Saturday, May 12, 2018

Dr. Eowyn: National data bases don’t show 6 adults were killed at Sandy Hook school


We are told that on December 14, 2012, lone gunman Adam Lanza went on a shooting spree in Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES) in Newtown, Connecticut, killing 20 children and 6 adults.

The six adults are the principal and teachers at SHES:
  1. Rachel Davino: teacher’s aide; age 29.
  2. Dawn Hocksprung: principal; age 47.
  3. Anne Marie Murphy: teacher’s aide; age 52.
  4. Lauren Rousseau: teacher; age 29.
  5. Mary Sherlach: school psychologist; age 56.
  6. Victoria Soto: teacher; age 27.
Strangely, various data bases do not show that the above six adults had actually died.

(1) Social Security Death Master File

To begin, neither the 6 adults nor the 20 children show up in Social Security’s Death Master File — the data base for the Social Security Death Index that’s reported on genealogy websites. I addressed this in my post, “No one died in Sandy Hook: Testimony from Social Security Death Master File“.

(2) FBI Crime Statistics

Then, there is the FBI’s 2012 crime statistics for Connecticut, which show the number of homicides (“murder and nonnegligent manslaughter”) for the city of Newtown in 2012 as zero (0). Here’s a screenshot of the table, which I’d taken from the FBI website as recently as April 28, 2018.



Some claim the reason for the zero homicide is because the FBI used only data reported by city and town law enforcement, but the Sandy Hook incident was handled by the Connecticut state police, which explains why Newtown police reported to the FBI zero homicides in 2012.
Indeed, the FBI does say this about its data sources:
The data used in creating this table were from all city and town law enforcement agencies submitting 12 months of complete offense data for 2012.
But how do we know that the reason why the FBI table shows zero homicide for Newtown in 2012 is because Newtown police left the reporting to the state police?

The FBI’s methodology for compiling its annual reports on crimes in the USA does not support that claim. The FBI states:
The national UCR Program published the Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook (revised 2004), which details procedures for classifying and scoring offenses and serves as the contributing agencies’ basic resource for preparing reports. The final responsibility for data submissions rests with the individual contributing law enforcement agency.
And who is the “individual contributing law enforcement agency”? The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, 2004 clearly states that the city, not state, police is the law enforcement agency responsible for reporting offenses, including homicides, that occurred within that city:
pp. 8-9: “Jurisdiction – The purpose of establishing appropriate jurisdiction is to depict the nature and volume of crime in a particular community, not for an agency to claim or take credit…the national UCR Program developed the following guidelines:
1. City law enforcement agencies should report offenses that occur within their city jurisdictions.
2. County or state law enforcement agencies should report offenses that take place in the county outside the limits of the city….
6. Agencies must report only those arrests made for offenses committed within their own jurisdictions….
In other words, cities having their own police departments, as a rule, report their own crime data to the UCR Program…. In some localities, the sheriff, state police, or a federal law enforcement agency will assist a local police department in the investigation of crimes committed within the limits of the city. Even though this is the case, the city police department will report the offenses, unless, again, there is a written or oral agreement specifying otherwise. The jurisdictional guidelines provide for most local reporting. Whenever possible, the local law enforcement agency of the geographical area in which the crime occurred should report the data.
From the above, it is clear that according to the FBI’s methodology, specifically the Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, it is the responsibility of city police departments, including Newtown’s police department, to report their crime data — including the number of homicides — to the FBI, which in 2012 numbered zero (0).

(3) Bureau of Labor Statistics on occupational fatalities

The U.S. Bureau of Labor collects and publishes data on the number and types of occupational fatalities, including fatalities in education — of management (e.g., school principals) and teachers.

But the data for Connecticut in 2012 do not support the claim that six staff members of Sandy Hook Elementary School had been killed.

To begin, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Table A-5 shows that there were only two deaths (“fatalities”) from “violence and other injuries by persons or animals” of elementary school teachers in the entire U.S.A. in 2012:

↓Click image to enlarge↓


It should then come as no surprise that the Bureau of Labor Statistics show no fatalities of teacher or principal in all of Connecticut in 2012:

↓Click image to enlarge↓


H/t Wolfgang Halbig and James Fetzer

See also “Are Sandy Hook child victims alive and well?
~Eowyn

11 comments:

  1. If many data bases show no adults were killed at Sandy Hook, and this is widely reported, only one factor can explain why this is so. Never, ever overestimate the dumbed down American. We're dealing with a poorly educated individual that values the blather of the 6pm news anchor person and not these statistics. We've had years to break through on this issue and still it does not register in the gray matter of most Americans. Over the years of Zionist control of media, the American has picked up learning patterns that center on the scenario whereby people come to associate the truth with somber looking people who are on TV for years and years. Trust for these images is built and the public is thereby bonded to these propagandists. Sandy Hook gave us a thorough look into this process and even though many Americans had great doubts about certain aspects of the event, their inner fears based in cognitive dissonance precluded their acceptance of far more complex phenomena as explained by several of America's great sleuths like Dr Fetzer. I've seen many perjorative descriptions of Fetzer, no doubt created by shills for the deep state. The more potentially damaging the pictures as presented by Fetzer, the more the deep state fears disclosure and hence the shills go into action trying to undo legitimate concerns as presented by the accomplished sleuths like Fetzer. The key to American deception is the fact too many Americans are dim bulbs dead certain the TV would never lie to them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I watched what Jim Fetzer did to "911 Truth" in the early to mid 2000's... he is a counterintelligence infiltrator for the government, and no one can convince me differently, I saw it happen. Fetzer is a completely different person since then... now he's pushing obviously false and illogical DISINFO... this strategy makes anyone investigating Sandy Hook look insane, it secondarily paints "911 Truth" with the same brush.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Considering that this guy has spent 25 years exposing governmental complicity in JFK, 9/11, Wellstone, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Las Vegas and Parkland, my critic would appear to be massively refuted by a mountain of readily available, publicly accessible evidence, which includes four books on JFK, two on 9/11 and many more. Check out my most recent at moonrockbooks.com and ask yourself what could possibly motivate such an irrational tirade that has no foundation in logic or the evidence?

      Delete
    2. "Dr Goldstein, yeah, right". You're correct, though. Fetz and I both studied under Goebbels and graduated with Alger Hiss. Jim almost got the chair with the Rosenbergs, but I saved him by cutting the wires. Your comments are inane, make no sense, and are not even laughable. But, one thing is sure. You are several steps below the level of "shill". Boring....

      Delete
    3. It appears that Fetzer seems programmed to get the attention of newbies. If there are any Fetzer followers for any length of time, that’s a red flag on those followers, for sure.

      It was interesting to note that Fetzer didn’t come to James Tracy’s aid. Pretty telling, as well. That’s similar to Steven Jones not being connected to April Gallop’s case.

      Delete
    4. Goldstein reflects her massive igorance of the facts of the matter. I was (and remain) the head of the James Tracy Legal Defense Fund. I have been instrumental in raising substantial sums for his legal defense.

      I don't get the "newbies" thing. We are doing everything we can to let the public know what did and did not happen at Sandy Hook.

      The proof it was an elaborate hoax is simply overwhelming. Check out "Sandy Hook Update: Tracy loses, Wolfgang wins" on BitChute for anyone who harbors any doubt.

      Delete
    5. Truth (= Christ), Induction, Science, And Reason Within satanic "Decline Of West"

      The INDUCTIVE evidence (which is how investigations, both in science and law are conducted) is ABSOLUTELY OVERWHELMING--that Sandy was HOAX HOAX HOAX. "Sloppy Sniper" (David Wheeler, prof. crisis-actor) is crushing, smashing, and conclusive evidence, all by itself, Wheeler trying to hide fm the camera, idiotically carrying TWO rifles, holding it by magazine is all comically persuasive, taken on whole. Then there's Fetzer's excellent book on the incident.

      So no scientist or any rational person could possibly have any doubts on Sandy hoax.

      And don't forget the totality of the inductive evidence--like regarding JFK assassination which most people KNOW was consp.--the poor scum just don't know what to do about it. The latest Judyth Vary Baker item is ABSOLUTELY CONCLUSIVE.

      Most of all, what most people are simply tooooo gosh-darned stupid to grasp, the very top-most, ruling institution of this utterly corrupt culture is a criminal enterprise, CENTRAL-BANKING, literally legalized counterfeiting, substituting INFINITE currency for real (finite) money, commodity-based--see Mises.org for fullest expo.

      So long as this criminal enterprise, the US Federal Reserve bank, which toooo few grasp for the sublime corruption, continues to thrive, continuing to pump out ENDLESS funds, buying everyone off, funding endless lies and prop., etc., nothing will happen. THERE'S JUST TOOO MANY, OVER-POPULATED MORONS, satisfied w. "bread and circuses" paid-for by this fraudulent, endless currency.

      So patriots simply have to be prepared and ready when and as the criminal currency system continues to falter and collapse. Petro-Yuan (gold-backed), ironic as it may seem, is going to kill the petro-dollar, so patriots only have to take heed and take measures, informing the poor, stupid goyim, much as possible.

      That's why Trump, puppet of Israel, will take us into war as way of "muddying waters," as we see.

      What's solution?--well, we need to heed attention to satanic criminals who worship LIES, lying, and liars, according to Gosp. JOHN 8:44--they're falling-out against one-another, the "leftist," "globalist" atheists having been snookered in last election (2016), thinking they had it in the bag, hoh o ho ho.

      But Trump is flunky for Zionist, Israel-first Jews, just as bad as hitlery and leftists--notice how Jew tube and other censorship has increased under Trump and Zionists.

      So I'd say patriots should rather heed to the larger Satanism which is led by Jews, JEws being the top, most organized, among Satanists. And Satanism, never forget is basically (extreme) subjectivism, idea reality is created by mentality/consciousness, making oneself God. And note there's really nothing either mysterious or even "religious" about this Satanism. The twist is top Jews are sublime colluders in a collectivistic subjectivism--as in way of CENTRAL-BANKING scam, Jews most organized, leveraging all the other Satanists, including among the gentile satanists who far out-number Jews, Satanists then leveraging all the rest of society but for very few true Christian opponents.

      Delete
  3. The 2012 Connecticut State crime report explains this very clearly.

    On page 25 is the state totals with a footnote:

    "Includes 27 victims of Newtown mass shooting"

    On page 245 is the local Newtown stats, with this footnote:

    "Does NOT include 27 victims of Newtown mass shooting (see State Police Misc.)

    If you read the state report and then the FBI report, you will understand the Zero murder stat

    BTW, the 2007 FBI report lists Zero murders in Blacksburg, VA. The VA Tech shooting happened in 2007

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where there's a will . . . . Completely indefensible. FBI Consolidated Crime Statistics for 2012 show zero murders in Newtown, hence none in Sandy Hook, which we have shown on multiple grounds.

      That the SSDI and US Department of Labor confirm the finding speaks for itself. It is stunning how desperately persons like jjis will insist on explanation for fake deaths when they have been exposed.

      Delete
  4. You simply do not know how the crime stats are gathered. The FBI is just a summary of the Connecticut state report. FBI just uses the numbers and without any details.

    The state report tells you why it says zero murders in Newtown, because they are included in the state totals. Then it will be the same way in the FBI report.

    Is that so hard to understand?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, of course: the convergence in the data from the SSDI, FBI Consolidated Crime Statistics for 2012 and the US Department of Labor fatality records for 2012 is purely coincidental.

      What dumbfounds me is that charlatans like you continue to post complete and utter rubbish with no apparent sense of shame for your blatant and ongoing deceits and deceptions.

      Delete