Sunday, July 22, 2018

Pilots for 9/11 Truth: The Missing Memorandum


The official flight trajectories for the 9/11 airliners


As a resource for Robert David Steele in the production of his series, "Memorandums for the President on 9/11", I have made quite a few recommendations of experts who could make their own important contributions. Among those I have suggested was Rob Balsamo, Co-Founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, which has made highly significant discoveries that never received the recognition that they deserve.

Rob, however, was ambivalent about contributing, emphasizing that Pilots wants nothing to do with (what has been called) "no planes theory", in spite of the fact that Pilots have adduced proof that two of the planes, Flight 93 (Shanksville) and Flight 175 (South Tower), were still in the air after they had "officially" crashed in New York and Pennsylvania. "No planes" theory is defined by four theses:

(T1) that Flight 11 did not hit the North Tower;
(T2) that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon;
(T3) that Flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville;
(T4) that Flight 175 did not hit the South Tower.

We already have memoranda from an Aeronautical Engineer, "Memorandum for the President: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon", and from John Lear, "Memorandum for the President: 9/11 Twin Towers were Not hit by Nor destroyed by two Boeing 767s", which establish theses (T1), (T2) and (T4). My belief was that Pilots could confirm (T3) and (T4) as a valuable contribution to the series.

Because Rob was reluctant, I suggested I could draft a memorandum for his consideration, but after a few days deliberation, he decided against it. Since my draft was based upon and simply paraphrased the content of three of Pilots' previously publish studies, I was rather taken aback. Here is the draft memorandum. I would welcome comments or speculation as to why Rob refused to endorse it.

Rob Balsamo, Memorandum for the President: We Have Not Been Told the Truth About 9/11 Attack Airplanes

From Pilots for 9/11 Truth, "9/11 Intercepted"
​  
Dear Mr. President,

Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an organization of aviation professionals and pilots through the globe, was founded in 2006 to seek the truth surrounding the events of 9/11. While we do not offer a theory or assign blame for the atrocities that occurred on that occasion, we have discovered a number of anomalies of which we believe you ought to be made aware. Here, I mention three.

Impossible Speed

Much controversy has surrounded the videos of (what purports to be) Flight 175, a Boeing 767, approaching the South Tower. We have analyzed data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in terms of a “Radar Data Impact Speed Study” in which the NTSB found 510 knots for Flight 175 (South Tower) and 430 knots for Flight 11 (North Tower). Relying upon a bench mark set by the crash in October 1999 of another 767, Egypt Air 900, Flight 175 as shown had exceeded its maximum operating limits causing in-flight structural failure, which would also have been the case for the WTC aircraft, as we have illustrated in our documentary, “9/11 Intercepted”.

Flight 93 Airborne After Crash

Air Traffic Control (ATC) transcripts reveal United 93 as being airborne after its alleged crash in Shanksville, PA. Similar scenarios have been offered with regard to American 11 and American 77, showing an aircraft target continuing past its alleged crash point in the case of American 11 or past its turn-around point in the case of American 77. Both of those cases can be explained by “Coast Mode” radar tacking. That is not the case with United 93, where tracking data shows it was over Champaign-Urbana, IL, after its reported crash in Pennsylvania. FAA Registration Records further show that it was not formally taken out of service until 28 September 2005.

Flight 175 Airborne Long After Crash

Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is used to send messages to and from aircraft. Similar to text messaging and email systems used today, developed in 1978 and still in use today, it allows airplanes to communicate with one another. ACARS messages obtained through FOIA requests demonstrate that Flight 175 was over Harrisburg, PA, and then over Pittsburgh, PA 20 minutes after allegedly having hit the South Tower. FAA Registration data, once again, show that the plane was not taken out of service until 28 September 2005.

Pilots does not take a position on the explanation for the data other than to conclude that we have determined the actual positions of Flights 93 and 175 are inconsistent with The Report of the 9/11 Commission (2004) and believe we are professionally obligated to so inform you.

Very respectfully,

DECLINED

References:

“Speeds Reported for World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed”, http://pilotsfor911truth.org/WTC2.html

“United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash – According to ATC/Radar”, http://pilotsfor911truth.org/UAL93.html

“ACARS Confirmed: 9/11 Aircraft Airborne Long After Crash”, http://pilotsfor911truth.org/WTC2.html

20 comments:

  1. Decline to Sign is not a rebuttal. Someone brings in a dog out of it's mind, drooling and salivating froth, a couple weeks ago it had killed a raccoon in the back yard late at night that had tested positive for Rabies. I put on huge autopsy rubber gloves and examine the dog. I hear the dog has been playing with the kids at the neighborhood park yesterday. I find nothing more of note on physical exam. Do I admit the dog for quarantine until the 10 day observation period yields either a dead dog for Rabies testing or still a live healthy dog? Do I sign the office examination findings and recommendations? Do I call their family doctor? Do I call county health to find those kids at the park? Do kids all get rabies vaccination that day?
    I have still no lab test verification of Rabies, but kids still get their preventative vaccination. There is a time for action that waits on no one and no test.
    Pilots with an occupation at risk can Sin with Omission. Architects, cops, judges, professors, ministers, doctors can all turn away from voicing their professional opinion for paycheck protection. Even with silence you are shirking duty. The public area provided you with that profession and you have a duty to stand forward. Those kids in the park need ya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How does any technician, human, animal, or otherwise, use HUGE autopsy gloves? Does this not preclude a careful examination especially for small bodily parts? Are you a vet or are you shilling us?

      Delete
  2. Rob is right to have nothing to do with No Planers. Whereas it is correct that none of the four 9/11 planes reached their targets that does NOT mean that NO plane reached the targets, which they did. It is simply one of many lines of converging compelling evidence that the initial Planes were swapped, one of 'the' most critical facts of 9/11 which puts the culpability squarely on those who had the inside knowledge, positions and technology to swap them. I have recently obtained
    a new book by a Dutch researcher who spent years analyzing the radar data that details precisely where and when the planes were swapped. And WTC witnesses who were just outside the WTC at the moment of impact have gone on record re the plane parts that rained down around them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Supposedly, the Hartford Courant today listed Halbig as NOW believing some people were killed at Sandy Hook. Is Wolf legit or is there a fly in the ointment?

      Delete
    2. Here I DEFINE "no planes theory" in the article and Barbara Honegger admits that the four theses specified are TRUE. Yet she insists that does not mean no plane hit any of the targets, because she misleadingly describes the UAV used at the Pentagon as "a plane".

      Something is wrong here, because no real planes--switched or not--hit either of the Twin Towers. We have photos of the ground beneath each facade. No plane parts "rained down" from the Twin Towers and the engine found at Church & Murray was a plant.

      Flight 11 and Flight 77 were not even in the air. And we know that no Boeing 757 could have performed the feats attributed to it. A plane was flown toward the Pentagon and then swerved over it, but that cannot salvage her position. Barbara has to do better than this.

      Delete
  3. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh6c1qVKREI
    [MAG TRUTH] ONE OF THE BIGGEST DECEPTION OF ALL TIMES [NOW YOU CAN SEE]
    MAG WICKED TRUTH
    Flash ...
    It don't take balls.
    You want to isolate the size of the deception to ...
    Hmmm...
    Obamanation
    Hitlery
    ManLandia
    GMO
    Cholesterol
    King James
    Marilyn, Jackie, Zaa Zaa, ManFields
    NationStates, CityStates
    Cable or Fiber
    Think a little bigger.
    We didn't start the fire ...
    We just get the shit job of putting it out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The fake video of UA175 penetrating WTC2 proves there were no planes.

    See the still frame from CNN videographer Michael Hezarkhani's famous shot with the 767 half-in half-out of the building with no reaction from plane or structure, which is entirely impossible and proves video fakery. The cartoon silhouette punch-outs in the WTC facades prove it as well. No mostly aluminum airplane could possibly cut through the steel box columns on the WTC exteriors and leave its sharp outline like that even out to the wingtips.

    The magic show on 9/11 was made possible by Hollywood-style video fakery, just like the movies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No planes were used in the commission of the 911 demolition, only the illusion of planes.
      The ONLY posible alternative to the buildings being hit would be the use of a smaller device such as a missle or drone later cloaked in post production with a plane overlayed.
      Still, a dubious cinfection.

      Delete
  5. "Rob" Just Conventional Cowardly, Sinful Human, Eh?

    Fetzer writes, "...but after a few days deliberation, he decided against it. Since my draft was based upon and simply paraphrased the content of three of Pilots' previously publish studies, I was rather taken aback. Here is the draft memorandum. I would welcome comments or speculation as to why Rob refused to endorse it."

    Fetzer can't figure it out? I submit, dear old "Rob" is SCARED SHITLESS--is that really any surprise? And don't forget, lots of others are too. It's easier to just go along w. establishment lies, like holohoax and other Jew-serving lies, right?

    After all, lots of nasty things have been done to people who don't go along w. kikes--could it be why kikes are sooooooo hated?--by all peoples of all races and cultures, all throughout history?

    Isn't that our very RELIGION?--to love truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) and to hate lies (JOHN 8:44)? Thus anti-semitism is actually important and essential element of Western religion, though so many scum, morons, and puke refuse to admit it.

    For don't the satanists make themselves God, holding they determine what's truth and what isn't?--and if u don't go along, well that's all the worse for u, eh?

    And don't kikes make themselves co-equal w. God, kikes being the very purpose for God, God their servant and slave?--who kills their enemies for them, like an attack-dog?--which mass-murder kikes celebrate at "Passover" and "Purim" holidays?--see Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for expo.

    And doesn't it say in their filthy Zohar ("Cabala") that satan is just another emanation of God?--whom Jews invoke for special powers, demands, curses, and charms, etc.?

    Fetzer: MOST people are scared, confused, easily frightened, intimidated, bribed, and extorted--we're all weak when we come into this world, and most stay that way through the rest of their meek, mediocre lives of "quiet desperation"--for such is the way of weak and sinful humanity.

    Look at all the dozens upon dozens of people killed over JFK assassination. U know, Trump could have spoken-out at his press-conference in Russia, recently, and noted that "lots of people thought CIA and FBI had a lot to do w. JFK assassination," ho ho ho ho ho--but even Trump was scared, eh? Ho ho ho ho.

    So old "Rob" surely did the easy and conventional thing as far as he was concerned, according to his calculations, and u can't blame him too much, and at least now u know where he stands vis-à-vis the rest of humanity.



    ReplyDelete
  6. Houston we have way more than missing signatures in this shit storm of flippers and frauds ...

    Bill Cosby Transgender victims?

    Michelle XX

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BWzHJjgFlCQ

    No Neck, No Dick Bill.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello Jim. I doubt Trump is going to wade into the shark infested and murky waters of 911. He knows the official story is bunk. He said so a long time ago. Maybe in his second term if at all or never is my guess. I would love to see you dig into something more current, like the "wildfires" last year in California. Structures turned to whitish gray ash while trees nearby are untouched. Cars melted into pools of metal lava that were no where near a ready flame source. No porcelain left in tact which has an even higher melting point than metal. Meanwhile the nearby woods is just as cool as a room full of Fonzies. metal and terracotta roofs clearly shown burning and the adjacent trees just laugh at the flames. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlMUtnogmDI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. T Rump has both a strong adhesion to things pertaining to the tribe and a morbid fear said tribe could put his lights out upon short notification. He's had to be very careful with many things he's said and done. One false step and he's JFK'd. I can't see him turning state's evidence as long as he's alive. Way too dangerous.

      Delete
  8. My experience attempting to communicate with Balsamo on the chemtrail test project impressed me that I was dealing with a toxic personality not unlike a career alcoholic.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You've been at this 9/11 stuff for over 10 years and have accomplished NOTHING. What makes you think anything is going to change now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies


    1. What's to be "accomplished"?--would it be informing people? So if such info is the purpose, then Fetzer can rest assured he's done best he could, sucker.

      Things only begin to "change" when people become informed--get a clue and a brain, ho ho oho

      Delete
    2. Feeding disinformation is not informing, it is diverting.

      Delete

    3. Have We "Eliminated The Impossible"?

      Yeah?--well, ur problem is specification, eh?--the proverbial "leg" to "standing" upon. Tell us what's the "dis-info" and why it's dis-info--u don't bother to doing that, do u?--just like, above, u talk w. similar lack of clarity and specificity, just making empty assertions.

      Fetzer works hard and deserves credit. And note one doesn't always have to be perfectly accurate for making a general pt.

      9/11 was a sublime fabric of lies, beginning w. the vids, which was all carefully prepared fm beginning--WHO could have done that? Chris Bollyn (see Bollyn.com) has the best overall answer, I'd say.

      I remember on the first day the guy in the vid telling us all so poignantly how he "witnessed" the plane(s) "reaming" through the building, then explaining for us dumb goyim how the buildings collapsed due to the heat of the fires due to the planes' fuel.

      Then there were the phone calls, like to the Solicitor General fm his wife, about the dastardly Arabs w. the box-cutters attacking the pilots and crew, etc.

      Then there were the experts sooo conveniently on hand, fm L. Paul Bremer, the Israeli, Ehud Barak, and others, all agreeing it was that dastardly Osama bin Laden who was likely behind it all, that sneaky guy--how well put-together it all was for us to know who/what to blame, eh? Doggone A-rabs who hated us for our freedoms, yet, the slimey snot-wagons.

      Then there were the "let's roll" heroes who inspired us--I thought it was sooooo touching, by golly.

      Now the plane crash in Penn. kinda' stumped me--the whole plane swallowed-up by the ground and dirt?--WTF?--how does that happen? Then there was the total incompetence and screw-ups by the interceptors who were all off somewhere else, then sent out over the ocean, which I thought was puzzling.

      Nowadays, our hill-billy hero, Ajax Jewns (InfoWars.com) has absolutely ZERO to say about it (9/11) all, his Jew advisors telling him, evidently, "mums the word, buddy"--it's all down the proverbial memory-hole--which further indicates Jews-media collusion, I say.

      For HOW could anything so dire and drastic, like 9/11, happen or take place without the OK signed-off by the top criminals, the central-banker "globalists?"--they weren't very bothered about it, were they?--matter of fact, they rather benefitted, didn't they?--along w. their Israeli allies and partners, eh?--Bush was soooo happy, he promoted a bunch of folks, and NO ONE was cited for negligence or being asleep or failing in any way--doggone A-rabs were really LUCKY weren't they? Arab guys who couldn't even fly performed brilliantly, eh? Ho ho ho ho oho

      So I submit guys like Fetzer who examine and analyze things help us to get an over-all grasp for things. Sherlock Holmes teaches us, "once u eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable MUST BE the truth." Thus we eliminate eskimoes, watusis, South Sea Islanders, Peruvians, and the others; who remains?--Jews--who'd have guessed, eh?--and are they persuasive for their alibi?--hmmmm--I don't think so, but then again, I'm prejudiced, ho ho ho ho ho


      Delete
  10. It's transparently ludicrous to claim that a B-767 penetrated the South tower with cartoon physics and with no splintering of the fragile aluminum airframe onto the street after striking a virtual mountain of concrete and steel.

    ReplyDelete

  11. “I would welcome comments or speculation as to why Rob refused to endorse it."

    I like to analyze what aspects of studying 9-11 that ALL researchers can agree on. I used to think that all agreed on the impossibility of the “official narrative” being true, however I can see that some researchers seem to put forth data and observations that are bound not to contradictory

    The subject of “no planes” is a subject that all researchers of 9-11 have been VERY AWARE OF AND VERY CAREFUL ABOUT in how they “deal with” in relation to the body of “evidence” and observations that each researcher and researcher group put forth.
    I would also venture to say that from the very beginning long before 9-11 the plotters, planners, and perpetrators of 9-11 were also very aware of and planning for how to handle this topic.

    The subject of no planes is part of the WHO DID IT issue and cannot be viewed as separate.
    The way the subject of no-planes is dealt with by a researcher is, to me, a litmus test in judging the objectivity and quality of the rest of a researcher’s work.
    Let’s count a few of the many ways the no-planes issue has been played with and tip toed around.
    Some researchers just totally ignore the issue and put forth a very confined set of data and observations that appear to be telling us “you must look here at this “bombshell evidence” and implying “don’t look there.”
    Some play with and manipulate us with the definitions of terms, like Barbara Honneger. I think that is called the logical fallacy of equivocation.
    Some imply there can be real planes AND real “controlled demolition materials” in the Towers.
    Some do an excellent job of explaining why no-planes is true but at the same time ally themselves with researcher(s) who exclusively confine their data and “theory” to what physically happened at all or only some of the 9-11 “target” sites and never say one word about the no-planes issue or only much later in time since 9-11 find reason to jump in a bit on that subject.

    There are many reasons by Mr. Balsamo and “Pilots wants nothing to do with (what has been called) "no planes theory", but must say that just the tone of that attitude is very contradictory to the kind of thinking we hope all pilots have. Now, Pilots even reject even a very neutral objective summary of “facts they have adduced” that support general no-planes deliberations. This rejection takes on the appearance of “reject at all costs”, “reject and have absolutely nothing to do with no matter what.”
    THAT is the attitude of like 99 percent of the researchers for 9-11 “truth” that I have observed over the years since my fairly extensive reading on the subject of 9-11 since 9-11-01.
    Researchers go through every contortion and distortion of reason and logic and every Sunsteinian strategy to manipulate the minds of “truthers” and destroy the plain truth wherever we may find it.

    So to me the question WHY is the no-planes issue such a hot-potato issue. It clearly is and the issue is not being treated objectively, that we know.
    An area of 9-11 inquiry that I think is inextricably related to no-planes study and sheds light on WHY the no-planes issue is so important relates to looking at those researchers whose work is characterized by a clear deliberate failure to deal with this issue objectively and honestly. I think there is a clear tight consistency in the way many researchers “treat” or “deal with” topics and terms such as “the Israelis” – the Mossad, the Zionists, the neocons, or the verboten J word. That is the common denominator linking all those 9-11 researchers who strongly adhere to non-objective study of the no-planes issue of 9-11.






    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. As Stupid Gentiles Continue Not Heeding Induction, Logic, Plain Facts, They Will Continue To Suffer

      Ever hrd of "it's Jews, stupid"? Ho ho ho ho. And yes, of course, I'm prejudiced--the whole world has long been prejudiced, and rightly so, against Jew criminals and murderers who worship lies, criminality, and mass-murder--it's the essence of Jew religion--SATANISM (extreme subjectivism, the mind/consciousness as creator of reality, making subject to be God), sucker--"midrash" and "Oral Law Tradition," by which Torah is made to mean anything they (rabbis) want it to mean. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for expo on Jew "religion."

      So since we KNOW Jews are topmost criminals and satanists responsible for and controlling all organized crime, of which they and only they are the masters, INDUCTIVE logic REQUIRES we suspect kikes, and that kikes now have to PROVE they didn't do it--which they can't do. Hence Jews now simply must be dealt with in appropriate fashion. And everyone knows it, deep-down, never doubt.

      Jews are satanic criminals--such is their very religion. And observe their filthy, satanic Holy days celebrate mass-murder, as at Passover and Purim.

      Easy thing to do, in theory, anyway, is to REMOVE Jews/satanists' main instrument/weapon, the central-bank(s), like US Fed, IMF, BIS, ECB, etc.--see Mises.org for expo on central-bank; use their site search engine.

      For central-banking features INFINITE currency--NOT NOT NOT real MONEY, commodity-based, like gold/silver, this real money the ONLY way to protect the people and their property. Fiat currency (legalized counterfeiting, literally) allows top criminals and kikes to steadily tax away people's wealth simply by means of "inflation," the currency losing value as new currency waves are issued, over and over and over, time after time.

      And ask urself: HOW could any crime or any event happen and take place WITHOUT the topmost criminals, who are ALWAYS watching everything, having signed-off on it?--HOW could that happen?--IMPOSSIBLE. And "CUI BONO"?--who benefitted?--kikes, as even Netanyahu admitted at the time, the dumbass, ho ho ho ho.

      So as long as the goyim play stupid, not heeding simple inductive logic, they're going to be taken, impoverished, and mass-murdered by the top criminals and satanists, "Jews, stupid."


      Delete