossible task. To convince the MSM that have worked hand-in-glove with the government to conceal the truth is preposterous. To convince those fine people who are devoted to truth in other areas to reconsider their positions on this core issue is conceivable. Surely the world is full of weird events that logic and science cannot explain. But when the defining event of recent history that has resulted in the world teetering on the edge of final destruction is explained by at least the following 15 miracles that Griffin lists, only a delusional person or one whose will to untruth is set in stone would not be moved to ask how these could be possible, and draw the obvious conclusions.
A Miraculous Precedent: The Assassination of JFK
I am reminded of that other foundational case in modern American history: the CIA-directed assassination of JFK.  Dan Rather, the famous CBS news anchor, was in Dallas that day, and after seeing the Zapruder film (which was then kept from the American public for a decade), went on television to say that when the president was shot in the head he violently lurched forward, clearly implying that the shot came from Oswald from the rear.Of course once the public was able to see the film, it was obvious to anyone with eyes that he was violently thrown back and to his left, therefore having been shot from his front right, not by Oswald. Bingo: a conspiracy.  Then in 2012, another famous TV personality, Bill O’Reilly wrote a book called Killing Kennedy in which he claims that he and his co-author watched the Zapruder film “time after time to understand the sequence of events,” but still concluded that The Warren Commission was correct and that Oswald shot Kennedy from behind despite the obvious visual evidence to the contrary. Miracles then, miracles now – they seem to define the two key events of modern American history for those wanting to obfuscate the truth.
Do you believe in miracles?
Here is a Summation of Griffin’s 15 Major Miracles:
  1. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 were the only steel-framed high-rise buildings ever to come down without explosives or incendiaries.
  2. The Twin Towers, each of which had 287 steel columns, were brought down solely by a combination of airplane strikes and jet-fuel fires.
  3. WTC 7 was not even hit by a plane, so it was the first steel-framed high-rise to be brought down solely by ordinary building fires.
  4. These World Trade Center buildings also came down in free fall – the Twin Towers in virtual free fall, WTC 7 in absolute free fall – for over two seconds.
  5. Although the collapses of the of the WTC buildings were not aided by explosives, the collapses imitated the kinds of implosions that can be induced only by demolition companies.
  6. In the case of WTC 7, the structure came down symmetrically (straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline), which meant that all 82 of the steel support columns had to fall simultaneously, although the building’s fires had a very asymmetrical pattern.
  7. The South Tower’s upper 30-floor block changed its angular momentum in midair.
  8. This 30 floor block then disintegrated in midair.
  9. With regard to the North Tower, some of its steel columns were ejected out horizontally for at least 500 feet.
  10. The fires in the debris from the WTC buildings could not be extinguished for many months.
  11. Although the WTC fires, based on ordinary building fires, could not have produced temperatures above 1,800℉, the fires inexplicably melted metals with much higher melting points, such as iron (2,800℉) and even molybdenum (4,753℉).
  12. Some of the steel in the debris had been sulfidized, resulting in Swiss-cheese-appearing steel, even though ordinary building fires could not have resulted in the sulfidation.
  13. As a passenger on AA Flight 77, Barbara Olson called her husband, telling him about hijackers on her plane, even though this plane had no onboard phones and its altitude was too high for a cell phone call to get through.
  14. Hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour could not possibly have flown the trajectory of AA 77 to strike Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, and yet he did.
  15. Besides going through an unbelievable personal transformation, ringleader Mohamed Atta also underwent an impossible physical transformation.
Griffin examines each of these “miracles” in detail. Taken together, they reduce the official explanation of 9/11 to a story told to credulous children who are afraid of the dark. One can only hope that Americans are ready to grow up and accept that the bogeyman is real and that he is out to devour them and the rest of the world if they don’t awaken from their hypnotic sleep.
The Overwhelming Consensus of Experts
It is important to note that David Ray Griffin is not alone in his assessment that 9/11 was an inside job done to legitimize disastrous policies at home and abroad. There are thousands of scholars, religious leaders, scientists, engineers, airline pilots, firefighters and countless others who agree with him after studying the evidence. Griffin names many of these experts in his conclusion. And they are not afraid of the absurd way the government and media accuse them of being “conspiracy theorists,” since they know “as Lance deHaven-Smith explained in his book Conspiracy Theory in America, [that] the CIA started using ‘conspiracy theory’ as a pejorative term in 1964 to ridicule the growing belief, contrary to the Warren Report, that President Kennedy was killed by people within the US government, including the CIA itself.” Thoughtful people know, and the evidence has long proven, that the US government is guilty of an extensive list of conspiracies, ranging from the alleged Gulf of Tonkin attack to its conspiracy to convince the American people that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and extending back through many CIA-engineered coup d’états, the assassinations of JFK, Malcolm X, MLK, RFK, etc.  The name calling has lost its sting when the documentary records confirm that the name callers are the conspirators.
So if you care about truth, your country, and the world; if you hate to be lied to; if you care about the victims of American violence everywhere – you should read Bush And Cheney: How They Ruined America And The World. It is a brave and brilliant book. Look at the evidence. Show others.  Pass the book on.Give it as a gift.
And tip your hat to David Ray Griffin, a truth teller extraordinaire, who for thirteen years has been asking us to wake out of the hypnotic state of denial that has allowed the liars to bring the world to the edge of destruction.  Griffin’s persistence is the sign of hope we all need to join him in the fight against these unspeakable forces of evil.
Edward Curtin is a writer whose work has appeared widely.  He teaches sociology at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts. His website is

Monday, August 28, 2017

Dr. Eowny: Remarkable resemblance of mothers of Charlottesville and Sandy Hook victims

Rearranging the kids to get a better shot during the Sandy Hook "evacuation"
Alert Americans found out about crisis actors because of the Sandy Hook false flag of December 14, 2012 — professional actors who simulate, i.e., pretend to be victims or bystanders or even perpetrators in mass casualty events.

Not only are there crisis actors, there are even amputee crisis actors!

We also know that there “public relations” firms that solicit actors for events, including rallies and protests. Below is a Craig’s List ad by Los Angeles public relations firm Crowds on Demand, soliciting “actors and photographers” in Charlotte, NC, to “participate” in “events” including rallies and protests.

Earlier this morning, FOTM reader jim alerted us to a video uploaded to YouTube by Joecol Flyer, on the remarkable similarities between the mothers of two victims in two separate incidents. The two mothers are:
  1. Susan Bro: the mother of Heather D. Heyer, 32, a paralegal who was killed on August 12, 2017 at the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, VA, by a car allegedly driven by James A. Fields Jr.
  2. Donna Fagan-Soto: the mother of Victoria Soto, 27, a teacher at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT, who allegedly was shot to death, along with 25 other victims, by Adam Lanza on December 14, 2012.
About two hours after I watched the YouTube video, it was removed “for violating YouTube‘s policy on harassment and bullying”. Fortunately, I had taken notes from the video and viewers’ comments, which enable me to conduct my own research.

Let’s compare Susan Bro and Donna Soto!

(1) Susan Bro

According to Spokeo people search, Heather D. Heyer, 32, of Charlottesville, VA, had a relative named Susan Heyer with two ages, 60 and 68, both at the same address in Ruckersville, VA:
Here’s a video interview of Susan Bro on Aug. 14, 2017, one day after her daughter Heather Heyer was killed. Pay close attention to Bro’s voice.

(2) Donna Soto

According to Wikipedia, Victoria Leigh Soto, born in November 1985, was 27 years old when she was gunned down by Adam Lanza while trying to protect her students. She was awarded posthumously the Presidential Citizens Medal. Victoria’s parents are Carlos Soto and Donna Fagan-Soto. Her obituary says Victoria’s siblings are Jillian, Carlee and Carlos Matthew Soto.

I found the right Donna Soto on Spokeo: Donna L. Soto of Stratford, CT, age 58. Strangely, among Donna’s relatives is Victoria Soto, who has been dead for almost 5 years:
  • Carlos Soto, 57.
  • Carlee Soto, 24.
  • Jillian Soto, 28.
  • Victoria Soto, 31, born November 1985, of Willimantic, CT. Here’s the link to her Spokeo page.
Here’s a video interview of Donna Soto on Dec. 19, 2012, five days after her daughter Victoria had been brutally gunned down.

(3) Comparison

Below are screenshots of Susan Bro and Donna Soto which I’d taken from their respective video interviews. Bear in mind that if they are the same person, Susan Bro would be a 5-year older version of Donna Soto, with undyed hair and no makeup.
↓ Click to enlarge ↓

Since people can look different in different photographs, I found some other images of the two women for another side-by-side comparison that is even more striking in their similarities. The source of the Susan Bro image is an ABC TV interview (video here); the source of the Soto image is a Getty photo of Donna Soto leaving Lordship Community Church after a funeral for her daughter Victoria on December 19, 2012, in Stratford, Connecticut.

Here are the similarities that I see:
  • Same egg-shaped face.
  • Same eyebrow shape, although Bro’s eyebrows are lighter in color.
  • Same deep lines, called lasolabial folds, along the sides of their mouths (see the yellow arrows I painted on the first side-by-side pics); same dimple-indentations at the corners of their mouths (see light blue arrows).
  • Both wear rectangular-shaped spectacles.
  • Same pudgy chin; same horizontal fold across their fat necks.
  • Same voice.
  • Both women punctuate their speech with “And” and “Um”.
  • Both said “And um”: 
    • Susan Bro said “And um” at the 1:47 mark in her video.
    • Donna Soto said “And um” at the 0:35 and 1:04 marks in her video.
  • Both Bro and Soto used the word “passion/passionate” to describe their respective daughters: 
    • Bro said, “Heather, her entire life has been passionate about justice” (0:01 mark).
    • Soto said, “that was her [Victoria’s] passion” (0:33 mark).
  • Both Bro and Soto flick their tongues out when they speak.

The dissimilarities are:
  • Soto’s eyes are larger (because of makeup)?
  • Their noses are slightly different, but that may be because of the angles of their heads.
  • Soto seems to have a larger mouth.
What do you think?
Speaking of the Soto family, I had noted in my post, “Remarkable resemblance of Sandy Hook victims and professional crisis actors,” that Victoria Soto’s brother and sister, Carlos Matthew and Carlee, look remarkably like the children of a professional (though obscure) actress, Jennifer Greenberg Sexton.

Also, there is an interesting video, “Car Attack Victim Heather Heyer – Where is She Now?,” which was first uploaded to YouTube, but was taken down/censored by YouTube. Thankfully, the video was re-uploaded to Vimeo.

Friday, August 25, 2017

Preston James: The Disturbing Truth about All American Wars in the Mideast since WW2

America had no legal or constitutional right to be involved in any Mideast Wars since WW2.
The USG never had any valid legal right to attack Iraq over its invasion of Kuwait in 1991 under US law, the US Constitution or International Law either.
Why? Because Iraq was very craftily manipulated by the USG and the CIA to invade Kuwait.
Here’s how it happened.

April Glaspie
It was a very crafty CIA covert operation that created the Invasion of Kuwait through political manipulation.
The CIA had approached the leaders of Kuwait with a plan to engage in horizontal drilling into Iraq’s main oil field.
Kuwaiti production was waning, and the CIA proprietary drilling company from Sante Fe [sic] assured Kuwaiti officials that the plan was foolproof and would never be discovered by Iraq.
After the horizontal drilling was completed and the oil was being pumped, it is alleged by some well-informed insiders that US Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie met with Saddam Hussein.
She informed him that Kuwait was using a new type of drilling (horizontal drilling) and was pumping oil from Iraq’s biggest oil field.
It has been alleged that Saddam Hussein was also provided with satellite photos made with ground penetrating radar that showed the horizontal drilling.
Saddam reacted with anger and asked Ambassador Glaspie what would happen if Iraq invaded Kuwait and took back the land which was rightfully theirs in the first place, taken away by the British earlier. Glaspie supposedly replied, the USG would view that as an “inter-Arab” affair and would consider it none of our concern.
Saddam Hussein took this as a green light from the USG and proceeded to invade Kuwait. Immediately there was an outcry in Congress that something had to be done to stop this Iraqi aggression, which was supposedly threatening the security of the whole Mideast.
Of course the public was never informed that Saddam Hussein had started working for the CIA as a bicycle hit-man at 15 years of age, and worked his way up through the system to become a full-fledged CIA dictator-puppet like Noriega and so many others. Saddam Hussein was willing to attack Iran on Israel’s behalf, in a lengthy war that resulted in millions of dead, with many of these being innocent women and children non-combatants.
Right now Iraq is a destroyed nation. Its major infrastructure has been destroyed by American bombs, and a once modern nation has been reduced to rubble.
Sadly that is what Israel and the Pentagon have long planned for Syria and Iran too.
This is not likely to happen however because the Russian Federation has stepped in and is now defending its Mideast allies, Syria and Iran.
Advanced Technology

Electronic warfare device
The Russian Federation’s electronic warfare systems are reputed by deep insiders to be back-engineered alien ET technology, and at present, are far superior to America’s electronic warfare weaponry.
Proof of this is the incident in March of 2014 when two Russian Su-24’s armed with the Khibiny system shut off the USS Donald Cook’s main power bus, temporarily rendering its Aegis missile system and all onboard sonar and radar completely inoperable during that time. 
The USS Donald Cook was dead in the water until the Su-24s left and turned off their Khibiny system.
It is a very good bet that this same advanced electronic warfare technology was used to set up the two recent collisions involving US Navy destroyers, with state of the art radar, sonar and other electronic warfare systems.
Since so many of the CPUs used on these ships were manufactured in China, it is possible that they all have secret backdoors that could be accessed remotely, but my best guess is that the ship’s GPS, radar and sonar were spoofed by someone’s satellite transmission using Quantum transmissions and Dimensional waves (D-waves).

USS Donald Cook
There’s a sucker born every minute” – P.T. Barnum
After the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, the CIA’s Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM) began immediately to publish and broadcast USG propaganda, big lies and false narratives.

During Nayirah al-Ṣabaḥ’s testimony to the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, she claimed Iraqi troops pulled babies out of incubators and threw them on the hospital floor to die. It was later revealed that she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States and that her testimony was proved false. It was a pretty convincing tale with tears and all, and Amnesty International even backed her story at first but later admitted it could not be verified. We now know for certain it was a fabricated story, a big lie and a clear case of false-atrocity propaganda.
The DC Establishment public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, hired by Kuwait, immediately prepared atrocity propaganda to motivate mainstream America to support a big American war to crush Saddam Hussein and Iraq.
The Kuwaiti Ambassador’s daughter told a very tall tale that was later shown to be a complete fabrication, that the Iraqi soldiers pulled Kuwaiti babies from incubators and threw them on the floor of the hospital to die.
Voice of God Alien ET Technology was deployed in the Gulf War.
Insiders have claimed for years that back-engineered Alien ET electronic warfare technology was deployed against Iraqi soldiers by the American Military.
There have been reliable reports from vetted, respected individuals that the “Voice of God” technology was deployed.
This technology was able to remotely entrain a voice believed by the Iraqi soldiers to be the voice of Allah that they plainly heard coming down from the heavens above.
Reports indicated that this voice of Allah instructed these Iraqi solders to lay down their arms and accept death and receive their immediate rewards from Allah. Thousands of Iraqi troops did so and were bulldozed into the ground to their deaths without any attempt to defend themselves.
Saddam Hussein did not have operable weapons of mass destruction when America attacked Iraq the second time and invaded its capitol city.
The second Mideast War was wrongly fought over false claims by the CIA and the Pentagon that Saddam Hussein and Iraq had operable weapons of mass destruction and was planning to deploy them against America. This claim was later proved to be completely false and was knowingly concocted by the Pentagon and fully supported in the UN by General Colin Powell.
So it is clear beyond any reasonable doubt that both the first Gulf war that stopped short of a complete invasion and set up “no fly zones”, and also the second Iraq war were major international war crimes, crimes against humanity and major acts of aggression against Iraq. The claim that it was the nations of the world that demanded these invasions through the UN was a concoction too, and the coalition forces were economically and financially manipulated into cursory support.

Rare Earth Elements found in Afghanistan
Now for the US invasion of Afghanistan.
The DC Establishment had wanted to take over Afghanistan for many years to get the opium and the rare earth minerals like Lithium for batteries. Plus the Pentagon PNACers and top NeoCons in the USG, most of whom were Israeli-American “Israel-first” Dual citizens wanted to protect Saudi Arabia as part of the Petro Dollar agreement set up in 1971 by Henry Kissinger for Richard Nixon.
The Soviets had the same intentions and invaded Afghanistan in late 1979 and finally ended in early 1989 because the CIA had created and built up the Mujahedin army inside Afghanistan and armed them with hundreds of shoulder-fired Stinger missiles. After the Russians withdrew, the Pentagon and the CIA kept the Mujahedin army viable and operative. 
When the Mossad (assisted by the Pentagon, NORTHCOM, the Administration, and the FAA) attacked America on 9-11-01, the USG immediately laid blame on the Terrorists run by Osama bin Laden that were based in Afghanistan.
This fake meme was broadcast and published day and night – 24/7 – by the Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM), which neglected to inform the American masses of the real truth – that Osama bin Laden was just another CIA man used to run the Mujahedin for the Pentagon. His CIA trade-craft name was “Colonel Tim Osman”, and he was seen numerous times going in and out of the Pentagon long before 9-11-01.

Several Israeli leaders, including Barak and Netanyahu, chortled about how 9-11 helped redeem and justify Israel’s hard-line position against its enemies, hoping that the US would realize what Israel had been dealing with
ISIS is the private mercenary army of the CIA, Israel and Saudi Arabia and has now been defeated.
There is substantial reason to believe that the CIA worked with Israel and Saudi Arabia to create a private mercenary Army called ISIS, ISIL or Daesh et al. This massive, well-supplied and -paid heterogeneous mercenary army was trained, supported and paid by the CIA with help from the Saudis.
This private foreign mercenary army of the CIA, Israel and Saudi Arabia has now been defeated by Syrian forces for Assad, with the help of precision Russian air-power. The Russian Federation is Syria’s legitimate and official ally, and was invited to be in Syria, to help defend Syria. Russia is a strong partner of the Syrians and has invested a lot of money there.
America has never had any business fighting anyone in Syria since it was never an ally and was never invited by Syria, who never wanted America there. Besides, the US Military has been accused by Syria of attacking its Syrian troops, like Israel occasionally did, and of supplying ISIS. It has now been admitted that ISIS’ wounded have been taken to Israel for medical treatment and that is strong evidence that they represent Israel and were created by Israel – the progenitor of Mideast terrorism.
Foreign CIA puppet/Cutout leaders get disposed of when no longer needed.
Like all other CIA foreign puppets, Osama bin Laden (Colonel Osman) was quickly discarded when no longer needed. But this time, he was used as a super devil to motivate the American Masses to attack Afghanistan. He died late in 2001, either from Americans bombs or of Kidney disease (Marfan’s disorder, the same genetic disorder that Abe Lincoln had and would have died of soon after his presidency, had he lived). He was buried in an unmarked grave, according to Mideast newspapers. But the Pentagon propaganda psyops masters decided to keep him officially alive, even though he was dead.

Afghanistan (Fine Art by James Dietz)
So now we know for certain that the USG’s officially stated reasons for America invading Afghanistan, as in both the Gulf War and the Invasion of Iraq, were all based on big government lies, false-narratives, and blatant propaganda.
Since WW2, the USG never had any valid reason to ever go to war in Iraq or Afghanistan or in any other war in the Mideast. These were all wars fought for the International Banksters, run out of the City of London.
But now the USG has recommitted American soldiers to Afghanistan and is sending in at least 6,000 more to fight in this illegal war of aggression for the Banksters, Israel and the Dual Citizens in the Pentagon.
Afghanistan did not attack America on 9-11-01.
Ever since the USG invaded Afghanistan in 2001, after falsely blaming them for the Israeli attack on America on 9-11-01, the US Army has been protecting the poppy production, which has increased many fold and is now the world’s largest.
The USAF flies the opium out of Afghanistan, and it ends up on the streets of America. Now, in America, young deaths from cheap, pure Heroin are the highest ever. And this is all done by the CIA to provide vast sums of drug money for black ops, money that is off the books and unaccountable to the Congress or the American people.
More American troops are now be sent to Afghanistan, because the Pentagon claims it is the root of most terrorism and there are many terrorist groups supported there. This is just another big USG lie. Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UK, and the USA are the world’s biggest terrorist countries. This is a hard, cold fact that needs to be faced.
Is this new American troop deployment to Afghanistan a secret way of trying to build up the Mujahedin into ISIS again?
America had no right under international law, American law or the US Constitution to ever attack Libya and murder Muammar Ghaddafy.
The Pentagon and the US Administration were ordered to do so by the International Banksters based in the City of London, a one square mile private nation inside London proper with its own ambassadors and police. It pays no taxes to the UK, but runs the global fiat interest-bearing, debt-note money systems.

(Copyright Gilbert Yu)

General Smedley Butler
Each of these nations – America, Israel, the UK, and Saudi Arabia, which foment terror all around the world through the CIA and NATO – has a war-based economy. This is because they have private Fiat money production that uses pernicious interest-bearing debt notes as mandated tender, which produces continuing inflation.
These terrorist nations must keep engaging in wars of aggression to acquire cheap natural resources and oil for the large International corporations and big profits for defense contractors and the Banksters.
The most decorated US Marine ever, General Smedley Butler, who was twice awarded the Medal of Honor, explained all this in his classic book, War is a Racket.